e497
This prospectus
supplement relates to an effective registration statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, but is not complete and may be
changed. This preliminary prospectus supplement and the
accompanying preliminary prospectus are not an offer to sell and
are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where such offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
JUNE 20, 2011
Filed Pursuant to Rule 497
Registration Statement
No. 333-166012
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(to Prospectus dated March 31,
2011)
Fifth Street Finance
Corp.
5,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
We are offering 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. We
are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with
investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective
is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and capital
appreciation from our equity investments.
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified
management investment company that has elected to be treated as
a business development company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940. We are managed by Fifth Street Management LLC.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol FSC. On June 17, 2011 and
March 31, 2011, the last reported sale price of our common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $11.83 and $13.35,
respectively. We are required to determine the net asset value
per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. Our net
asset value per share of our common stock as of March 31,
2011 was $10.68.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk
and should be considered highly speculative. See
Supplementary Risk Factors beginning on page S-7 of
this prospectus supplement and Risk Factors
beginning on page 12 of the accompanying prospectus to read
about factors you should consider, including the risk of
leverage, before investing in our common stock.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
contain important information about us that a prospective
investor should know before investing in our common stock.
Please read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus before investing and keep them for future reference.
We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This information is available free of charge by contacting us at
10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, New York 10606 or
by telephone at
(914) 286-6800
or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be
part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus. The Securities and Exchange Commission also
maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains
information about us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales load (underwriting discount)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We estimate that we will incur approximately $600,000 (or
$0.12 per share of the shares sold in this offering) of
expenses relating to this offering, resulting in net proceeds,
after sales load (underwriting discount) and expenses, to us of
approximately $ million (or
$ per share of the shares sold in
this offering). |
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or
about ,
2011.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable at any
time until 30 days after the date of this prospectus
supplement, to purchase up to 750,000 additional shares of our
common stock to cover over-allotments of shares.
|
|
|
UBS
Investment Bank |
RBC Capital Markets |
Deutsche Bank Securities |
The date of this prospectus supplement
is ,
2011.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
S-ii
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
Supplementary Risk Factors
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
|
|
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
S-11
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
S-36
|
|
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
|
|
S-43
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Prospectus Summary
|
|
|
1
|
|
The Offering
|
|
|
5
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
Selected Financial and Other Data
|
|
|
11
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
12
|
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
28
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
29
|
|
Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions
|
|
|
30
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
32
|
|
Business
|
|
|
57
|
|
Portfolio Companies
|
|
|
69
|
|
Management
|
|
|
74
|
|
Portfolio Management
|
|
|
84
|
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
|
|
|
86
|
|
Administration Agreement
|
|
|
93
|
|
License Agreement
|
|
|
93
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
94
|
|
Control Persons and Principal Stockholders
|
|
|
95
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
|
|
|
97
|
|
Description of Our Capital Stock
|
|
|
98
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
|
|
101
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
109
|
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
114
|
|
Custodian, Transfer and Distribution Paying Agent and Registrar
|
|
|
115
|
|
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices
|
|
|
115
|
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
115
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
115
|
|
Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
115
|
|
Available Information
|
|
|
116
|
|
Privacy Notice
|
|
|
116
|
|
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
S-i
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Neither
we nor the underwriters have authorized any other person to
provide you with different information from that contained in
this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. Neither this prospectus supplement
nor the accompanying prospectus constitutes an offer to sell, or
a solicitation of an offer to buy, any shares of our common
stock by any person in any jurisdiction where it is unlawful for
that person to make such an offer or solicitation or to any
person in any jurisdiction to whom it is unlawful to make such
an offer or solicitation. The information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is
complete and accurate only as of their respective dates,
regardless of the time of their delivery or sale of our common
stock. Our financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since those dates. To the extent
required by law, we will amend or supplement the information
contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus to reflect any material changes to such information
subsequent to the date of this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus and prior to the completion of any
offering pursuant to this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus.
This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus
supplement, which describes the terms of this offering of common
stock and also adds to and updates information contained in the
accompanying prospectus. The second part is the accompanying
prospectus, which gives more general information and disclosure.
To the extent the information contained in this prospectus
supplement differs from or is additional to the information
contained in the accompanying prospectus, you should rely only
on the information contained in this prospectus supplement. You
should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus together with the additional information described
under the heading Available Information before
investing in our common stock.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Information contained in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus may contain forward-looking statements.
In addition, forward-looking statements can generally be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
may, will, expect,
intend, anticipate,
estimate, or continue or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
The matters described in Supplementary Risk Factors
in this prospectus supplement and Risk Factors
in the accompanying prospectus and certain other factors noted
throughout this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus constitute cautionary statements identifying
important factors with respect to any such forward-looking
statements, including certain risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in such
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided
by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or the
Securities Act. For a list of factors that could affect these
forward-looking statements, see Supplementary Risk
Factors in this prospectus supplement and Risk
Factors and Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements in the accompanying prospectus.
S-ii
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. It is not
complete and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. To understand the terms of the common stock
offered pursuant to this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, you should read the entire prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus carefully. Together,
these documents describe the specific terms of the shares we are
offering. Except as otherwise noted, all information in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus assumes no
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option.
We commenced operations on February 15, 2007 as Fifth
Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street
Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. Unless otherwise noted,
the terms we, us, our and
Fifth Street refer to Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners III, L.P. prior to the merger date and Fifth Street
Finance Corp. on and after the merger date. In addition, the
terms Fifth Street Management and investment
adviser refer to Fifth Street Management LLC, our external
investment adviser.
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with
investments by private equity sponsors. We define small and
mid-sized companies as those with annual revenues between
$25 million and $250 million. Our investment objective
is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and capital
appreciation from our equity investments. We are externally
managed and advised by Fifth Street Management. Fifth Street
Management is an affiliate of Fifth Street Capital LLC, a
private investment firm founded and managed by our chief
executive officer, and Fifth Street Managements managing
partner, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, who has led the investment of
over $1.5 billion in small and mid-sized companies,
including the investments made by Fifth Street, since 1998.
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to
$75 million and are principally in the form of first and
second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity
component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on
first lien loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from
these loans are superior to second lien investments and offer
superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate
additional second lien and unsecured loans in the future.
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified
management investment company that has elected to be treated as
a business development company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, or the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we
are required to comply with regulatory requirements, including
limitations on our use of debt. We are permitted to, and expect
to, finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a
business development company, we are only generally allowed to
borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the
1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount
of leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of
market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed
borrowing.
We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As a
RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal
income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we
distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain
source-of-income,
distribution and asset diversification requirements.
In addition, we maintain a wholly-owned subsidiary that is
licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and
regulated by the Small Business Administration, or the SBA. The
SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to
issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We received exemptive relief
from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to permit
us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the
SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset
coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act.
S-1
Our
Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Bank Street,
12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 and our telephone number
is
(914) 286-6800.
We maintain a website on the Internet at
www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus and you should not
consider information contained on our website to be part of this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus.
Recent
Developments
On April 12, 2011, we closed a private offering of
$150 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.375%
convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior
notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as
defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act. In addition, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our
chief executive officer, purchased $2 million principal
amount of the convertible senior notes directly from us in a
private placement.
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at
a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain
circumstances, or at any time on or after January 1, 2016,
the convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of our
common stock at a conversion rate of 67.7415 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior
notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of
approximately $14.76 per share of our common stock. The
conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution
adjustments, including for any cash dividends or distributions
paid on shares of our common stock in excess of the monthly
dividend of $ 0.1066 per share we are currently paying on our
common stock. In addition, if certain corporate events occur in
respect of us, holders of the convertible senior notes may
require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their
convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be
repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but
excluding, the required repurchase date. We do not have the
right to redeem the convertible senior notes prior to maturity.
The convertible senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016,
unless repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms
prior to such date.
On May 27, 2011, we received a letter from the
Investment Division of the Small Business Administration, or the
SBA, that invited us to continue moving forward with our
application for a second small business investment company, or
SBIC, license. This license would enable us to issue up to an
additional $75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures,
subject to us receiving an SBA capital commitment. Although our
application for this license is subject to the SBAs
approval, we remain cautiously optimistic that we will complete
the licensing process.
As of June 20, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under
our
three-year
$100 million secured credit facility, or the Wells Fargo
facility, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, successor
to Wachovia Bank, N.A., and had $28.0 million of
outstanding borrowings under our three-year $215 million
secured syndicated revolving credit facility, or the ING
facility, with certain lenders party thereto from time to time
and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent.
S-2
About the
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
5,000,000 shares |
|
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering |
|
66,761,996 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering (assuming no
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option) |
|
71,761,996 shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
750,000 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this
offering to make investments in small and mid-sized companies in
accordance with our investment objective and strategies
described in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus and for general corporate purposes, including working
capital requirements. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds from this offering to repay any outstanding borrowings
under our credit facilities. Pending these uses, we will invest
the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt
securities, consistent with our business development company
election and our election to be taxed as a RIC, at
yields significantly below those we expect to earn on
investments in small and mid-sized companies. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
FSC |
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
Fifth Street Management serves as our investment adviser. We pay
Fifth Street Management a fee for its services under the
investment advisory agreement, consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2% of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for
investment purposes. From and after January 1, 2010, our
investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base
management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of
our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or
hurdle, and a catch up feature. The
second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end
of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment
advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee
Capital Gains, which equals our realized capital gains on
a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year,
if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and
unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the
aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive
fee. |
|
Administration agreement |
|
FSC, Inc. serves as our administrator. We reimburse FSC, Inc.
the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by
it in performing its obligations under the administration
agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs
of compensation and related expenses of our chief financial
officer and his staff, and the staff of our chief compliance
officer. |
S-3
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
We intend to pay monthly distributions to our stockholders out
of assets legally available for distribution. Our distributions,
if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the
following dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on July 29, 2011 to
stockholders of record on July 1, 2011;
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on August 31, 2011
to stockholders of record on August 1, 2011; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on September 30,
2011 to stockholders of record on September 1, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
We elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we generally
will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net
ordinary income or capital gains that we currently distribute to
our stockholders. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must
meet specified
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually
at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income
earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable
income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover
taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared
prior to timely filing the final tax return related to the year
which generated such taxable income. |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
Your investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk and should be considered highly speculative. See
Supplementary Risk Factors in this prospectus
supplement and Risk Factors in the accompanying
prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in
our common stock. |
S-4
FEES AND
EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in our common stock will
bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the
percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may
vary. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this
prospectus supplement contains a reference to fees or expenses
paid by you, us or Fifth
Street, or that we will pay fees or expenses,
stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as
investors in us.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Transaction Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
3.00
|
%(1)
|
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
1.01
|
%(2)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan fees
|
|
|
|
%(3)
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock):
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
4.64
|
%(4)
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
2.75
|
%(5)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
0.82
|
%(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
8.21
|
%(7)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the underwriting discount with respect to the shares
of our common stock sold by us in this offering. |
|
(2) |
|
The expenses of this offering payable by us are estimated to be
approximately $600,000. If the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full, the offering expenses borne by
our common stockholders (as a percentage of the offering price)
will be approximately 0.88%. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are
included in operating expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Our management fees are made up of our base
management fee and the incentive fees payable under our
investment advisory agreement. The base management fee portion
of our management fees reflected in the table above
is 2.49%, which is calculated based on our net assets (rather
than our gross assets). Our base management fee under the
investment advisory agreement is based on our gross assets,
which includes borrowings for investment purposes. Our
investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base
management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents as of
the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As a
result, our base management fee payable from and after such
fiscal quarter will be calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our
gross assets, including any investments made with borrowings,
but excluding any cash and cash equivalents as of the end of
each quarter. |
|
|
|
The incentive fee portion of our management fees is
2.15%. This calculation assumes that annual incentive fees
earned by our investment adviser remain consistent with the
incentive fees earned by our investment adviser during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011. The incentive fee consists of
two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in
arrears, will equal 20% of the excess, if any, of our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income that exceeds
a 2% quarterly (8% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a
catch up provision measured at the end of each
fiscal quarter. The first part of the incentive fee will be
computed and paid on income that may include interest that is
accrued but not yet received in cash. The operation of the first
part of the incentive fee for each quarter is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee is payable to the investment adviser in any
fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle).
|
|
|
|
100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect
to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income,
if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal
to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the
investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the
hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any
fiscal quarter; and
|
S-5
|
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the investment adviser (once the
hurdle is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved, 20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
thereafter is allocated to the investment adviser).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second part of the incentive fee equals 20% of our
Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which equals our
realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception
through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a
cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously
paid capital gain incentive fees. The second part of the
incentive fee is payable, in arrears, at the end of each fiscal
year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement,
as of the termination date). |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds represent our
estimated annual interest payments on borrowed funds and relate
to borrowings under the Wells Fargo facility, the ING facility,
our SBA-guaranteed debentures and our convertible senior notes. |
|
(6) |
|
Other Expenses are based on estimated amounts for
the current fiscal year. |
|
(7) |
|
Total annual expenses are presented as a percentage
of net assets attributable to common stockholders because our
common stockholders bear all of our fees and expenses. |
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount
of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common
stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have
assumed we would have no additional leverage and that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the
table above, and that you would pay a sales load of 3.0% (the
underwriting discount to be paid by us with respect to common
stock sold by us in this offering).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses, and
actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown.
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income portion of our incentive fee
under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5%
annual return, would either not be payable or have an
insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not
included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains,
to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses,
and returns to our investors, would be higher. In addition,
while the example assumes reinvestment of all distributions at
net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan
will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined
by dividing the total dollar amount of the cash distribution
payable to a participant by either (i) the greater of
(a) the current net asset value per share of our common
stock and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our
common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed
by our Board of Directors in the event that we use newly issued
shares to satisfy the share requirements of the divided
reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price,
excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares
of common stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend
reinvestment plan in the event that shares are purchased in the
open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend
reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset
value.
S-6
SUPPLEMENTARY
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
In addition to the other information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you
should carefully consider the following supplementary risk
factors together with the risk factors beginning on page 12
of the accompanying prospectus before making an investment in
our common stock. The risks set out below and in the
accompanying prospectus are not the only risks we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us
might also impair our operations and performance. If any of the
events described herein or in the accompanying prospectus occur,
our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, our
net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could
decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to our Convertible Senior Notes
Our
stockholders may experience dilution upon the conversion of our
convertible senior notes.
Our convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of our
common stock beginning January 1, 2016 or, under certain
circumstances, earlier. Upon conversion, we must deliver shares
of our common stock. The conversion rate of our convertible
senior notes was initially, and currently is,
67.7415 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of our convertible senior notes (equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of common
stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. If we
deliver shares of common stock upon a conversion at the time our
net asset value per share exceeds the conversion price in effect
at such time, our stockholders may incur dilution. In addition,
our stockholders will experience dilution in their ownership
percentage of our common stock upon our issuance of common stock
in connection with the conversion of our convertible senior
notes and any dividends paid on our common stock will also be
paid on shares issued in connection with such conversion after
such issuance.
We may
not have, or have the ability to raise, the funds necessary to
repurchase our convertible senior notes upon a fundamental
change, and our debt may contain limitations on our ability to
deliver shares of our common stock upon conversion or pay cash
upon repurchase of our convertible senior notes.
Holders of our convertible senior notes will have the right to
require us to repurchase their notes upon the occurrence of
certain significant corporate events involving us, including if
our common stock ceases to trade on any national securities
exchange or we consolidate or merge into another entity in
certain circumstances, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of
their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any. We refer to such a corporate event as a fundamental
change. However, we may not have enough available cash or
be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make
repurchases of convertible senior notes surrendered therefor. In
addition, our ability to repurchase our convertible senior notes
or deliver shares of our common stock upon conversions of the
convertible senior notes may be limited by law, by regulatory
authority or by agreements governing our indebtedness, including
our credit facilities. In this regard, the ING facility
currently prohibits us from repurchasing our convertible senior
notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change. Our failure
to repurchase the notes at a time when the repurchase is
required by the indenture relating to the convertible senior
notes or to deliver any shares of our common stock deliverable
on future conversions of the convertible senior notes as
required by the indenture would constitute a default under the
indenture. A default under the indenture or the occurrence of a
fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under
agreements governing our indebtedness. If the repayment of the
related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable
notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to
repay the indebtedness and repurchase our convertible senior
notes.
Provisions
of our convertible senior notes could discourage an acquisition
of us by a third party.
Certain provisions of our convertible senior notes could make it
more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire
us. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, the holders of
our convertible senior notes will have the right, at their
option, to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their
convertible senior notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We
may also be required to increase the conversion rate of the
S-7
convertible senior notes in certain other circumstances,
including in the event of certain fundamental changes. These
provisions could discourage an acquisition of us by a third
party.
Certain
adverse consequences could result if our convertible senior
notes are treated as equity interests in us for purposes of
regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974.
Pursuant to regulations under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), it is possible that,
due to their convertibility feature, our convertible senior
notes could be treated as equity interests in us. In that event,
if employee benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA,
plans that are not subject to ERISA but that are subject to
Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (the
Code), such as individual retirement accounts, and
entities that are deemed to hold the assets of such plans or
accounts (such plans, accounts, and entities, Benefit Plan
Investors) were to acquire 25% or more of the aggregate
value of our convertible senior notes, among other consequences,
we and our management would be subject to ERISA fiduciary
duties, and certain transactions we might enter into, or may
have entered into, in the ordinary course of our business might
constitute non-exempt prohibited transactions under
Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code and
might have to be rescinded at significant cost to us. Moreover,
if our underlying assets were deemed to be assets constituting
plan assets, (i) our assets could be subject to
ERISAs reporting and disclosure requirements, (ii) a
fiduciary causing a Benefit Plan Investor to make an investment
in our equity interests could be deemed to have delegated its
responsibility to manage the assets of the Benefit Plan
Investor, and (iii) various providers of fiduciary or other
services to us, and any other parties with authority or control
with respect to our assets, could be deemed to be plan
fiduciaries or otherwise parties in interest or disqualified
persons by virtue of their provision of such services.
We do not believe that our convertible senior notes should be
treated as equity interests in us for purposes of ERISA in light
of the relevant regulations. No assurance can be given, however,
that our convertible senior notes will not be so treated.
The
accounting for convertible debt securities is complex and
subject to uncertainty.
The accounting for convertible debt securities is complex and
subject to frequent scrutiny by the accounting regulatory bodies
and is subject to change. The issuance of our convertible senior
notes may have an accounting effect on our earnings per share on
a fully diluted basis. Further, we cannot predict if or when
changes in the accounting for convertible debt securities could
be made and whether any such change could have an adverse impact
on our reported or future financial results. Any such impacts
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
S-8
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The net proceeds from our sale of the 5,000,000 shares of
common stock in this offering are estimated to be approximately
$56.8 million, or $65.4 million if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full,
assuming a public offering price of $11.83 per share (based on
the last reported sales price of our common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on June 17, 2011), and after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. A $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed
offering price per share would increase (decrease) net proceeds
to us from this offering by $2.4 million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus supplement remains the same. Any additional
proceeds to us resulting from an increase in the public offering
price or the number of shares offered pursuant to this
prospectus supplement will be used by us as described below.
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this
offering to make investments in small and mid-sized companies
(including investments made through our first SBIC subsidiary
and our second SBIC subsidiary to the extent that it receives a
SBIC license from the SBA) in accordance with our investment
objective and strategies described in this prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus and for general corporate
purposes, including working capital requirements. We may also
use the net proceeds from this offering to repay our outstanding
borrowings under the ING facility. As of June 20, 2011, we
had $28.0 million outstanding under the ING facility. The
ING facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum and has a maturity of February 22, 2014. Pending
these uses, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high
quality, short-term debt securities, consistent with our
business development company election and our election to be
taxed as a RIC, at yields significantly below those we expect to
earn on investments in small and mid-sized companies. The
management fee payable by us to our investment adviser will not
be reduced while our assets are invested in these securities
unless such securities constitute cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited
to the extent that the net proceeds from this offering, pending
full investment, are held in lower-yielding interest-bearing
deposits or other short-term instruments.
S-9
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to reflect the sale of 5,000,000 shares
of common stock in this offering, assuming a public offering
price of $11.83 per share (based on the last reported sales
price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
June 17, 2011), after deducting the underwriting discount
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
38,556,212
|
|
|
$
|
95,331,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
$
|
134,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
134,000,000
|
(2)(3)
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
138,300,000
|
|
|
|
138,300,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt(5)
|
|
|
272,300,000
|
|
|
|
272,300,000
|
|
Net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value (150,000,000 shares
authorized; 66,667,933 shares outstanding actual,
71,667,933 shares outstanding as adjusted)
|
|
|
666,679
|
|
|
|
716,679
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
765,404,953
|
|
|
|
822,130,453
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(12,978,443
|
)
|
|
|
(12,978,443
|
)
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(47,054,064
|
)
|
|
|
(47,054,064
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
5,708,972
|
|
|
|
5,708,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets
|
|
|
711,748,097
|
|
|
|
768,523,597
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
984,048,097
|
|
|
$
|
1,040,823,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We may change the size of this offering based on demand and
market conditions. A $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed
offering price per share would increase (decrease) net proceeds
to us from this offering by $2.4 million, assuming the number of
shares offered by us as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus supplement remains the same, after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated expenses payable by us. Any
additional proceeds to us resulting from an increase in the
public offering price or the number of shares offered pursuant
to this prospectus supplement will increase our cash and cash
equivalents on an as adjusted basis and will be used as
described in Use of Proceeds. |
|
(2) |
|
As described under Use of Proceeds, we may also use
a part of the net proceeds from this offering to repay a portion
of the borrowings outstanding under the ING facility. We have
not yet determined how much of the net proceeds of this offering
will be used for this purpose and, as a result, we have not
reflected the consequences of such repayment in this table. |
|
(3) |
|
As of June 20, 2011, we had loans payable in the amount of
$28.0 million due to net paydowns under our credit
facilities in the amount of $106.0 million subsequent to
March 31, 2011. This table has not been adjusted to reflect
such net paydowns. |
|
(4) |
|
As of June 20, 2011, we had SBA debentures payable in the
amount of $147.3 million. This table has not been adjusted
to reflect the additional issuance of $9.0 million of
SBA-guaranteed debentures subsequent to March 31, 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
This amount does not reflect the $152.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our senior convertible notes issued on
April 12, 2011, all of which are outstanding as of June 17,
2011. |
S-10
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read together
with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes
and the discussion under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
which are included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus. Effective as of January 2,
2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and
into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The financial information as of
and for the period from inception (February 15,
2007) to September 30, 2007, and for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 set forth below
was derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements
and related notes for Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.
and Fifth Street Finance Corp., respectively. The financial
information at and for the six months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 was derived from our unaudited financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely
of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair
presentation of financial statements for the interim periods,
have been included. The historical financial information below
may not be indicative of our future performance. Our results for
the interim period may not be indicative of our results for the
full year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and for the Period
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
At and for the Year Ended
|
|
|
February 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
55,036
|
|
|
$
|
31,098
|
|
|
$
|
70,538
|
|
|
$
|
49,828
|
|
|
$
|
33,219
|
|
|
$
|
4,296
|
|
Base management fee, net
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
Incentive fee
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
4,889
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
4,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other expenses
|
|
|
8,207
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
7,483
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
30,612
|
|
|
|
19,555
|
|
|
|
43,024
|
|
|
|
31,362
|
|
|
|
20,144
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate swap
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
(10,795
|
)
|
|
|
(16,948
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(13,963
|
)
|
|
|
(2,802
|
)
|
|
|
(18,780
|
)
|
|
|
(14,373
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in partners capital/net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
|
33,119
|
|
|
|
18,929
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share at period end
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
13.02
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Market price at period end
|
|
|
13.35
|
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
|
|
11.14
|
|
|
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
10.05
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and
interest rate swap
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
(1.02
|
)
|
|
|
(1.08
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net increase in partners capital/net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Balance Sheet data at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
939,749
|
|
|
$
|
460,865
|
|
|
$
|
563,821
|
|
|
$
|
299,611
|
|
|
$
|
273,759
|
|
|
$
|
88,391
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
38,556
|
|
|
|
23,469
|
|
|
|
76,765
|
|
|
|
113,205
|
|
|
|
22,906
|
|
|
|
17,654
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
|
|
11,340
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
995,748
|
|
|
|
490,844
|
|
|
|
651,926
|
|
|
|
415,887
|
|
|
|
299,149
|
|
|
|
107,330
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
284,000
|
|
|
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
82,754
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Total net assets
|
|
|
711,748
|
|
|
|
484,397
|
|
|
|
569,172
|
|
|
|
410,556
|
|
|
|
294,336
|
|
|
|
106,816
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average annual yield on debt investments(1)
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Number of portfolio companies at period end
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted average annual yield is calculated based upon our debt
investments at the end of the period. |
S-11
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in connection with
our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto
included in this prospectus supplement.
The information in this section contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see
Supplementary Risk Factors in this prospectus
supplement and Risk Factors and Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in the accompanying
prospectus for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and
assumptions associated with these statements.
Overview
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with
investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective
is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and capital
appreciation from our equity investments.
We were formed as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) on February 15, 2007.
Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance
Corp. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership
interests in Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. were
exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock in Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements prior to January 2,
2008 reflect our operations as a Delaware limited partnership
(Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) prior to our merger
with and into a corporation (Fifth Street Finance Corp.).
On June 17, 2008, we completed an initial public offering
of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at the offering
price of $14.12 per share. Our shares are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol FSC.
On July 21, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering
of 9,487,500 shares of our common stock, which included the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option, at
the offering price of $9.25 per share.
On September 25, 2009, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 5,520,000 shares of our common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share.
On January 27, 2010, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, which did
not include the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.20 per
share. On February 25, 2010, we sold 300,500 shares of
our common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share upon
the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option
in connection with this offering.
On June 21, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering
of 9,200,000 shares of our common stock, which included the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option, at
the offering price of $11.50 per share.
On December 7, 2010, we entered into an
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of our common
stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, we sold
429,110 shares of our common stock at an average offering
price of $11.87 per share. We terminated the
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011
and did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant thereto
subsequent to December 31, 2010.
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.
S-12
Current
Market Conditions
Since mid-2007, the global financial markets have experienced
stress, volatility, illiquidity, and disruption. This turmoil
appears to have peaked in the fall of 2008, resulting in several
major financial institutions becoming insolvent, being acquired,
or receiving government assistance. While the turmoil in the
financial markets appears to have abated somewhat, the global
economy continues to experience economic uncertainty. Economic
uncertainty impacts our business in many ways, including
changing spreads, structures, and purchase multiples as well as
the overall supply of investment capital.
Despite the economic uncertainty, our deal pipeline remains
robust, with high quality transactions backed by private equity
sponsors in small to mid-sized companies. As always, we remain
cautious in selecting new investment opportunities, and will
only deploy capital in deals which are consistent with our
disciplined philosophy of pursuing superior risk-adjusted
returns.
As evidenced by our recent investment activities, we expect to
grow the business in part by increasing the average investment
size when and where appropriate. At the same time, we expect to
focus more on first lien transactions. Although we believe that
we currently have sufficient capital available to fund
investments, a prolonged period of market disruptions may cause
us to reduce the volume of loans we originate
and/or fund,
which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. In this regard, because
our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then
current net asset value per share and we are limited in our
ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset
value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise
equity capital.
Critical
Accounting Policies
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification) on July 1, 2009 (effective
for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009), changed the way that
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the
Codification officially became the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants
must also consider rules, regulations, and interpretive guidance
issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way
companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their
accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely
of the number used in the Codifications structural
organization.
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification,
financial statements for periods ending after September 15,
2009 refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification
historical GAAP.
Basis
of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
affecting amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial
Statements. We have identified investment valuation and revenue
recognition as our most critical accounting estimates. We
continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to
the matters described below. These estimates are based on the
information that is currently available to us and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A
discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
Investment
Valuation
We are required to report our investments that are not publicly
traded or for which current market values are not readily
available at fair value. The fair value is deemed to be the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date.
Under Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which we
adopted effective October 1, 2008, we perform detailed
valuations of our debt and equity
S-13
investments on an individual basis, using market, income, and
bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize the
bond yield method in determining the fair value of our
investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in our judgment,
the bond yield approach is not appropriate, we may use the
enterprise value approach in determining the fair value of our
investment in the portfolio company. If there is deterioration
in the credit quality of the portfolio company or an investment
is in workout status, we may use alternative methodologies
including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of
the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one
methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any
one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a
range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of
enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a
portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the
portfolio companys historical and projected financial
results. Typically, private companies are valued based on
multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization), cash flows, net income,
revenues, or in limited cases, book value. We generally require
portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and
monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual
projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze
discounted cash flow models based on our projections of the
future free cash flows of the business. Under the bond yield
approach, we use bond yield models to determine the present
value of the future cash flow streams of our debt investments.
We review various sources of transactional data, including
private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with
similar characteristics, and assess the information in the
valuation process.
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process
each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of
our investments:
|
|
|
|
|
Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within our investment adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of our investment adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit reports to us;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of our Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
|
The fair value of all of our investments at March 31, 2011,
and September 30, 2010, was determined by our Board of
Directors. Our Board of Directors is solely responsible for the
valuation of our portfolio investments at fair value as
determined in good faith pursuant to our valuation policy and
our consistently applied valuation process.
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms
to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of
their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms
provide us with written reports regarding the preliminary
valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of
such quarter. We
S-14
will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide
us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value
of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, our
Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for
determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.
The portions of our portfolio valued, as a percentage of the
portfolio at fair value, by independent valuation firms by
period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
|
|
|
88.7
|
%(1)
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17.2
|
%(2)
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2011
|
|
|
82.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc.,
which closed on December 31, 2009, and therefore was not
part of the independent valuation process |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009
and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process |
Our $50 million credit facility with Bank of Montreal was
terminated effective September 16, 2009. The facility
required independent valuations for at least 90% of the
portfolio on a quarterly basis. With the termination of this
facility, this valuation test is no longer required. However, we
still intend to have a portion of the portfolio valued by an
independent third party on a quarterly basis, with a substantial
portion being valued on an annual basis.
As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010,
approximately 94.4% and 86.5%, respectively, of our total assets
represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair
value.
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
and Dividend Income
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. We stop accruing interest on investments when it is
determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions
from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when
the distribution is received.
Fee
Income
We receive a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business.
Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and
amortized in accordance with
ASC 310-20
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with
ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted
against the cost and fair value of the respective investments.
Other fees, such as servicing fees, are classified as fee income
and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
We have also structured exit fees across certain of our
portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of
those investments. These fees are to be paid to us upon the
sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the
S-15
borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower,
(ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date
when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are payable
upon the exit of a debt security and a portion of these fees are
included in net investment income over the life of the loan. The
receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event
for each of the investments.
Payment-in-Kind
(PIK) Interest
Our loans typically contain a contractual PIK interest
provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually
deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally
due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the
accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be
collected. We generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is
insufficient value to support the accrual or if we do not expect
the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and
interest due. Our decision to cease accruing PIK interest
involves subjective judgments and determinations based on
available information about a particular portfolio company,
including whether the portfolio company is current with respect
to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt
securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company; our assessment
of the portfolio companys business development success,
including product development, profitability and the portfolio
companys overall adherence to its business plan;
information obtained by us in connection with periodic formal
update interviews with the portfolio companys management
and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information
about the general economic and market conditions in which the
portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information,
we determine whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or
debt security. Our determination to cease accruing PIK interest
on a loan or debt security is generally made well before our
full write-down of such loan or debt security. In addition, if
it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to
collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of
our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such
previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest.
For a discussion of risks we are subject to as a result of our
use of PIK interest in connection with our investments, see
Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business
and Structure We may have difficulty paying our
required distributions if we recognize income before or without
receiving cash representing such income,
We may in the future choose to pay dividends
in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax
in excess of the cash you receive and
Our incentive fee may induce our investment
adviser to make speculative investments in our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010. In addition, if it
is subsequently determined that we will not be able to collect
any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of our loans
or debt securities would decline by the amount of such
previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest. The accrual
of PIK interest on our debt investments increases the recorded
cost basis of these investments in our Consolidated Financial
Statements and, as a result, increases the cost basis of these
investments for purposes of computing the capital gains
incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser.
To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK income must be paid out to
our stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have
not yet collected the cash and may never collect the cash
relating to the PIK interest. Accumulated PIK interest was
$18.9 million and represented 2.0% of the fair value of our
portfolio of investments as of March 31, 2011 and
$19.3 million or 3.4% as of September 30, 2010. The
net increase in loan balances as a result of contracted PIK
arrangements are separately identified in our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
Portfolio
Composition
Our investments principally consist of loans, purchased equity
investments and equity grants in privately-held companies. Our
loans are typically secured by either a first or second lien on
the assets of the portfolio company and generally have terms of
up to six years (but an expected average life of between three
and four years). We are currently focusing our new debt
origination efforts on first lien loans because we believe that
the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to
second lien and unsecured loans at this time and offer superior
credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien
and unsecured loans in the future.
S-16
A summary of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost
and fair value as a percentage of total investments is shown in
the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
85.92
|
%
|
|
|
72.61
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
9.97
|
%
|
|
|
25.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
87.46
|
%
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
8.79
|
%
|
|
|
24.45
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-17
The industry composition of our portfolio at cost and fair value
as a percentage of total investments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
18.47
|
%
|
|
|
14.76
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
Oil & gas equipment & services
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
7.58
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Specialty stores
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
5.59
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Advertising
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Other diversified financial services
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
19.39
|
%
|
|
|
15.83
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
7.82
|
%
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
Oil & gas equipment & services
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Specialty stores
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Advertising
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
Other diversified financial services
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
Asset Quality
We employ a grading system to assess and monitor the credit risk
of our investment portfolio. We rate all investments on a scale
from 1 to 5. The system is intended to reflect the performance
of the borrowers business, the collateral coverage of the
loan, and other factors considered relevant to making a credit
judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing
above expectations
and/or a
capital gain is expected.
|
S-19
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing
substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain
neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time
of the original investment. All new investments are initially
rated 2.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but
where we expect no loss of investment return (interest
and/or
dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may
be out of compliance with financial covenants.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and for which risk has increased
materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of
investment return, but no loss of principal.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing
substantially below our expectations and whose risks have
increased substantially since the original investment.
Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of
principal is expected.
|
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on
the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value, as of
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
102,517,984
|
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
$
|
89,150,457
|
|
|
|
15.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
2
|
|
|
811,039,654
|
|
|
|
86.30
|
%
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
424,494,799
|
|
|
|
75.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
3
|
|
|
18,238,348
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
13.25
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,823,120
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
5
|
|
|
7,953,067
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
(1)
|
|
|
8,297,412
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to operating performance this ratio is not measurable and,
as a result, is excluded from the total portfolio calculation. |
We may from time to time modify the payment terms of our
investments, either in response to current economic conditions
and their impact on certain of our portfolio companies or in
accordance with tier pricing provisions in certain loan
agreements. As of March 31, 2011, we had modified the
payment terms of our investments in five portfolio companies.
Such modified terms may include increased PIK interest
provisions and reduced cash interest rates. These modifications,
and any future modifications to our loan agreements, may limit
the amount of interest income that we recognize from the
modified investments, which may, in turn, limit our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders.
Loans and
Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status
As of March 31, 2011, we had stopped accruing cash
interest, PIK interest and original issue discount
(OID) on three investments that did not pay all of
their scheduled cash interest payments for the period ended
March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, we had stopped
accruing PIK interest and OID on four investments, including two
investments that had not paid all of their scheduled cash
interest payments.
S-20
The non-accrual status of our portfolio investments as of
March 31, 2011, September 30, 2010 and March 31,
2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
$
|
1,460,163
|
|
|
$
|
1,311,024
|
|
|
$
|
3,566,595
|
|
|
$
|
2,445,588
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
146,184
|
|
|
|
451,313
|
|
|
|
386,574
|
|
|
|
920,196
|
|
OID income
|
|
|
30,138
|
|
|
|
103,911
|
|
|
|
60,276
|
|
|
|
207,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,636,485
|
|
|
$
|
1,866,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,013,445
|
|
|
$
|
3,573,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
and Analysis of Results and Operations
Results
of Operations
The principal measure of our financial performance is net
increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations,
which includes net investment income (loss), net realized gain
(loss) and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Net
investment income is the difference between our income from
interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and total
expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the
difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of
portfolio investments and their stated costs. Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) is the net change in the fair value
of our investment portfolio and derivative instruments.
Comparison
of the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010
Total
Investment Income
Total investment income includes interest and dividend income on
our investments, fee income and other investment income. Fee
income consists principally of loan and arrangement fees,
administrative fees, unused fees, amendment fees, equity
structuring fees, exit fees, prepayment fees, and waiver fees.
Other investment income consists primarily of dividend income
received from certain of our equity investments.
Total investment income for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was
$29.7 million and $17.9 million, respectively. For the
three months ended March 31, 2011, this amount primarily
consisted of $25.8 million of interest income from
portfolio investments (which included $3.5 million of PIK
interest), and $3.9 million of fee income. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, total investment income
primarily consisted of $16.4 million of interest income
from portfolio investments (which included $2.3 million of
PIK interest), and $1.4 million of fee income.
Total investment income for the six months ended March 31,
2011 and March 31, 2010 was $55.0 million and
$31.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended
March 31, 2011, this amount primarily consisted of
$46.6 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $6.6 million of PIK interest), and
$8.4 million of fee income. For the six months ended
March 31, 2010, this amount primarily consisted of
$28.7 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $4.3 million of PIK interest), and
$2.4 million of fee income.
S-21
The increase in our total investment income for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three
and six months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily
attributable to higher average levels of outstanding debt
investments, which was principally due to an increase of 21
investments in our portfolio in the
year-over-year
period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments
received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
Expenses
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base
management fee) for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010 were $13.1 million and
$6.7 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2010 by $6.4 million, primarily
as a result of increases in the base management fee, the
incentive fee, interest expense and professional fees.
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base
management fee) for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010 were $24.4 million and
$11.5 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the six
months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the six months
ended March 31, 2010 by $12.9 million, primarily as a
result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive
fee, interest expense, professional fees, and other general and
administrative expenses.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $11.8 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $6.4 million increase
in net expenses, net investment income for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 reflected a $5.3 million, or
47.7%, increase compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
As a result of the $23.9 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $12.9 million increase
in net expenses, net investment income for the six months ended
March 31, 2011 reflected an $11.0 million, or 56.5%,
increase compared to the six months ended March 31, 2010.
Realized
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference
between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio
investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be
recorded in connection with our determination that certain
investments are considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded
investment realization events, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2010, we received a cash payment of $8.7 million
from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all obligations under
the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no
realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, we received a cash payment of
$11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of
all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment
was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on
this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, we restructured our investment in Vanguard
Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we
recorded a realized loss in the amount of $1.7 million in
accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Nicos
Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring resulted
in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement.
As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$3.9 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
S-22
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we received a cash payment of
$25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all
obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was
exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we received a cash payment of
$11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial
satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No
realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Lighting by
Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we
recorded a realized loss in the amount of $7.8 million in
accordance with
ASC 470-50; and
|
|
|
|
In March 2011, we received a cash payment of $5.0 million
from AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. as part of a restructuring of
the loan agreement. The restructuring resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we
recorded a realized loss in the amount of $0.3 million in
accordance with
ASC 470-50.
|
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded
investment realization events, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, we received a cash payment in the amount of
$0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts
due in connection with the cancellation of our loan agreement
with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a
$0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded
$10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American
Hardwoods;
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, we received a cash payment of $3.9 million
from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in partial satisfaction
of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or
loss was recorded on this transaction; and
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of
our investment in CPAC, Inc.
|
Net
Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and
Interest Rate Swaps
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in
the fair value of our investment portfolio and our interest rate
swaps during the reporting period, including the reversal of
previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when
gains or losses are realized.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded
net unrealized depreciation of $0.4 million. This consisted
of $1.4 million of net unrealized depreciation of equity
investments, offset by $0.2 million of net unrealized
appreciation on debt investments, $0.6 million of net
reclassifications to realized losses and $0.2 million of
net unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net
unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million. This consisted of
$3.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses and
$1.1 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity
investments, partially offset by $3.2 million of net
unrealized depreciation on debt investments.
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded net
unrealized appreciation of $16.5 million. This consisted of
$10.9 million of net reclassifications to realized losses,
$5.7 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt
investments and $1.0 million of net unrealized appreciation
on interest rate swaps, offset by $1.1 million of net
unrealized depreciation on equity investments. During the six
months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net unrealized
appreciation of $2.2 million. This consisted of
$3.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses and
$0.9 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity
investments, partially offset by $2.0 million of net
unrealized depreciation on debt investments.
S-23
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
We have a number of alternatives available to fund the growth of
our investment portfolio and our operations, including, but not
limited to, raising equity, increasing debt, or funding from
operational cash flow. Additionally, we may reduce investment
size by syndicating a portion of any given transaction.
For the six months ended March 31, 2011, we experienced a
net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $38.2 million.
During that period, we used $342.6 million of cash in
operating activities, primarily for the funding of
$452.7 million of investments, partially offset by
$72.4 million of principal payments received and
$30.6 million of net investment income. During the same
period, cash provided by financing activities was
$304.4 million, primarily consisting of $134.0 million
of net borrowings under our credit facilities,
$65.3 million of SBA borrowings, and $143.9 million of
proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, partially offset
by $34.0 million of cash dividends paid, and
$4.3 million of deferred financing costs paid. We intend to
fund our future distribution obligations through operating cash
flow or with funds obtained through future equity and debt
offerings or credit facilities, as we deem appropriate.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, we experienced a
net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $89.7 million.
During that period, we used $144.4 million of cash in
operating activities, primarily for the funding of
$176.7 million of investments, partially offset by
$15.4 million of principal payments and proceeds received
and $19.6 million of net investment income. During the same
period cash provided by financing activities was
$54.7 million, primarily consisting of $78.1 million
of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, partially
offset by $22.6 million of cash dividends paid.
As of March 31, 2011, we had 38.6 million in cash and
cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of
$939.7 million, $6.6 million of interest and fees
receivable, $138.3 million of SBA debentures payable,
$134.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit
facilities, and unfunded commitments of $85.6 million.
As of September 30, 2010, we had $76.8 million in cash
and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of
$563.8 million, $3.8 million of interest and fees
receivable, $73.0 million of SBA debentures payable, and
unfunded commitments of $49.5 million.
Other
Sources of Liquidity
We intend to continue to generate cash primarily from cash flows
from operations, including interest earned from the temporary
investment of cash, future borrowings and future offerings of
securities. In the future, we may also securitize a portion of
our investments in first and second lien senior loans or
unsecured debt or other assets. To securitize loans, we would
likely create a wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of
loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the
subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would
retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. Our
primary use of funds is investments in our targeted asset
classes and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment
portfolio through the net proceeds from future equity offerings,
including our dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of
senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted
by the 1940 Act, our plans to raise capital may not be
successful. In this regard, because our common stock has at
times traded at a price below our then-current net asset value
per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common
stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be
limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
In addition, we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our
taxable income to our stockholders in order to satisfy the
requirements applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code.
See Regulated Investment Company Status and
Dividends below. Consequently, we may not have the funds
or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional
investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded
commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In
addition, the illiquidity of our portfolio
S-24
investments may make it difficult for us to sell these
investments when desired and, if we are required to sell these
investments, we may realize significantly less than their
recorded value.
Also, as a business development company, we generally are
required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less
liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior
securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our
borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least
200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. As
of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with this
requirement. To fund growth in our investment portfolio in the
future, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital from
various sources, including the equity markets and the
securitization or other debt-related markets, which may or may
not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Finally, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we sought and
obtained a license from the SBA to operate an SBIC. In this
regard, on February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license,
effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an
SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment
Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of
private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA
regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses
and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage
by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of
a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures.
SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest-only
debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten
year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures
is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid
at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed
debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven
spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC
subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it
has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a
capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an
examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of
March 31, 2011, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in
regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to
our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and
$138.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of
March 31, 2011. $73.0 million of these debentures bear
interest at a rate of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual
charge of 0.285%, and $65.3 million of these debentures
bear interest at a rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA
annual charge of 0.285%.
We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit us to exclude
the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the
definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage test
under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under
the 200% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to
$150 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent
the receipt of this exemptive relief.
We are also in the process of preparing an application to the
SBA for a second SBIC license. If approved, this license would
provide us with the capability to issue an additional
$75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures beyond the
$150 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures we, through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, currently have the ability to issue.
However, there are no assurances that we will be successful in
obtaining a second SBIC license from the SBA.
S-25
Significant
capital transactions that occurred from October 1, 2009
through March 31, 2011
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per
share that our Board of Directors has declared on our common
stock from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
December 10, 2009
|
|
December 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
9.7 million
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
$
|
0.5 million
|
|
January 12, 2010
|
|
March 3, 2010
|
|
March 30, 2010
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12.9 million
|
|
|
|
58,689
|
|
|
|
0.7 million
|
|
May 3, 2010
|
|
May 20, 2010
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
14.0 million
|
|
|
|
42,269
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
September 1, 2010
|
|
September 29, 2010
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
October 6, 2010
|
|
October 27, 2010
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
24,850
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
November 3, 2010
|
|
November 24, 2010
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
|
|
26,569
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
December 1, 2010
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
|
|
28,238
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
January 4, 2011
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
5.4 million
|
|
|
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
February 1, 2011
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
5.5 million
|
|
|
|
29,072
|
|
|
|
0.4 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
March 1, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
6.5 million
|
|
|
|
43,766
|
|
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
April 1, 2011
|
|
April 29, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
6.5 million
|
|
|
|
45,193
|
|
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
May 2, 2011
|
|
May 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
June 1, 2011
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects shareholder transactions that
occurred from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Proceeds
|
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
|
(Uses)
|
|
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
Public offering
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$
|
78.4 million
|
|
February 25, 2010
|
|
Underwriters exercise of over-allotment
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
3.4 million
|
|
June 21, 2010
|
|
Public offering(1)
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
|
|
105.8 million
|
|
December 2010
|
|
At-the-market offering
|
|
|
429,110
|
|
|
|
11.87
|
(2)
|
|
|
5.1 million
|
|
February 4, 2011
|
|
Public offering(1)
|
|
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
|
12.65
|
|
|
|
145.5 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the underwriters full exercise of their
over-allotment option |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Average offering price |
Borrowings
On November 16, 2009, we and Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a
consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose
subsidiary (Funding), entered into a Loan and
Servicing Agreement (Agreement), with respect to a
three-year credit facility (Wells Fargo facility)
with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells
Fargo), as successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association (Wachovia), Wells Fargo Securities, LLC,
as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional
and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of
the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount
of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for
potential future expansion of the facility up to
$100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0%
per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to
expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to
the amendment, we received an additional $50 million
commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from
$50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature
that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from
a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million.
In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was
reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the
facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two
additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each
of the lender parties thereto.
S-26
On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility
to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to
time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio
companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain
restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an
aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
On February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo facility
to, among other things, reduce the interest rate to LIBOR plus
3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity
date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, we concurrently
entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with
Funding, pursuant to which we will sell to Funding certain loan
assets we have originated or acquired, or will originate or
acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo,
pursuant to which we pledged all of our equity interests in
Funding as security for the payment of Fundings
obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into
in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo
facility required both us and Funding to, among other things
(i) make representations and warranties regarding the
collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to
certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with
various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on
acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and
other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The
Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary
default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments
under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the
failure by Funding or us to materially perform under the
Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which,
if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the
facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our
liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of
Funding, and all of our equity interest in Funding. We intend to
use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a
portion of our loan origination activities and for general
corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be
assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the
Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of
March 31, 2011, we had $60.0 million of borrowings
outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
On May 27, 2010, we entered into a three-year secured
syndicated revolving credit facility (ING facility)
pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement
(ING Credit Agreement) with certain lenders party
thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative
agent. The ING facility allows for us to borrow money at a rate
of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5%
per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of
the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR
plus 1% per annum, and had a maturity date of May 27, 2013.
The ING facility also allowed us to request letters of credit
from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial
commitment under the ING facility was $90 million, and the
ING facility included an accordion feature that allows for
potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of
$150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially
all of our assets, as well as the assets of two of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP
Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other
things, equity interests in our SBIC subsidiary and equity
interests in Fifth Street Funding, LLC (the special purpose
subsidiary established pursuant to the Wells Fargo facility) as
further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement
(ING Security Agreement) entered into in connection
with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP
Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and us.
Neither our SBIC subsidiary nor Fifth Street Funding, LLC is
party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not
been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides
that we may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the
facility for general corporate purposes, including acquiring and
funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities,
convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other
investments.
On February 22, 2011, we amended the ING facility to, among
other things, expand the borrowing capacity to
$215 million. In addition, the ING facilitys
accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future
expansion up to a total of $300 million and the maturity
date was extended to February 22, 2014.
S-27
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING
Security Agreement, including our obligations to the lenders and
the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement.
Additionally, we pledged our entire equity interests in FSFC
Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent
pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the
ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.
and us to, among other things (i) make representations and
warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our
businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification
obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various
affirmative and negative covenants and other customary
requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility
documents also include usual and customary default provisions
such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility,
the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by us to
materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related
agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with,
could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby
materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial
condition and results of operations.
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot
be assured that we will be able to borrow funds under the ING
facility at any particular time or at all.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $74.0 million of
borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
As of March 31, 2011, except for assets that were funded
through our SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of our assets
were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the
ING facility.
Interest expense for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2011 was $2.7 million and $4.7 million,
respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010 was $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
S-28
The following table describes significant financial covenants
with which we must comply under each of our credit facilities on
a quarterly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Financial Covenant
|
|
Description
|
|
Target Value
|
|
Reported Value(1)
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity (inclusive of affiliates)
|
|
Net assets shall not be less than $510 million plus 50% of the
aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$510 million
|
|
|
|
$575 million
|
|
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity (exclusive of affiliates)
|
|
Net assets exclusive of affiliates other than Funding shall not
be less than $250 million
|
|
|
$250 million
|
|
|
|
$500 million
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage ratio
|
|
Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.00:1
|
|
|
2.00:1
|
|
|
|
5.78:1
|
|
ING facility
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity
|
|
Net assets shall not be less than the greater of (a) 55% of
total assets; and (b) $385 million plus 50% of the aggregate net
proceeds of all sales of equity interests after February 24, 2010
|
|
|
$439 million
|
|
|
|
$575 million
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage ratio
|
|
Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.25:1
|
|
|
2.25:1
|
|
|
|
7.46:1
|
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio
|
|
Interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.50:1
|
|
|
2.50:1
|
|
|
|
31.48:1
|
|
|
|
Eligible portfolio investments test
|
|
Aggregate value of (a) Cash and cash equivalents and (b)
Portfolio investments rated 1, 2 or 3 shall not be less than
$175 million
|
|
|
$175 million
|
|
|
|
$332 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As contractually required, we report financial covenants based
on the last filed quarterly or annual report, in this case our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. |
S-29
The following table reflects credit facility and debenture
transactions that occurred from October 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2011. Amounts available and drawn are as of
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Upfront
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Interest
|
Facility
|
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fee Paid
|
|
Availability
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
Rate
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
November 16, 2009
|
|
Entered into credit facility
|
|
|
$50 million
|
|
|
|
$0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 4.00%
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2010
|
|
Expanded credit facility
|
|
|
100 million
|
|
|
|
0.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.50%
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
Amended credit facility
|
|
|
100 million
|
|
|
|
0.4 million
|
|
|
|
$78 million
|
(1)
|
|
|
$60 million
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.00%
|
|
ING facility
|
|
May 27, 2010
|
|
Entered into credit facility
|
|
|
90 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.50%
|
|
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
Expanded credit facility
|
|
|
215 million
|
|
|
|
1.6 million
|
|
|
|
215 million
|
|
|
|
74 million
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.50%
|
|
SBA
|
|
February 16, 2010
|
|
Received capital commitment
|
|
|
75 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2010
|
|
Received capital commitment
|
|
|
150 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
150 million
|
|
|
|
138.3 million
|
|
|
|
3.50% (2)
4.369% (3)
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Availability to increase upon our decision to further
collateralize the facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For the first $73.0 million; includes the SBA annual charge
of 0.285%. |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
For the remaining $65.3 million; includes the SBA annual
charge of 0.285%. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financial needs of our portfolio companies. As of March 31,
2011, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of
$85.6 million of unfunded commitments, which was comprised
of $82.1 million to provide debt financing to certain of
our portfolio companies and $3.5 million related to
unfunded limited partnership interests. As of September 30,
2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of
$49.5 million, which was comprised of $46.7 million to
provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies and
$2.8 million related to unfunded limited partnership
interests. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on
our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Contractual
Obligations
On February 3, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary received a
license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to
operate as an SBIC. The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary
to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject
to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other
customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are
non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable
semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount
of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to
maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The
interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a
semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over
U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities. As of March 31, 2011, we had
$138.3 million of SBA debentures payable.
$73.0 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate
of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%,
and $65.3 million of these debentures bear interest at a
rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of
0.285%.
On November 16, 2009, we entered into the Wells Fargo
facility in the amount of $50 million with an accordion
feature, which allowed for potential future expansion of the
Wells Fargo facility up to $100 million. The Wells Fargo
facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4% per annum and had a
maturity date of November 26, 2012. On May 26, 2010,
we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand our borrowing
capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we
received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby
increasing the
S-30
size of the Wells Fargo facility from $50 million to
$100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for
potential future expansion of that facility from a total of
$100 million up to a total of $150 million. In
addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was
reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the
facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. On November 5, 2010, we amended the
Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the
issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit
of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to
certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and
an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million. On
February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo Facility to,
among other things, reduce the interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0%
per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of
the facility to February 25, 2014.
On May 27, 2010, we entered into the ING facility, which
allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an
alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate,
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per
annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING
facility also allows us to request letters of credit from ING
Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under
the ING facility was $90 million, and the ING facility
included an accordion feature that allowed for potential future
expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. On
February 22, 2011, we amended the ING facility to expand
the borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the
ING facilitys accordion feature was increased to allow for
potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million
and the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $74.0 million of
borrowings outstanding under the ING facility and
$60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells
Fargo facility.
The table below reflects information pertaining to debt
outstanding under the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo
facility and the ING facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
as of September 30,
|
|
|
as of March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
$
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
138,300,000
|
|
|
$
|
104,859,341
|
|
|
$
|
138,300,000
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
35,489,011
|
|
|
|
85,000,000
|
|
ING facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,000,000
|
|
|
|
22,576,923
|
|
|
|
90,000,000
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
|
272,300,000
|
|
|
|
162,925,275
|
|
|
|
298,300,000
|
|
The following table reflects our contractual obligations arising
from the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and
the ING facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period as of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
< 1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
> 5 Years
|
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
$
|
138,300,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,300,000
|
|
Interest due on SBA debentures
|
|
|
52,638,157
|
|
|
|
5,203,917
|
|
|
|
10,815,914
|
|
|
|
10,830,728
|
|
|
|
25,787,598
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest due on Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
3,920,944
|
|
|
|
1,202,611
|
|
|
|
2,718,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ING facility
|
|
|
74,000,000
|
|
|
|
74,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest due on ING facility
|
|
|
5,802,446
|
|
|
|
1,627,863
|
|
|
|
4,174,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
334,661,547
|
|
|
$
|
142,034,391
|
|
|
$
|
17,708,830
|
|
|
$
|
10,830,728
|
|
|
$
|
164,087,598
|
|
S-31
A summary of the composition of unfunded commitments (consisting
of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as
of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is shown in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
877,895
|
|
|
|
966,360
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
583,522
|
|
|
|
864,175
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
5,159,479
|
|
|
|
9,062,453
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,623,148
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
Specialty Bakers, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
4,879,435
|
|
|
|
4,798,897
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership
interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
IOS Acquisitions, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
|
|
|
2,142,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,593,188
|
|
|
$
|
49,515,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated
Investment Company Status and Dividends
We elected, effective as of January 2, 2008, to be treated
as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify
as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable
income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such
taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be
distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial
reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in
the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes
net unrealized
S-32
appreciation or depreciation until realized. Dividends declared
and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that
year as such dividends may include the distribution of current
year taxable income or the distribution of prior year taxable
income carried forward into and distributed in the current year.
Distributions also may include returns of capital.
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things,
distribute, with respect to each taxable year, at least 90% of
our investment company taxable income (i.e., our net ordinary
income and our realized net short-term capital gains in excess
of realized net long-term capital losses, if any). As a RIC, we
are also subject to a federal excise tax, based on distributive
requirements of our taxable income on a calendar year basis
(e.g., calendar year 2011). We anticipate timely distribution of
our taxable income within the tax rules; however, we incurred a
de minimis U.S. federal excise tax for the calendar year
2010. We intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90%
and 100% of our annual taxable income (which includes our
taxable interest and fee income). However, in future periods, we
will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash
distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution
requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing
SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be
necessary to enable us to maintain our status as a RIC. We may
have to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for our
SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our
RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such
waiver. Also, the covenants under the Wells Fargo facility
could, under certain circumstances, restrict Fifth Street
Funding, LLC from making distributions to us and, as a result,
hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement.
Similarly, the covenants contained in the ING facility may
prohibit us from making distributions to our stockholders, and,
as a result, could hinder our ability to satisfy the
distribution requirement. In addition, we may retain for
investment some or all of our net taxable capital gains (i.e.,
realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net
short-term capital losses) and treat such amounts as deemed
distributions to our stockholders. If we do this, our
stockholders would be treated as if they received actual
distributions of the capital gains we retained and then
reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. Our
stockholders also may be eligible to claim tax credits (or, in
certain circumstances, tax refunds) equal to their allocable
share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed
to them. To the extent our taxable earnings for a fiscal taxable
year fall below the total amount of our dividends for that
fiscal year, a portion of those dividend distributions may be
deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow
us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the
amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we
may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the
asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a
business development company under the 1940 Act and due to
provisions in our credit facilities. If we do not distribute a
certain percentage of our taxable income annually, we would
suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of our
status as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will
receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level.
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure
2010-12), or
the Revenue Procedure, issued by the Internal Revenue Service,
or IRS, the IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions
from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid
part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy
the RICs annual distribution requirements and qualify for
the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. In
order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue Procedure
requires that at least 10% of the total distribution be payable
in cash and that each stockholder have a right to elect to
receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many
stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to
receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to
be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash
may receive less than 10% of such stockholders
distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applies to
distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with
respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31,
2011. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares
of our stock.
Related
Party Transactions
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth
Street Management LLC, our investment adviser. Fifth Street
Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing
member
S-33
and the chairman of our Board of Directors and our chief
executive officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory
agreement, fees payable to our investment adviser will be equal
to (a) a base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our
gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment
purposes, and (b) an incentive fee based on our
performance. Our investment adviser agreed to permanently waive
that portion of its base management fee attributable to our
assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the
end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. The incentive
fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and
payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or
hurdle, and a catch up feature. The
second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end
of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment
advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee
Capital Gains, which equals our realized capital gains on
a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year,
if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and
unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the
aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive
fee.
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. During the three and six months
ended March 31, 2011, we paid our investment adviser
$8.9 million and $16.2 million, respectively, under
the investment advisory agreement.
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which
is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will furnish us
with the facilities and administrative services necessary to
conduct our
day-to-day
operations, including equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and
recordkeeping services at such facilities. In addition, FSC,
Inc. will assist us in connection with the determination and
publishing of our net asset value, the preparation and filing of
tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders. We will pay FSC, Inc. our allocable portion of
overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement, including a
portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial
officer and chief compliance officer and their respective
staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving
reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief
compliance officer. Although FSC, Inc. currently intends to
forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no
obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the
future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. During the three and six months
ended March 31, 2011, we paid FSC, Inc. $0.6 million
and $1.3 million, respectively, under the administration
agreement.
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street
Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has
agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use
the name Fifth Street. Under this agreement, we will
have a right to use the Fifth Street name for so
long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates
remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this
limited license, we will have no legal right to the Fifth
Street name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by
Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.
Recent
Developments
On April 1, 2011, we repaid $18.0 million under the
ING facility. On April 12, 2011, we repaid
$60.0 million and $56.0 million under the Wells Fargo
facility and ING facility, respectively. As of May 4, 2011,
we had no loans outstanding under our credit facilities.
On April 12, 2011, we closed a private offering of
$150 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.375%
convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior
notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as
defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act. We granted the initial purchasers for the
offering the option, which expired on May 7, 2011, to
purchase up to an additional $22.5 million aggregate
principal amount of the convertible senior notes. In addition,
Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer, purchased
$2 million principal amount of the convertible senior notes
directly from us in a private placement.
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at
a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain
circumstances, or at any time on or after January 1, 2016,
the convertible senior notes
S-34
are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion
rate of 67.7415 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of our common
stock. The conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution
adjustments, including for any cash dividends or distributions
paid on shares of our common stock in excess of the monthly
dividend of $0.1066 per share we are currently paying on our
common stock. In addition, if certain corporate events occur in
respect of us, holders of the convertible senior notes may
require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their
convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be
repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but
excluding, the required repurchase date. We do not have the
right to redeem the convertible senior notes prior to maturity.
The convertible senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016,
unless repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms
prior to such date.
On April 29, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of
$0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on April 1,
2011.
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the
following dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on July 29, 2011 to stockholders
of record on July 1, 2011;
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on August 31, 2011 to
stockholders of record on August 1, 2011; and
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on September 30, 2011 to
stockholders of record on September 1, 2011.
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement for a
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the
expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-35
UNDERWRITING
UBS Securities LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. are acting as joint book-running managers of the
offering and as representatives of the underwriters named below.
Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting
agreement
dated ,
2011, each underwriter named below severally agrees to purchase
the number of shares indicated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the
shares being offered, if any are purchased, other than the
shares covered by the option described below.
Over-allotment
Option
If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set
forth in the table above, the underwriters have an option to buy
up to an additional 750,000 shares from us. They may
exercise that option for 30 days. If any shares are
purchased pursuant to this option, the underwriters will
severally purchase shares in approximately the same proportion
as set forth in the table above.
Commissions
and Discounts
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions to be paid by us to the underwriters.
These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full
exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional
shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by Fifth Street
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the public offering price set forth on the cover of
this prospectus supplement. If all the shares are not sold at
the public offering price, the representatives may change the
offering price and the other selling terms. The offering of the
shares by the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance
and subject to the underwriters right to reject any order
in whole or in part.
We estimate that our share of the total expenses of the
offering, excluding underwriting discounts, will be
approximately $600,000.
We have agreed to indemnify the several underwriters against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act.
Lock-up
Agreements
We and our officers and directors have agreed with the
underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to issue, sell,
dispose of or hedge any of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock
during the period from the date of this prospectus supplement
continuing through the date 30 days after the date of this
prospectus supplement, except with the prior written consent of
UBS Securities LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc.
The 30-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days
of the
30-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce
material news or a material event; or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
30-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
15-day
period following the last day of the
30-day
restricted period, in which case the restrictions described in
the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the
expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release of the
announcement of the material news or material event.
S-36
Price
Stabilizations and Short Positions
In connection with the offering, UBS Securities LLC, on behalf
of the underwriters, may purchase and sell shares of common
stock in the open market. These transactions may include short
sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases to cover positions
created by short sales. Short sales involve the sale by the
underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are
required to purchase in the offering. Covered short
sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares from us
in the offering. The underwriters may close out any covered
short position by either exercising their option to purchase
additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In
determining the source of shares to close out the covered short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase additional
shares pursuant to the option granted to them. Naked
short sales are any sales in excess of such option. The
underwriters must close out any naked short position by
purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is
more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that
there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock
in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions
consist of various bids for or purchases of common stock made by
the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of
the offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the
account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing
transactions, as well as other purchases by the underwriters for
their own accounts, may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of our stock, and
together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of our common
stock. As a result, the price of the common stock may be higher
than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If
these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued at any
time. These transactions may be effected on the New York Stock
Exchange, in the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise.
Potential
Conflicts of Interest
In the ordinary course of business, the underwriters or their
affiliates have engaged and may in the future engage in various
financing, commercial banking and investment banking services
with, and provide financial advisory services to, us and our
affiliates, for which they have received or may in the future
receive customary fees and expenses, including acting as
underwriters for our equity offerings. Certain of the net
proceeds from the sale of our common stock, not including
underwriting compensation, may be paid to affiliates of UBS
Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with
the repayment of debt owed under the ING facility. As a result,
UBS Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC
and/or their
affiliates may receive more than 5% of the net proceeds of this
offering, not including underwriting compensation.
Sales
Outside the United States
No action has been taken in any jurisdiction (except in the
United States) that would permit a public offering of the common
shares, or the possession, circulation or distribution of this
prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus or any other
material relating to us or the common shares in any jurisdiction
where action for that purpose is required. Accordingly, the
common shares may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, and none of this prospectus supplement, the
accompanying prospectus or any other offering material or
advertisements in connection with the common shares may be
distributed or published, in or from any country or jurisdiction
except in compliance with any applicable rules and regulations
of any such country or jurisdiction.
Each of the underwriters may arrange to sell common shares
offered hereby in certain jurisdictions outside the United
States, either directly or through affiliates, where they are
permitted to do so.
S-37
NOTICE TO
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that
with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the
Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make
an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State
prior to the publication of a prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus in relation to the shares which has been
approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member
State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive,
except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant
Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the public in
that Relevant Member State at any time:
(a) to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as
defined in the Prospectus Directive;
(b) to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has
implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending
Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), as permitted
under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior
consent of the representative for any such offer; or
(c) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the issuer of a prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of shares to the public in relation to any
shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the
same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD
Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant
Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in
the Relevant Member State and the expression 2010 PD
Amending Directive means Directive 2010/73/EU.
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
|
|
|
|
|
it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will
only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act of
2000, or FSMA) received by it in connection with the
issue or sale of the shares in circumstances in which
Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the
Issuer; and
|
|
|
|
it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions
of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to
the shares in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
|
United
Kingdom
In addition, each underwriter: (a) has only communicated or
caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to
be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in
investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of
the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the
FSMA) received by it in connection with the issue or
sale of shares of common stock in circumstances in which
Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us, and
(b) has complied and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom.
S-38
Without limitation to the other restrictions referred to herein,
this prospectus supplement is directed only at (1) persons
outside the United Kingdom; (2) persons having professional
experience in matters relating to investments who fall within
the definition of investment professionals in
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005; or (3) high net
worth bodies corporate, unincorporated associations and
partnerships and trustees of high value trusts as described in
Article 49(2) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. Without limitation to the
other restrictions referred to herein, any investment or
investment activity to which this prospectus supplement relates
is available only to, and will be engaged in only with, such
persons, and persons within the United Kingdom who receive this
communication (other than persons who fall within (2) or
(3) above) should not rely or act upon this communication.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Switzerland
This document as well as any other material relating to the
shares of our common stock which are the subject of the offering
contemplated by this prospectus do not constitute an issue
prospectus pursuant to Article 652a or Article 1156 of the Swiss
Code of Obligations. Our common stock will not be listed on the
SWX Swiss Exchange and, therefore, the documents relating to our
common stock, including, but not limited to, this document, do
not claim to comply with the disclosure standards of the listing
rules of SWX Swiss Exchange and corresponding prospectus schemes
annexed to the listing rules of the SWX Swiss Exchange.
We have not been authorised by the Swiss Financial Market
Supervisory Authority as a foreign collective investment scheme
under Article 120 of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act
dated 23 June 2006 (CISA). Hence this prospectus
does not constitute a prospectus for public advertising of
foreign collective investment schemes within the meaning of
Article 120 CISA. Accordingly, the shares of our common stock
may not be offered or distributed in or from Switzerland unless
the offer or distribution is exclusively addressed to qualified
investors as defined in section 10 CISA and its implementing
ordinances, and only under use of the usual advertising media
for this kind of business.
Our common stock is being offered in Switzerland by way of a
private placement, i.e. to qualified investors as defined in
section 10 CISA only, without any public offer and only to
investors who do not purchase shares of our common stock with
the intention to distribute them to the public. The investors
will be individually approached by us from time to time.
This document as well as any other material relating to our
common stock is personal and confidential and does not
constitute an offer to any other person. This document may only
be used by those investors to whom it has been handed out in
connection with the offering described herein and may neither
directly nor indirectly be distributed or made available to
other persons without our express consent. It may not be used in
connection with any other offer and shall in particular not be
copied and/or distributed to the public in (or from) Switzerland.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Australia
This prospectus is not a formal disclosure document and has not
been, nor will be, lodged with the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission. It does not purport to contain all
information that an investor or their professional advisers
would expect to find in a prospectus or other disclosure
document (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia))
for the purposes of Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001
(Australia) or in a product disclosure statement for the
purposes of Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act 2001
(Australia), in either case, in relation to the securities.
The securities are not being offered in Australia to
retail clients as defined in sections 761G and
761GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). This offering is
being made in Australia solely to wholesale clients
for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act
2001 (Australia) and, as such, no prospectus, product disclosure
statement or other disclosure document in relation to the
securities has been, or will be, prepared.
S-39
This prospectus does not constitute an offer in Australia other
than to wholesale clients. By submitting an application for our
securities, you represent and warrant to us that you are a
wholesale client for the purposes of section 761G of the
Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). If any recipient of this
prospectus is not a wholesale client, no offer of, or invitation
to apply for, our securities shall be deemed to be made to such
recipient and no applications for our securities will be
accepted from such recipient. Any offer to a recipient in
Australia, and any agreement arising from acceptance of such
offer, is personal and may only be accepted by the recipient. In
addition, by applying for our securities you undertake to us
that, for a period of 12 months from the date of issue of
the securities, you will not transfer any interest in the
securities to any person in Australia other than to a wholesale
client.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Hong Kong
Our securities may not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means
of this prospectus or any document other than (i) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (ii) in circumstances
which do not constitute an offer to the public within the
meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong),
or (iii) in other circumstances which do not result in the
document being a prospectus within the meaning of
the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong). No
advertisement, invitation or document relating to our securities
may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the
purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or
elsewhere) which is directed at, or the contents of which are
likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong
(except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong
Kong) other than with respect to the securities which are or are
intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or
only to professional investors within the meaning of
the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong
Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Japan
Our securities have not been and will not be registered under
the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Law) and our securities will
not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to,
or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used
herein means any person resident in Japan, including any
corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan),
or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly,
in Japan, or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an
exemption from the registration requirements of, and otherwise
in compliance with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law
and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial
guidelines of Japan.
Notice to
Prospective Investors in Singapore
This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore and in Singapore, the offer and
sale of our securities is made pursuant to exemptions provided
in sections 274 and 275 of the Securities and Futures Act,
Chapter 289 of Singapore (SFA). Accordingly,
this prospectus and any other document or material in connection
with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or
purchase, of our securities may not be circulated or
distributed, nor may our securities be offered or sold, or be
made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase,
whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other
than (i) to an institutional investor as defined in
Section 4A of the SFA pursuant to Section 274 of the
SFA, (ii) to a relevant person as defined in
section 275(2) of the SFA pursuant to Section 275(1)
of the SFA, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A) of
the SFA, and in accordance with the conditions specified in
Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to,
and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable
provision of the SFA, in each case subject to compliance with
the conditions (if any) set forth in the SFA. Moreover, this
document is not a prospectus as defined in the SFA. Accordingly,
statutory liability under the SFA in relation to the content of
prospectuses would not apply. Prospective investors in Singapore
should consider carefully whether an investment in our
securities is suitable for them.
S-40
Where our securities are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
(a) by a corporation (which is not an accredited investor
as defined in Section 4A of the SFA) the sole business of
which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of
which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an
accredited investor; or
(b) for a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited
investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each
beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited
investor,
shares of that corporation or the beneficiaries rights and
interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be
transferable for six months after that corporation or that trust
has acquired the shares under Section 275 of the SFA,
except:
(1) to an institutional investor (for corporations under
Section 274 of the SFA) or to a relevant person defined in
Section 275(2) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to an
offer that is made on terms that such shares of that corporation
or such rights and interest in that trust are acquired at a
consideration of not less than S$200,000 (or its equivalent in a
foreign currency) for each transaction, whether such amount is
to be paid for in cash or by exchange of securities or other
assets, and further for corporations, in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA;
(2) where no consideration is given for the
transfer; or
(3) where the transfer is by operation of law.
In addition, investors in Singapore should note that the
securities acquired by them are subject to resale and transfer
restrictions specified under Section 276 of the SFA, and
they, therefore, should seek their own legal advice before
effecting any resale or transfer of their securities.
Electronic
Delivery
The underwriters may make prospectuses available in electronic
format. A prospectus in electronic format may be made available
on the website maintained by any of the underwriters, and
underwriters may distribute such prospectuses electronically.
The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a limited number
of shares for sale to their online brokerage customers. Any such
allocation for online distributions will be made by the
underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts
to exceed five percent of the total number of shares offered.
The addresses of the underwriters are: UBS Securities LLC, 299
Park Ave., New York, New York 10171; RBC Capital Markets, LLC,
200 Vesey Street, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10281; and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., 60 Wall Street,
New York, New York 10005.
S-41
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement and certain other legal matters will be
passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP,
Washington D.C. Certain legal matters related to the offering
will be passed upon for the underwriters by Fried, Frank,
Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP New York, New York.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statement
schedule as of September 30, 2010 and for the year ended
September 30, 2010, included in the accompanying
prospectus, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing therein.
The Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30,
2009 and for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and
the financial statement schedule for the year ended
September 30, 2009, included in the accompanying
prospectus, have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, our former
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing therein.
CHANGE IN
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On February 11, 2010, we dismissed Grant Thornton LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm. During the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and through
February 11, 2010, there were no disagreements between us
and Grant Thornton LLP with respect to any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton LLP, would have
caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such
disagreements in its reports on the financial statements for
such years.
On February 11, 2010, we engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as our new independent registered public accounting firm to
audit our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our shares of common stock
offered by this prospectus supplement. The registration
statement contains additional information about us and our
shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus
supplement.
We file with or furnish to the SEC annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the
informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements
and other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the
SECs website at www.sec.gov. Copies of these
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic
request at the following
e-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs
Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549.
S-42
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost at March 31, 2011: $11,045,168;
cost at September 30, 2010: $12,195,029)
|
|
$
|
9,695,327
|
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost at March 31, 2011: $48,829,558;
cost at September 30, 2010: $50,133,521)
|
|
|
35,747,092
|
|
|
|
47,222,059
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost at March 31,
2011: $893,318,481; cost at September 30, 2010:
$530,168,045)
|
|
|
894,306,634
|
|
|
|
512,899,257
|
|
Total investments at fair value (cost at March 31, 2011:
$953,193,207; cost at September 30, 2010: $592,496,595)
|
|
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
563,821,316
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
38,556,212
|
|
|
|
76,765,254
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
6,622,820
|
|
|
|
3,813,757
|
|
Due from portfolio company
|
|
|
96,424
|
|
|
|
103,426
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
8,849,335
|
|
|
|
5,465,964
|
|
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
1,874,666
|
|
|
|
1,956,013
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
995,748,510
|
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
Liabilities and Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
452,770
|
|
|
$
|
1,322,282
|
|
Base management fee payable
|
|
|
4,785,961
|
|
|
|
2,875,802
|
|
Incentive fee payable
|
|
|
4,139,032
|
|
|
|
2,859,139
|
|
Due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
808,525
|
|
|
|
1,083,038
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
652,827
|
|
|
|
282,640
|
|
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
|
|
|
861,298
|
|
|
|
1,330,724
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
134,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
138,300,000
|
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
284,000,413
|
|
|
|
82,753,625
|
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares
authorized, 66,667,933 and 54,550,290 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010
|
|
|
666,679
|
|
|
|
545,503
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
765,404,953
|
|
|
|
619,759,984
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(12,978,443
|
)
|
|
|
(29,448,713
|
)
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(47,054,064
|
)
|
|
|
(33,090,961
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
5,708,972
|
|
|
|
11,406,292
|
|
Total Net Assets (equivalent to $10.68 and $10.43 per
common share at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010)
(Note 12)
|
|
|
711,748,097
|
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
|
|
$
|
995,748,510
|
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-43
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
$
|
12,463
|
|
|
$
|
(41,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,432
|
|
|
$
|
182,827
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
1,127,620
|
|
|
|
2,257,404
|
|
|
|
2,290,136
|
|
|
|
4,516,905
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
21,202,939
|
|
|
|
11,874,938
|
|
|
|
37,692,123
|
|
|
|
19,548,264
|
|
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
5,521
|
|
|
|
13,530
|
|
|
|
201,183
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
22,347,415
|
|
|
|
14,095,944
|
|
|
|
40,009,221
|
|
|
|
24,449,179
|
|
PIK interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
101,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
275,633
|
|
|
|
323,533
|
|
|
|
557,433
|
|
|
|
655,149
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
3,094,431
|
|
|
|
1,981,640
|
|
|
|
5,922,986
|
|
|
|
3,611,798
|
|
Total PIK interest income
|
|
|
3,471,403
|
|
|
|
2,305,173
|
|
|
|
6,615,091
|
|
|
|
4,266,947
|
|
Fee income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
133,407
|
|
|
|
425,261
|
|
|
|
266,961
|
|
|
|
679,038
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
3,740,634
|
|
|
|
1,018,639
|
|
|
|
8,007,850
|
|
|
|
1,680,003
|
|
Total fee income
|
|
|
3,874,069
|
|
|
|
1,443,900
|
|
|
|
8,401,325
|
|
|
|
2,359,041
|
|
Dividend and other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
10,722
|
|
|
|
22,666
|
|
Total dividend and other income
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
10,722
|
|
|
|
22,666
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
29,701,175
|
|
|
|
17,856,350
|
|
|
|
55,036,359
|
|
|
|
31,097,833
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
4,785,961
|
|
|
|
2,336,878
|
|
|
|
8,564,740
|
|
|
|
4,603,881
|
|
Incentive fee
|
|
|
4,139,032
|
|
|
|
2,801,562
|
|
|
|
7,652,933
|
|
|
|
4,888,826
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
507,483
|
|
|
|
329,014
|
|
|
|
1,197,972
|
|
|
|
630,619
|
|
Board of Directors fees
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
85,500
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,724,188
|
|
|
|
260,941
|
|
|
|
4,662,898
|
|
|
|
352,120
|
|
Administrator expense
|
|
|
391,175
|
|
|
|
318,806
|
|
|
|
745,344
|
|
|
|
570,624
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
561,209
|
|
|
|
559,901
|
|
|
|
1,515,241
|
|
|
|
1,142,524
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
13,145,048
|
|
|
|
6,650,102
|
|
|
|
24,424,628
|
|
|
|
12,269,594
|
|
Base management fee waived
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727,067
|
)
|
Net expenses
|
|
|
13,145,048
|
|
|
|
6,650,102
|
|
|
|
24,424,628
|
|
|
|
11,542,527
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
16,556,127
|
|
|
|
11,206,248
|
|
|
|
30,611,731
|
|
|
|
19,555,306
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap
|
|
|
234,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
(757,321
|
)
|
|
|
486,853
|
|
|
|
7,313,275
|
|
|
|
2,480,075
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
(8,590,695
|
)
|
|
|
3,327,908
|
|
|
|
(10,171,003
|
)
|
|
|
3,727,842
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
8,741,597
|
|
|
|
(2,638,050
|
)
|
|
|
18,357,442
|
|
|
|
(4,031,912
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
(606,419
|
)
|
|
|
1,176,711
|
|
|
|
15,499,714
|
|
|
|
2,176,005
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
(40,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,805,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,908,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,908,084
|
)
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
(472,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,157,398
|
)
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(512,884
|
)
|
|
|
(2,908,084
|
)
|
|
|
(13,963,103
|
)
|
|
|
(2,802,084
|
)
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
15,670,990
|
|
|
$
|
9,474,875
|
|
|
$
|
33,118,898
|
|
|
$
|
18,929,227
|
|
Net investment income per common share basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Earnings per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
62,120,473
|
|
|
|
43,019,350
|
|
|
|
58,339,723
|
|
|
|
40,421,657
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-44
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
30,611,731
|
|
|
$
|
19,555,306
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
16,470,270
|
|
|
|
2,176,005
|
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(13,963,103
|
)
|
|
|
(2,802,084
|
)
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
|
33,118,898
|
|
|
|
18,929,227
|
|
Stockholder transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders
|
|
|
(36,309,051
|
)
|
|
|
(23,794,498
|
)
|
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
|
|
|
(36,309,051
|
)
|
|
|
(23,794,498
|
)
|
Capital share transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
143,429,688
|
|
|
|
77,537,266
|
|
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
2,336,457
|
|
|
|
1,168,939
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
|
145,766,145
|
|
|
|
78,706,205
|
|
Total increase in net assets
|
|
|
142,575,992
|
|
|
|
73,840,934
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
711,748,097
|
|
|
$
|
484,397,005
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
66,667,933
|
|
|
|
45,282,596
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-45
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
33,118,898
|
|
|
$
|
18,929,227
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash used by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(16,470,270
|
)
|
|
|
(2,176,005
|
)
|
Net realized losses on investments
|
|
|
13,963,103
|
|
|
|
2,802,084
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
(6,615,091
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266,947
|
)
|
Recognition of fee income
|
|
|
(8,401,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,359,041
|
)
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(808,927
|
)
|
|
|
(448,427
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
955,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income received
|
|
|
14,010,650
|
|
|
|
6,466,569
|
|
Increase in interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
(1,826,027
|
)
|
|
|
(1,781,438
|
)
|
Decrease in due from portfolio company
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
|
|
78,521
|
|
(Increase) decrease in collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
81,347
|
|
|
|
(1,736,387
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
|
|
101,045
|
|
|
|
(85,056
|
)
|
Increase in base management fee payable
|
|
|
1,910,159
|
|
|
|
784,718
|
|
Increase in incentive fee payable
|
|
|
1,279,893
|
|
|
|
857,299
|
|
Decrease in due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
(274,513
|
)
|
|
|
(152,845
|
)
|
Increase in interest payable
|
|
|
370,187
|
|
|
|
24,537
|
|
Decrease in payments received in advance from portfolio companies
|
|
|
(469,426
|
)
|
|
|
(95,997
|
)
|
Purchases of investments and net revolver activity, net of
syndications
|
|
|
(452,660,960
|
)
|
|
|
(176,666,609
|
)
|
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled payments)
|
|
|
10,186,307
|
|
|
|
4,182,202
|
|
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
|
|
|
62,204,072
|
|
|
|
6,385,000
|
|
PIK interest income received in cash
|
|
|
6,711,111
|
|
|
|
635,194
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,191,721
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(342,627,611
|
)
|
|
|
(144,431,680
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash
|
|
|
(33,972,594
|
)
|
|
|
(22,625,559
|
)
|
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
65,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
378,000,000
|
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
|
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
(244,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(38,000,000
|
)
|
Deferred financing costs paid
|
|
|
(4,338,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
|
143,921,427
|
|
|
|
78,086,148
|
|
Offering costs paid
|
|
|
(491,739
|
)
|
|
|
(765,602
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
304,418,569
|
|
|
|
54,694,987
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(38,209,042
|
)
|
|
|
(89,736,693
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
76,765,254
|
|
|
|
113,205,287
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
38,556,212
|
|
|
$
|
23,468,594
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
3,337,557
|
|
|
$
|
213,855
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
2,336,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,168,939
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-46
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Housewares &
Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,155,306
|
|
|
$
|
3,996,187
|
|
|
$
|
4,055,655
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 6% due 3/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,356,187
|
|
|
|
4,055,655
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.
|
|
Environmental &
facilities services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
5,134,672
|
|
|
|
5,061,481
|
|
|
|
5,139,672
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
50% Membership Interest in CD Holdco, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,688,981
|
|
|
|
5,639,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,045,168
|
|
|
$
|
9,695,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
11,184,988
|
|
|
$
|
11,124,844
|
|
|
$
|
11,239,858
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,639,277
|
|
|
|
1,622,288
|
|
|
|
1,698,293
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
31,490
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,127,545
|
|
|
|
12,969,641
|
|
MK Network, LLC (13)(14)
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
8,784,277
|
|
|
|
8,484,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,975,819
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,004,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,426,488
|
|
|
|
6,170,953
|
|
|
|
6,543,222
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,923,107
|
|
|
|
14,446,111
|
|
|
|
14,842,797
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,391,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,697,462
|
|
|
|
22,777,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,829,558
|
|
|
$
|
35,747,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
Household
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,133,269
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,269
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133,269
|
|
|
|
1,133,269
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,508,523
|
|
|
|
3,352,646
|
|
|
|
3,274,691
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
63,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,102,646
|
|
|
|
3,338,378
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
Construction and
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
2,361,779
|
|
|
|
2,263,371
|
|
|
|
2,263,371
|
|
Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
2,846,473
|
|
|
|
2,727,870
|
|
|
|
2,727,870
|
|
Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,027,956
|
|
|
|
3,860,124
|
|
|
|
3,860,124
|
|
Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
|
|
5,031,251
|
|
|
|
5,031,251
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015(9)
|
|
|
|
|
20,376,773
|
|
|
|
20,157,995
|
|
|
|
19,325,690
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,936,102
|
|
|
|
4,936,102
|
|
|
|
3,213,442
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,661,650
|
|
|
|
36,421,748
|
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,952
|
|
|
|
395,215
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure
facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
997,107
|
|
|
|
1,006,811
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,703,099
|
|
|
|
5,662,270
|
|
|
|
5,713,995
|
|
1,000 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
138,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,702,285
|
|
|
|
6,859,256
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
7,335,987
|
|
|
|
7,159,978
|
|
|
|
7,316,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,159,978
|
|
|
|
7,316,796
|
|
Boot Barn
|
|
Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,855
|
|
|
|
8,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,915
|
|
|
|
80,119
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
18,758,227
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
3,897,412
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
3,897,412
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
|
|
Industrial
machinery
|
|
|
10,174,134
|
|
|
|
9,954,793
|
|
|
|
10,191,421
|
|
33,463 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
715,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,299,306
|
|
|
|
10,907,395
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Electronic
manufacturing
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
17,331,049
|
|
|
|
14,552,152
|
|
|
|
9,779,405
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
5,120,565
|
|
|
|
5,120,565
|
|
|
|
5,120,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,672,717
|
|
|
|
14,899,970
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
Construction
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
6,706,609
|
|
|
|
6,578,609
|
|
|
|
6,705,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578,609
|
|
|
|
6,705,597
|
|
S-49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies &
entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,462,970
|
|
|
|
6,186,332
|
|
|
|
6,498,125
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,230,293
|
|
|
|
10,140,293
|
|
|
|
10,500,432
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,000
|
|
|
|
1,016,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,317,625
|
|
|
|
18,014,931
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,726,772
|
|
|
|
13,520,365
|
|
|
|
13,763,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,520,365
|
|
|
|
13,763,520
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
19,616,954
|
|
|
|
18,808,868
|
|
|
|
19,638,428
|
|
414,419 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,269,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,407,250
|
|
|
|
20,908,144
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,049,775
|
|
|
|
4,004,026
|
|
|
|
4,055,414
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,259,468
|
|
|
|
16,783,215
|
|
|
|
17,263,298
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
632,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,210,996
|
|
|
|
21,951,082
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight &
logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,777,468
|
|
|
|
12,502,032
|
|
|
|
12,881,433
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,892,667
|
|
|
|
5,015,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,394,699
|
|
|
|
17,896,977
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.89% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
S-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,478
|
|
|
|
416,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,478
|
|
|
|
416,478
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Fertilizers &
agricultural
chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,831,887
|
|
|
|
8,008,672
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
14,370,059
|
|
|
|
14,077,157
|
|
|
|
14,356,636
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,750,000
|
|
|
|
4,540,784
|
|
|
|
4,782,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,449,828
|
|
|
|
27,148,196
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Home
improvement
retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,023,879
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,708,636
|
|
|
|
22,708,636
|
|
|
|
22,695,582
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due
12/30/2014(10)
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,498,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,208,636
|
|
|
|
28,218,378
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
28,664,063
|
|
|
|
27,943,969
|
|
|
|
28,697,559
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.75% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
896,667
|
|
|
|
1,324,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,840,636
|
|
|
|
30,022,053
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
24,640,000
|
|
|
|
24,272,161
|
|
|
|
24,723,072
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,323,354
|
|
|
|
21,997,682
|
|
|
|
22,333,892
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,441,333
|
|
|
|
1,507,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,711,176
|
|
|
|
48,564,572
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
6,800,000
|
|
|
|
6,654,706
|
|
|
|
6,807,073
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,927,154
|
|
|
|
12,643,019
|
|
|
|
12,937,783
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,264,166
|
|
|
|
19,744,856
|
|
S-51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,875,000
|
|
|
|
9,705,286
|
|
|
|
9,868,451
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,076,228
|
|
|
|
7,936,932
|
|
|
|
8,084,702
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
967,333
|
|
|
|
1,005,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,609,551
|
|
|
|
18,959,116
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Electronic
equipment &
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (12.75% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
30,017,061
|
|
|
|
29,519,554
|
|
|
|
30,061,843
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,421,154
|
|
|
|
3,502,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,940,708
|
|
|
|
33,563,929
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
7,850,000
|
|
|
|
7,669,829
|
|
|
|
7,868,400
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,614,071
|
|
|
|
7,868,400
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
Diversified
support
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
15,250,000
|
|
|
|
14,978,636
|
|
|
|
15,287,877
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,070,781
|
|
|
|
10,872,060
|
|
|
|
11,067,261
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
927,738
|
|
|
|
1,083,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,778,434
|
|
|
|
27,439,103
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,297,500
|
|
|
|
9,094,984
|
|
|
|
9,275,558
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
17,159,953
|
|
|
|
16,780,515
|
|
|
|
17,186,836
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
533,454
|
|
|
|
621,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,408,953
|
|
|
|
27,084,272
|
|
S-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
Food
distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,775,000
|
|
|
|
8,565,857
|
|
|
|
8,782,067
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,743,058
|
|
|
|
11,040,725
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,215,482
|
|
|
|
19,822,792
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
IT consulting &
other services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
|
|
28,500,168
|
|
|
|
29,068,105
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
|
21,604,000
|
|
|
|
22,040,291
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,879,168
|
|
|
|
51,108,396
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
Internet
software &
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
16,400,000
|
|
|
|
16,095,901
|
|
|
|
16,400,313
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.25% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
21,096,423
|
|
|
|
20,711,423
|
|
|
|
21,075,236
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
2,140,000
|
|
|
|
2,274,860
|
|
2,086,163 Common Units in RPWL Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,163
|
|
|
|
2,112,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,033,487
|
|
|
|
41,862,450
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
14,659,710
|
|
|
|
15,042,504
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015
|
|
|
|
|
17,162,074
|
|
|
|
14,426,785
|
|
|
|
17,126,857
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
10,371 Preferred Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
|
|
954,366
|
|
146,289 Series D Common Equity units in Miche Holdings,
LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462,888
|
|
|
|
1,346,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,468,273
|
|
|
|
34,469,897
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P.
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
30,350,000
|
|
|
|
29,769,524
|
|
|
|
30,394,983
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
20,058,396
|
|
|
|
19,685,062
|
|
|
|
20,161,592
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,361,253
|
|
|
|
50,556,575
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,148,750
|
|
|
|
8,012,134
|
|
|
|
8,163,952
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,006,534
|
|
|
|
8,163,952
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
Human
resources &
employment
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,750,198
|
|
|
|
13,084,515
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,331,511
|
|
|
|
8,173,515
|
|
|
|
8,311,374
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,847,571
|
|
|
|
21,395,889
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
Building
products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
772,768
|
|
|
|
772,768
|
|
|
|
772,768
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772,768
|
|
|
|
772,768
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
Building
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
2,060,713
|
|
|
|
1,946,983
|
|
|
|
2,060,713
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,863,838
|
|
|
|
3,863,838
|
|
|
|
3,863,838
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock in Vanguard
Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,810,821
|
|
|
|
5,924,551
|
|
S-54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10.5% due 1/4/2016
|
|
|
|
|
17,060,989
|
|
|
|
16,697,763
|
|
|
|
17,060,989
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% due 1/4/2016(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,655,263
|
|
|
|
17,060,989
|
|
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
|
|
Diversified
support
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (11.75% floor) due 1/6/2016
|
|
|
|
|
11,850,000
|
|
|
|
11,605,493
|
|
|
|
11,850,000
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (8.25% floor) due 1/6/2016(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,564,279
|
|
|
|
11,850,000
|
|
U.S. Retirement Partners, Inc.
|
|
Diversified
financial
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (11.5% floor) due 1/6/2016
|
|
|
|
|
11,700,000
|
|
|
|
11,361,007
|
|
|
|
11,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,361,007
|
|
|
|
11,700,000
|
|
IOS Acquisitions, Inc.
|
|
Oil & gas
equipment &
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 1/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
5,300,000
|
|
|
|
5,178,937
|
|
|
|
5,300,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+12% (14% floor) due 1/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
6,025,702
|
|
|
|
5,885,311
|
|
|
|
6,025,702
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 1/14/2016(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,017,451
|
|
|
|
11,325,702
|
|
Actient Pharmaceuticals LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+6.25% (8.25% floor) due 7/29/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,754,098
|
|
|
|
9,564,490
|
|
|
|
9,754,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,564,490
|
|
|
|
9,754,098
|
|
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
|
|
Household
products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.5% floor) due 1/13/2016
|
|
|
|
|
8,571,429
|
|
|
|
8,386,251
|
|
|
|
8,571,429
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, LIBOR+13.875% due 2/1/2017
|
|
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
|
|
|
19,611,111
|
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.5% floor) due 1/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
4,285,714
|
|
|
|
4,145,893
|
|
|
|
4,285,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,143,255
|
|
|
|
32,857,143
|
|
S-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
U.S. Collections, Inc.
|
|
Diversified
support services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5.25% (7% floor) due 3/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
11,358,793
|
|
|
|
11,136,614
|
|
|
|
11,358,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,136,614
|
|
|
|
11,358,793
|
|
CCCG, LLC
|
|
Oil & gas
equipment &
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (10.75% floor) due 7/29/2015
|
|
|
|
|
34,938,750
|
|
|
|
34,248,422
|
|
|
|
34,938,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,248,422
|
|
|
|
34,938,750
|
|
Maverick Healthcare Group, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (10.75% floor) due 12/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
24,937,500
|
|
|
|
24,379,539
|
|
|
|
24,937,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,379,539
|
|
|
|
24,937,500
|
|
Refac Optical Group
|
|
Specialty
stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 3/23/2016
|
|
|
|
|
19,510,000
|
|
|
|
19,040,081
|
|
|
|
19,510,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10.25% due 3/23/2016
|
|
|
|
|
20,033,509
|
|
|
|
19,546,656
|
|
|
|
20,033,509
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 3/23/2016(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 Shares of Common Stock in Refac Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
1,000 Shares of Preferred Stock in Refac Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999,000
|
|
|
|
999,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,397,846
|
|
|
|
40,543,509
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893,318,481
|
|
|
$
|
894,306,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
953,193,207
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted
in (13) or (14) below. Interest rates and floors may
contain fixed rate PIK provisions. Equity is non-income
producing unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
portfolio composition by geographic region. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
S-56
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
Cash Interest
|
|
PIK Interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
−2.0% on Bridge Loan
|
|
|
|
Per loan amendment
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
|
|
May 28, 2010
|
|
−4.0% on Second Lien Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on Second Lien Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
October 1, 2010
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on
Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
+ 4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Default interest per credit agreement
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Cost amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn
commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership
interest. |
|
(13) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of March 31,
2011. |
|
(14) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of March 31,
2011. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
S-57
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Housewares &
Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,419,495
|
|
|
$
|
4,728,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,503,716
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,575,783
|
|
|
|
6,906,440
|
|
|
|
2,196,284
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
152,312
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing &
Outsourced Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,961,448
|
|
|
$
|
10,869,262
|
|
|
$
|
10,805,775
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,853,976
|
|
|
|
1,828,494
|
|
|
|
1,896,645
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
38,592
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,740,358
|
|
|
|
9,539,188
|
|
|
|
7,913,140
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,926,187
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
3,938,660
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058,767
|
|
|
|
11,851,800
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,141,190
|
|
|
|
6,813,431
|
|
|
|
7,113,622
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,692,015
|
|
|
|
14,102,756
|
|
|
|
14,179,626
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,335,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,996,585
|
|
|
|
22,629,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,133,521
|
|
|
$
|
47,222,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
Household
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
S-58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Building
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,827,373
|
|
|
|
5,812,199
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,207,895
|
|
|
|
1,029,268
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,708,971
|
|
|
|
3,475,906
|
|
|
|
3,486,342
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
354,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,225,906
|
|
|
|
3,840,456
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
|
|
Construction and
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
19,969,524
|
|
|
|
19,724,493
|
|
|
|
19,440,090
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Environmental &
facilities services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
3,154,876
|
|
|
|
3,040,465
|
|
|
|
1,782,181
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
6,180,185
|
|
|
|
5,713,125
|
|
|
|
3,347,672
|
|
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
TBA Global, LLC(9)
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,840,081
|
|
|
|
10,594,939
|
|
|
|
10,625,867
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,002,891
|
|
|
|
11,021,082
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,245,136
|
|
|
|
1,247,418
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,631,547
|
|
|
|
5,575,477
|
|
|
|
5,674,493
|
|
1,000 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
118,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,316,518
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
S-59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Boot Barn(9)
|
|
Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
|
|
|
|
|
23,545,479
|
|
|
|
23,288,566
|
|
|
|
23,477,539
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
18,452,952
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
|
|
Industrial
machinery
|
|
|
10,071,866
|
|
|
|
9,798,901
|
|
|
|
9,829,869
|
|
33,786 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
402,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
Goldco, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
8,355,688
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
|
|
Electronic
manufacturing
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
16,315,866
|
|
|
|
13,536,969
|
|
|
|
12,854,425
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
|
|
Construction
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,864,713
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies &
entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,662,970
|
|
|
|
6,324,339
|
|
|
|
6,488,990
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,178,726
|
|
|
|
10,068,726
|
|
|
|
9,962,414
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
489,000
|
|
|
|
508,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,882,065
|
|
|
|
16,960,371
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,588,794
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
S-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
20,172,004
|
|
|
|
19,257,215
|
|
|
|
19,544,864
|
|
414,419 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,417,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,855,597
|
|
|
|
20,962,750
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,449,775
|
|
|
|
4,387,947
|
|
|
|
4,406,684
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,258,033
|
|
|
|
16,702,405
|
|
|
|
17,092,868
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
676,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight &
logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,751,463
|
|
|
|
12,536,099
|
|
|
|
12,549,159
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,468,667
|
|
|
|
1,491,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.87% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Fertilizers &
agricultural
chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,789,498
|
|
|
|
8,806,763
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
14,225,615
|
|
|
|
13,892,772
|
|
|
|
13,897,677
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,012,255
|
|
|
|
4,107,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Home
improvement
retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,277,900
|
|
|
|
9,127,886
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,423,729
|
|
|
|
21,920,479
|
|
|
|
21,913,276
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,432,500
|
|
|
|
1,442,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
31,054,688
|
|
|
|
30,243,946
|
|
|
|
30,660,049
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.75% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,842,835
|
|
|
|
30,258,938
|
|
S-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
26,320,000
|
|
|
|
25,877,206
|
|
|
|
26,250,475
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,098,966
|
|
|
|
21,729,057
|
|
|
|
22,114,113
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
|
|
|
7,120,671
|
|
|
|
7,144,136
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,862,760
|
|
|
|
12,539,879
|
|
|
|
12,644,316
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,909,720
|
|
|
|
4,915,885
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,025,733
|
|
|
|
3,952,399
|
|
|
|
3,946,765
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,825,452
|
|
|
|
8,825,983
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Electronic
equipment &
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
30,245,558
|
|
|
|
29,684,880
|
|
|
|
29,409,043
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,409,615
|
|
|
|
3,478,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
Diversified
support
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,014,977
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
376,852
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
7,750,000
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
13,555,178
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
Food
distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
530,168,045
|
|
|
$
|
512,899,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted
in (13) or (14) below. Interest rates and floors may
contain fixed rate PIK provisions. Equity is non-income
producing unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
portfolio composition by geographic region. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
S-63
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
Cash Interest
|
|
PIK Interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A & B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
April 1, 2008
|
|
+ 0.5% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Per loan amendment
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Boot Barn
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 2.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
+ 4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Default interest per credit agreement
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
May 1, 2010
|
|
−4.5% on Term Loan
|
|
−0.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
|
|
May 28, 2010
|
|
−4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
July 1, 2010
|
|
−2.0% on Term Loan
|
|
−0.75% on Term Loan
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
+ 3.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per loan agreement
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership
interest. |
|
(13) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
|
(14) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
S-64
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the
Partnership), a Delaware limited partnership, was
organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt
securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC
was the Partnerships general partner (the General
Partner). The Partnerships investments were managed
by Fifth Street Management LLC (the Investment
Adviser). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were
under common ownership.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the Company), an
externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the 1940 Act). Fifth Street Finance Corp. is
managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to January 2,
2008, references to the Company are to the Partnership. Since
January 2, 2008, references to the Company,
FSC, we or our are to Fifth
Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries,
including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax
purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the
Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company for
accounting purposes, and the portfolio investments held by the
subsidiaries are included in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
The Companys shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol FSC. The following table
reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since
inception:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Gross Proceeds
|
|
June 17, 2008
|
|
Initial public offering
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.12
|
|
|
$141.2 million
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,487,500
|
|
|
$
|
9.25
|
|
|
$87.8 million
|
September 25, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
5,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
$58.0 million
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$78.4 million
|
February 25, 2010
|
|
Underwriters exercise of over-allotment option
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$3.4 million
|
June 21, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwritersexercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.50
|
|
|
$105.8 million
|
December 2010
|
|
At-the-Market
offering
|
|
|
429,110
|
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
(1)
|
|
$5.1 million
|
February 4, 2011
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.65
|
|
|
$145.5 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average offering price |
On February 3, 2010, the Companys consolidated
wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV,
L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from
the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to
operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under
Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of
1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private
equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA
regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses
and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
The SBIC license allows the Companys SBIC subsidiary to
obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to
the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other
customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are
non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable
semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount
of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior
S-65
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The
interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a
semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over
U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the
Companys SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of
$150 million when it has at least $75 million in
regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA
and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to
licensing. As of March 31, 2011, the Companys SBIC
subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA
has issued a capital commitment to the Companys SBIC
subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and
$138.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of
March 31, 2011. $73.0 million of these debentures bear
interest at a rate of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual
charge of 0.285%, and $65.3 million of these debentures
bear interest at a rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA
annual charge of 0.285%.
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their
capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a
change of control or transfer of an SBIC and require
that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations.
In addition, the Companys SBIC subsidiary may also be
limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if
it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA
regulations.
The Companys SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and
oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to
maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other
covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the
SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding
and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in
compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC
subsidiarys assets over the Companys stockholders in
the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA
exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures
issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
The Company has received exemptive relief from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit it to
exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA
from the definition of senior securities in the Companys
200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows the
Company increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test
by permitting it to borrow up to $150 million more than it
would otherwise be able to under the 1940 Act absent the receipt
of this exemptive relief.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation and Liquidity:
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and
Regulation S-X.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal
recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation
of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The
financial results of the Companys portfolio investments
are not consolidated in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its
investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent
and future equity offerings, the Companys dividend
reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future
borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company
cannot assure that its plans to raise capital will be
successful. In addition, the Company intends to distribute to
its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its taxable income each
year in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to
Regulated Investment Companies (RICs) under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
Consequently, the Company may not have the funds or the ability
to fund new investments, to make additional investments in its
portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded commitments to
portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the
illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make it difficult
for the Company to
S-66
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
sell these investments when desired and, if the Company is
required to sell these investments, it may realize significantly
less than their recorded value.
Use of
Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information
that is currently available to the Company and on various other
assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most
significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are the
valuation of investments and revenue recognition.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio
investments at fair value of $939.7 million and
$563.8 million at March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2010, respectively. The portfolio investments
represent 132.0% and 99.1% of net assets at March 31, 2011
and September 30, 2010, respectively, and their fair values
have been determined by the Companys Board of Directors in
good faith in the absence of readily available market values.
Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined
values may differ significantly from the values that would have
been used had a ready market existed for the investments, and
the differences could be material.
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the
requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control
Investments are defined as investments in companies in
which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board
representation; Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5%
and 25% of the voting securities; and
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate
Investments.
Fair
Value Measurements:
The Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 820 Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) defines
fair value as the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. A
liabilitys fair value is defined as the amount that would
be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the
amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the
creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable
market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or
parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available
or reliable, valuation techniques are applied. These valuation
techniques involve some level of management estimation and
judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price
transparency for the investments or market and the
investments complexity.
Assets recorded at fair value in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements are categorized based upon the level of
judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair
value.
Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly
related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs
to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted, quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the
measurement date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data at the measurement date for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
S-67
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement
date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the
valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the
model.
|
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of
its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using
market, income and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In
general, the Company utilizes the bond yield method in
determining the fair value of its investments, as long as it is
appropriate. If, in the Companys judgment, the bond yield
approach is not appropriate, it may use the enterprise value
approach in determining the fair value of the Companys
investment in the portfolio company. If there is deterioration
in the credit quality of the portfolio company or an investment
is in workout status, the Company may use alternative
methodologies, including an asset liquidation or expected
recovery model.
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise
value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is
no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact,
for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best
expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company
derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the
enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes
various factors, including the portfolio companys
historical and projected financial results. Typically, private
companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows,
net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The
Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual
audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial
statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming
fiscal year.
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and
analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the
future free cash flows of the business.
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield
models to determine the present value of the future cash flow
streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various
sources of transactional data, including private mergers and
acquisitions involving debt investments with similar
characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation
process.
The Companys Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step
valuation process each quarter in connection with determining
the fair value of the Companys investments:
|
|
|
|
|
The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of the Investment Adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit the reports to the Company;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
S-68
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in the Companys portfolio in
good faith.
|
The fair value of all of the Companys investments at
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 was determined
by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is solely
responsible for the valuation of the portfolio investments at
fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to the
Companys valuation policy and a consistently applied
valuation process.
The Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms
to provide valuation assistance. Upon completion of their
processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide
the Company with written reports regarding the preliminary
valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of
such quarter. The Company will continue to engage independent
valuation firms to provide assistance regarding the
determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities
each quarter; however, the Board of Directors is ultimately and
solely responsible for determining the fair value of the
Companys investments in good faith.
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the
difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of
portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses
may also be recorded in connection with the Companys
determination that certain investments are considered worthless
securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
Investment
Income:
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments
when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In
connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives
nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation
process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company
receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost
basis in its investment between its debt securities and its
nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting
discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest
income over the life of the loan.
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded
as dividend income when the distribution is received.
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a
payment-in-kind
or PIK interest provision. PIK interest is computed
at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement
and added to the principal balance of the investment and
recorded as income.
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees
that the Company receives in connection with its debt
investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination
fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees
received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income
from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the
straight line method or effective interest method as applicable,
over the life of the investment.
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its
portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of
those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon
the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the
maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full
prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are
payable upon the exit of a debt security, and a percentage of
these fees are included in net investment income over the life
of the loan. The receipt of such fees is contingent upon a
successful exit event for each of the investments.
S-69
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when
acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with
financial institutions and, at times, cash held in bank accounts
may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured
limit. Included in cash and cash equivalents is
$0.6 million that is held at Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (Wells Fargo) in connection with the
Companys three-year credit facility. The Company is
restricted in terms of access to this cash until such time as
the Company submits its required monthly reporting schedules and
Wells Fargo verifies the Companys compliance per the terms
of the credit agreement.
Deferred
Financing Costs:
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in
connection with the closing of credit facilities and are
capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are
amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the
respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is
included in interest expense in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Collateral
Posted to Bank:
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral
with respect to the Companys interest rate swap. The
Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral
until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires.
Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
Interest
Rate Swap:
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its
interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through
its Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Offering
Costs:
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the public offer and sale of the Companys
common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees.
$0.5 million of offering costs have been charged to capital
during the six months ended March 31, 2011.
Income
Taxes:
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on
the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed
currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company intends
to distribute between 90% and 100% of its taxable income and
gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the Company
anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state income
tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a
federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its
taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year
2011). The Company anticipates timely distribution of its
taxable income within the tax rules; however, the Company
incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for calendar years 2008
2009 and 2010. In addition, the Company may incur a federal
excise tax in future years.
The purpose of the Companys taxable subsidiaries is to
permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio
companies which are pass through entities for
federal tax purposes in order to comply with the source
income requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements.
The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company
for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a
result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This
income tax expense, if any, would be reflected in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its
taxable subsidiaries income taxes. Using this method, the
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary
differences between financial
S-70
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In addition,
the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits associated with net
operating carry forwards that it may use to offset future tax
obligations. The Company measures deferred tax assets and
liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which it expects to recover or
settle those temporary differences.
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(ASC 740) provides guidance for how uncertain tax
positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether
the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year.
Managements determinations regarding ASC 740 may be
subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon
factors including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of
tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company
recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only
where the position is more likely than not to be
sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management
has analyzed the Companys tax positions, and has concluded
that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be
recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns
filed for open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in
the Companys 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its
major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State,
and the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it
is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized
tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair
Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving
disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant
transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. The disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective
for fiscal years after December 15, 2010 and for the
interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for certain
detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective for
fiscal years after December 15, 2010 and interim periods
within those years, the new guidance became effective for the
Companys fiscal 2010 second quarter. The adoption of this
disclosure-only guidance is included in Note 3
Portfolio Investments and did not have an impact on the
Companys consolidated financial results.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At March 31, 2011, 132.0% of net assets or
$939.7 million was invested in 55 long-term portfolio
investments and 5.4% of net assets or $38.6 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at
September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or
$563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio
investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of March 31,
2011, primarily all of the Companys debt investments were
secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the
portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity
investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of
common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company
interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity
for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do
not produce a current return, but are held for potential
investment appreciation and capital gain.
During the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the
Company recorded net realized losses on investments of
$0.5 million and $14.0 million, respectively. During
the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
recorded net realized losses on investments of $2.9 million
and $2.8 million, respectively. During the three and six
months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded net
unrealized depreciation of
S-71
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$0.4 million and net unrealized appreciation of
$16.5 million, respectively. During the three and six
months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded net
unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million and
$2.2 million, respectively.
The composition of the Companys investments as of
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 at cost and fair
value was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities
|
|
$
|
939,758,904
|
|
|
$
|
928,817,827
|
|
|
$
|
585,529,301
|
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
Investments in equity securities
|
|
|
13,434,303
|
|
|
|
10,931,226
|
|
|
|
6,967,294
|
|
|
|
5,241,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
953,193,207
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of the Companys debt investments as of
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 at fixed rates
and floating rates was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt securities
|
|
$
|
375,510,714
|
|
|
|
40.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
375,584,242
|
|
|
|
67.24
|
%
|
Floating rate debt securities
|
|
|
553,307,113
|
|
|
|
59.57
|
%
|
|
|
182,995,709
|
|
|
|
32.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
928,817,827
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value as of March 31, 2011, by caption on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
821,884,661
|
|
|
$
|
821,884,661
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,586,455
|
|
|
|
82,586,455
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,346,711
|
|
|
|
24,346,711
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,559,714
|
|
|
|
4,559,714
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,371,512
|
|
|
|
6,371,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
197,121
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,946,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-72
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value as of September 30, 2010, by caption on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument
within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable
factors are the most significant to the overall fair value
measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or
Level 3 components, observable components (that is,
components that are actively quoted and can be validated by
external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation)
in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part
to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011
for all investments for which the Company determines fair value
using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
642,402,398
|
|
|
$
|
85,394,636
|
|
|
$
|
4,221,399
|
|
|
$
|
3,963,240
|
|
|
$
|
6,413,662
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
New investments & net revolver activity
|
|
|
196,101,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,098,928
|
|
|
|
999,000
|
|
|
|
904,786
|
|
|
|
219,104,286
|
|
Redemptions/repayments
|
|
|
(17,074,472
|
)
|
|
|
(2,679,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,754,134
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
1,895,461
|
|
|
|
(241,057
|
)
|
|
|
214,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869,314
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
337,962
|
|
|
|
82,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,290
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(2,844,253
|
)
|
|
|
119,105
|
|
|
|
(388,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,114,037
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
1,334,579
|
|
|
|
(88,895
|
)
|
|
|
(799,637
|
)
|
|
|
(148,680
|
)
|
|
|
(903,786
|
)
|
|
|
(606,419
|
)
|
Net change from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
(268,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253,846
|
)
|
|
|
(43,150
|
)
|
|
|
(565,582
|
)
|
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
821,884,661
|
|
|
$
|
82,586,455
|
|
|
$
|
24,346,711
|
|
|
$
|
4,559,714
|
|
|
$
|
6,371,512
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-73
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2011 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,065,992
|
|
|
$
|
(88,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
(799,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
(402,526
|
)
|
|
$
|
(946,936
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,172,002
|
)
|
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010,
for all investments for which the Company determines fair value
using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
280,768,502
|
|
|
$
|
152,254,769
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,661,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,008,446
|
|
|
$
|
436,693,540
|
|
New investments & net revolver activity
|
|
|
38,267,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,914
|
|
|
|
38,748,852
|
|
Redemptions/repayments
|
|
|
(1,757,500
|
)
|
|
|
(13,252,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,003
|
)
|
|
|
(15,080,537
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
1,274,728
|
|
|
|
920,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,195,173
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
124,757
|
|
|
|
102,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,484
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(548,719
|
)
|
|
|
360,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,743
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(408,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,828,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,413,558
|
|
|
|
1,176,711
|
|
Net change from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,297,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,908,084
|
)
|
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
317,721,667
|
|
|
$
|
137,946,991
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,661,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,534,915
|
|
|
$
|
460,865,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2010 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(408,039
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,801,978
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,116,558
|
|
|
$
|
(2,093,459
|
)
|
S-74
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011
for all investments for which the Company determines fair value
using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
$
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
$
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
$
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
New investments & net revolver activity
|
|
|
425,949,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,064,910
|
|
|
|
2,036,112
|
|
|
|
4,727,894
|
|
|
|
453,778,568
|
|
Redemptions/repayments
|
|
|
(20,887,909
|
)
|
|
|
(52,567,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,455,289
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
3,690,849
|
|
|
|
(4,213,530
|
)
|
|
|
426,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,020
|
)
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
494,029
|
|
|
|
314,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
808,927
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(7,121,126
|
)
|
|
|
917,653
|
|
|
|
(388,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,592,362
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
17,154,014
|
|
|
|
283,566
|
|
|
|
(1,160,717
|
)
|
|
|
(114,687
|
)
|
|
|
(662,462
|
)
|
|
|
15,499,714
|
|
Net change from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
(13,718,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253,846
|
)
|
|
|
(43,150
|
)
|
|
|
(14,015,801
|
)
|
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
821,884,661
|
|
|
$
|
82,586,455
|
|
|
$
|
24,346,711
|
|
|
$
|
4,559,714
|
|
|
$
|
6,371,512
|
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2011 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
six months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
6,625,331
|
|
|
$
|
503,467
|
|
|
$
|
(1,160,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(368,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(705,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,893,936
|
|
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2009 to March 31, 2010,
for all investments for which the Company determines fair value
using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
$
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,471
|
|
|
$
|
800,266
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
New investments & net revolver activity
|
|
|
170,031,723
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,886
|
|
|
|
176,666,609
|
|
Redemptions/repayments
|
|
|
6,708,213
|
|
|
|
(21,290,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,003
|
)
|
|
|
(14,652,923
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
2,061,244
|
|
|
|
1,570,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,631,753
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
232,289
|
|
|
|
216,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,427
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(4,564,359
|
)
|
|
|
456,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,107,528
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
1,235,615
|
|
|
|
(2,299,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227,648
|
)
|
|
|
3,467,766
|
|
|
|
2,176,005
|
|
Net change from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,297,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,908,084
|
)
|
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
317,721,667
|
|
|
$
|
137,946,991
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,661,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,534,915
|
|
|
$
|
460,865,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-75
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2010 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
six months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,235,615
|
|
|
$
|
(3,514,541
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(227,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,170,766
|
|
|
$
|
(1,335,808
|
)
|
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective
October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation
techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt
investments where there is not a readily available market value
(Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company
estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by
first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company
which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise
value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various
factors, including the portfolio companies historical and
projected financial results. Typically, private companies are
valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income,
revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the
Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics,
discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In
some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a
discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a
portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may
have provided the best indication of enterprise value.
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment
of the Companys debt, the fair value of the Level 3
loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the
amortized original issue discount unless the borrowers
condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value
at a different amount.
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a
bond yield model to value these investments based on the present
value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the
model are market interest rates for debt with similar
characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio
companys credit risk. The credit risk component of the
valuation considers several factors including financial
performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral
position.
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of
$85.6 million and $49.5 million of unfunded
commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies
or to fund limited partnership interests as of March 31,
2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Such commitments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess
of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities and are not reflected on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
S-76
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments
(consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership
interests) as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010
is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
877,895
|
|
|
|
966,360
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
583,522
|
|
|
|
864,175
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
5,159,479
|
|
|
|
9,062,453
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,623,148
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
Specialty Bakers, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
4,879,435
|
|
|
|
4,798,897
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership
interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
IOS Acquisitions, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
|
|
|
2,142,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,593,188
|
|
|
$
|
49,515,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-77
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summaries of the composition of the Companys investment
portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total
investments are shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
819,025,973
|
|
|
|
85.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
430,200,694
|
|
|
|
72.61
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
95,052,449
|
|
|
|
9.97
|
%
|
|
|
150,600,807
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
25,680,482
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
4,727,800
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
6,216,015
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
2,330,305
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
6,679,705
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
4,467,524
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
538,583
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
953,193,207
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
821,884,661
|
|
|
|
87.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
82,586,455
|
|
|
|
8.79
|
%
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
24.45
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
24,346,711
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
3,973,327
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
|
625,371
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
6,419,316
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
4,446,529
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
538,583
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United
States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by
geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of
total investments. The geographic composition is determined by
the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio
company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of
the portfolio companys business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
294,387,203
|
|
|
|
30.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
175,370,861
|
|
|
|
29.60
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
236,037,587
|
|
|
|
24.77
|
%
|
|
|
121,104,464
|
|
|
|
20.44
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
185,861,206
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
%
|
|
|
108,804,931
|
|
|
|
18.36
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
155,539,266
|
|
|
|
16.32
|
%
|
|
|
133,879,457
|
|
|
|
22.60
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
81,367,945
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
|
53,336,882
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
953,193,207
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
285,198,168
|
|
|
|
30.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
161,264,153
|
|
|
|
28.60
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
222,098,808
|
|
|
|
23.63
|
%
|
|
|
107,468,588
|
|
|
|
19.07
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
191,004,149
|
|
|
|
20.33
|
%
|
|
|
109,457,070
|
|
|
|
19.41
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
157,478,117
|
|
|
|
16.76
|
%
|
|
|
131,881,487
|
|
|
|
23.39
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
83,969,811
|
|
|
|
8.93
|
%
|
|
|
53,750,018
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-78
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The composition of the Companys portfolio by industry at
cost and fair value as of March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
176,032,901
|
|
|
|
18.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,443,639
|
|
|
|
14.76
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
72,090,715
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
49,879,168
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
49,479,327
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
Oil & gas equipment & services
|
|
|
45,265,873
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
42,845,187
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
44,901,602
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
41,033,487
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
39,661,650
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Specialty stores
|
|
|
39,397,846
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
33,276,524
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
32,940,708
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
31,724,188
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
28,208,636
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
26,449,828
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
26,375,460
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
30,415,200
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
21,210,996
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
20,847,571
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
19,672,717
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,264,166
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Advertising
|
|
|
19,017,503
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
19,828,343
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
17,394,699
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,520,365
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
13,127,545
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Other diversified financial services
|
|
|
11,361,007
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,299,306
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
6,702,285
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
6,583,589
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
6,578,609
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
5,688,981
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
5,356,187
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
4,102,646
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
12,485,385
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
538,583
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
953,193,207
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-79
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
182,188,812
|
|
|
|
19.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
89,261,760
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
73,502,072
|
|
|
|
7.82
|
%
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
51,108,396
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
50,647,896
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
Oil & gas equipment & services
|
|
|
46,264,452
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
41,862,450
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Specialty stores
|
|
|
40,543,509
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
36,421,748
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
34,550,016
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
33,990,412
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
33,563,929
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
30,022,053
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
42,110,738
|
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
28,218,378
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
27,148,196
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
27,139,588
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
30,316,811
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
21,951,082
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
21,395,889
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,744,856
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Advertising
|
|
|
19,354,331
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
19,847,065
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
17,896,977
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
14,899,970
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,763,520
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
12,969,641
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
Other diversified financial services
|
|
|
11,700,000
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,907,395
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
6,859,256
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
6,705,597
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
6,697,319
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
5,639,672
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
4,055,655
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
3,897,412
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
3,338,378
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
12,099,935
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
538,583
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
939,749,053
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investments are generally in small and
mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the Company had
no single investment that represented greater than 10% of the
total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting of
interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and
realization of gains or losses, can fluctuate upon repayment or
sale of an investment and in any given year can be highly
concentrated among several investments. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, no individual
investment produced income that exceeded 10% of investment
income.
S-80
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of
business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are
capitalized and amortized in accordance with
ASC 310-20
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with
ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted
against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such
as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as
fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the six months
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Beginning unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
11,900,871
|
|
|
$
|
5,589,630
|
|
Net fees received
|
|
|
10,589,519
|
|
|
|
6,469,801
|
|
Unearned fee income recognized
|
|
|
(3,997,160
|
)
|
|
|
(2,312,436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
18,493,230
|
|
|
$
|
9,746,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had structured
$7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio
investments upon the future exit of those investments. These
fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of
(i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the
assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan,
or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs.
Exit fees are fees which are payable upon the exit of a debt
investment and a portion of these fees is included in net
investment income over the period of the loan. The receipt of
such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of
the investments.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding
partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for
12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An
additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders
in cash.
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public
offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the
offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled
$129.5 million after deducting investment banking
commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of
$1.8 million.
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of
$0.7 million.
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock,
which included the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per
share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million
and offering costs of $0.3 million.
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at
the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional
shares being sold as part of the underwriters partial
exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25,
2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million
and offering costs of $0.5 million.
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, amendments to the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 49,800,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares and to remove the Companys
authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
S-81
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of
$0.5 million.
On December 7, 2010, the Company entered into an
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of its common
stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, the Company sold
429,110 shares of its common stock at an average offering
price of $11.87 per share. The net proceeds totaled
$5.0 million after deducting fees and commissions of
$0.1 million. The Company terminated the
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011
and did not sell any shares of the Companys common stock
pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
On February 4, 2011, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 11,500,000 shares of its common stock,
which included the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $12.65 per
share. The net proceeds totaled $138.6 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $6.5 million
and offering costs of $0.3 million.
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets
and Liabilities at March 31, 2011. The following table sets
forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for
computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
62,120,473
|
|
|
|
43,019,350
|
|
|
|
58,339,723
|
|
|
|
40,421,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per
share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared
and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the
dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP), on its common
stock from inception to March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record
|
|
Payment
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cash
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
Date Declared
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Issued
|
|
Value
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
$0.30
|
|
$1.9 million
|
|
133,317
|
|
$1.9 million
|
8/6/2008
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
0.31
|
|
5.1 million
|
|
196,786(1)
|
|
1.9 million
|
12/9/2008
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
0.32
|
|
6.4 million
|
|
105,326
|
|
0.8 million
|
12/9/2008
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
0.33
|
|
6.6 million
|
|
139,995
|
|
0.8 million
|
12/18/2008
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
0.05
|
|
1.0 million
|
|
21,211
|
|
0.1 million
|
4/14/2009
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
0.25
|
|
5.6 million
|
|
11,776
|
|
0.1 million
|
8/3/2009
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
0.25
|
|
7.5 million
|
|
56,890
|
|
0.6 million
|
11/12/2009
|
|
12/10/2009
|
|
12/29/2009
|
|
0.27
|
|
9.7 million
|
|
44,420
|
|
0.5 million
|
1/12/2010
|
|
3/3/2010
|
|
3/30/2010
|
|
0.30
|
|
12.9 million
|
|
58,689
|
|
0.7 million
|
5/3/2010
|
|
5/20/2010
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
0.32
|
|
14.0 million
|
|
42,269
|
|
0.5 million
|
8/2/2010
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
0.10
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
25,425
|
|
0.3 million
|
8/2/2010
|
|
10/6/2010
|
|
10/27/2010
|
|
0.10
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
24,850
|
|
0.3 million
|
8/2/2010
|
|
11/3/2010
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
0.11
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
26,569
|
|
0.3 million
|
8/2/2010
|
|
12/1/2010
|
|
12/29/2010
|
|
0.11
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
28,238
|
|
0.3 million
|
11/30/2010
|
|
1/4/2011
|
|
1/31/2011
|
|
0.1066
|
|
5.4 million
|
|
36,038
|
|
0.5 million
|
11/30/2010
|
|
2/1/2011
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
0.1066
|
|
5.5 million
|
|
29,072
|
|
0.4 million
|
11/30/2010
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
0.1066
|
|
6.5 million
|
|
43,766
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed. |
S-82
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$8 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open
market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed
appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009.
In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of
common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase
program.
In October 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$20 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the
open market at times and in such amounts as the Companys
management deems appropriate, provided it is below the most
recently published net asset value per share. The stock
repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be
limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time
without prior notice.
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a
consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose
subsidiary (Funding), and the Company entered into a
Loan and Servicing Agreement (Agreement), with
respect to a three-year credit facility (Wells Fargo
facility) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank,
National Association (Wachovia), Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional
institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to
time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to
time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion
feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the
facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at
LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of
November 16, 2012.
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility.
Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional
$50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the
facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an
accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of
that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of
$150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells
Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date
of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two
additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each
of the lender parties thereto.
On November 5, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from
time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of the
Companys portfolio companies. The letters of credit are
subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base
limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
On February 28, 2011, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to, among other things, reduce the interest rate to
LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the
maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company
concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement
with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding
certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will
originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells
Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity
interests in Funding as security for the payment of
Fundings obligations under the Agreement and other
documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo
facility.
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo
facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other
things (i) make representations and warranties regarding
the collateral as well as each of their businesses,
(ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and
(iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures,
limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting
requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit
facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include
S-83
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to
make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of
Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially
perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the
facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate
repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely
affecting the Companys liquidity, financial condition and
results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance
with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of
Funding, and all of the Companys equity interest in
Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the
Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination
activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan
origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding
will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at
any particular time or at all. As of March 31, 2011, the
Company had $60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under
the Wells Fargo facility.
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year
secured syndicated revolving credit facility (ING
facility) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Agreement (ING Credit Agreement) with certain
lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as
administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to
borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate
based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus
0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and had a maturity
date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the
Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as
the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility
was $90 million, and the ING facility included an accordion
feature that allowed for potential future expansion of the
facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is
secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, as
well as the assets of two of the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.,
subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity
interests in the Companys SBIC subsidiary and equity
interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge
and Security Agreement (ING Security Agreement)
entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among
FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as
collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Companys
SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and
their respective assets have not been pledged in connection
therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use
the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for
general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding
leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities,
convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other
investments.
On February 22, 2011, the Company amended the ING facility
to, among other things, expand the borrowing capacity to
$215 million. In addition, the ING facilitys
accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future
expansion up to a total of $300 million and the maturity
date was extended to February 22, 2014.
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING
Security Agreement, including the Companys obligations to
the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit
Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity
interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to
the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security
Agreement.
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the
ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.
and the Company to, among other things (i) make
representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well
as each of the Companys businesses, (ii) agree to
certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to
comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other
customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING
facility documents also include usual and customary default
provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the
facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure
by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit
Agreement and related
S-84
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with,
could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby
materially and adversely affecting the Companys liquidity,
financial condition and results of operations. The Company is
currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the
ING facility.
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The
Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds
under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $74.0 million of
borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
As of March 31, 2011, except for assets that were funded
through the Companys SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of
the Companys assets were pledged as collateral under the
Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
Interest expense for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2011 was $2.7 million and $4.7 million,
respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010 was $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 7.
|
Interest
and Dividend Income
|
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent
that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance
with the Companys policy, accrued interest is evaluated
periodically for collectability. The Company stops accruing
interest on investments when it is determined that interest is
no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies
are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is
received.
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a PIK
interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents
contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that
is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally
recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are
expected to be collected. The Company generally ceases accruing
PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the
accrual or if the Company does not expect the portfolio company
to be able to pay all principal and interest due. The
Companys decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves
subjective judgments and determinations based on available
information about a particular portfolio company, including
whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its
payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt
securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company; the
Companys assessment of the portfolio companys
business development success, including product development,
profitability and the portfolio companys overall adherence
to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in
connection with periodic formal update interviews with the
portfolio companys management and, if appropriate, the
private equity sponsor; and information about the general
economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company
operates. Based on this and other information, the Company
determines whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or
debt security. The Companys determination to cease
accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally
made well before the Companys full write-down of such loan
or debt security.
S-85
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the six months ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
PIK balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19,300,954
|
|
|
$
|
12,059,478
|
|
Gross PIK interest accrued
|
|
|
7,001,665
|
|
|
|
5,187,143
|
|
PIK income reserves
|
|
|
(386,574
|
)
|
|
|
(920,196
|
)
|
PIK interest received in cash
|
|
|
(6,711,111
|
)
|
|
|
(635,194
|
)
|
Adjustments due to loan exits
|
|
|
(316,258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,143,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
18,888,676
|
|
|
$
|
14,547,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had stopped accruing cash
interest, PIK interest and original issue discount
(OID) on three investments that did not pay all of
their scheduled cash interest payments for the period ended
March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had
stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on four investments,
including two investments that had not paid all of their
scheduled cash interest payments.
The non-accrual status of the Companys portfolio
investments as of March 31, 2011, September 30, 2010
and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Income non-accrual amounts for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
$
|
1,460,163
|
|
|
$
|
1,311,024
|
|
|
$
|
3,566,595
|
|
|
$
|
2,445,588
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
146,184
|
|
|
|
451,313
|
|
|
|
386,574
|
|
|
|
920,196
|
|
OID income
|
|
|
30,138
|
|
|
|
103,911
|
|
|
|
60,276
|
|
|
|
207,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,636,485
|
|
|
$
|
1,866,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,013,445
|
|
|
$
|
3,573,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8.
|
Taxable/Distributable
Income and Dividend Distributions
|
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net
assets resulting from operations primarily due to:
(1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments,
as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable
income until they are realized; (2) origination fees
received in connection with investments in portfolio companies,
which are amortized into interest income over the life of the
investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon
receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs;
(4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and
(5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.
S-86
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss
carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains,
to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss
carryforward will expire in the Companys tax year ending
September 30, 2017. During the year ended
September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses
from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year
end (post-October capital losses) of
$12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as
arising on the first day of the following year.
Listed below is a reconciliation of net increase in net
assets resulting from operations to taxable income for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
15,671,000
|
|
|
$
|
33,119,000
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation
|
|
|
372,000
|
|
|
|
(16,470,000
|
)
|
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
|
|
|
3,114,000
|
|
|
|
6,592,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to organizational and deferred offering
costs
|
|
|
(22,000
|
)
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
1,726,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
|
|
|
513,000
|
|
|
|
13,963,000
|
|
Other book-tax differences
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
121,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable/Distributable Income(1)
|
|
$
|
20,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,008,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys taxable income for 2011 is an estimate and
will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax
return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the
estimate. |
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date.
The Company is required to distribute annually to its
stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net
realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized
long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be
eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter
M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend
all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid
out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is
based on managements estimate of the Companys annual
taxable income. The Company maintains an opt out
dividend reinvestment plan for its stockholders.
S-87
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
To date, the Companys Board of Directors declared the
following distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Record
|
|
Payment
|
|
Amount
|
Dividend Type
|
|
Declared
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
8/6/2008
|
|
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
Special
|
|
|
12/18/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
4/14/2009
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
8/3/2009
|
|
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
11/12/2009
|
|
|
|
12/10/2009
|
|
|
|
12/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
1/12/2010
|
|
|
|
3/3/2010
|
|
|
|
3/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
5/3/2010
|
|
|
|
5/20/2010
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
10/6/2010
|
|
|
|
10/27/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
11/3/2010
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
12/1/2010
|
|
|
|
12/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
1/4/2011
|
|
|
|
1/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
2/1/2011
|
|
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
1/30/2011
|
|
|
|
4/1/2011
|
|
|
|
4/29/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
1/30/2011
|
|
|
|
5/2/2011
|
|
|
|
5/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
1/30/2011
|
|
|
|
6/1/2011
|
|
|
|
6/30/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that its
distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and
will be reflected as such on the
Form 1099-DIV
for the calendar year 2011. The Company anticipates declaring
further distributions to its stockholders to meet the RIC
distribution requirements.
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax
based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a
calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these
distribution requirements for calendar years 2008, 2009 and 2010
the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those
calendar years.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Realized
Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
|
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between
the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis
of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or
depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments
written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized
losses may also be recorded in connection with the
Companys determination that certain investments are
considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax
rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the
portfolio pursuant to the Companys valuation guidelines
and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized
appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.
S-88
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company
recorded investment realization events, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$8.7 million from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all
obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was
exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of
all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment
was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on
this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the
Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$1.7 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring
resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan
agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the
amount of $3.9 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all
obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was
exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial
satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No
realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Lighting by Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a
material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As
such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$7.8 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50; and
|
|
|
|
In March 2011, the Company received a cash payment of
$5.0 million from AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. as part of a
restructuring of the loan agreement. The restructuring resulted
in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement.
As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$0.3 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50.
|
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
recorded investment realization events, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the
amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of
all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan
agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company
recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously
recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in
American Hardwoods;
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment of
$3.9 million from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in
partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan
agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, the Company recorded a realized loss in the
amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a
portion of its investment in CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
Note 10.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risks
|
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at
times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit.
The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its
cash with high credit quality financial institutions and
monitoring their financial stability.
S-89
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 11.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement
with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory
agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its
services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of
two components a base management fee and an
incentive fee.
Base
management Fee
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of
the Companys gross assets, which includes any borrowings
for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable
quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value
of the Companys gross assets at the end of each fiscal
quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any
equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The
base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be
appropriately prorated.
On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the
Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following
actions:
|
|
|
|
|
To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio
investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of
the management fee waived was $727,000; and
|
|
|
|
To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee
attributable to the Companys assets held in the form of
cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter
beginning March 31, 2010.
|
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as
defined in the notes to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the net
base management fees were $4.8 million and
$8.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010, the net base management fees were
$2.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. At
March 31, 2011, the Company had a liability on its
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount
of $4.8 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the base
management fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
Incentive
Fee
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement
has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable
quarterly in arrears based on the Companys
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose,
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means
interest income, dividend income and any other income (including
any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company
receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal
quarter, minus the Companys operating expenses for the
quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable
under the Companys administration agreement with FSC,
Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding
the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest
feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with
PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that
the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains,
realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of the Companys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter,
will be compared to a hurdle rate of 2% per quarter
(8% annualized), subject to a
catch-up
provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The
Companys net investment income used to calculate this part
of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross
assets used to
S-90
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the
incentive fee with respect to the Companys Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any
fiscal quarter in which the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle);
|
|
|
|
100% of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee
Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but
is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company
refers to this portion of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal
to 2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of the Companys Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when
the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal
quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser
once the hurdle is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
|
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable
in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon
termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the
termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and
equals 20% of the Companys realized capital gains, if any,
on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each
fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and
unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the
aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive
fees.
GAAP requires the Company to accrue for the theoretical capital
gains incentive fee that would be payable after giving effect to
the net realized and unrealized capital appreciation and
depreciation. It should be noted that a fee so calculated and
accrued would not necessarily be payable under the Investment
Advisory Agreement, and may never be paid based upon the
computation of capital gains incentive fees in subsequent
periods. Amounts ultimately paid under the Investment Advisory
Agreement will be consistent with the formula reflected in the
Investment Advisory Agreement.
The Company does not currently accrue for capital gains
incentive fees due to the accumulated realized and unrealized
losses in the portfolio.
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011,
incentive fees were $4.1 million and $7.7 million,
respectively. For the three and six months ended March 31,
2010, incentive fees were $2.8 million and
$4.9 million, respectively, and were comprised solely of
incentive fees related to the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee
Net Investment Income. At March 31, 2011, the Company had a
liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and
Liabilities in the amount of $4.1 million reflecting the
unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to the Investment
Adviser.
Indemnification
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard
of their respective duties and obligations, the Companys
Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and
any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to
indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities,
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees
and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the
rendering of the
S-91
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investment Advisers services under the investment advisory
agreement or otherwise as the Companys Investment Adviser.
Administration
Agreement
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement
with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative
services for the Company, including office facilities and
equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services
at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC,
Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the
Companys required administrative services, which includes
being responsible for the financial records which the Company is
required to maintain and preparing reports to the Companys
stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC,
Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the
Companys net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of the Companys tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to the Companys stockholders, and
generally overseeing the payment of the Companys expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services,
facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the
allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by
FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration
agreement, including rent and the Companys allocable
portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the
Companys chief financial officer and chief compliance
officer and their staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined
to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for
the Company by its chief compliance officer. However, although
FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such
reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease
to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide,
on the Companys behalf, managerial assistance to the
Companys portfolio companies. The administration agreement
may be terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party.
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the
Company accrued administrative expenses of $0.6 million,
including $0.2 million of general and administration
expenses, and $1.3 million, including $0.6 million of
general and administration expenses, that are due to FSC, Inc.,
respectively. At March 31, 2011, $0.8 million was
included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the Consolidated Statement of
Assets and Liabilities.
S-92
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 12. Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and
interest rate swap
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.57
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
Per share market value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12.14
|
|
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
13.35
|
|
|
$
|
11.61
|
|
|
$
|
13.35
|
|
|
$
|
11.61
|
|
Total return(1)
|
|
|
12.61
|
%
|
|
|
10.89
|
%
|
|
|
26.04
|
%
|
|
|
11.44
|
%
|
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
55,059,057
|
|
|
|
37,923,407
|
|
|
|
54,550,290
|
|
|
|
37,878,987
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
66,667,933
|
|
|
|
45,282,596
|
|
|
|
66,667,933
|
|
|
|
45,282,596
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
574,919,813
|
|
|
$
|
410,257,351
|
|
|
$
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
$
|
410,556,071
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
711,748,097
|
|
|
$
|
484,397,005
|
|
|
$
|
711,748,097
|
|
|
$
|
484,397,005
|
|
Average net assets(2)
|
|
$
|
662,783,066
|
|
|
$
|
456,501,106
|
|
|
$
|
616,969,193
|
|
|
$
|
432,914,471
|
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(3)
|
|
|
10.13
|
%
|
|
|
9.96
|
%
|
|
|
9.95
|
%
|
|
|
9.06
|
%
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets(3)
|
|
|
8.04
|
%
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
|
|
7.94
|
%
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
Weighted average outstanding debt(4)
|
|
$
|
224,511,111
|
|
|
$
|
11,928,015
|
|
|
$
|
162,925,275
|
|
|
$
|
6,151,216
|
|
Average debt per share
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market
value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided
by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment
prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return is not annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated based upon the daily weighted average net assets for
the period. |
|
(3) |
|
Interim periods are annualized. |
|
(4) |
|
Calculated based upon the daily weighted average of loans
payable for the period. |
The Companys restated certificate of incorporation had not
authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on
April 4, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate
of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common
stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred
stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of
$500 per share (Series A Preferred Stock) and
authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of
Series A
S-93
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred Stock. A certificate of amendment was also approved by
the holders of a majority of the shares of the Companys
outstanding common stock through a written consent first
solicited on April 7, 2008.
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, an amendment to the Companys restated certificate
of incorporation to remove the Companys authority to issue
shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
|
|
Note 14.
|
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest
rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse
fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of
$100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the
Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a
floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as
of March 31, 2011 was 0.24%. For the three and six months
ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded
$0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of
unrealized appreciation related to this swap agreement. As of
March 31, 2011, this swap agreement had a fair value of
$0.2 million which is included in collateral posted
to bank and other assets in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company posted $1.5 million
of cash as collateral with respect to the interest rate swap.
The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral
until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires.
Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which
could result from changes in the market values of underlying
assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a
result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the
total amount of potential losses that the Company could
ultimately incur.
|
|
Note 15.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On April 12, 2011, the Company closed a private offering of
$150 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.375%
convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior
notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as
defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act. The Company has granted the initial
purchasers for the offering the option, which expires
May 7, 2011, to purchase up to an additional
$22.5 million aggregate principal amount of the convertible
senior notes. In addition, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, the
Companys chief executive officer, purchased
$2 million principal amount of the convertible senior notes
directly from the Company in a private placement.
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at
a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain
circumstances, the convertible senior notes are convertible into
shares of the Companys common stock at an initial
conversion rate of 67.7415 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes, which is
equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$14.76 per share of common stock, subject to customary
anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, if certain corporate
events occur in respect of the Company, holders of the
convertible senior notes may require the Company to repurchase
for cash all or part of their convertible senior notes at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
convertible senior notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and
unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase
date. The Company does not have the right to redeem the
convertible senior notes prior to maturity. The convertible
senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016, unless
repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to
such date.
S-94
$500,000,000
Fifth Street Finance
Corp.
Common Stock
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of shares of
our common stock in one or more offerings. Our common stock may
be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more
supplements to this prospectus. You should read this prospectus
and the applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you
invest in our common stock.
The offering price per share of our common stock, less any
underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees, will not
be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock
at the time of the offering.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers through agents designated from time to time by us, or
to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement
relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock, and will
disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters
or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount
may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may
not sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of such common stock.
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by
private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize
our portfolios total return by generating current income
from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our
equity investments.
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified
management investment company that has elected to be regulated
as a business development company under the Investment Company
Act of 1940.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol FSC. On March 28, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, the last reported sale price of our
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $13.37 and
$12.14, respectively. We are required to determine the net asset
value per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. Our
net asset value per share of our common stock as of
December 31, 2010 was $10.44.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk,
and should be considered highly speculative. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 12 to read about factors
you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before
investing in our common stock.
This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement
contain important information about us that a prospective
investor should know before investing in our common stock.
Please read this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement before investing and keep them for future reference.
We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This information is available free of charge by contacting us at
10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 or by
telephone at
(914) 286-6800
or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider that
information to be part of this prospectus. The Securities and
Exchange Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that
contains such information.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Prospectus dated March 31, 2011
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, using
the shelf registration process. Under the shelf
registration process, we may offer, from time to time, up to
$500,000,000 of shares of our common stock on terms to be
determined at the time of the offering. This prospectus provides
you with a general description of the common stock that we may
offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer common stock,
we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain
specific information about the terms of that offering. The
prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information
contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this
prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement together
with the additional information described under Available
Information and Risk Factors before you make
an investment decision.
i
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any
information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus or any accompanying supplement to this prospectus.
You must not rely on any unauthorized information or
representations not contained in this prospectus or any
accompanying prospectus supplement as if we had authorized it.
This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement do
not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer
to buy any security other than the registered securities to
which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such
an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. The information
contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement is accurate as of the dates on their covers. Our
financial condition, results of operations and prospects may
have changed since that date. To the extent required by law, we
will amend or supplement the information contained in this
prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement to reflect
any material changes to such information subsequent to the date
of the prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement and
prior to the completion of any offering pursuant to the
prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement.
ii
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this
prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the
information that you may want to consider. You should read the
entire prospectus carefully, including the section entitled
Risk Factors before making a decision to invest in
our common stock.
We commenced operations on February 15, 2007 as Fifth
Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street
Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. Unless otherwise noted,
the terms we, us, our and
Fifth Street refer to Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners III, L.P. prior to the merger date and Fifth Street
Finance Corp. on and after the merger date. In addition, the
terms Fifth Street Management and investment
adviser refer to Fifth Street Management LLC, our external
investment adviser.
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by
private equity sponsors. We define small and mid-sized companies
as those with annual revenues between $25 million and
$250 million. Our investment objective is to maximize our
portfolios total return by generating current income from
our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
investments. We are externally managed and advised by Fifth
Street Management LLC, which we also refer to as our
investment adviser.
As of December 31, 2010, we had originated
$907.5 million of funded debt and equity investments and
our portfolio totaled $742.4 million at fair value and was
comprised of 45 investments, 41 of which were in
operating companies and four of which were in private equity
funds. The four investments in private equity funds represented
less than 1% of the fair value of our assets at
December 31, 2010. The 38 debt investments in our
portfolio as of December 31, 2010 had a weighted average
debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation
and Amortization) multiple of 3.24x calculated at the time of
origination of the investment. The weighted average annual yield
of our debt investments as of December 31, 2010 was
approximately 13.2%, of which 11.4% represented cash payments
and 1.8% represented
payment-in-kind,
or PIK, interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred
interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the
end of the loan term and recorded as interest income on an
accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be
collected. For additional information regarding PIK interest and
related risks, see Risk Factors Risks Relating
to Our Business and Structure Our incentive fee may
induce our investment adviser to make speculative
investments and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
Payment-in-Kind
(PIK) Interest.
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to
$75 million and are principally in the form of first and
second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity
component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on
first lien loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from
these loans are superior to second lien investments and offer
superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate
additional second lien and unsecured loans in the future. As of
December 31, 2010, substantially all of our debt
investments were secured by first or second priority liens on
the assets of our portfolio companies. Moreover, we held equity
investments consisting of common stock, preferred stock, or
other equity interests in 21 out of 45 portfolio companies as of
December 31, 2010.
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified
management investment company that has elected to be regulated
as a business development company, or BDC, under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. As
a business development company, we are required to comply with
regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of
debt. We are permitted to, and expect to continue to, finance
our investments through borrowings. However, as a business
development company, we are only generally allowed to borrow
amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940
Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of
leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market
conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed
borrowing. See Regulation Business Development
Company Regulations.
1
We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the
Code. See Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Considerations. As a RIC, we generally will not have
to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders
if we meet certain
source-of-income,
income distribution and asset diversification requirements.
In addition, we have a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed
as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and regulated
by the Small Business Administration, or the SBA.
See Regulation Small Business Investment
Company Regulations. The SBIC license allows us, through
our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures.
We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC, to permit us to exclude
the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the
definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio
we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the
200% asset coverage ratio limitation, we are permitted to borrow
one dollar for every dollar we have in assets less all
liabilities and indebtedness not represented by debt securities
issued by us or loans obtained by us. For example, as of
December 31, 2010, we had approximately $663.9 million
in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented
by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us, which
would permit us to borrow up to approximately
$663.9 million, notwithstanding other limitations on our
borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities.
As a result of our receipt of an exemption from the SEC for our
SBA debt, we have increased capacity to fund up to
$150 million (the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed
debentures an SBIC may currently have outstanding once certain
conditions have been met) of investments with SBA-guaranteed
debentures in addition to being able to fund investments with
borrowings up to the maximum amount of debt that the 200% asset
coverage ratio limitation would allow us to incur. As a result,
we, in effect, are permitted to have a lower asset coverage
ratio than the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation under the
1940 Act and, therefore, we can have more debt outstanding than
assets to cover such debt. For example, we are able to borrow up
to $150 million more than the approximately
$663.9 million permitted under the 200% asset coverage
ratio limit as of December 31, 2010. For additional
information on SBA regulations that affect our access to
SBA-guaranteed debentures, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure Our
SBIC subsidiarys investment adviser has no prior
experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA
regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiarys
investment advisers lack of experience or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our operations. As of
March 31, 2011, we, through our SBIC subsidiary, had a
total of $138.3 million of
SBA-guaranteed
debentures outstanding.
The
Investment Adviser
Our investment adviser is affiliated with Fifth Street Capital
LLC, a private investment firm founded and managed by Leonard M.
Tannenbaum who has led the investment of over $1.4 billion
in small and mid-sized companies, including the investments made
by us, since 1998. Mr. Tannenbaum and his respective
private investment firms have acted as the lead (and often sole)
first or second lien investor in over 80 investment
transactions. The other investment funds managed by these
private investment firms generally are fully committed and,
other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio
companies, are no longer making investments.
We benefit from our investment advisers ability to
identify attractive investment opportunities, conduct diligence
on and value prospective investments, negotiate investments and
manage a diversified portfolio of those investments. The
principals of our investment adviser have broad investment
backgrounds, with prior experience at investment funds,
investment banks and other financial services companies and have
developed a broad network of contacts within the private equity
community. This network of contacts provides our principal
source of investment opportunities.
The principals of our investment adviser are
Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and our
investment advisers managing partner, Bernard D. Berman,
our president, chief compliance officer and secretary and a
partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our
co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment
adviser, Chad Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer, Juan E.
Alva, a partner of our investment adviser, Casey J. Zmijeski, a
partner of our investment adviser and William H. Craig, our
chief financial officer.
2
Business
Strategy
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios
total return by generating current income from our debt
investments and capital appreciation from our equity
investments. We have adopted the following business strategy to
achieve our investment objective:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on our investment advisers strong
relationships with private equity sponsors. Our
investment adviser has developed an extensive network of
relationships with private equity sponsors that invest in small
and mid-sized companies. We believe that the strength of these
relationships is due to a common investment philosophy, a
consistent market focus, a rigorous approach to diligence and a
reputation for delivering on commitments. In addition to being
our principal source of originations, we believe that private
equity sponsors provide significant benefits including
incremental due diligence, additional monitoring capabilities
and a potential source of capital and operational expertise for
our portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
Focus on established small and mid-sized
companies. We believe that there are fewer
finance companies focused on transactions involving small and
mid-sized companies than larger companies, and that this is one
factor that allows us to negotiate favorable investment terms.
Such favorable terms include higher debt yields and lower
leverage levels, more significant covenant protection and
greater equity grants than typical of transactions involving
larger companies. We generally invest in companies with
established market positions, seasoned management teams, proven
products and services and strong regional or national
operations. We believe that these companies possess better
risk-adjusted return profiles than newer companies that are
building management or in early stages of building a revenue
base.
|
|
|
|
Continue our growth of direct originations. As
of December 31, 2010, we directly originated 100% of our
debt investments, although we may not directly originate 100% of
our investments in the future. Over the last several years, the
principals of our investment adviser have developed an
origination strategy designed to ensure that the number and
quality of our investment opportunities allows us to continue to
directly originate substantially all of our investments. We
believe that the benefits of direct originations include, among
other things, our ability to control the structuring of
investment protections and to generate origination and exit fees.
|
|
|
|
Employ disciplined underwriting policies and rigorous
portfolio management. Our investment adviser has
developed an extensive underwriting process which includes a
review of the prospects, competitive position, financial
performance and industry dynamics of each potential portfolio
company. In addition, we perform substantial diligence on
potential investments, and seek to invest along side private
equity sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value.
As part of the monitoring process, our investment adviser will
analyze monthly and quarterly financial statements versus the
previous periods and year, review financial projections, meet
with management, attend board meetings and review all compliance
certificates and covenants.
|
|
|
|
Structure our debt investments to minimize risk of loss and
achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns. We
structure our debt investments on a conservative basis with high
cash yields, cash origination fees, low leverage levels and
strong investment protections. As of December 31, 2010, the
weighted average annualized yield of our debt investments was
approximately 13.2%, which includes a cash component of 11.4%.
Our debt investments have strong protections, including default
penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and
affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien
protection and prohibitions against change of control. We
believe these protections, coupled with the other features of
our investments described above, should allow us to reduce our
risk of capital loss and achieve attractive risk adjusted
returns; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able
to successfully structure our investments to minimize risk of
loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.
|
|
|
|
Benefit from lower, fixed, long-term cost of
capital. The SBIC license held by our
wholly-owned subsidiary allows it to issue SBA-guaranteed
debentures. SBA-guaranteed debentures carry long-term fixed
rates that are generally lower than rates on comparable bank and
other debt. Because we expect lower cost SBA leverage to become
a more significant part of our capital base through our SBIC
subsidiary, our relative cost of debt capital may be lower than
many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we
receive
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
through our SBIC subsidiary represents a stable, long-term
component of our capital structure that should permit the proper
matching of duration and cost compared to our portfolio
investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage the skills and experience of our investment
adviser. The principals of our investment adviser
have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at
private investment funds, investment banks and other financial
services companies and they also have experience managing
distressed companies. We believe that our investment
advisers expertise in valuing, structuring, negotiating
and closing transactions provides us with a competitive
advantage by allowing us to provide financing solutions that
meet the needs of our portfolio companies while adhering to our
underwriting standards.
|
Corporate
Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Bank
Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 and our telephone
number is
(914) 286-6800.
We maintain a website on the Internet at
www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus,
and you should not consider that information to be part of this
prospectus.
Recent
Developments
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.
On February 24, 2011, we amended our secured credit
facility led by ING Capital LLC (the ING facility)
to expand our borrowing capacity to $215 million. In
addition, the ING facilitys accordion feature was
increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total
of $300 million, the maturity date was extended to
February 22, 2014, and, if we obtain a credit rating of BBB
or the equivalent, the interest rate will be reduced from LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, in each
case, with no minimum interest rate, or floor,
payable thereunder. As of March 31, 2011, we had
$74.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING
facility.
On February 28, 2011, we amended our $100 million
secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (the Wells Fargo facility) to reduce our
interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor,
and extend the maturity date of the facility to
February 25, 2014. As of March 31, 2011, there was
$60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells
Fargo facility.
4
THE
OFFERING
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of shares of
our common stock, on terms to be determined at the time of the
offering. Our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms
to be disclosed in one or more prospectus supplements. The
offering price per share of our common stock, less any
underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees, will not
be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock
at the time of the offering.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers by us or through agents designated from time to time
by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of
the offering, including the name or names of any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock by us, the
purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement
between us and our agents or underwriters or among our
underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not
sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of our common stock.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering
of our common stock:
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the
sale of our common stock to make investments in small and
mid-sized companies in accordance with our investment objective
and strategies described in this prospectus, and for general
corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding borrowings. Pending
such use, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high
quality, short-term debt securities consistent with our business
development company election and our election to be taxed as a
RIC. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
FSC |
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
Fifth Street Management serves as our investment adviser. We pay
Fifth Street Management a fee for its services under the
investment advisory agreement consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2% of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for
investment purposes. From and after January 1, 2010, our
investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base
management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of
our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or
hurdle, and a catch up feature. The
second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end
of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment
advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee
Capital Gains, which equals our realized capital gains on
a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year,
if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and
unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the
aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive
fee. See Investment Advisory Agreement. |
|
Administration agreement |
|
FSC, Inc. serves as our administrator. We reimburse our
administrator the allocable portion of overhead and other
expenses incurred by our administrator in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement, including rent
and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and
related expenses of our chief financial officer and chief
compliance officer, and their staff. See Administration
Agreement. Our administrator has voluntarily determined to
forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us
by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his
compensation. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
However, although our administrator currently intends to forgo
its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no
obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the
future. |
|
Distributions |
|
We intend to pay dividends to our stockholders out of assets
legally available for distribution. From our initial public
offering through the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010, we paid
quarterly dividends, but in the first fiscal quarter of 2011 we
began paying, and we intend to continue paying, monthly
dividends to our stockholders. Our distributions, if any, will
be determined by our Board of Directors. |
|
Taxation |
|
We elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we generally
will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net
ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our
stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we
must meet specified source-of-income and asset diversification
requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of our net
ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in
excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any.
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year,
we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of
current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4%
excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income
must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing
the final tax return related to the year which generated such
taxable income. See Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations. |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan for our
stockholders. The dividend reinvestment plan is an opt
out reinvestment plan. As a result, if we declare a
distribution, then stockholders cash distributions will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash distributions.
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock will
be subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences
as stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in
cash; however, since their cash dividends will be reinvested,
such stockholders will not receive cash with which to pay any
applicable taxes on reinvested dividends. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan. |
|
Risk factors |
|
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should consider carefully the information found in
Risk Factors, including the following risks: |
|
|
|
|
|
The current state of the economy and financial markets increases
the likelihood of material adverse effects on our financial
position and results of operations.
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of our investment portfolio is and will
continue to be recorded at fair value as determined in good
faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is and
will continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
|
|
|
|
Our business model depends to a significant extent upon strong
referral relationships with private equity sponsors, and the
inability of the principals of our investment adviser to
maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these
relationships to generate investment opportunities, could
adversely affect our business.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities,
which could reduce returns and result in losses.
|
|
|
|
Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts
invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of
investing in us.
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of our assets could potentially be subject to
security interests under secured credit facilities and if we
default on our obligations under the facilities, we may suffer
adverse consequences, including the lenders foreclosing on our
assets.
|
|
|
|
Because we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our
income to our stockholders in connection with our election to be
treated as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to
finance our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not
available on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be
impaired.
|
|
|
|
Regulations governing our operation as a business development
company and RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in
which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment
purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.
|
|
|
|
Our SBIC subsidiarys investment adviser has no prior
experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA
regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiarys
investment advisers lack of experience or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our operations.
|
|
|
|
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are
unable to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M
of the Code or do not satisfy the annual distribution
requirement.
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to pay you distributions, our distributions
may not grow over time and a portion of our distributions may be
a return of capital.
|
|
|
|
Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we
could lose all or part of our investment.
|
|
|
|
Investing in small and mid-sized companies involves a number of
significant risks. Among other things, these companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet
their obligations under their debt instruments that we hold,
which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any
collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any
guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio
companies that we may have obtained in connection with our
investment, as well as a corresponding decrease in the value of
the equity components of our investments;
|
|
|
|
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines,
smaller market shares and/or significant customer concentrations
than larger businesses, which tend to render them more
vulnerable to competitors actions and market conditions,
as well as general economic downturns;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts
of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability,
resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could
have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in
turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
generally have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly
changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk
of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital
to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position; and
|
|
|
|
generally have less publicly available information about their
businesses, operations and financial condition. If we are unable
to uncover all material information about these companies, we
may not make a fully informed investment decision, and may lose
all or part of our investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with,
or senior to, our investments in such companies.
|
|
|
|
We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging
transactions.
|
|
|
|
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business
development companies, may trade at a discount to their net
asset value.
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net
proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms within an
attractive timeframe.
|
|
|
|
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 12 for a
more complete discussion of these and other risks you should
carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our
common stock. |
|
Leverage |
|
We expect to continue to use leverage to make investments. As a
result, we may continue to be exposed to the risks of leverage,
which include that leverage may be considered a speculative
investment technique. The use of leverage magnifies the
potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore
increases the risks associated with investing in our shares of
common stock. |
|
Available information |
|
We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. This information is available at
the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street,
NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 and on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs public reference room by calling the
SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
This information is also available free of charge by contacting
us at Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor,
White Plains, NY, 10606, by telephone at
(914) 286-6800,
or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. The
information on this website is not incorporated by reference
into this prospectus. |
8
FEES AND
EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the
percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may
vary. Moreover, the information set forth below does not include
any transaction costs and expenses that investors will incur in
connection with each offering of shares of our common stock
pursuant to this prospectus. As a result, investors are urged to
read the Fees and Expenses table contained in any
corresponding prospectus supplement to fully understanding the
actual transaction costs and expenses they will incur in
connection with each such offering. Except where the context
suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a
reference to fees or expenses paid by you,
us or Fifth Street, or that
we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will
indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transaction expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
%(1)
|
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
%(2)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan fees
|
|
|
|
%(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
|
|
%(4)
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable
to common stock):
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
5.07
|
%(5)
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
2.11
|
%(6)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2.32
|
%(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
9.50
|
%(8)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event that our common stock is sold to or through
underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will
disclose the applicable sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
In the event that we conduct on offering of our common stock, a
corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated
offering expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are
included in operating expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses may include sales load
and will be disclosed in a future prospectus supplement, if any. |
|
(5) |
|
Our management fees are made up of our base
management fee and the incentive fees payable under our
investment advisory agreement. The base management fee portion
of our management fees reflected in the table above
is 2.63%, which is calculated based on our net assets (rather
than our gross assets). Our base management fee under the
investment advisory agreement is based on our gross assets,
which includes borrowings for investment purposes. Our
investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base
management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements)
as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As
a result, our base management fee payable from and after such
fiscal quarter will be calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our
gross assets, including any investments made with borrowings,
but excluding any cash and cash equivalents as of the end of
each quarter. See Investment Advisory
Agreement Overview of Our Investment
Adviser Management Fee. |
|
|
|
The incentive fee portion of our management fees is
2.44%. This calculation assumes that annual incentive fees
earned by our investment adviser remain consistent with the
incentive fees earned by our investment adviser during the
quarter ended December 31, 2010. The incentive fee consists
of two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in
arrears, is equal to 20% of the excess, if any, of our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income that exceeds
a 2% quarterly (8% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a
catch up provision measured at the end of each
fiscal quarter. The first part of the incentive fee is computed
and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but
not yet received in cash. The operation of the first part of the
incentive fee for each quarter is as follows: |
|
|
|
no incentive fee is payable to the investment
adviser in any fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle);
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is
less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the investment adviser. We refer to
this portion of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to
2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any
fiscal quarter; and
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal
quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser
(once the hurdle is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved, 20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
thereafter is allocated to the investment adviser).
|
|
|
|
The second part of the incentive fee equals 20% of our
Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which equals our
realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception
through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a
cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously
paid capital gain incentive fees. The second part of the
incentive fee is payable, in arrears, at the end of each fiscal
year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement,
as of the termination date). |
|
(6) |
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds represent our
estimated annual interest payments on borrowed funds and relate
to borrowings under the Wells Fargo facility, the ING facility
and our SBA-guaranteed debentures. |
|
(7) |
|
Other expenses are based on estimated amounts for
the current fiscal year, which are higher than such actual
expenses for the year ended September 30, 2010. |
|
(8) |
|
Total annual expenses is presented as a percentage
of net assets attributable to common stockholders because our
common stockholders bear all of our fees and expenses. |
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount
of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common
stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have
assumed we would have no additional leverage, that none of our
assets are cash or cash equivalents and that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the
table above. In the event that shares to which this prospectus
relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding
prospectus supplement will restate this example to reflect the
applicable sales load and offering expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
3 Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses, and
actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown.
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income portion of our incentive fee
under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5%
annual return, would either not be payable or have an
insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not
included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains,
to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses,
and returns to our investors, would be higher. In addition,
while the example assumes reinvestment of all distributions at
net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan
will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined
by dividing the total dollar amount of the cash distribution
payable to a participant by either (i) the greater of
(a) the current net asset value per share of our common
stock and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our
common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed
by our Board of Directors in the event that we use newly issued
shares to satisfy the share requirements of the divided
reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price,
excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares
of common stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend
reinvestment plan in the event that shares are purchased in the
open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend
reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset
value. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan for additional
information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
10
SELECTED
FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following selected financial data should be read together
with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
and the discussion under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. Effective as of
January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.
merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The financial
information as of and for the period from inception
(February 15, 2007) to September 30, 2007 and for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010,
set forth below was derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes for Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and Fifth Street Finance Corp.,
respectively. The financial information at and for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was derived from
our unaudited financial statements and related notes. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of
normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair
presentation of financial statements for the interim periods,
have been included. The historical financial information below
may not be indicative of our future performance. Our results for
the interim period may not be indicative of our results for the
full year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
At and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and for the period
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
At and for the Year Ended
|
|
|
February 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
25,335
|
|
|
$
|
13,241
|
|
|
$
|
70,538
|
|
|
$
|
49,828
|
|
|
$
|
33,219
|
|
|
$
|
4,296
|
|
Base management fee, net
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
Incentive fee
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
4,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other expenses
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
7,483
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
14,056
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
43,024
|
|
|
|
31,362
|
|
|
|
20,144
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate swap
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
16,106
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
(10,795
|
)
|
|
|
(16,948
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(13,450
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(18,780
|
)
|
|
|
(14,373
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in partners capital/net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
|
|
9,454
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share at period end
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
13.02
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Market price at period end
|
|
|
12.14
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
|
|
11.14
|
|
|
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
10.05
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and
interest rate swap
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
(1.02
|
)
|
|
|
(1.08
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net increase in partners capital/net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Balance Sheet data at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
742,395
|
|
|
$
|
436,694
|
|
|
$
|
563,821
|
|
|
$
|
299,611
|
|
|
$
|
273,759
|
|
|
$
|
88,391
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,021
|
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
76,765
|
|
|
|
113,205
|
|
|
|
22,906
|
|
|
|
17,654
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,360
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
11,340
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
798,776
|
|
|
|
453,199
|
|
|
|
651,926
|
|
|
|
415,887
|
|
|
|
299,149
|
|
|
|
107,330
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
223,856
|
|
|
|
42,941
|
|
|
|
82,754
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Total net assets
|
|
|
574,920
|
|
|
|
410,257
|
|
|
|
569,172
|
|
|
|
410,556
|
|
|
|
294,336
|
|
|
|
106,816
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average annual yield on debt investments(1)
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Number of portfolio companies at period end
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted average annual yield is calculated based upon our debt
investments at the end of the period. |
11
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a number of significant
risks. In addition to the other information contained in this
prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, you
should consider carefully the following information before
making an investment in our common stock. The risks set out
below are not the only risks we face; however, they discuss the
presently known principal risks of investing in our common
stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us might also impair our operations and performance. If any of
the following events occur, our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading
price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose part
or all of your investment.
Risks
Relating to Economic Conditions
The
current state of the economy and financial markets increases the
likelihood of material adverse effects on our financial position
and results of operations.
The U.S. capital markets experienced extreme volatility and
disruption over the past several years, leading to recessionary
conditions and depressed levels of consumer and commercial
spending. Disruptions in the capital markets increased the
spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk
securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital
markets. While recent indicators suggest improvement in the
capital markets, we cannot provide any assurance that these
conditions will not worsen. If these conditions continue or
worsen, the prolonged period of market illiquidity may have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
and results of operations. Unfavorable economic conditions also
could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend
credit to us. These events could limit our investment
originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact
our operating results.
In addition, to the extent that recessionary conditions return,
the financial results of small to mid-sized companies, like
those in which we invest, will likely experience deterioration,
which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt
service requirements and an increase in defaults. Additionally,
the end markets for certain of our portfolio companies
products and services have experienced, and continue to
experience, negative economic trends. The performances of
certain of our portfolio companies have been, and may continue
to be, negatively impacted by these economic or other
conditions, which may ultimately result in our receipt of a
reduced level of interest income from our portfolio companies
and/or
losses or charge offs related to our investments, and, in turn,
may adversely affect distributable income.
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair the ability of our
portfolio companies to repay loans, which, in turn, could
increase our non-performing assets, decrease the value of our
portfolio, reduce our volume of new loans and harm our operating
results, which would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Many of our portfolio companies are and may be susceptible to
economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our
loans during such periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets
are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely
to decrease during such periods. Adverse economic conditions
also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our
loans and the value of our equity investments. In this regard,
as a result of recent economic conditions and their impact on
certain of our portfolio companies, we have agreed to modify the
payment terms of our investments in four of our portfolio
companies as of December 31, 2010. Such modified terms
include changes in
payment-in-kind
interest provisions and/or cash interest rates. These
modifications, and any future modifications to our loan
agreements as a result of the recent economic conditions or
otherwise, may limit the amount of interest income that we
recognize from the modified investments, which may, in turn,
limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
12
Risks
Relating to Our Business and Structure
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
Because we may borrow to fund our investments, a portion of our
net investment income may be dependent upon the difference
between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the
interest rate at which we invest these funds. A portion of our
investments will have fixed interest rates, while a portion of
our borrowings will likely have floating interest rates. As a
result, a significant change in market interest rates could have
a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In
periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds could
increase, which would reduce our net investment income. We may
hedge against such interest rate fluctuations by using standard
hedging instruments such as interest rate swap agreements,
futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable
legal requirements, including without limitation, all necessary
registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission. These activities may limit
our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest
rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse
developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging
transactions could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
have a limited operating history.
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. commenced operations
on February 15, 2007. On January 2, 2008, Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street
Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. As a result, we are
subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties
associated with any new business, including the risk that we
will not achieve our investment objective and that the value of
our common stock could decline substantially.
A
significant portion of our investment portfolio is and will
continue to be recorded at fair value as determined in good
faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is and
will continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio
investments at market value or, if there is no readily available
market value, at fair value as determined by our Board of
Directors. Typically, there is not a public market for the
securities of the privately held companies in which we have
invested and will generally continue to invest. As a result, we
value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in
good faith by our Board of Directors.
Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair
value of our investments include the nature and realizable value
of any collateral, the portfolio companys earnings and its
ability to make payments on its indebtedness, the markets in
which the portfolio company does business, comparison to
comparable publicly-traded companies, discounted cash flow and
other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and
particularly valuations of private securities and private
companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short
periods of time and may be based on estimates, our
determinations of fair value may differ materially from the
values that would have been used if a ready market for these
securities existed. Due to this uncertainty, our fair value
determinations may cause our net asset value on a given date to
materially understate or overstate the value that we may
ultimately realize upon the sale of one or more of our
investments. As a result, investors purchasing our common stock
based on an overstated net asset value would pay a higher price
than the realizable value of our investments might warrant.
Our
ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our
investment advisers ability to support our investment
process; if our investment adviser were to lose any of its
principals, our ability to achieve our investment objective
could be significantly harmed.
As discussed above, we were organized on February 15, 2007.
We have no employees and, as a result, we depend on the
investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of
the principals of our investment adviser. The principals of our
investment adviser evaluate, negotiate, structure, execute,
monitor and service our investments. Our future success will
depend to a significant extent on the continued service and
coordination of the principals of our investment adviser. The
departure of any of these individuals could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment
objective.
13
Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our
investment advisers ability to identify, analyze, invest
in, finance and monitor companies that meet our investment
criteria. Our investment advisers capabilities in
structuring the investment process, providing competent,
attentive and efficient services to us, and facilitating access
to financing on acceptable terms depend on the employment of
investment professionals in adequate number and of adequate
sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions.
To achieve our investment objective, our investment adviser may
need to hire, train, supervise and manage new investment
professionals to participate in our investment selection and
monitoring process. Our investment adviser may not be able to
find investment professionals in a timely manner or at all.
Failure to support our investment process could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
business model depends to a significant extent upon strong
referral relationships with private equity sponsors, and the
inability of the principals of our investment adviser to
maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these
relationships to generate investment opportunities, could
adversely affect our business.
We expect that the principals of our investment adviser will
maintain and develop their relationships with private equity
sponsors, and we will rely to a significant extent upon these
relationships to provide us with potential investment
opportunities. If the principals of our investment adviser fail
to maintain their existing relationships or develop new
relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment
opportunities, we will not be able to grow our investment
portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the principals of
our investment adviser have relationships are not obligated to
provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there
is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment
opportunities for us.
We may
face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which
could reduce returns and result in losses.
We compete for investments with other business development
companies and investment funds (including private equity funds
and mezzanine funds), as well as traditional financial services
companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding.
Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not
available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have
higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than we
have. These characteristics could allow our competitors to
consider a wider variety of investments, establish more
relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible
structuring than we are able to do. We may lose investment
opportunities if we do not match our competitors pricing,
terms and structure. If we are forced to match our
competitors pricing, terms and structure, we may not be
able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may
bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant part of our
competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market for
investments in small and mid-sized companies is underserved by
traditional commercial banks and other financial sources. A
significant increase in the number
and/or the
size of our competitors in this target market could force us to
accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many of
our competitors have greater experience operating under, or are
not subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act
imposes on us as a business development company.
Our
incentive fee may induce our investment adviser to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser may
create an incentive for it to make investments on our behalf
that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the
absence of such compensation arrangement, which could result in
higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic
downturns. The way in which the incentive fee payable to our
investment adviser is determined, which is calculated separately
in two components as a percentage of the income (subject to a
hurdle rate) and as a percentage of the realized gain on
invested capital, may encourage our investment adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments or otherwise
manipulate our income so as to recognize income in quarters
where the hurdle rate is exceeded. Under certain circumstances,
the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default,
which would disfavor the holders of our common stock, including
investors in offerings of common stock pursuant to this
prospectus.
14
The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser also
may create an incentive for our investment adviser to invest on
our behalf in instruments that have a deferred interest feature.
Under these investments, we would accrue the interest over the
life of the investment but would not receive the cash income
from the investment until the end of the investments term,
if at all. Our net investment income used to calculate the
income portion of our incentive fee, however, includes accrued
interest. Thus, a portion of the incentive fee would be based on
income that we have not yet received in cash and may never
receive in cash if the portfolio company is unable to satisfy
such interest payment obligation to us. Consequently, while we
may make incentive fee payments on income accruals that we may
not collect in the future and with respect to which we do not
have a formal claw back right against our investment
adviser per se, the amount of accrued income written off in any
period will reduce the income in the period in which such
write-off was taken and thereby reduce such periods
incentive fee payment.
In addition, our investment adviser receives the incentive fee
based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our
investments. Unlike the portion of the incentive fee based on
income, there is no performance threshold applicable to the
portion of the incentive fee based on net capital gains. As a
result, our investment adviser may have a tendency to invest
more in investments that are likely to result in capital gains
as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice
could result in our investing in more speculative securities
than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher
investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.
Given the subjective nature of the investment decisions made by
our investment adviser on our behalf, we will be unable to
monitor these potential conflicts of interest between us and our
investment adviser.
Our
base management fee may induce our investment adviser to incur
leverage.
The fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our
gross assets, which would include any borrowings for investment
purposes, may encourage our investment adviser to use leverage
to make additional investments. Under certain circumstances, the
use of increased leverage may increase the likelihood of
default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock,
including investors in offerings of common stock pursuant to
this prospectus. Given the subjective nature of the investment
decisions made by our investment adviser on our behalf, we will
not be able to monitor this potential conflict of interest.
Because
we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in
us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in
us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for
loss on invested equity capital. If we continue to use leverage
to partially finance our investments, through borrowings from
banks and others, you will experience increased risks of
investing in our common stock. We, through our SBIC subsidiary,
issue debt securities guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the
capital markets. As a result of its guarantee of the debt
securities, the SBA has fixed dollar claims on the assets of our
SBIC subsidiary that are superior to the claims of our common
stockholders. We may also borrow under our credit facilities. If
the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net
asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have
had we not leveraged. Similarly, any decrease in our income
would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would
have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect
our ability to make common stock distribution payments. Leverage
is generally considered a speculative investment technique.
As of December 31, 2010, we, through our SBIC subsidiary,
had $123.3 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed
by the SBA and $89.0 million of outstanding indebtedness
under our credit facilities. The debentures and our credit
facilities require periodic payments of interest. The weighted
average interest rate charged on our borrowings as of
December 31, 2010 was 3.42% (exclusive of deferred
financing costs). We will need to generate sufficient cash flow
to make these required interest payments. If we are unable to
meet the financial obligations under the debentures, the SBA, as
a creditor, will have a superior claim to the assets of our SBIC
subsidiary over our stockholders in the event we liquidate or
the SBA exercises its remedies under such debentures as the
result of a default by us. If we are unable to meet the
financial obligations under our credit facilities, the lenders
under the credit facilities will have a superior to claim to our
assets over our stockholders.
We have received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to
exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA
from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset
coverage ratio we are required to
15
maintain under the 1940 Act. As a result of our receipt of this
relief, we have the ability to incur leverage in excess of the
amounts set forth in the 1940 Act. If we incur additional
leverage in excess of the amounts set forth in the
1940 Act, our net asset value will decline more sharply if
the value of our assets declines than if we had not incurred
such additional leverage and the effects of leverage described
above will be magnified.
Illustration. The following table illustrates
the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our
common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses.
The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual
returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below.
Assumed
Return on Our Portfolio(1)
(net of expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10.0%
|
|
|
-5.0%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
Corresponding net return to common stockholder
|
|
|
-15.16
|
%
|
|
|
-8.21
|
%
|
|
|
-1.26
|
%
|
|
|
5.68
|
%
|
|
|
12.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes $798.8 million in total assets, $212.3 million
in debt outstanding, $574.9 million in net assets, and an
average cost of funds of 3.42%. Actual interest payments may be
different. |
Substantially
all of our assets are subject to security interests under
secured credit facilities or claims of the SBA with respect to
our SBA-guaranteed debentures and if we default on our
obligations thereunder, we may suffer adverse consequences,
including the lenders and/or the SBA foreclosing on our
assets.
As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of our assets
were pledged as collateral under our credit facilities or
subject to a superior claim over our stockholders by the SBA. If
we default on our obligations under these facilities or our
SBA-guaranteed
debentures, the lenders and/or the SBA may have the right to
foreclose upon and sell, or otherwise transfer, the collateral
subject to their security interests or their superior claim. In
such event, we may be forced to sell our investments to raise
funds to repay our outstanding borrowings in order to avoid
foreclosure and these forced sales may be at times and at prices
we would not consider advantageous. Moreover, such deleveraging
of our company could significantly impair our ability to
effectively operate our business in the manner in which we have
historically operated. As a result, we could be forced to
curtail or cease new investment activities and lower or
eliminate the dividends that we have historically paid to our
stockholders.
In addition, if the lenders exercise their right to sell the
assets pledged under our credit facilities, such sales may be
completed at distressed sale prices, thereby diminishing or
potentially eliminating the amount of cash available to us after
repayment of the amounts outstanding under the credit facilities.
Because
we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our income to
our stockholders in connection with our election to be treated
as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance
our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not available
on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be
impaired.
In order to qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs and
to minimize corporate-level taxes, we intend to distribute to
our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable
income, except that we may retain certain net capital gains for
investment, and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to
our stockholders. If we elect to treat any amounts as deemed
distributions, we must pay income taxes at the corporate rate on
such deemed distributions on behalf of our stockholders. As a
result of these requirements, we will likely need to raise
capital from other sources to grow our business. As a business
development company, we generally are required to meet a
coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and
indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total
senior securities, which includes all of our borrowings and any
outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. These
requirements limit the amount that we may borrow. Because we
will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio,
these limitations may prevent us from incurring debt and require
us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be
disadvantageous to do so.
While we expect to be able to borrow and to issue additional
debt and equity securities, we cannot assure you that debt and
equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or
at all. Also, as a business development company, we generally
are not permitted to issue equity securities priced below net
asset value without stockholder
16
approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could
be forced to curtail or cease new investment activities, and our
net asset value and share price could decline.
Our
ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is
restricted.
We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in
certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the
prior approval of the members of our independent directors and,
in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or
indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is
our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and we are generally
prohibited from buying or selling any securities (other than our
securities) from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval
of our independent directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits
certain joint transactions with certain of our
affiliates, which could include investments in the same
portfolio company (whether at the same or different times),
without prior approval of our independent directors and, in some
cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting
securities, we are prohibited from buying or selling any
security (other than any security of which we are the issuer)
from or to such person or certain of that persons
affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with
such person, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar
restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our
officers, or directors or their affiliates. As a result of these
restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any
security (other than any security of which we are the issuer)
from or to any portfolio company of a private equity fund
managed by our investment adviser without the prior approval of
the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities
that would otherwise be available to us.
There
are significant potential conflicts of interest which could
adversely impact our investment returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and certain members of our
investment adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or
principals of entities that operate in the same or a related
line of business as we do or of investment funds managed by our
affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors
in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the
best interests of us or our stockholders. For example,
Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and managing
partner of our investment adviser, is the managing partner of
Fifth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm. Although
the other investment funds managed by Fifth Street Capital LLC
and its affiliates generally are fully committed and, other than
follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, are no
longer making investments, in the future, the principals of our
investment adviser may manage other funds which may from time to
time have overlapping investment objectives with those of us and
accordingly invest in, whether principally or secondarily, asset
classes similar to those targeted by us. If this should occur,
the principals of our investment adviser would face conflicts of
interest in the allocation of investment opportunities to us and
such other funds. Although our investment professionals will
endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and
equitable manner, we and our common stockholders could be
adversely affected in the event investment opportunities are
allocated among us and other investment vehicles managed or
sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers,
directors and members of our investment adviser.
The
incentive fee we pay to our investment adviser relating to
capital gains may be effectively greater than 20%.
As a result of the operation of the cumulative method of
calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee we
pay to our investment adviser, the cumulative aggregate capital
gains fee received by our investment adviser could be
effectively greater than 20%, depending on the timing and extent
of subsequent net realized capital losses or net unrealized
depreciation. For additional information on this calculation,
see the disclosure in footnote 2 to Example 2 under the caption
Investment Advisory Agreement Management
Fee Incentive Fee. We cannot predict whether,
or to what extent, this payment calculation would affect your
investment in our stock.
The
involvement of our investment advisers investment
professionals in our valuation process may create conflicts of
interest.
Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded
securities. As a result, the values of these securities are not
readily available. We value these securities at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon
the recommendation of the Valuation Committee of our Board of
Directors. In connection with that determination, investment
professionals from our investment adviser prepare portfolio
company
17
valuations based upon the most recent portfolio company
financial statements available and projected financial results
of each portfolio company. The participation of our investment
advisers investment professionals in our valuation process
could result in a conflict of interest as our investment
advisers management fee is based, in part, on our gross
assets.
A
failure on our part to maintain our qualification as a business
development company would significantly reduce our operating
flexibility.
If we fail to continuously qualify as a business development
company, we might be subject to regulation as a registered
closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would
significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition,
failure to comply with the requirements imposed on business
development companies by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to
bring an enforcement action against us. For additional
information on the qualification requirements of a business
development company, see the disclosure under the caption
Regulation Business
Development Company Regulations.
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company and
RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise,
additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may
have a negative effect on our growth.
As a result of the annual distribution requirement to qualify
for tax free treatment at the corporate level on income and
gains distributed to stockholders, we need to periodically
access the capital markets to raise cash to fund new
investments. We generally are not able to issue or sell our
common stock at a price below net asset value per share, which
may be a disadvantage as compared with other public companies or
private investment funds. We may, however, sell our common
stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common
stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the
common stock if our Board of Directors and independent directors
determine that such sale is in our best interests and the best
interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders as well as
those stockholders that are not affiliated with us approve such
sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to
be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the
determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates
the market value of such securities (less any underwriting
commission or discount). If our common stock trades at a
discount to net asset value, this restriction could adversely
affect our ability to raise capital.
We also may make rights offerings to our stockholders at prices
less than net asset value, subject to applicable requirements of
the 1940 Act. If we raise additional funds by issuing more
shares of our common stock or issuing senior securities
convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the
percentage ownership of our stockholders may decline at that
time and such stockholders may experience dilution. Moreover, we
can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell
additional equity securities in the future, on terms favorable
to us or at all.
In addition, we may issue senior securities,
including borrowing money from banks or other financial
institutions only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as
defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such
incurrence or issuance. Our ability to issue different types of
securities is also limited. Compliance with these requirements
may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce
our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from
favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and
the rates at which we can lend. As a business development
company, therefore, we may need to issue equity more frequently
than our privately owned competitors, which may lead to greater
stockholder dilution.
We expect to continue to borrow for investment purposes. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the
asset coverage test, which could prohibit us from paying
dividends and could prevent us from qualifying as a RIC. If we
cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to
sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature
of our debt financing, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a
time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize our
portfolio securities to generate cash for funding new
investments. To securitize loans, we would likely create a
wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the
subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a
non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a
portion of the equity in the subsidiary. An inability to
successfully securitize our loan portfolio could
18
limit our ability to grow our business or fully execute our
business strategy and may decrease our earnings, if any. The
securitization market is subject to changing market conditions
and we may not be able to access this market when we would
otherwise deem appropriate. Moreover, the successful
securitization of our portfolio might expose us to losses as the
residual investments in which we do not sell interests will tend
to be those that are riskier and more apt to generate losses.
The 1940 Act also may impose restrictions on the structure of
any securitization.
Our
SBIC subsidiarys investment adviser has no prior
experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA
regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiarys
investment advisers lack of experience or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our operations.
On February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth
Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license,
effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an
SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment
Act of 1958 and is regulated by the SBA. The SBIC license allows
our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed
debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by
the SBA and other customary procedures. The SBA places certain
limitations on the financing terms of investments by SBICs in
portfolio companies and prohibits SBICs from providing funds for
certain purposes or to businesses in a few prohibited
industries. Compliance with SBIC requirements may cause our SBIC
subsidiary to forego attractive investment opportunities that
are not permitted under SBA regulations.
Further, SBA regulations require that a licensed SBIC be
periodically examined and audited by the SBA to determine its
compliance with the relevant SBA regulations. The SBA prohibits,
without prior SBA approval, a change of control of
an SBIC or transfers that would result in any person (or a group
of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or more of a class of
capital stock of a licensed SBIC. If our SBIC subsidiary fails
to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could,
depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit
its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures
immediately due and payable,
and/or limit
it from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke
or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or
willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or any rule or regulation
promulgated thereunder. These actions by the SBA would, in turn,
negatively affect us because our SBIC subsidiary is our
wholly-owned subsidiary. Our SBIC subsidiarys investment
adviser does not have any prior experience managing an SBIC. Its
lack of experience in complying with SBA regulations may hinder
its ability to take advantage of our SBIC subsidiarys
access to SBA-guaranteed debentures.
Any failure to comply with SBA regulations could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including our ability or
inability to make investments in companies that meet our
investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt
securities we acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in
and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized
gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in
our market and general economic conditions. As a result of these
factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as
being indicative of performance in future periods.
Our
Board of Directors may change our investment objective,
operating policies and strategies without prior notice or
stockholder approval, the effects of which may be
adverse.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our
current investment objective, operating policies and strategies
without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot
predict the effect any changes to our current investment
objective, operating policies and strategies would have on our
business, net asset value, operating results and value of our
stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could
negatively impact our ability to pay you distributions and cause
you to lose part or all of your investment.
19
We
will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable
to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the
Code or do not satisfy the annual distribution
requirement.
To maintain RIC status and be relieved of federal taxes on
income and gains distributed to our stockholders, we must meet
the following annual distribution, income source and asset
diversification requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
The annual distribution requirement for a RIC will be satisfied
if we distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least
90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. Because we may use debt financing, we are
subject to an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940
Act and we may be subject to certain financial covenants under
our debt arrangements that could, under certain circumstances,
restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the
distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from
other sources, we could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment
and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
|
|
|
|
The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at
least 90% of our income for each year from dividends, interest,
gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources.
|
|
|
|
The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we
meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of
each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement,
at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash,
cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other acceptable securities; and no more than
25% of the value of our assets can be invested in the
securities, other than U.S. government securities or
securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or more issuers
that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules,
by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related
trades or businesses or of certain qualified publicly
traded partnerships. Failure to meet these requirements
may result in our having to dispose of certain investments
quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most
of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore
will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made
at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.
|
If we fail to qualify for or maintain RIC status or to meet the
annual distribution requirement for any reason and are subject
to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution and the amount of our distributions.
We may
not be able to pay you distributions, our distributions may not
grow over time and a portion of our distributions may be a
return of capital.
We intend to pay distributions to our stockholders out of assets
legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we
will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a
specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year
increases in cash distributions. Our ability to pay
distributions might be adversely affected by, among other
things, the impact of one or more of the risk factors described
in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. In addition,
the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to
us as a business development company can limit our ability to
pay distributions. All distributions will be paid at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our
earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC
status, compliance with applicable business development company
regulations and such other factors as our Board of Directors may
deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that we
will pay distributions to our stockholders in the future.
When we make distributions, we will be required to determine the
extent to which such distributions are paid out of current or
accumulated earnings and profits. Distributions in excess of
current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as
a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of an
investors basis in our stock and, assuming that an
investor holds our stock as a capital asset, thereafter as a
capital gain.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain
amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original
issue discount or accruals on a contingent payment debt
instrument, which may occur if we receive warrants in connection
with the origination of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances including with respect to equity investments in
foreign corporations. Such original issue discount is included
in income before we receive any
20
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement necessary
to be relieved of federal taxes on income and gains distributed
to our stockholders. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of
our investments at times
and/or at
prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt
or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this
purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources,
we may fail to satisfy the annual distribution requirement and
thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
We may
in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which
case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you
receive.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in
our stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be
required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary
income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such
distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to
the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits
for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a
U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to
such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a
U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend
in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than
the amount included in income with respect to the dividend,
depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the
sale. Furthermore, with respect to
non-U.S. stockholders,
we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to
such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such
dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant
number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock
in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, any such sales may put
downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.
In addition, as discussed elsewhere in this prospectus, our
loans typically contain a
payment-in-kind
(PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, computed
at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is
added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as
interest income. To avoid the imposition of corporate-level tax
on us, this non-cash source of income needs to be paid out to
stockholders in cash distributions or, in the event that we
determine to do so, in shares of our common stock, even though
we have not yet collected and may never collect the cash
relating to the PIK interest. As a result, if we distribute
taxable dividends in the form of our common stock, we may have
to distribute a stock dividend to account for PIK interest even
though we have not yet collected the cash.
Our
wholly-owned SBIC subsidiary may be unable to make distributions
to us that will enable us to maintain RIC status, which could
result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.
In order for us to continue to qualify for RIC tax treatment and
to minimize corporate-level taxes, we are required to distribute
substantially all of our net ordinary income and net capital
gain income, including income from certain of our subsidiaries,
which includes the income from our SBIC subsidiary. We are
partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash
distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution
requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing
SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be
necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to
request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for our SBIC
subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC
status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver
and if our SBIC subsidiary is unable to obtain a waiver,
compliance with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC
tax treatment and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax
on us.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business or cause us to alter our business
strategy.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the
local, state and federal level. New legislation may be enacted
or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted,
including those governing the types of investments we are
permitted to make or that impose limits on our ability to pledge
a significant amount of our assets to secure loans, any of which
could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive
effect.
21
Additionally, any changes to the laws and regulations governing
our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to
alter our investment strategy in order to avail ourselves of new
or different opportunities. Such changes could result in
material differences to the strategies and plans set forth in
this prospectus and may result in our investment focus shifting
from the areas of expertise of our investment adviser to other
types of investments in which our investment adviser may have
less expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such
changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and the value of your investment.
We
have identified deficiencies in our internal control over
financial reporting from time to time. Future control
deficiencies could prevent us from accurately and timely
reporting our financial results.
We have identified deficiencies in our internal control over
financial reporting from time to time, including significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses. A significant
deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that
is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to
merit attention by those responsible for oversight of a
companys financial reporting. A material weakness is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of a companys
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
Our failure to identify deficiencies in our internal control
over financial reporting in a timely manner or remediate any
deficiencies, or the identification of material weaknesses or
significant deficiencies in the future could prevent us from
accurately and timely reporting our financial results.
Risks
Relating to Our Investments
Our
investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could
lose all or part of our investment.
Investing in small and mid-sized companies involves a number of
significant risks. Among other things, these companies:
|
|
|
|
|
may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet
their obligations under their debt instruments that we hold,
which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any
collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any
guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio
companies that we may have obtained in connection with our
investments, as well as a corresponding decrease in the value of
the equity components of our investments;
|
|
|
|
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines,
smaller market shares
and/or
significant customer concentrations than larger businesses,
which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors
actions and market conditions, as well as general economic
downturns;
|
|
|
|
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts
of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability,
resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could
have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in
turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
generally have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly
changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk
of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital
to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position; and
|
|
|
|
generally have less publicly available information about their
businesses, operations and financial condition. If we are unable
to uncover all material information about these companies, we
may not make a fully informed investment decision, and may lose
all or part of our investment.
|
In addition, in the course of providing significant managerial
assistance to certain of our portfolio companies, certain of our
officers and directors may serve as directors on the boards of
such companies. To the extent that litigation arises out of our
investments in these companies, our officers and directors may
be named as defendants in such litigation, which could result in
an expenditure of funds (through our indemnification of such
officers and directors) and the diversion of management time and
resources.
22
An
investment strategy focused primarily on privately held
companies presents certain challenges, including the lack of
available information about these companies.
We invest primarily in privately held companies. Generally,
little public information exists about these companies,
including typically a lack of audited financial statements and
ratings by third parties. We must therefore rely on the ability
of our investment adviser to obtain adequate information to
evaluate the potential risks of investing in these companies.
These companies and their financial information may not be
subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern
public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material
information about these companies, we may not make a fully
informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our
investments. These factors could affect our investment returns.
If we
make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection
in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or
insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more
senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies defaults
on their indebtedness.
We may make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies in
the future. Unsecured debt investments are unsecured and junior
to other indebtedness of the portfolio company. As a
consequence, the holder of an unsecured debt investment may lack
adequate protection in the event the portfolio company becomes
distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower
recovery than more senior debtholders in the event the portfolio
company defaults on its indebtedness. In addition, unsecured
debt investments of small and mid-sized companies are often
highly illiquid and in adverse market conditions may experience
steep declines in valuation even if they are fully performing.
If we
invest in the securities and obligations of distressed or
bankrupt companies, such investments may be subject to
significant risks, including lack of income, extraordinary
expenses, uncertainty with respect to satisfaction of debt,
lower-than expected investment values or income potentials and
resale restrictions.
We are authorized to invest in the securities and other
obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies. At times,
distressed debt obligations may not produce income and may
require us to bear certain extraordinary expenses (including
legal, accounting, valuation and transaction expenses) in order
to protect and recover our investment. Therefore, to the extent
we invest in distressed debt, our ability to achieve current
income for our stockholders may be diminished.
We also will be subject to significant uncertainty as to when
and in what manner and for what value the distressed debt we
invest in will eventually be satisfied (e.g., through a
liquidation of the obligors assets, an exchange offer or
plan of reorganization involving the distressed debt securities
or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation).
In addition, even if an exchange offer is made or plan of
reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed debt held
by us, there can be no assurance that the securities or other
assets received by us in connection with such exchange offer or
plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income
potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was
made.
Moreover, any securities received by us upon completion of an
exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to
resale. As a result of our participation in negotiations with
respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with
respect to an issuer of distressed debt, we may be restricted
from disposing of such securities.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We invest, and will continue to invest, in companies whose
securities are not publicly traded, and whose securities will be
subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will
otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. In
fact, all of our assets may be invested in illiquid securities.
The illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult for
us to sell these investments when desired. In addition, if we
are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio
quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at
which we had previously recorded these investments. Our
investments are usually subject to contractual or legal
restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there
is usually no established trading market for such investments.
The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult
for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a
result, we may suffer losses.
23
We may
not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in
our portfolio companies.
After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be
called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to
such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment
through the exercise of a warrant to purchase common stock.
There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient
funds to make, follow-on investments. Any decisions not to make
a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such
an investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company
in need of such an investment, may result in a missed
opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful
operation or may reduce the expected yield on the investment.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or
senior to, our investments in such companies.
We invest primarily in first and second lien debt issued by
small and mid-sized companies. Our portfolio companies may have,
or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally
with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms,
such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive
payments of interest or principal on or before the dates on
which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the
debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments
ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors,
such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use
for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking
equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have
to share on an equal basis any distributions with other
creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency,
liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the
relevant portfolio company.
The
disposition of our investments may result in contingent
liabilities.
Most of our investments will involve private securities. In
connection with the disposition of an investment in private
securities, we may be required to make representations about the
business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical
of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may
also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment
to the extent that any such representations turn out to be
inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities.
These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that
ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied
through our return of certain distributions previously made to
us.
There
may be circumstances where our debt investments could be
subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject
to lender liability claims.
Even though we have structured some of our investments as senior
loans, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt,
depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent
to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that
portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our
debt investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to
that of other creditors. We may also be subject to lender
liability claims for actions taken by us with respect to a
borrowers business or instances where we exercise control
over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject
to a lenders liability claim, including as a result of
actions taken in rendering significant managerial assistance.
Second
priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our
portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior
creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the
value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full
both the first priority creditors and us.
Certain loans that we make to portfolio companies will be
secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral
securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first
priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio
companys obligations under any outstanding senior debt and
may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be
incurred by the company under the agreements governing the
loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority
liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation
of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of
the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In
addition, the
24
value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend
on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers
and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds,
if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be
sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second
priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured
by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds
are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan
obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to
the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the
collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the
companys remaining assets, if any.
The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing
the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt
outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or
more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the
holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement,
at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first
priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions
that may be taken with respect to the collateral will be at the
direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first
priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of
enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to
control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of
amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the
collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral
documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such
actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.
We
generally do not and will not control our portfolio
companies.
We do not, and do not expect to, control most of our portfolio
companies, even though we may have board representation or board
observation rights, and our debt agreements may contain certain
restrictive covenants. As a result, we are subject to the risk
that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business
decisions with which we disagree and the management of such
company, as representatives of the holders of their common
equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not
serve our interests as a debt investor. Due to the lack of
liquidity for our investments in non-traded companies, we may
not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio
companies as readily as we would like or at an appropriate
valuation. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions
that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
Defaults
by our portfolio companies would harm our operating
results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.
We may
not realize gains from our equity investments.
Certain investments that we have made in the past and may make
in the future include warrants or other equity securities. In
addition, we have made in the past and may make in the future
direct equity investments in companies. Our goal is ultimately
to realize gains upon our disposition of such equity interests.
However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in
value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may
not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any
gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity
interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we
experience. We also may be unable to realize any value if a
portfolio company does not have a liquidity event, such as a
sale of the business, recapitalization or public offering, which
would allow us to sell the underlying equity interests. We often
seek puts or similar rights to give us the right to sell our
equity securities back to the portfolio company issuer. We may
be unable to exercise these puts rights for the consideration
provided in our investment documents if the issuer is in
financial distress.
We are
subject to certain risks associated with foreign
investments.
We may make investments in foreign companies. Investing in
foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not
typically associated with investing in U.S. companies.
These risks include changes in foreign exchange
25
rates, exchange control regulations, political and social
instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less
liquid markets and less available information than is generally
the case in the U.S., higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate
and effectively manage these and other risks. We cannot assure
you that these and other factors will not have a material
adverse effect on our business as a whole.
We may
expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging
transactions.
We have and may in the future enter into hedging transactions,
which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions.
We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts and
interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge
against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio
positions and amounts due under our credit facilities from
changes in market interest rates. Use of these hedging
instruments may include counterparty credit risk. Utilizing such
hedging instruments does not eliminate the possibility of
fluctuations in the values of such positions and amounts due
under our credit facilities or prevent losses if the values of
such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish
other positions designed to gain from those same developments,
thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio
positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the
opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio
positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to
hedge against an interest rate fluctuation that is so generally
anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging
transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions will depend on our
ability to correctly predict movements and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In
addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of
the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements
in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for
a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect
correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio
holdings or credit facilities being hedged. Any such imperfect
correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and
expose us to risk of loss. See also Changes in
interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment
income.
Risks
Relating to an Offering of Our Common Stock
Shares
of closed-end investment companies, including business
development companies, may trade at a discount to their net
asset value.
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business
development companies, may trade at a discount from net asset
value. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies
and business development companies is separate and distinct from
the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. We
cannot predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or
below net asset value.
We may
be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of
this offering on acceptable terms within an attractive
timeframe.
Delays in investing the net proceeds raised in an offering may
cause our performance to be worse than that of other fully
invested business development companies or other lenders or
investors pursuing comparable investment strategies. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to identify any investments that
meet our investment objective or that any investment that we
make will produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest
the net proceeds of any offering on acceptable terms within the
time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our
financial condition and operating results.
We anticipate that, depending on market conditions, it may take
us a substantial period of time to invest substantially all of
the net proceeds of any offering in securities meeting our
investment objective. During this period, we will invest the net
proceeds of an offering primarily in cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements and
high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from
the time of
26
investment, which may produce returns that are significantly
lower than the returns which we expect to achieve when our
portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our investment
objective. As a result, any distributions that we pay during
this period may be substantially lower than the distributions
that we may be able to pay when our portfolio is fully invested
in securities meeting our investment objective. In addition,
until such time as the net proceeds of an offering are invested
in securities meeting our investment objective, the market price
for our common stock may decline. Thus, the initial return on
your investment may be lower than when, if ever, our portfolio
is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective.
Investing
in our common stock may involve an above average degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of
principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher
levels of risk, and therefore, an investment in our shares may
not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
The
market price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our
common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors,
some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly
related to our operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain any exemptive relief that may be required by
us from the SEC;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax
guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs, business
development companies and SBICs;
|
|
|
|
loss of our BDC or RIC status or our SBIC subsidiarys
status as an SBIC;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
departure of our investment advisers key
personnel; and
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors.
|
Certain
provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws as well as the Delaware General
Corporation Law could deter takeover attempts and have a
material adverse impact on the price of our common
stock.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and
restated bylaws as well as the Delaware General Corporation Law
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a
third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These
anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in
circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock
the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for
our common stock.
27
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this prospectus and any accompanying
prospectus supplement constitute forward-looking statements
because they relate to future events or our future performance
or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained
in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement
may include statements as to:
|
|
|
|
|
our future operating results and dividend projections;
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies;
|
|
|
|
the impact of the investments that we expect to make;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives;
|
|
|
|
our expected financings and investments;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our
portfolio companies.
|
In addition, words such as anticipate,
believe, expect and intend
indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all
forward-looking statements include these words. The
forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus, and any
accompanying prospectus supplement, involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for
any reason, including the factors set forth in Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and any
accompanying prospectus supplement. Other factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or
the economy generally due to terrorism or natural
disasters; and
|
|
|
|
future changes in laws or regulations (including the
interpretation of these laws and regulations by regulatory
authorities) and conditions in our operating areas, particularly
with respect to business development companies, RICs and SBICs.
|
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this
prospectus and will base the forward-looking statements included
in any accompanying prospectus supplement on information
available to us on the date of this prospectus and any
accompanying prospectus supplement, as appropriate, and we
assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking
statements, except as required by law. Although we undertake no
obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures
that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in
the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K.
The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus and
any accompanying prospectus supplement are excluded from the
safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the forward looking statements
contained in our periodic reports are excluded from the
safe-harbor protection provided by Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act.
28
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from
selling our common stock to make investments in small and
mid-sized companies in accordance with our investment objective
and strategies described in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement, and for general corporate purposes. We may also use
a portion of the net proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding
borrowings. Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds
primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities consistent
with our business development company election and our election
to be taxed as a RIC. See
Regulation Business Development Company
Regulations Temporary Investments. Our ability
to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent
that the net proceeds from an offering, pending full investment,
are held in interest-bearing deposits or other short-term
instruments. See Risk Factors Risks Relating
to an Offering of our Common Stock We may be unable
to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of this
offering on acceptable terms within an attractive
timeframe for additional information regarding this
matter. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an
offering will more fully identify the use of proceeds from such
an offering.
29
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol FSC. The following table sets forth, for
each fiscal quarter during the last two most recently completed
fiscal years and for the first fiscal quarter of 2011 and the
second fiscal quarter of 2011 through March 28, 2011, the
range of high and low sales prices of our common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange, the sales price as a
percentage of our net asset value (NAV) and the dividends
declared by us for each fiscal quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
High Sales
|
|
Low Sales
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Price to NAV(2)
|
|
Price to NAV(2)
|
|
per Share(3)
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.86
|
|
|
$
|
10.24
|
|
|
$
|
5.02
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.94
|
|
|
$
|
8.48
|
|
|
$
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
(4)
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.95
|
|
|
$
|
10.92
|
|
|
$
|
7.24
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
11.36
|
|
|
$
|
9.02
|
|
|
|
105
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
|
$
|
12.13
|
|
|
$
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
113
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
13.64
|
|
|
$
|
10.49
|
|
|
|
131
|
%
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
11.30
|
|
|
$
|
9.79
|
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Year ending September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.24
|
|
|
$
|
10.94
|
|
|
|
119
|
%
|
|
|
105
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.3198
|
(5)
|
Second Quarter (through
March 28, 2011)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
13.95
|
|
|
$
|
11.83
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
0.3198
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not determinable at the time of filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices.
The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at
the end of each period. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by
net asset value. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the dividend declared in the specified quarter. We
have adopted an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a cash
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes a special dividend of $0.05 declared on
December 18, 2008 with a record date of December 30,
2008 and a payment date of January 29, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
From our initial public offering through the fourth fiscal
quarter of 2010, we paid quarterly dividends, but in the first
fiscal quarter of 2011 we began paying, and we intend to
continue paying, monthly dividends to our stockholders. Our
monthly dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of
Directors on a quarterly basis. |
|
(6) |
|
On January 31, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the
following dividends: $0.1066 per share, payable on
April 29, 2011 to stockholders of record on April 1,
2011; $0.1066 per share, payable on May 31, 2011 to
stockholders of record on May 2, 2011 and $0.1066 per
share, payable on June 30, 2011 to stockholders of record
on June 1, 2011. |
The last reported price for our common stock on March 28,
2011 was $13.37 per share. As of March 28, 2011, we had
44 stockholders of record, which did not include
stockholders for whom shares are held in nominee or street name.
Shares of business development companies may trade at a market
price that is less than the value of the net assets attributable
to those shares. The possibilities that our shares of common
stock will trade at a discount from net asset value or at
premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate
and distinct from the risk that our
30
net asset value will decrease. It is not possible to predict
whether the common stock offered hereby will trade at, above, or
below net asset value. Since our initial public offering in June
2008, our shares of common stock have at times traded at prices
significantly less than our net asset value.
Our dividends, if any, are determined by our Board of Directors.
We have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as
a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify as a
RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable
income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such
taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be
distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things,
distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized
net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income
earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable
income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover
taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared
prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which
generated such taxable income. Please refer to Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for further
information regarding the consequences of our retention of net
capital gains. We may, in the future, make actual distributions
to our stockholders of our net capital gains. We can offer no
assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior
securities, we may be prohibited from making distributions if
doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by
the terms of any of our borrowings. See Regulation
and Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations.
We have adopted an opt out dividend reinvestment
plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we make a cash
distribution, then stockholders cash distributions will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash distributions.
On October 22, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program to acquire up to $20 million of
our outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this
program are to be made through the open market at times and in
such amounts as our management deems appropriate, provided that
the price is below the most recent net asset value per share.
The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and
may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any
time without prior notice.
31
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information in this section contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see
Risk Factors and Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements for a discussion of the
uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements. You should read the following discussion in
conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and
other financial information appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Overview
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by
private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize
our portfolios total return by generating current income
from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our
equity investments.
We were formed as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) on February 15, 2007.
Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance
Corp. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership
interests in Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. were
exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock in Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Our consolidated financial statements prior to January 2,
2008 reflect our operations as a Delaware limited partnership
(Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) prior to our merger
with and into a corporation (Fifth Street Finance Corp.).
On June 17, 2008, we completed an initial public offering
of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at the offering
price of $14.12 per share. Our shares are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol FSC.
On July 21, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering
of 9,487,500 shares of our common stock, which included the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option, at
the offering price of $9.25 per share.
On September 25, 2009, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 5,520,000 shares of our common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share.
On January 27, 2010, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, which did
not include the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.20 per
share. On February 25, 2010, we sold 300,500 shares of
our common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share upon
the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option
in connection with this offering.
On June 21, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering
of 9,200,000 shares of our common stock, which included the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option, at
the offering price of $11.50 per share.
On December 7, 2010, we entered into an
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of our common
stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, we sold
429,110 shares of our common stock at an average offering
price of $11.87 per share. We terminated the
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011
and did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant thereto
subsequent to December 31, 2010.
Current
Market Conditions
Since mid-2007, the global financial markets have experienced
stress, volatility, illiquidity, and disruption. This turmoil
appears to have peaked in the fall of 2008, resulting in several
major financial institutions becoming insolvent, being acquired,
or receiving government assistance. While the turmoil in the
financial markets appears to have abated somewhat, the global
economy continues to experience economic uncertainty. Economic
uncertainty impacts our business in many ways, including
changing spreads, structures, and purchase multiples as well as
the overall supply of investment capital.
Despite the economic uncertainty, our deal pipeline remains
robust, with high quality transactions backed by private equity
sponsors in small to mid-sized companies. As always, we remain
cautious in selecting new
32
investment opportunities, and will only deploy capital in deals
which are consistent with our disciplined philosophy of pursuing
superior risk-adjusted returns.
As evidenced by our recent investment activities, we expect to
grow the business in part by increasing the average investment
size when and where appropriate. At the same time, we expect to
focus more on first lien transactions. Although we believe that
we currently have sufficient capital available to fund
investments, a prolonged period of market disruptions may cause
us to reduce the volume of loans we originate
and/or fund,
which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. In this regard, because
our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then
current net asset value per share and we are limited in our
ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset
value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise
equity capital.
Critical
Accounting Policies
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification) on July 1, 2009 (effective
for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009), changes the way that
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the
Codification officially became the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants
must also consider rules, regulations, and interpretive guidance
issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way
companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their
accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely
of the number used in the Codifications structural
organization.
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification,
financial statements for periods ending after September 15,
2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification
historical GAAP.
Basis
of Presentation
Effective January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners
III, L.P. (the Partnership), a Delaware limited
partnership organized on February 15, 2007, merged with and
into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The merger involved the exchange
of shares between companies under common control. In accordance
with the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under
common control, our results of operations and cash flows for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 are presented as if
the merger had occurred as of October 1, 2007. Accordingly,
no adjustments were made to the carrying value of assets and
liabilities (or the cost basis of investments) as a result of
the merger. Prior to January 2, 2008, references to Fifth
Street are to the Partnership. After January 2, 2008,
references to Fifth Street, FSC,
we or our are to Fifth Street Finance
Corp., unless the context otherwise requires. Fifth
Streets financial results for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 refer to the Partnership.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
affecting amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial
Statements. We have identified investment valuation and revenue
recognition as our most critical accounting estimates. We
continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to
the matters described below. These estimates are based on the
information that is currently available to us and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A
discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
Investment
Valuation
We are required to report our investments that are not publicly
traded or for which current market values are not readily
available at fair value. The fair value is deemed to be the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date.
Under Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which we
adopted effective October 1, 2008, we perform detailed
valuations of our debt and equity investments on an individual
basis, using market based, income based, and bond yield
approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize a bond yield
method for the majority of our investments, as long as it is
appropriate. If, in our judgment, the
33
bond yield approach is not appropriate, we may use the
enterprise value approach, or, in certain cases, an alternative
methodology potentially including an asset liquidation or
expected recovery model.
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of
the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one
methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any
one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a
range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of
enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a
portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the
portfolio companys historical and projected financial
results. Typically, private companies are valued based on
multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization), cash flows, net income,
revenues, or in limited cases, book value. We generally require
portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and
monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual
projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze
discounted cash flow models based on our projections of the
future free cash flows of the business. Under the bond yield
approach, we use bond yield models to determine the present
value of the future cash flow streams of our debt investments.
We review various sources of transactional data, including
private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with
similar characteristics, and assess the information in the
valuation process.
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process
each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of
our investments:
|
|
|
|
|
Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within our investment adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of our investment adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit reports to us;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of our Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
|
The fair value of all of our investments at December 31,
2010, September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was
determined by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is
solely responsible for the valuation of our portfolio
investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant
to our valuation policy and our consistently applied valuation
process.
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms
to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of
their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms
provide us with written reports regarding the preliminary
valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of
such quarter. We will continue to engage independent valuation
firms to provide us with assistance regarding our determination
of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter;
however, our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely
responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in
good faith.
34
The portions of our portfolio valued, as a percentage of the
portfolio at fair value, by independent valuation firms by
period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
|
|
|
88.7
|
%(1)
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17.2
|
%(2)
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc.,
which closed on December 31, 2009 and therefore was not
part of the independent valuation process |
|
(2) |
|
24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009
and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process |
Our $50 million credit facility with Bank of Montreal was
terminated effective September 16, 2009. The facility
required independent valuations for at least 90% of the
portfolio on a quarterly basis. With the termination of this
facility, this valuation test is no longer required. However, we
still intend to have a portion of the portfolio valued by an
independent third party on a quarterly basis, with a substantial
portion being valued on an annual basis.
As of December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, approximately 92.9%, 86.5% and 72.0%,
respectively, of our total assets represented investments in
portfolio companies valued at fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
and Dividend Income
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. We stop accruing interest on investments when it is
determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions
from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when
the distribution is received.
Fee
Income
We receive a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business.
Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and
amortized in accordance with
ASC 310-20
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with
ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted
against the cost and fair value of the respective investments.
Other fees, such as servicing fees, are classified as fee income
and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
We have also structured exit fees across certain of our
portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of
those investments. These fees are to be paid to us upon the
sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the
maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full
prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are
earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar
to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included
in net investment income until received. The receipt of such
fees as well as the timing of our receipt of such fees is
contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the
investments.
35
Payment-in-Kind
(PIK) Interest
Our loans typically contain a contractual PIK interest
provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually
deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally
due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the
accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be
collected. We generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is
insufficient value to support the accrual or if we do not expect
the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and
interest due. Our decision to cease accruing PIK interest
involves subjective judgments and determinations based on
available information about a particular portfolio company,
including whether the portfolio company is current with respect
to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt
securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company; our assessment
of the portfolio companys business development success,
including product development, profitability and the portfolio
companys overall adherence to its business plan;
information obtained by us in connection with periodic formal
update interviews with the portfolio companys management
and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information
about the general economic and market conditions in which the
portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information,
we determine whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or
debt security. Our determination to cease accruing
PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made
well before our full write-down of such loan or debt security.
In addition, if it is subsequently determined that we will not
be able to collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair
value of our loans or debt securities would decline by the
amount of such previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK
interest.
For a discussion of risks we are subject to as a result of our
use of PIK interest in connection with our investments, see
Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business
and Structure We may have difficulty paying our
required distributions if we recognize income before or without
receiving cash representing such income,
We may in the future choose to pay dividends
in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax
in excess of the cash you receive and
Our incentive fee may induce our investment
adviser to make speculative investments. In addition, if
it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to
collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of
our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such
previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest.
To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK income must be paid out to
our stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have
not yet collected the cash and may never collect the cash
relating to the PIK interest. Accumulated PIK interest was
$17.3 million and represented 2.3% of the fair value of our
portfolio of investments as of December 31, 2010,
$19.3 million or 3.4% as of September 30, 2010 and
$12.1 million or 4.0% as of September 30, 2009. The
net increase in loan balances as a result of contracted PIK
arrangements are separately identified in our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
The accrual of PIK interest on our debt investments increases
the recorded cost basis of these investments in our financial
statements and, as a result, increases the cost basis of these
investments for purposes of computing the capital gains
incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser.
Portfolio
Composition
Our investments principally consist of loans, purchased equity
investments and equity grants in privately-held companies. Our
loans are typically secured by either a first or second lien on
the assets of the portfolio company and generally have terms of
up to six years (but an expected average life of between three
and four years). We are currently focusing our new debt
origination efforts on first lien loans because we believe that
the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to
second lien and unsecured loans at this time and offer superior
credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien
and unsecured loans in the future.
36
A summary of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost
and fair value as a percentage of total investments is shown in
the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
84.85
|
%
|
|
|
72.61
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
|
|
25.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
86.53
|
%
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
11.35
|
%
|
|
|
24.45
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The industry composition of our portfolio at cost and fair value
as a percentage of total investments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
19.97
|
%
|
|
|
14.76
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
7.58
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
5.29
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
|
5.59
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
20.76
|
%
|
|
|
15.83
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
6.42
|
%
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
5.08
|
%
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
Asset Quality
We employ a grading system to assess and monitor the credit risk
of our investment portfolio. We rate all investments on a scale
from 1 to 5. The system is intended to reflect the performance
of the borrowers business, the collateral coverage of the
loan, and other factors considered relevant to making a credit
judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing
above expectations
and/or a
capital gain is expected.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing
substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain
neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time
of the original investment. All new investments are initially
rated 2.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but
where we expect no loss of investment return (interest
and/or
dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may
be out of compliance with financial covenants.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and for which risk has increased
materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of
investment return, but no loss of principal.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing
substantially below our expectations and whose risks have
increased substantially since the original investment.
Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of
principal is expected.
|
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on
the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value, as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
80,790,254
|
|
|
|
10.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
89,150,457
|
|
|
|
15.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
2
|
|
|
620,901,779
|
|
|
|
83.63
|
%
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
424,494,799
|
|
|
|
75.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
3
|
|
|
21,672,872
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
|
11.16
|
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
13.25
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,823,120
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
5
|
|
|
19,030,430
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
(1)
|
|
|
8,297,412
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to operating performance this ratio is not measurable and,
as a result, is excluded from the total portfolio calculation. |
We may from time to time modify the payment terms of our
investments, either in response to current economic conditions
and their impact on certain of our portfolio companies or in
accordance with tier pricing provisions in certain loan
agreements. As of December 31, 2010, we had modified the
payment terms of our investments in four portfolio companies.
Such modified terms may include increased PIK interest
provisions and reduced cash interest rates. These modifications,
and any future modifications to our loan agreements may limit
the amount of interest income that we recognize from the
modified investments, which may, in turn, limit our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders.
39
Loans and
Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status
As of December 31, 2010, we had stopped accruing cash
interest, PIK interest and original issue discount
(OID) on three investments that did not pay all of
their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the period
ended December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, we
had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five investments
that did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash interest
payments for the year ended September 30, 2010. As of
December 31, 2009, we had stopped accruing PIK interest and
OID on five investments, including two investments that had not
paid all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments.
The non-accrual status of our portfolio investments as of
December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments
for the three months ended December 31, 2010, the year
ended September 30, 2010 and the three months ended
December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
$
|
2,106,432
|
|
|
$
|
5,804,101
|
|
|
$
|
1,134,564
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
240,390
|
|
|
|
1,903,005
|
|
|
|
468,882
|
|
OID income
|
|
|
30,138
|
|
|
|
328,792
|
|
|
|
103,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,376,960
|
|
|
$
|
8,035,898
|
|
|
$
|
1,707,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
and Analysis of Results and Operations
Results
of Operations
The principal measure of our financial performance is net
increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations,
which includes net investment income (loss), net realized gain
(loss) and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Net
investment income is the difference between our income from
interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and total
expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the
difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of
portfolio investments and their stated costs. Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) is the net change in the fair value
of our investment portfolio and derivative instruments.
Comparison
of the three months ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009
Total
Investment Income
Total investment income includes interest and dividend income on
our investments, fee income and other investment income. Fee
income consists principally of loan and arrangement fees,
administrative fees, unused fees, amendment fees, equity
structuring fees, exit fees, prepayment fees and waiver fees.
Other investment income consists primarily of dividend income
received from certain of our equity investments and interest on
cash and cash equivalents on deposit with financial institutions.
Total investment income for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$25.3 million and $13.2 million, respectively. For the
three months ended December 31, 2010, this amount primarily
consisted of $20.8 million of interest income from
portfolio investments (which included $3.1 million of PIK
interest), and $4.5 million of fee income. For the three
months ended December 31, 2009, total investment
40
income primarily consisted of $12.3 million of interest
income from portfolio investments (which included
$2.0 million of PIK interest), and $0.9 million of fee
income.
The increase in our total investment income for the three months
ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the three months
ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to
higher average levels of outstanding debt investments, which was
principally due to an increase of 13 investments in our
portfolio in the
year-over-year
period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments
received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
Expenses
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base
management fee) for the three months ended December 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 were $11.3 million and
$4.9 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the
three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the
three months ended December 31, 2009 by $6.4 million,
primarily as a result of increases in the base management fee,
the incentive fee, interest expense, professional fees, and
other general and administrative expenses.
The increase in base management and incentive fees resulted from
an increase in our total assets as reflected in the growth of
the investment portfolio, offset partially by our investment
advisers unilateral decision to waive $0.7 million of
the base management fee for the three months ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in interest expense
resulted from a $174.3 million increase in debt levels in
the
year-over-year
period.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $12.1 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $6.4 million increase
in net expenses, net investment income for the three months
ended December 31, 2010 reflected a $5.7 million, or
68.4%, increase compared to the three months ended
December 31, 2009.
Realized
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference
between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio
investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be
recorded in connection with our determination that certain
investments are considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we
recorded the following investment realization events:
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, we restructured our investment in Best Vinyl,
Inc., which resulted in a material modification of the terms of
the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the
amount of $1.7 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Nicos
Polymers & Grinding Inc., which resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we
recorded a realized loss in the amount of $3.9 million in
accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, we cancelled Lighting by Gregory, LLCs
entire Term Loan B balance and $1.5 million of Term Loan A.
We recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of
$7.8 million.
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million,
representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection
with the cancellation of our loan agreement with American
Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a $0.1 million
reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized
loss on this investment.
Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and Interest Rate
Swaps
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in
the fair value of our investment portfolio and interest rate
swaps during the reporting period, including the reversal of
previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when
gains or losses are realized.
41
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we
recorded net unrealized appreciation of $16.8 million. This
consisted of $10.3 million of reclassifications to realized
losses, $5.5 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt
investments, $0.3 million of net unrealized appreciation on
equity investments and $0.7 million of net unrealized
appreciation on interest rate swaps. During the three months
ended December 31, 2009, we recorded net unrealized
appreciation of $1.0 million. This consisted of
$1.2 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt
investments, partially offset by $0.2 million of net
unrealized depreciation on equity investments.
Comparison
of years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009
Total
Investment Income
Total investment income for the years ended September 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009 was $70.5 million and
$49.8 million, respectively. For the year ended
September 30, 2010, this amount primarily consisted of
$63.9 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $10.0 million of PIK interest), and
$6.0 million of fee income. For the year ended
September 30, 2009, this amount primarily consisted of
$46.0 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $7.4 million of PIK interest), and
$3.5 million of fee income.
The increase in our total investment income for the year ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the year ended
September 30, 2009 was primarily attributable to a net
increase of eight debt investments in our portfolio in the
year-over-year
period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments
received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
Expenses
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base
management fee) for the years ended September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 were $27.5 million and
$18.4 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the
year ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the year ended
September 30, 2009 by $9.1 million, primarily as a
result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive
fee, interest expense, administrator expense, and other general
and administrative expenses.
The increase in base management and incentive fees resulted from
an increase in our total assets as reflected in the growth of
the investment portfolio, offset partially by our investment
advisers unilateral decision to waive $727,000 and
$172,000 of the base management fee for the years ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $20.7 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $9.1 million increase
in total expenses, net investment income for the year ended
September 30, 2010 reflected a $11.6 million, or
37.2%, increase compared to the year ended September 30,
2009.
Realized
Gain (Loss) on Investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference
between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio
investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be
recorded in connection with our determination that certain
investments are considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, we recorded the
following investment realization events:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, we received a cash payment in the amount of
$0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts
due in connection with the cancellation of our loan agreement
with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a
$0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded
$10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American
Hardwoods;
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of
our interest in CPAC, Inc.;
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2010, we received a cash payment of $7.6 million
from Storyteller Theaters Corporation in full satisfaction of
all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment
was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on
this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, we restructured our investment in Rail
Acquisition Corp. Although the full amount owed under the loan
agreement remained intact, the restructuring resulted in a
material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As
such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$2.6 million in accordance with EITF Abstract Issue
No. 96-19;
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, we sold our investment in Martini Park, LLC
and received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million.
We recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of
$4.0 million; and
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, we exited our investment in Rose Tarlow, Inc.
and received a cash payment in the amount of $3.6 million
in full settlement of the debt investment. We recorded a
realized loss on this investment in the amount of
$9.3 million.
|
During the year ended September 30, 2009, we exited our
investment in American Hardwoods Industries, LLC and recorded a
realized loss of $10.4 million, and recorded a
$4.0 million realized loss on our investment in CPAC, Inc.
in connection with our determination that the investment was
permanently impaired based on, among other things, our analysis
of changes in the portfolio companys business operations
and prospects.
Net
Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in
the fair value of our investment portfolio during the reporting
period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized
appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net
unrealized depreciation of $1.8 million. This consisted of
$18.7 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt
investments and $0.8 million of net unrealized depreciation
on interest rate swaps, offset by $17.2 million of
reclassifications to realized losses and $0.5 million of
net unrealized appreciation on equity investments.
During the year ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net
unrealized depreciation of $10.8 million. This consisted of
$23.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt
investments and $2.0 million of net unrealized depreciation
on equity investments, offset by $14.3 million of
reclassifications to realized losses.
Comparison
of years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008
Total
Investment Income
Total investment income for the years ended September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008 was $49.8 million and
$33.2 million, respectively. For the year ended
September 30, 2009, this amount primarily consisted of
$46.0 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $7.4 million of PIK interest), and
$3.5 million of fee income. For the year ended
September 30, 2008, this amount primarily consisted of
$30.5 million of interest income from portfolio investments
(which included $4.9 million of PIK interest), and
$1.8 million of fee income.
The increase in our total investment income for the year ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the year ended
September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to a net
increase of two debt investments in our portfolio in the
year-over-year
period, partially offset by debt repayments received during the
same period.
Expenses
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base
management fee) for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008 were $18.4 million and
$13.1 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the
year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the year ended
September 30, 2008 by $5.3 million, primarily as a
result of increases in base management fee, incentive fees and
other general and administrative expenses.
43
The increase in base management fee resulted from an increase in
our total assets as reflected in the growth of the investment
portfolio offset partially by our investment advisers
unilateral decision to waive $172,000 of the base management fee
for the year ended September 30, 2009. Incentive fees were
implemented effective January 2, 2008 when Fifth Street
Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street
Finance Corp., and reflect the growth of our net investment
income before such fees.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $16.6 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $5.3 million increase
in total expenses, net investment income for the year ended
September 30, 2009 reflected a $11.3 million, or
55.7%, increase compared to the year ended September 30,
2008.
Realized
Gain (Loss) on Investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference
between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio
investments and their stated costs. During the year ended
September 30, 2009, we exited our investment in American
Hardwoods Industries, LLC and recorded a realized loss of
$10.4 million, and recorded a $4.0 million realized
loss on our investment in CPAC, Inc. in connection with our
determination that the investment was permanently impaired based
on, among other things, our analysis of changes in the portfolio
companys business operations and prospects. During the
year ended September 30, 2008, we sold our equity
investment in Filet of Chicken and realized a gain of $62,000.
Net
Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in
the fair value of our investment portfolio during the reporting
period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized
appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
During the year ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net
unrealized depreciation of $10.8 million. This consisted of
$23.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt
investments and $2.0 million of net unrealized depreciation
on equity investments, offset by $14.3 million of
reclassifications to realized losses. During the year ended
September 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation
of $16.9 million. This consisted of $12.1 million of
net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and
$4.8 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity
investments.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
We have a number of alternatives available to fund the growth of
our investment portfolio and our operations, including, but not
limited to, raising equity, increasing debt, or funding from
operational cash flow. Additionally, we may reduce investment
size by syndicating a portion of any given transaction.
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we
experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of
$33.7 million. During that period, we used
$159.4 million of cash in operating activities, primarily
for the funding of $238.6 million of investments, partially
offset by $57.6 million of principal payments received and
$14.1 million of net investment income. During the same
period cash provided by financing activities was
$125.6 million, primarily consisting of $89.0 million
of net borrowings under our credit facilities,
$50.3 million of SBA borrowings, and $5.0 million of
proceeds from issuances of our common stock, partially offset by
$16.5 million of cash dividends paid, $0.2 million of
offering costs paid and $2.0 million of deferred financing
costs paid. We intend to fund our future distribution
obligations through operating cash flow or with funds obtained
through future equity offerings or credit facilities, as we deem
appropriate.
For the year ended September 30, 2010, we experienced a net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $36.4 million.
During that period, we used $239.2 million of cash in
operating activities, primarily for the funding of
$325.5 million of investments, partially offset by
$44.5 million of principal payments received and
$43.0 million of net investment income. During the same
period cash provided by financing activities was
$202.7 million, primarily consisting of $179.1 million
of proceeds from issuances of our common stock and
$73.0 million of SBA
44
borrowings, partially offset by $41.8 million of cash
dividends paid, $1.3 million of offering costs paid and
$6.3 million of deferred financing costs paid. We intend to
fund our future distribution obligations through operating cash
flow or with funds obtained through future equity offerings or
credit facilities, as we deem appropriate.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $43.0 million in cash
and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of
$742.4 million, $4.7 million of interest and fees
receivable, $123.3 million of SBA debentures payable, $89.0
of borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities, and
unfunded commitments of $95.3 million.
As of September 30, 2010, we had $76.8 million in cash
and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of
$563.8 million, $3.8 million of interest and fees
receivable, $73.0 million of SBA debentures payable, and
unfunded commitments of $49.5 million.
Other
Sources of Liquidity
We intend to continue to generate cash primarily from cash flows
from operations, including interest earned from the temporary
investment of cash in U.S. government securities and other
high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less,
future borrowings and future offerings of securities. In the
future, we may also securitize a portion of our investments in
first and second lien senior loans or unsecured debt or other
assets. To securitize loans, we would likely create a
wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the
subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a
non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a
portion of the equity in the subsidiary. Our primary use of
funds is investments in our targeted asset classes and cash
distributions to holders of our common stock.
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment
portfolio through the net proceeds from future equity offerings,
including our dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of
senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted
by the 1940 Act, our plans to raise capital may not be
successful. In this regard, because our common stock has at
times traded at a price below our then-current net asset value
per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common
stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be
limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
In addition, we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our
taxable income to our stockholders in order to satisfy the
requirements applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code.
See Regulated Investment Company Status and
Distributions below. Consequently, we may not have the
funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional
investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded
commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In
addition, the illiquidity of our portfolio investments may make
it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired and,
if we are required to sell these investments, we may realize
significantly less than their recorded value.
Also, as a business development company, we generally are
required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less
liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior
securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our
borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least
200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. As
of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with this
requirement. To fund growth in our investment portfolio in the
future, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital from
various sources, including the equity markets and the
securitization or other debt-related markets, which may or may
not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Finally, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we sought and
obtained a license from the SBA to operate an SBIC.
In this regard, on February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P.,
received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the
SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to
stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small
businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to
eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of
small businesses.
45
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage
by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of
a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures.
SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only
debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten
year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures
is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid
at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed
debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven
spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC
subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it
has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a
capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an
examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of
December 31, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million
in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment
to our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million,
and $123.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of
December 31, 2010. $73.0 million of these debentures
bore an interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual
charge of 0.285%, while the remainder do not yet have a locked
interest rate.
We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit us to exclude
the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the
200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows us
increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test.
Significant
capital transactions that occurred from October 1, 2008
through December 31, 2010
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per
share that our Board of Directors has declared on our common
stock from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cash
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Issued
|
|
Value
|
|
December 9, 2008
|
|
December 19, 2008
|
|
December 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
6.4 million
|
|
|
|
105,326
|
|
|
$
|
0.8 million
|
|
December 9, 2008
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
6.6 million
|
|
|
|
139,995
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
December 18, 2008
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
1.0 million
|
|
|
|
21,211
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
April 14, 2009
|
|
May 26, 2009
|
|
June 25, 2009
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
5.6 million
|
|
|
|
11,776
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
August 3, 2009
|
|
September 8, 2009
|
|
September 25, 2009
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
7.5 million
|
|
|
|
56,890
|
|
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
December 10, 2009
|
|
December 29, 2009
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
9.7 million
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
January 12, 2010
|
|
March 3, 2010
|
|
March 30, 2010
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12.9 million
|
|
|
|
58,689
|
|
|
|
0.7 million
|
|
May 3, 2010
|
|
May 20, 2010
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
14.0 million
|
|
|
|
42,269
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
September 1, 2010
|
|
September 29, 2010
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
October 6, 2010
|
|
October 27, 2010
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
24,850
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
November 3, 2010
|
|
November 24, 2010
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
|
|
26,569
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
August 2, 2010
|
|
December 1, 2010
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
5.7 million
|
|
|
|
28,238
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
January 4, 2011
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
5.4 million
|
|
|
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
February 1, 2011
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
5.5 million
|
|
|
|
29,072
|
|
|
|
0.4 million
|
|
November 30, 2010
|
|
March 1, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.1066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
The following table reflects shareholder transactions that
occurred from October 1, 2008 through December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Shares
|
|
Share Price
|
|
(Uses)
|
|
October 27, 2008
|
|
Repurchase shares
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.96
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2 million
|
)
|
October 28, 2008
|
|
Repurchase shares
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
(0.2 million
|
)
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
Public offering(1)
|
|
|
9,487,500
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
|
|
87.8 million
|
|
September 25, 2009
|
|
Public offering(1)
|
|
|
5,520,000
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
|
58.0 million
|
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
Public offering
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
78.4 million
|
|
February 25, 2010
|
|
Underwriters exercise of
over-allotment
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
3.4 million
|
|
June 21, 2010
|
|
Public offering(1)
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
|
|
105.8 million
|
|
December 2010
|
|
At-the-market offering
|
|
|
429,110
|
|
|
|
11.87
|
(2)
|
|
|
5.1 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the underwriters full exercise of their
over-allotment option |
(2) |
|
Average offering price |
Borrowings
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a
consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose
subsidiary (Funding), and we entered into a Loan and
Servicing Agreement (Agreement), with respect to a
three-year credit facility (Wells Fargo facility)
with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells
Fargo), as successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative
agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders
party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents
party thereto from time to time, in the amount of
$50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for
potential future expansion of the facility up to
$100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0%
per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to
expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to
the amendment, we received an additional $50 million
commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from
$50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature
that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from
a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million.
In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was
reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the
facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two
additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each
of the lender parties thereto.
On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility
to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to
time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio
companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain
restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an
aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, we concurrently
entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with
Funding, pursuant to which we will sell to Funding certain loan
assets we have originated or acquired, or will originate or
acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo,
pursuant to which we pledged all of our equity interests in
Funding as security for the payment of Fundings
obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into
in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo
facility required both Funding and us to, among other things
(i) make representations and warranties regarding the
collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to
certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with
various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on
acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and
other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The
Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary
default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments
under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the
failure by Funding or us to materially perform under the
Agreement and related agreements governing the facility,
47
which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under
the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our
liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of
Funding, and all of our equity interest in Funding. We intend to
use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a
portion of our loan origination activities and for general
corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be
assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the
Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of
December 31, 2010, we had $38.0 million of borrowings
outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
On May 27, 2010, we entered into a three-year secured
syndicated revolving credit facility
(ING facility) pursuant to a Senior Secured
Revolving Credit Agreement (ING Credit Agreement)
with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING
Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows
for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus
3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate
base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a
maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows
us to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the
issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility
is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion
feature that allows for potential future expansion of the
facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is
secured by substantially all of our assets, as well as the
assets of two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings,
Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings,
Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things,
equity interests in our SBIC subsidiary and equity
interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge
and Security Agreement (ING Security Agreement)
entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among
FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital
LLC, as collateral agent, and us. Neither our
SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility
and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection
therewith. The ING facility provides that we may use the
proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general
corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged
loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible
securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING
Security Agreement, including our obligations to the lenders and
the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement.
Additionally, we pledged our entire equity interests in FSFC
Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent
pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the
ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.
and us to, among other things (i) make representations and
warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our
businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification
obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various
affirmative and negative covenants and other customary
requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility
documents also include usual and customary default provisions
such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility,
the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by us to
materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related
agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with,
could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby
materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial
condition and results of operations.
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot
be assured that we will be able to borrow funds under the ING
facility at any particular time or at all.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $51.0 million of
borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
As of December 31, 2010, except for assets that were funded
through our SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of our assets
were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the
ING facility.
Interest expense for the three months ended December 31,
2010, the year ended September 30, 2010 and the three
months ended December 31, 2009 was $1.9 million,
$1.9 million $0.1 million, respectively.
48
The following table describes significant financial covenants
with which we must comply under each of our credit facilities on
a quarterly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Financial Covenant
|
|
Description
|
|
Target Value
|
|
Reported Value(1)
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity (inclusive of affiliates)
|
|
Net assets shall not be less than $200 million plus 75% of the
aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after
November 16, 2009
|
|
$338 million
|
|
$569 million
|
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity (exclusive of affiliates)
|
|
Net assets exclusive of affiliates other than Funding shall not
be less than $250 million
|
|
$250 million
|
|
$494 million
|
|
|
Asset coverage ratio
|
|
Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.00:1
|
|
2.00:1
|
|
2.78:1
|
ING facility
|
|
Minimum shareholders equity
|
|
Net assets shall not be less than the greater of (a) 55% of
total assets; and (b) $385 million plus 50% of the aggregate net
proceeds of all sales of equity interests after
February 24, 2010
|
|
$436 million
|
|
$569 million
|
|
|
Asset coverage ratio
|
|
Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.25:1
|
|
2.25:1
|
|
8.80:1
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio
|
|
Interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.50:1
|
|
2.50:1
|
|
43.18:1
|
|
|
Eligible portfolio investments test
|
|
Aggregate value of (a) Cash and cash equivalents and (b)
Portfolio investments rated 1, 2 or 3 shall not be less than
$175 million
|
|
$175 million
|
|
$288 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As contractually required, we report financial covenants based
on the last filed quarterly or annual report, in this case our
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010. |
The following table reflects credit facility and debenture
transactions that occurred from October 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2010. Amounts available and drawn are as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Upfront
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fee Paid
|
|
Availability
|
|
Drawn
|
|
Rate
|
|
Bank of Montreal
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
Renewed credit facility
|
|
$
|
50 million
|
|
|
$
|
0.3 million
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25%
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2009
|
|
Terminated credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
November 16, 2009
|
|
Entered into credit facility
|
|
|
50 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 4.00%
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2010
|
|
Expanded credit facility
|
|
|
100 million
|
|
|
|
0.9 million
|
|
|
|
91 million
|
(1)
|
|
|
38 million
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.50%
|
|
ING facility
|
|
May 27, 2010
|
|
Entered into credit facility
|
|
|
90 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
90 million
|
|
|
|
51 million
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.50%
|
|
SBA
|
|
February 16, 2010
|
|
Received capital commitment
|
|
|
75 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2010
|
|
Received capital commitment
|
|
|
150 million
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
|
150 million
|
|
|
|
123.3 million
|
|
|
|
3.50% (2)
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Availability to increase upon our decision to further
collateralize the facility. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the SBA annual charge of 0.285%. |
49
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financial needs of our portfolio companies. As of
December 31, 2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements
consisted of $95.3 million of unfunded commitments, which
was comprised of $91.8 million to provide debt financing to
certain of our portfolio companies and $3.6 million related
to unfunded limited partnership interests. As of
September 30, 2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements
consisted of $49.5 million, which was comprised of
$46.7 million to provide debt financing to certain of our
portfolio companies and $2.8 million related to unfunded
limited partnership interests. Such commitments involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are
not reflected on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and
Liabilities.
Contractual
Obligations
On February 3, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary received a
license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to
operate as an SBIC. The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary
to obtain leverage by issuing
SBA-guaranteed
debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by
the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed
debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with
interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The
principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to
be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without
penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed
on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over
U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$123.3 million of SBA debentures payable.
$73.0 million of these debentures bore an interest rate of
3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, while the
remainder do not yet have a locked interest rate.
On November 16, 2009, we entered into the Wells Fargo
facility in the amount of $50 million with an accordion
feature, which allowed for potential future expansion of the
Wells Fargo facility up to $100 million. The Wells Fargo
facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4% per annum and had a
maturity date of November 26, 2012. On May 26, 2010,
we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand our borrowing
capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we
received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby
increasing the size of the Wells Fargo facility from
$50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature
that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from
a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million.
In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was
reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the
facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. On November 5, 2010, we amended the
Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the
issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit
of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to
certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and
an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
On May 27, 2010, we entered into the ING facility, which
allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an
alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate,
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per
annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING
facility also allows us to request letters of credit from ING
Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under
the ING facility is $90 million, and the ING facility
includes an accordion feature that allows for potential future
expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $51.0 million of
borrowings outstanding under the ING facility and
$38.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells
Fargo facility.
The table below reflects the following information pertaining to
debt outstanding under the SBA debentures payable, the Wells
Fargo facility and the ING facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average debt outstanding
|
|
Maximum debt outstanding
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding as of
|
|
Debt Outstanding as of
|
|
for the three months ended
|
|
for the three months ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
$
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
123,300,000
|
|
|
$
|
81,276,087
|
|
|
$
|
123,300,000
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
|
|
|
16,380,435
|
|
|
|
75,000,000
|
|
ING facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
|
|
5,021,739
|
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
|
212,300,000
|
|
|
|
102,678,261
|
|
|
|
234,300,000
|
|
50
The following table reflects our contractual obligations arising
from the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and
the ING facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Total
|
|
< 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
> 5 years
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
$
|
123,300,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,300,000
|
|
Interest due on SBA debentures
|
|
|
42,112,568
|
|
|
|
3,237,603
|
|
|
|
8,642,822
|
|
|
|
8,631,000
|
|
|
|
21,601,143
|
|
Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest due on Wells Fargo facility
|
|
|
5,266,012
|
|
|
|
2,179,039
|
|
|
|
3,086,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ING facility
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest due on ING facility
|
|
|
5,686,226
|
|
|
|
2,352,921
|
|
|
|
3,333,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
265,364,806
|
|
|
$
|
7,769,563
|
|
|
$
|
104,063,099
|
|
|
$
|
8,631,000
|
|
|
$
|
144,901,143
|
|
51
A summary of the composition of unfunded commitments (consisting
of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as
of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 is shown
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
877,895
|
|
|
|
966,360
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
678,583
|
|
|
|
864,175
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
9,062,453
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,623,148
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
Specialty Bakers, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
5,040,865
|
|
|
|
4,798,897
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership
interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
|
4,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
95,347,343
|
|
|
$
|
49,515,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated
Investment Company Status and Dividends
We elected, effective as of January 2, 2008, to be treated
as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify
as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable
income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such
taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be
distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial
reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in
the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes
net unrealized appreciation or depreciation until realized.
Dividends declared and paid by us in a year may differ from
taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the
distribution of current year taxable income or the distribution
of
52
prior year taxable income carried forward into and distributed
in the current year. Distributions also may include returns of
capital.
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things,
distribute, with respect to each taxable year, at least 90% of
our investment company taxable income (i.e., our net ordinary
income and our realized net short-term capital gains in excess
of realized net long-term capital losses, if any). As a RIC, we
are also subject to a federal excise tax, based on distributive
requirements of our taxable income on a calendar year basis
(e.g., calendar year 2011). We anticipate timely distribution of
our taxable income within the tax rules; however, we expect to
incur a de minimis U.S. federal excise tax for the calendar
year 2010. We intend to distribute to our stockholders between
90% and 100% of our annual taxable income (which includes our
taxable interest and fee income). However, in future periods, we
will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash
distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution
requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing
SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be
necessary to enable us to maintain our status as a RIC. We may
have to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for our
SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our
RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such
waiver. Also, the covenants under the Wells Fargo facility
could, under certain circumstances, restrict Fifth Street
Funding, LLC from making distributions to us and, as a result,
hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement.
Similarly, the covenants contained in the ING facility may
prohibit us from making distributions to our stockholders, and,
as a result, could hinder our ability to satisfy the
distribution requirement. In addition, we may retain for
investment some or all of our net taxable capital gains (i.e.,
realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net
short-term capital losses) and treat such amounts as deemed
distributions to our stockholders. If we do this, our
stockholders will be treated as if they received actual
distributions of the capital gains we retained and then
reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. Our
stockholders also may be eligible to claim tax credits (or, in
certain circumstances, tax refunds) equal to their allocable
share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed
to them. To the extent our taxable earnings for a fiscal taxable
year fall below the total amount of our dividends for that
fiscal year, a portion of those dividend distributions may be
deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow
us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the
amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we
may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the
asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a
business development company under the 1940 Act and due to
provisions in our credit facilities. If we do not distribute a
certain percentage of our taxable income annually, we will
suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of our
status as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will
receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level.
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure
2010-12), or
the Revenue Procedure, issued by the Internal Revenue Service,
or IRS, the IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions
from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid
part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy
the RICs annual distribution requirements and qualify for
the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. In
order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue Procedure
requires that at least 10% of the total distribution be payable
in cash and that each stockholder have a right to elect to
receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many
stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to
receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to
be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash
may receive less than 10% of such stockholders
distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applies to
distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with
respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31,
2011. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares
of our stock.
Related
Party Transactions
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth
Street Management LLC, our investment adviser. Fifth Street
Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing
member and the chairman of our Board of Directors and our chief
executive officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory
agreement, fees payable to our investment adviser will be equal
to (a) a base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our
gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment
purposes, and (b) an incentive fee based on our
performance. Our investment adviser agreed to permanently waive
that portion of its base management fee attributable to our
assets
53
held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of
each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. The incentive fee
consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable
quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding
quarter, subject to a preferred return, or hurdle,
and a catch up feature. The second part is
determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal
year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement)
and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee Capital Gains,
which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis
from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net
of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital
depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of
any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. During the three months ended
December 31, 2010, we accrued management and incentive fees
payable to our investment adviser under the investment advisory
agreement in the amount of $7.3 million.
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which
is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will
furnish us with the facilities and administrative services
necessary to conduct our
day-to-day
operations, including equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and
recordkeeping services at such facilities. In addition, FSC,
Inc. will assist us in connection with the determination and
publishing of our net asset value, the preparation and filing of
tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders. We will pay FSC, Inc. our allocable portion of
overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement, including a
portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial
officer and chief compliance officer and their respective
staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving
reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief
compliance officer. Although FSC, Inc. currently intends to
forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no
obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the
future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. During the three months ended
December 31, 2010, we paid FSC, Inc. $0.8 million
under the administration agreement.
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street
Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has
agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use
the name Fifth Street. Under this agreement, we will
have a right to use the Fifth Street name, for so
long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates
remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this
limited license, we will have no legal right to the Fifth
Street name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by
Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.
Recent
Developments
On January 4, 2011, we closed a $19.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a
technology-enabled home-delivery pharmacy. The investment is
backed by a private equity sponsor and $17.0 million was
funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a
$2.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 6.0%
per annum and a $17.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate
of LIBOR + 10.5% per annum. This is a first lien facility with a
scheduled maturity of five years.
On January 6, 2011, we closed a $14.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a provider
of outsourced Medicaid eligibility services. The investment is
backed by a private equity sponsor and $12.0 million was
funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a
$2.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 6.5%
per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor, and a $12.0 million
Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 7.5-10.0% per annum
with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a
scheduled maturity of five years.
On January 6, 2011, we closed a $20.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a manager
and administrator of investment products. The investment is
backed by a private equity sponsor and $11.7 million was
funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a
$20.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of + 9.5% LIBOR
per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility
with a scheduled maturity of five years.
54
On January 14, 2011, we closed a $13.3 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a provider
of
non-destructive
pipe testing services. The investment is backed by a private
equity sponsor and $11.3 million was funded at closing. The
terms of this investment include a $2.0 million revolver at
an interest rate of LIBOR + 8.0% per annum with a 2% LIBOR
floor, a $5.3 million Term Loan A at an interest rate of
LIBOR + 8.0% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor, and a
$6.0 million Term Loan B at an interest rate of LIBOR + 12%
per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility
with a scheduled maturity of five years.
On January 20, 2011, we closed a $10.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of an acquirer
and operator of specialty pharmaceutical companies. The
investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and
$10.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this
investment include a $10.0 million Term Loan at an interest
rate of LIBOR + 6.25% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a
first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
On January 30, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the
following dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on April 29, 2011 to
stockholders of record on April 1, 2011;
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on May 31, 2011 to stockholders
of record on May 2, 2011; and
|
|
|
|
$0.1066 per share, payable on June 30, 2011 to stockholders
of record on June 1, 2011.
|
On January 31, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of
$0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on
January 4, 2011.
On February 1, 2011, we closed a $35.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a
distributor of branded homecare products. The investment is
backed by a private equity sponsor and $32.9 million was
funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a
$6.4 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.0%
per annum with a 1.5% LIBOR floor, an $8.6 million Senior
Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.0% per annum with a
1.5% LIBOR floor and a $20.0 million unsecured Term Loan at
an interest rate of 13.875% per annum. This facility has a
scheduled maturity of five years for the revolver and Senior
Term Loan and six years for the unsecured Term Loan.
On February 1, 2011, we closed an $11.5 million senior
secured debt facility to support the expansion of credit to an
outsourced provider of revenue cycle management services to
healthcare providers. The investment is backed by a private
equity sponsor and $11.5 million was funded at closing. The
terms of this investment include an $11.5 million Term Loan
at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.25% per annum with a 1.75%
LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled
maturity of approximately five years.
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public
offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.
On February 24, 2011, we amended the ING facility to expand
our borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the
ING facilitys accordion feature was increased to allow for
potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million,
the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014, and,
if we obtain a credit rating of BBB or the equivalent, the
interest rate will be reduced to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with
no LIBOR floor.
On February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo facility
to reduce our interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with
no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to
February 25, 2014.
On February 28, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of
$0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on February 1,
2011.
On March 4, 2011, we closed a $35.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a designer
and manufacturer of heavy equipment for oil and gas production.
The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and
$35.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this
investment include a $35.0 million Term Loan at an interest
rate of LIBOR + 9.0% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is
a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of
4.5 years.
On March 8, 2011, we closed a $25.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support an add-on for a provider of
homecare medical products and services. The investment is backed
by a private equity sponsor and $25.0 million
55
was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a
$25.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 9.0%
per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien
facility with a scheduled maturity of approximately five years.
On March 23, 2011, we closed a $64.0 million senior
secured debt facility to support the acquisition of an operator
of specialty retail stores. The investment is backed by a
private equity sponsor and $55.0 million was funded at
closing, including the purchase of $1.0 million of equity.
The terms of this investment include a $10.0 million
revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR +7.5% per annum, a
$26.0 million Term Loan A at an interest rate of LIBOR
+7.5% per annum and a $28.0 million Term Loan B at an
interest rate of LIBOR +10.25% per annum. This is a first lien
facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
In March 2011, our SBIC subsidiary locked in a fixed annual
interest rate of 4.369%, including an SBA annual charge of
0.285%, on $65.3 million of its SBA-guaranteed debentures.
Our SBIC subsidiary had previously locked in a fixed annual
interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of
0.285%, on $73.0 million of its SBA-guaranteed debentures.
As a result, we, through our SBIC subsidiary, had a total of
$138.3 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding as
of March 28, 2011, all of which had locked fixed annual interest
rates.
In addition, we are also in the process of preparing an
application to the SBA for a second SBIC license. If approved,
this license would provide us with the capability to issue an
additional $75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures beyond
the $150 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures we, through
our wholly owned subsidiary, currently have the ability to
issue. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful
in obtaining a second SBIC license from the SBA.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the
expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in
interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect both our
cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio
investments, cash and cash equivalents and idle funds
investments. Our risk management systems and procedures are
designed to identify and analyze our risk, to set appropriate
policies and limits and to continually monitor these risks and
limits by means of reliable administrative and information
systems and other policies and programs. Our investment income
will be affected by changes in various interest rates, including
LIBOR and prime rates, to the extent any of our debt investments
include floating interest rates. The significant majority of our
debt investments are made with fixed interest rates for the term
of the investment. However, as of December 31, 2010, 50.0%
of our debt investment portfolio (at fair value) and 48.5% of
our debt investment portfolio (at cost) bore interest at
floating rates. As of December 31, 2010, based on our
applicable levels of floating-rate debt investments, a 1.0%
change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our
level of interest income from debt investments.
Based on our review of interest rate risk, we determine whether
or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate
exposure to changes in interest rates. On August 16, 2010,
we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that expires on
August 15, 2013, for a total notional amount of
$100 million, for the purposes of hedging the interest rate
risk related to the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility.
Under the interest rate swap agreement, we will pay a fixed
interest rate of 0.99% and receive a floating rate based on the
prevailing one-month LIBOR.
Our investments are carried at fair value as determined in good
faith by our Board of Directors in accordance with the 1940 Act
(See Critical Accounting Policies
Investment Valuation). Our valuation methodology utilizes
discount rates in part in valuing our investments, and changes
in those discount rates may have an impact on the valuation of
our investments. Assuming no changes in our investment and
capital structure, a hypothetical increase or decrease in
discount rates of 100 basis points would increase or
decrease our net assets resulting from operations by
$17 million.
56
BUSINESS
General
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in
small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by
private equity sponsors. We define small and mid-sized companies
as those with annual revenues between $25 million and
$250 million. Our investment objective is to maximize our
portfolios total return by generating current income from
our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
investments. We are externally managed and advised by Fifth
Street Management LLC, which we also refer to as our
investment adviser.
As of December 31, 2010, we had originated
$907.5 million of funded debt and equity investments and
our portfolio totaled $742.4 million at fair value and was
comprised of 45 investments, 41 of which were in operating
companies and four of which were in private equity funds. The
four investments in private equity funds represented less than
1% of the fair value of our assets at December 31, 2010.
The 38 debt investments in our portfolio as of
December 31, 2010 had a weighted average debt to EBITDA
(Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization)
multiple of 3.24x calculated at the time of origination of
the investment. The weighted average annual yield of our debt
investments as of December 31, 2010 was approximately
13.2%, of which 11.4% represented cash payments and 1.8%
represented
payment-in-kind,
or PIK, interest.
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to
$75 million and are principally in the form of first and
second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity
component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on
first lien loans. As of December 31, 2010, substantially
all of our debt investments were secured by first or second
priority liens on the assets of our portfolio companies.
Moreover, we held equity investments consisting of common stock,
preferred stock, or other equity interests in 21 out of 45
portfolio companies as of December 31, 2010.
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., our predecessor fund,
commenced operations as a private partnership on
February 15, 2007. Effective as of January 2, 2008,
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into
us. We were formed in late 2007 for the purpose of acquiring
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and continuing its
business as a public entity. We are an externally managed,
closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that
has elected to be regulated as a business development company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act.
As a business development company, we are required to comply
with regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use
of debt. We are permitted to, and expect to, finance our
investments through borrowings. However, as a business
development company, we are only generally allowed to borrow
amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940
Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of
leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market
conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed
borrowing. See Regulation Business Development
Company Regulations.
We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. See
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations Taxation as a Regulated Investment
Company. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay
corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income
or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we
meet certain
source-of-income,
distribution and asset diversification requirements.
In addition, we maintain a wholly-owned subsidiary that is
licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and
regulated by the Small Business Administration, or the SBA. See
Regulation Small Business Investment Company
Regulations. The SBIC license allows us, through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We
have received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC
subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior
securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to
maintain under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the 200% asset coverage
ratio limitation, we are permitted to borrow one dollar for
every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and
indebtedness not represented by debt securities issued by us or
loans obtained by us. For example, as of December 31, 2010,
we had approximately $663.9 million in assets less all
liabilities and indebtedness not
57
represented by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by
us, which would permit us to borrow up to approximately
$663.9 million, notwithstanding other limitations on our
borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities.
As a result of our receipt of an exemption from the SEC for our
SBA debt, we have increased capacity to fund up to
$150 million (the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed
debentures an SBIC may currently have outstanding once certain
conditions have been met) of investments with SBA-guaranteed
debentures in addition to being able to fund investments with
borrowings up to the maximum amount of debt that the 200% asset
coverage ratio limitation would allow us to incur. As a result,
we, in effect, are permitted to have a lower asset coverage
ratio than the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation under the
1940 Act and, therefore, we can have more debt outstanding than
assets to cover such debt. For example, we are able to borrow up
to $150 million more than the approximately
$663.9 million permitted under the 200% asset coverage
ratio limit as of December 31, 2010. For additional
information on SBA regulations that affect our access to
SBA-guaranteed debentures, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure Our
SBIC subsidiarys investment adviser has no prior
experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA
regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiarys
investment advisers lack of experience or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our operations.
The
Investment Adviser
Our investment adviser is affiliated with Fifth Street Capital
LLC, a private investment firm founded and managed by Leonard M.
Tannenbaum who has led the investment of over $1.4 billion
in small and mid-sized companies, including the investments made
by us, since 1998. Mr. Tannenbaum and his respective
private investment firms have acted as the lead (and often sole)
first or second lien investor in over 80 investment
transactions. The other investment funds managed by these
private investment firms generally are fully committed and,
other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio
companies, are no longer making investments.
We benefit from our investment advisers ability to
identify attractive investment opportunities, conduct diligence
on and value prospective investments, negotiate investments and
manage a diversified portfolio of those investments. The
principals of our investment adviser have broad investment
backgrounds, with prior experience at investment funds,
investment banks and other financial services companies and have
developed a broad network of contacts within the private equity
community. This network of contacts provides our principal
source of investment opportunities.
The principals of our investment adviser are
Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and our
investment advisers managing partner, Bernard D. Berman,
our president, chief compliance officer and secretary and a
partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our
co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment
adviser, Chad Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer, Juan E.
Alva, a partner of our investment adviser, Casey J.
Zmijeski, a partner of our investment adviser and William H.
Craig, our chief financial officer.
Business
Strategy
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios
total return by generating current income from our debt
investments and capital appreciation from our equity
investments. We have adopted the following business strategy to
achieve our investment objective:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on our investment advisers strong
relationships with private equity sponsors. Our
investment adviser has developed an extensive network of
relationships with private equity sponsors that invest in small
and mid-sized companies. We believe that the strength of these
relationships is due to a common investment philosophy, a
consistent market focus, a rigorous approach to diligence and a
reputation for delivering on commitments. In addition to being
our principal source of originations, we believe that private
equity sponsors provide significant benefits including
incremental due diligence, additional monitoring capabilities
and a potential source of capital and operational expertise for
our portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
Focus on established small and mid-sized
companies. We believe that there are fewer
finance companies focused on transactions involving small and
mid-sized companies than larger companies, and that this is one
factor that allows us to negotiate favorable investment terms.
Such favorable terms include higher debt yields and lower
leverage levels, more significant covenant protection and
greater equity grants than typical of
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
transactions involving larger companies. We generally invest in
companies with established market positions, seasoned management
teams, proven products and services and strong regional or
national operations. We believe that these companies possess
better risk-adjusted return profiles than newer companies that
are building management or in early stages of building a revenue
base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue our growth of direct originations. As
of December 31, 2010, we directly originated 100% of our
debt investments, although we may not directly originate 100% of
our investments in the future. Over the last several years, the
principals of our investment adviser have developed an
origination strategy designed to ensure that the number and
quality of our investment opportunities allows us to continue to
directly originate substantially all of our investments. We
believe that the benefits of direct originations include, among
other things, our ability to control the structuring of
investment protections and to generate origination and exit fees.
|
|
|
|
Employ disciplined underwriting policies and rigorous
portfolio management. Our investment adviser has
developed an extensive underwriting process which includes a
review of the prospects, competitive position, financial
performance and industry dynamics of each potential portfolio
company. In addition, we perform substantial diligence on
potential investments, and seek to invest along side private
equity sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value.
As part of the monitoring process, our investment adviser will
analyze monthly and quarterly financial statements versus the
previous periods and year, review financial projections, meet
with management, attend board meetings and review all compliance
certificates and covenants.
|
|
|
|
Structure our debt investments to minimize risk of loss and
achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns. We
structure our debt investments on a conservative basis with high
cash yields, cash origination fees, low leverage levels and
strong investment protections. As of December 31, 2010, the
weighted average annualized yield of our debt investments was
approximately 13.2%, which includes a cash component of 11.4%.
Our debt investments have strong protections, including default
penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and
affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien
protection and prohibitions against change of control. We
believe these protections, coupled with the other features of
our investments described above, should allow us to reduce our
risk of capital loss and achieve attractive risk adjusted
returns; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able
to successfully structure our investments to minimize risk of
loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.
|
|
|
|
Benefit from lower, fixed, long-term cost of
capital. The SBIC license held by our
wholly-owned subsidiary allows it to issue SBA-guaranteed
debentures. SBA-guaranteed debentures carry long-term fixed
rates that are generally lower than rates on comparable bank and
other debt. Because we expect lower cost SBA leverage to become
a more significant part of our capital base through our SBIC
subsidiary, our relative cost of debt capital may be lower than
many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we
receive through our SBIC subsidiary will represent a stable,
long-term component of our capital structure that should permit
the proper matching of duration and cost compared to our
portfolio investments.
|
|
|
|
Leverage the skills and experience of our investment
adviser. The principals of our investment adviser
have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at
private investment funds, investment banks and other financial
services companies and they also have experience managing
distressed companies. We believe that our investment
advisers expertise in valuing, structuring, negotiating
and closing transactions provides us with a competitive
advantage by allowing us to provide financing solutions that
meet the needs of our portfolio companies while adhering to our
underwriting standards.
|
Investment
Criteria
The principals of our investment adviser have identified the
following investment criteria and guidelines for use in
evaluating prospective portfolio companies and they use these
criteria and guidelines in evaluating investment opportunities
for us. However, not all of these criteria and guidelines were,
or will be, met in connection with each of our investments.
59
|
|
|
|
|
Established companies with a history of positive operating
cash flow. We seek to invest in established
companies with sound historical financial performance. We
typically focus on companies with a history of profitability on
an operating cash flow basis. We do not intend to invest in
start-up
companies or companies with speculative business plans.
|
|
|
|
Ability to exert meaningful influence. We
target investment opportunities in which we will be the
lead/sole investor in our tranche and in which we can add value
through active participation, often through advisory positions.
|
|
|
|
Private equity sponsorship. We generally seek
to invest in companies in connection with private equity
sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value. We
believe that a private equity sponsor can serve as a committed
partner and advisor that will actively work with the company and
its management team to meet company goals and create value. We
assess a private equity sponsors commitment to a portfolio
company by, among other things, the capital contribution it has
made or will make in the portfolio company.
|
|
|
|
Seasoned management team. We generally will
require that our portfolio companies have a seasoned management
team, with strong corporate governance. We also seek to invest
in companies that have proper incentives in place, including
having significant equity interests, to motivate management to
act in accordance with our interests.
|
|
|
|
Defensible and sustainable business. We seek
to invest in companies with proven products
and/or
services and strong regional or national operations.
|
|
|
|
Exit strategy. We generally seek to invest in
companies that we believe possess attributes that will provide
us with the ability to exit our investments. We expect to exit
our investments typically through one of three scenarios:
(i) the sale of the company resulting in repayment of all
outstanding debt, (ii) the recapitalization of the company
through which our loan is replaced with debt or equity from a
third party or parties or (iii) the repayment of the
initial or remaining principal amount of our loan then
outstanding at maturity. In some investments, there may be
scheduled amortization of some portion of our loan which would
result in a partial exit of our investment prior to the maturity
of the loan.
|
Deal
Origination
Our deal originating efforts are focused on building
relationships with private equity sponsors that are focused on
investing in the small and mid-sized companies that we target.
We divide the country geographically into Eastern, Central and
Western regions and emphasize active, consistent sponsor
coverage. Over the last ten years, the investment professionals
of our investment adviser have developed an extensive network of
relationships with these private equity sponsors. We estimate
that there are approximately 1,400 of such private equity firms
and our investment adviser has active relationships with
approximately 140 of them. An active relationship is one through
which our investment adviser has received at least one
investment opportunity from the private equity sponsor within
the last year.
Our investment adviser reviewed over 500 potential investment
transactions with private equity sponsors for the year ended
September 30, 2010. All of the investment transactions that
we have completed to date were originated through our investment
advisers relationships with private equity sponsors. We
believe that our investment adviser has a reputation as a
reliable, responsive and efficient source of funding to support
private equity investments. We believe that this reputation and
the relationships of our investment adviser with private equity
sponsors will provide us with significant investment
opportunities.
Our origination process is designed to efficiently evaluate a
large number of opportunities and to identify the most
attractive of such opportunities. A significant number of
opportunities that clearly do not fit our investment criteria
are screened by the partners of our investment adviser when they
are initially identified. If an originator believes that an
opportunity fits our investment criteria and merits
consideration, the investment is presented to our investment
advisers Investment Committee. This is the first stage of
our origination process, the Review stage. During
this stage, the originator gives a preliminary description of
the opportunity. This is followed by preliminary due diligence,
from which an investment summary is created. The opportunity may
be discussed several times by the full Investment Committee of
our investment adviser, or subsets of that Committee. At any
point in this stage, we
60
may reject the opportunity, and, indeed, we have historically
decided not to proceed with more than 80% of the investment
opportunities reviewed by our investment advisers
Investment Committee.
For the subset of opportunities that we decide to pursue, we
issue preliminary term sheets and classify them in the
Term Sheet Issued stage. This term sheet serves as a
basis for negotiating the critical terms of a transaction. At
this stage we begin our underwriting and investment approval
process, as more fully described below. After the term sheet for
a potential transaction has been fully negotiated, the
transaction is presented to our investment advisers
Investment Committee for approval. If the deal is approved, the
term sheet is signed. Approximately half of the term sheets we
issue result in an executed term sheet. Our underwriting and
investment approval process is ongoing during this stage, during
which we begin documentation of the loan. The final stage,
Closings, culminates with the funding of an
investment only after all due diligence is satisfactorily
completed and all closing conditions, including the
sponsors funding of its investment in the portfolio
company, have been satisfied.
Underwriting
Underwriting
Process and Investment Approval
We make our investment decisions only after consideration of a
number of factors regarding the potential investment including,
but not limited to: (i) historical and projected financial
performance; (ii) company and industry specific
characteristics, such as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities
and threats; (iii) composition and experience of the
management team; and (iv) track record of the private
equity sponsor leading the transaction. Our investment adviser
uses a proprietary scoring system that evaluates each
opportunity. This methodology is employed to screen a high
volume of potential investment opportunities on a consistent
basis.
If an investment is deemed appropriate to pursue, a more
detailed and rigorous evaluation is made along a variety of
investment parameters, not all of which may be relevant or
considered in evaluating a potential investment opportunity. The
following outlines the general parameters and areas of
evaluation and due diligence for investment decisions, although
not all will necessarily be considered or given equal weighting
in the evaluation process.
Management
assessment
Our investment adviser makes an in-depth assessment of the
management team, including evaluation along several key metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
The number of years in their current positions;
|
|
|
|
Track record;
|
|
|
|
Industry experience;
|
|
|
|
Management incentive, including the level of direct investment
in the enterprise;
|
|
|
|
Background investigations; and
|
|
|
|
Completeness of the management team (lack of positions that need
to be filled).
|
Industry
dynamics
An evaluation of the industry is undertaken by our investment
adviser that considers several factors. If considered
appropriate, industry experts will be consulted or retained. The
following factors are analyzed by our investment adviser:
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity to economic cycles;
|
|
|
|
Competitive environment, including number of competitors, threat
of new entrants or substitutes;
|
|
|
|
Fragmentation and relative market share of industry leaders;
|
|
|
|
Growth potential; and
|
|
|
|
Regulatory and legal environment.
|
61
Business
model and financial assessment
Prior to making an investment decision, our investment adviser
will undertake a review and analysis of the financial and
strategic plans for the potential investment. There is
significant evaluation of and reliance upon the due diligence
performed by the private equity sponsor and third party experts
including accountants and consultants. Areas of evaluation
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Historical and projected financial performance;
|
|
|
|
Quality of earnings, including source and predictability of cash
flows;
|
|
|
|
Customer and vendor interviews and assessments;
|
|
|
|
Potential exit scenarios, including probability of a liquidity
event;
|
|
|
|
Internal controls and accounting systems; and
|
|
|
|
Assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities.
|
Private
equity sponsor
Among the most critical due diligence investigations is the
evaluation of the private equity sponsor making the investment.
A private equity sponsor is typically the controlling
shareholder upon completion of an investment and as such is
considered critical to the success of the investment. The
private equity sponsor is evaluated along several key criteria,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment track record;
|
|
|
|
Industry experience;
|
|
|
|
Capacity and willingness to provide additional financial support
to the company through additional capital contributions, if
necessary; and
|
|
|
|
Reference checks.
|
Investments
We target debt investments that will yield meaningful current
income and provide the opportunity for capital appreciation
through equity securities. We typically structure our debt
investments with the maximum seniority and collateral that we
can reasonably obtain while seeking to achieve our total return
target. In most cases, our debt investment will be
collateralized by a first or second lien on the assets of the
portfolio company. As of December 31, 2010, substantially
all of our debt investments were secured by first or second
priority liens on the assets of the portfolio company.
Debt
Investments
We tailor the terms of our debt investments to the facts and
circumstances of the transaction and prospective portfolio
company, negotiating a structure that seeks to protect our
rights and manage our risk while creating incentives for the
portfolio company to achieve its business plan. A substantial
source of return is monthly cash interest that we collect on our
debt investments. As of December 31, 2010, we directly
originated 100% of our loans, although we may not directly
originate 100% of our investments in the future. We are
currently focusing our new origination efforts on first lien
loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these
loans are superior to second lien investments and offer superior
credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien
and unsecured loans in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Loans. Our first lien loans
generally have terms of four to six years, provide for a
variable or fixed interest rate, contain prepayment penalties
and are secured by a first priority security interest in all
existing and future assets of the borrower. Our first lien loans
may take many forms, including revolving lines of credit, term
loans and acquisition lines of credit.
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Loans. Our second lien loans
generally have terms of four to six years, primarily provide for
a fixed interest rate, contain prepayment penalties and are
secured by a second priority security interest in all existing
and future assets of the borrower. Our second lien loans often
include
payment-in-kind,
or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest accrued
and added to the principal that generally becomes due at
maturity. As of December 31, 2010, all of our second lien
loans had intercreditor agreements requiring a standstill period
of no more than 180 days. During the standstill period, we
are generally restricted from exercising remedies against the
borrower or the collateral in order to provide the first lien
lenders time to cure any breaches or defaults by the borrower.
|
|
|
|
Unsecured Loans. Our unsecured investments
generally have terms of five to six years and provide for a
fixed interest rate. We may make unsecured investments on a
stand-alone basis, or in connection with a senior secured loan,
a junior secured loan or a one-stop financing. Our
unsecured investments may include
payment-in-kind,
or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest accrued
and added to the principal that generally becomes due at
maturity, and an equity component, such as warrants to purchase
common stock in the portfolio company.
|
We typically structure our debt investments to include covenants
that seek to minimize our risk of capital loss. Our debt
investments have strong protections, including default
penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and
affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien
protection and prohibitions against change of control. Our debt
investments also have substantial prepayment penalties designed
to extend the life of the average loan, which we believe will
help to grow our portfolio.
Equity
Investments
When we make a debt investment, we may be granted equity in the
company in the same class of security as the sponsor receives
upon funding. In addition, we may from time to time make
non-control, equity
co-investments
in connection with private equity sponsors. We generally seek to
structure our equity investments, such as direct equity
co-investments, to provide us with minority rights provisions
and event-driven put rights. We also seek to obtain limited
registration rights in connection with these investments, which
may include piggyback registration rights.
Private
Equity Fund Investments
We make investments in the private equity funds of certain of
our equity sponsors. In general, we make these investments where
we have a long term relationship and are comfortable with the
sponsors business model and investment strategy. As of
December 31, 2010, we had investments in four private
equity funds, which represented less than 1% of the fair value
of our assets as of such date.
Portfolio
Management
Active
Involvement in our Portfolio Companies
As a business development company, we are obligated to offer to
provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies and to
provide it if requested. In fact, we provide managerial
assistance to our portfolio companies as a general practice and
we seek investments where such assistance is appropriate. We
monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to assess
the appropriate course of action for each company and to
evaluate overall portfolio quality. We have several methods of
evaluating and monitoring the performance of our investments,
including but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
review of monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for portfolio companies;
|
|
|
|
periodic and regular contact with portfolio company management
to discuss financial position requirements and accomplishments;
|
|
|
|
attendance at board meetings;
|
|
|
|
periodic formal update interviews with portfolio company
management and, if appropriate, the private equity
sponsor; and
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
assessment of business development success, including product
development, profitability and the portfolio companys
overall adherence to its business plan.
|
Rating
Criteria
In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, we
use an investment rating system to characterize and monitor the
credit profile and our expected level of returns on each
investment in our portfolio. We use a five-level numeric rating
scale. The following is a description of the conditions
associated with each investment rating:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing
above expectations
and/or a
capital gain is expected.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing
substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain
neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time
of the original investment. All new loans are initially rated 2.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but
where we expect no loss of investment return (interest
and/or
dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may
be out of compliance with financial covenants.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing
below our expectations and for which risk has increased
materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of
investment return, but no loss of principal.
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing
substantially below our expectations and whose risks have
increased substantially since the original investment.
Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of
principal is expected.
|
In the event that we determine that an investment is
underperforming, or circumstances suggest that the risk
associated with a particular investment has significantly
increased, we will undertake more aggressive monitoring of the
effected portfolio company. While our investment rating system
identifies the relative risk for each investment, the rating
alone does not dictate the scope
and/or
frequency of any monitoring that we perform. The frequency of
our monitoring of an investment is determined by a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, the trends in the
financial performance of the portfolio company, the investment
structure and the type of collateral securing our investment, if
any.
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on
the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
80,790,254
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
2
|
|
|
620,901,779
|
|
|
|
83.6
|
%
|
3
|
|
|
21,672,872
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
5
|
|
|
19,030,430
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exit
Strategies/Refinancing
As of December 31, 2010, we had structured
$7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio
investments to be received upon the future exit of those
investments. We expect to exit our investments typically through
one of three scenarios: (i) the sale of the company
resulting in repayment of all outstanding debt, (ii) the
recapitalization of the company in which our loan is replaced
with debt or equity from a third party or parties or
(iii) the repayment of the initial or remaining principal
amount of our loan then outstanding at maturity. In some
investments, there may be
64
scheduled amortization of some portion of our loan which would
result in a partial exit of our investment prior to the maturity
of the loan.
Valuation
of Portfolio Investments and Net Asset Value
Determinations
As a business development company, we generally invest in
illiquid securities including debt and equity investments of
small and mid-sized companies. All of our investments are
recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors.
Authoritative accounting guidance defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair
value is based on observable market prices or parameters or
derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices
or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques
are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of
management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is
dependent on the price transparency for the investments or
market and the investments complexity.
In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, we perform
detailed valuations of our debt and equity investments on an
individual basis, using market, income, and bond yield
approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize a bond yield
method for the majority of our investments, as long as it is
appropriate. If, in our judgment, the bond yield approach is not
appropriate, we may use the enterprise value approach, or, in
certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including
an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of
the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one
methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any
one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a
range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of
enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a
portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the
portfolio companys historical and projected financial
results. Typically, private companies are valued based on
multiples of EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in
limited cases, book value. We generally require portfolio
companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly
unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections
for the upcoming fiscal year.
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze
discounted cash flow models based on projections of the future
free cash flows of the business.
Under the bond yield approach, we use bond yield models to
determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of
our debt investments. We review various sources of transactional
data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt
investments with similar characteristics, and assess the
information in the valuation process.
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process
each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of
our investments:
|
|
|
|
|
The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within the investment adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of the investment adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit the reports to us;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of our Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
|
The fair value of all of our investments at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2010 was determined by our Board of
Directors. Our Board of Directors is solely responsible for the
valuation of the portfolio investments at fair value as
determined in good faith pursuant to our valuation policy and a
consistently applied valuation process.
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms
to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of
their process each quarter, the independent valuation firms
provide us with a written report regarding the preliminary
valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of
such quarter. We will continue to engage independent valuation
firms to provide us with assistance regarding our determination
of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter;
however, our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely
responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in
good faith.
The percentages of our portfolio at fair value for which
independent valuation firms provided us with valuation
assistance by period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Portfolio at
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
|
|
|
88.7
|
%(1)
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17.2
|
%(2)
|
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc.,
which closed on June 30, 2009 and therefore was not part of
the independent valuation process |
|
(2) |
|
24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009
and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process |
We intend to have valuation firms provide us with valuation
assistance on a portion of our portfolio on a quarterly basis
and a substantial portion of our portfolio on an annual basis.
Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and
estimates. The notes to our financial statements refer to the
uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such
valuations, and any change in such valuations, on our financial
statements.
66
Quarterly
Net Asset Value Determination
We determine the net asset value per share of our common stock
on a quarterly basis. The net asset value per share of our
common stock is equal to the value of our total assets minus
liabilities and any preferred stock outstanding divided by the
total number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Determinations
in Connection with Certain Offerings
In connection with certain offerings of shares of our common
stock, our board of directors or one of its committees will be
required to make the determination that we are not selling
shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net
asset value per share of our common stock at the time at which
the sale is made. Our board of directors or the applicable
committee will consider the following factors, among others, in
making such determination:
|
|
|
|
|
the net asset value per share of our common stock most recently
disclosed by us in the most recent periodic report that we filed
with the SEC;
|
|
|
|
our managements assessment of whether any material change
in the net asset value per share of our common stock has
occurred (including through the realization of gains on the sale
of our portfolio securities) during the period beginning on the
date of the most recently disclosed net asset value per share of
our common stock and ending two days prior to the date of the
sale of our common stock; and
|
|
|
|
the magnitude of the difference between the net asset value per
share of our common stock most recently disclosed by us and our
managements assessment of any material change in the net
asset value per share of our common stock since that
determination, and the offering price of the shares of our
common stock in the proposed offering.
|
This determination will not require that we calculate the net
asset value per share of our common stock in connection with
such offerings of shares of our common stock, but instead it
will involve the determination by our board of directors or a
committee thereof that we are not selling shares of our common
stock at a price below the then current net asset value per
share of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made.
Competition
We compete for investments with a number of business development
companies and investment funds (including private equity funds
and mezzanine funds), as well as traditional financial services
companies such as commercial banks and other sources of
financing. Many of these entities have greater financial and
managerial resources than we do. We believe we are able to be
competitive with these entities primarily on the basis of the
experience and contacts of our management team, our responsive
and efficient investment analysis and decision-making processes,
the investment terms we offer, and our willingness to make
smaller investments.
We believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest
rates and returns that are comparable to or lower than the rates
and returns that we target. Therefore, we do not seek to compete
solely on the interest rates and returns that we offer to
potential portfolio companies. For additional information
concerning the competitive risks we face, see Risk
Factors Risks Relating to Our Business and
Structure We may face increasing competition for
investment opportunities, which could reduce returns and result
in losses.
Employees
We do not have any employees. Our
day-to-day
investment operations are managed by our investment adviser. See
Investment Advisory Agreement. Our investment
adviser employs a total of 18 investment professionals,
including its principals. In addition, we reimburse our
administrator, FSC, Inc., for the allocable portion of overhead
and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations
under an administration agreement, including the compensation of
our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer, and
their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo
receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our
chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his
compensation arrangement with our investment adviser. However,
although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to
receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so
and may cease to
67
do so at any time in the future. For a more detailed discussion
of the administration agreement, see Administration
Agreement.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties
materially important to our operation; however, we lease office
space for our executive office at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor,
White Plains, NY 10606. Our investment adviser also
maintains additional office space at 500 W. Putnam
Ave., Suite 400, Greenwich, CT 06830. We believe that our
current office facilities are adequate for our business as we
intend to conduct it.
Legal
Proceedings
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation
arising out of our operations in the normal course of business
or otherwise, we are currently not a party to any pending
material legal proceedings.
68
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The following table sets forth certain information as of
December 31, 2010, for each portfolio company in which we
had a debt or equity investment. Other than these investments,
our only formal relationships with our portfolio companies are
the managerial assistance ancillary to our investments and the
board observation or participation rights we may receive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of
|
|
|
|
Titles of Securities
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
Fair Value of
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Held by Us
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Loan Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Investment
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 Bowery
|
|
Housewares &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,055,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,996,187
|
|
|
$
|
4,055,655
|
|
New York, NY 10012
|
|
specialties
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,404
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
97.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,556,187
|
|
|
|
4,055,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 East 40th Street
|
|
Environmental &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
|
|
4,957,235
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
New York, NY 10016
|
|
facilities services
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I
LLC - Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.57% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I
LLC - Granted
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,125,321
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1785 South, 4130 West
|
|
Data processing &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,073,880
|
|
|
|
10,997,715
|
|
|
|
10,879,458
|
|
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
|
|
outsourced services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,872,993
|
|
|
|
1,851,757
|
|
|
|
1,913,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance
Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,229,885
|
|
|
|
12,796,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Corporate Place
|
|
Education services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,789,304
|
|
|
|
9,539,188
|
|
|
|
6,928,697
|
|
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,950,941
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
3,448,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor),
due 6/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058,767
|
|
|
|
10,377,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10541 NW 117th Ave
Miami, FL 33122
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85%
(12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,783,839
|
|
|
|
6,492,617
|
|
|
|
6,768,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,808,616
|
|
|
|
14,275,137
|
|
|
|
14,353,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,349,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,848,152
|
|
|
|
22,471,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2364 Leicester Road
|
|
Household products
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
Leicester, NY 14481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 Congress Street, Suite 900
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,584,394
|
|
|
|
3,388,830
|
|
|
|
3,417,458
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
438,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,138,830
|
|
|
|
3,856,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 Waiakamilo Rd #C
|
|
Construction and
|
|
Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 06/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,361,779
|
|
|
|
2,243,690
|
|
|
|
2,243,690
|
|
Honolulu, HI 96817
|
|
engineering
|
|
Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 06/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,846,473
|
|
|
|
2,704,149
|
|
|
|
2,704,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 06/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,027,956
|
|
|
|
3,826,558
|
|
|
|
3,826,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 06/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,987,501
|
|
|
|
4,987,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 12% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,174,355
|
|
|
|
19,942,451
|
|
|
|
19,742,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,755,534
|
|
|
|
4,755,534
|
|
|
|
4,221,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,144,820
|
|
|
|
37,725,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21700 Oxhard Street
|
|
Advertising
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
|
|
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,952
|
|
|
|
395,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1100 Kings Highway
Fairfield, CT 06825
|
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25%
(10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
1,121,180
|
|
|
|
1,125,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,667,603
|
|
|
|
5,619,154
|
|
|
|
5,726,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 Common Units
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
121,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,783,242
|
|
|
|
6,973,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 Forest Parkway
|
|
Food distributors
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,327,820
|
|
|
|
9,108,209
|
|
|
|
9,023,399
|
|
Forest Park, GA 30297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,108,209
|
|
|
|
9,023,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boot Barn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1520 S. Sinclair Street
|
|
Apparel, accessories
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
Anaheim, CA 92806
|
|
& luxury goods and
footwear
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,191
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of
|
|
|
|
Titles of Securities
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
Fair Value of
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Held by Us
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Loan Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Investment
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 West Franklin Street
|
|
Trucking
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,606,639
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
Grapevine, TX 76051
|
|
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714 Walnut Street
|
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,123,432
|
|
|
|
9,877,279
|
|
|
|
9,917,997
|
|
Mount Carmel, IL 62863
|
|
|
|
33,463 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
739,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,221,792
|
|
|
|
10,657,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1791 West Dairy
|
|
Electronic
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,821,351
|
|
|
|
14,042,454
|
|
|
|
11,680,404
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85705
|
|
manufacturing svcs.
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,001,589
|
|
|
|
16,639,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3450 East 36th Street
|
|
Construction
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,615,232
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85713
|
|
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2209 Miguel Chavez Road
|
|
Movies &
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
Santa Fe, NM 87505
|
|
entertainment
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 Needham Street
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,562,970
|
|
|
|
6,255,358
|
|
|
|
6,485,832
|
|
Newtown, MA 02461
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,204,760
|
|
|
|
10,104,760
|
|
|
|
10,082,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
|
|
|
546,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,850,118
|
|
|
|
17,114,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3541 Rier Trail South
|
|
Distributors
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,658,366
|
|
|
|
13,436,082
|
|
|
|
13,415,216
|
|
St. Louis, MO 63045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,436,082
|
|
|
|
13,415,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
851 South Rampart Boulevard
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,051,045
|
|
|
|
19,186,297
|
|
|
|
19,569,475
|
|
Las Vegas, NV 89145
|
|
|
|
414,419 Common Units
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,319,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,784,679
|
|
|
|
20,888,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7020 Tudsbury Road
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,249,775
|
|
|
|
4,196,179
|
|
|
|
4,232,773
|
|
Baltimore, MD 21244
|
|
technology
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,259,468
|
|
|
|
16,743,527
|
|
|
|
17,113,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
647,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,360,961
|
|
|
|
21,993,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1040 Trade Ave
|
|
Air freight &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,006,996
|
|
|
|
15,710,301
|
|
|
|
15,878,390
|
|
Suite 106 DFW
|
|
logistics
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,890,667
|
|
|
|
1,956,755
|
|
Airport, TX 75261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,600,968
|
|
|
|
17,835,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Exeter Plaza
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
1.87% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
699 Boylston Street, 8th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
Boston, MA 02116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Exeter Plaza
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
0.33% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
699 Boylston Street, 8th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
Boston, MA 02116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 Aero Lane
|
|
Fertilizers &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
|
|
|
8,311,428
|
|
|
|
8,365,910
|
|
Sanford, FL 32771
|
|
agricultural
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,298,448
|
|
|
|
13,985,575
|
|
|
|
14,002,842
|
|
|
|
chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,026,520
|
|
|
|
4,170,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,323,523
|
|
|
|
26,539,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 West Alameda Dr.
|
|
Home improvement
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,250,000
|
|
|
|
9,048,648
|
|
|
|
8,951,281
|
|
Tempe, AZ 85282
|
|
retail
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,567,297
|
|
|
|
22,101,997
|
|
|
|
21,922,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,436,550
|
|
|
|
1,444,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,587,195
|
|
|
|
32,318,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6602 E. 75th Street, Suite 200
|
|
Education services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,859,375
|
|
|
|
30,093,388
|
|
|
|
30,457,010
|
|
Indianapolis, IN 46250
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,716,166
|
|
|
|
30,457,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 West Alameda Dr.
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,480,000
|
|
|
|
25,075,398
|
|
|
|
25,525,452
|
|
Tempe, AZ 85282
|
|
equipment
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,212,109
|
|
|
|
21,864,318
|
|
|
|
22,164,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,877,049
|
|
|
|
47,689,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1422 Woodland Dr.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,050,000
|
|
|
|
6,888,024
|
|
|
|
6,927,166
|
|
Saline, MI 48176
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,863,830
|
|
|
|
12,560,321
|
|
|
|
12,686,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,412,498
|
|
|
|
19,613,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 Broadway, 51st Floor
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
2.53% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of
|
|
|
|
Titles of Securities
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
Fair Value of
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Held by Us
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Loan Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Investment
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Securities Center,
|
|
Advertising
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,937,500
|
|
|
|
9,755,254
|
|
|
|
9,753,678
|
|
3500 Piedmont Rd Ste 320
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,046,018
|
|
|
|
7,898,194
|
|
|
|
7,995,656
|
|
Atlanta, GA 30305
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,618,781
|
|
|
|
17,749,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5750 Hellyer Ave
|
|
Electronic equipment
|
|
First Lien Term, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,132,293
|
|
|
|
29,603,069
|
|
|
|
29,284,795
|
|
San Jose, CA 95138
|
|
& instruments
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,415,385
|
|
|
|
3,397,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,018,454
|
|
|
|
32,682,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5901 C Peachtree
|
|
Health care services
|
|
First Lien Term, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,801,966
|
|
|
|
7,808,773
|
|
Dunwoody Rd., Ste 350
Atlanta, GA 30328
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741,890
|
|
|
|
7,808,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8014 Bayberry Road
|
|
Diversified support
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,250,000
|
|
|
|
14,950,346
|
|
|
|
14,892,359
|
|
Jacksonville, FL 32256
|
|
services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,043,150
|
|
|
|
10,827,388
|
|
|
|
10,928,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,699,275
|
|
|
|
25,820,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1349 Empire Central,
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,685,000
|
|
|
|
9,459,263
|
|
|
|
9,423,141
|
|
Ste 515 Dallas, TX 75247
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,031,895
|
|
|
|
16,624,539
|
|
|
|
16,680,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
728,544
|
|
|
|
779,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,812,346
|
|
|
|
26,882,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 South State Street
|
|
Food distributors
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,769,920
|
|
|
|
8,799,561
|
|
Marysville, LA 17053
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR + 11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,723,533
|
|
|
|
10,706,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,392,920
|
|
|
|
19,505,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8150 Leesburg Pike,
|
|
IT consulting &
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
|
|
28,460,094
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
Suite 405
|
|
other services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
|
21,582,000
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
Vienna, VA 22182
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,804,594
|
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 East 4th St. Suite 207
|
|
Internet software
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,400,000
|
|
|
|
16,079,508
|
|
|
|
16,400,000
|
|
Frederick, MD 21701
|
|
& services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12.25% due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,030,634
|
|
|
|
20,624,634
|
|
|
|
21,030,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,134,000
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity interest - purchased
|
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,163
|
|
|
|
2,086,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,924,305
|
|
|
|
40,766,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10808 S. River Front
|
|
Apparel, accessories
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
|
15,118,187
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
Pkwy, Suite 150
|
|
& luxury goods
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR + 10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,034,000
|
|
|
|
14,152,177
|
|
|
|
14,534,000
|
|
South Jordan, UT 84095
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,371 shares of preferred equity interest - granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,289 shares of series D common equity interest - granted
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462,888
|
|
|
|
1,462,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,645,809
|
|
|
|
32,534,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
Limited partnership interest
|
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 Circuit Drive
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,750,000
|
|
|
|
30,140,651
|
|
|
|
30,750,000
|
|
North Kingston, RI 02852
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,008,333
|
|
|
|
19,615,000
|
|
|
|
20,008,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,657,568
|
|
|
|
50,758,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4131 W. Loomis Road, Suite 300
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
|
|
8,056,673
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
Greenfield, WI 53221
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,050,773
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12600 Northborough
Drive, Suite 300
|
|
Human resources &
employment services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,727,732
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
Houston, TX 77067
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,300,346
|
|
|
|
8,128,965
|
|
|
|
8,300,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,774,104
|
|
|
|
21,300,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 North 1020 West
|
|
Building products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,020,043
|
|
|
|
1,916,192
|
|
|
|
2,020,043
|
|
American Fork, UT 84003
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock- Granted
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock - Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,960,182
|
|
|
|
5,807,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2844 Croddy Way
|
|
Building products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
Santa Ana, CA 92704
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
71
Description
of Portfolio Companies
Set forth below is a brief description of each of our portfolio
companies as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc. is a distributor of pesticides and
herbicides and related equipment for commercial and industrial
use.
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management is a provider of interventional
pain management.
|
|
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. is a holding company that
holds two subsidiaries that franchise and provide bathroom
remodeling services.
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC is a vinyl fence
installer and distributor in the Western United States.
|
|
|
|
Boot Barn is a western-themed specialty retailer.
|
|
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. is a private
equity firm that invests in lower middle market companies.
|
|
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc. is a nurse registry in Florida
that provides in home assisted living services.
|
|
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC is an age management medicine
organization that evaluates and provides therapy with a focus on
optimal health, wellness, and prevention.
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc. manufactures and markets specialty chemicals
and related accessories for household and commercial cleaning,
personal care, and photo-processing applications.
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc. is a provider of technology solutions.
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC is a provider of clinical
quantitative urine drug monitoring.
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc. is a provider of employee screening
services, including drug and alcohol testing, background
screening, safety training and occupational medical testing.
|
|
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. provides hospitalist
contract services, telemedicine, and hospitalist temporary
staffing to hospitals in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions.
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC is an Accounts Receivable
Management/Collection Agency that has emerged as a leader in the
ARM Industry.
|
|
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc. is a provider of home healthcare
to medically fragile infants and children in the state of Texas.
|
|
|
|
Filet of Chicken (formerly known as FOC Acquisition LLC)
is a processor of frozen chicken products.
|
|
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC operates fitness clubs in Fairfield
County, Connecticut.
|
|
|
|
Flatout, Inc. manufactures and markets healthy, premium
flatbreads, wraps, and snack crisps.
|
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation is a provider of multi-specialty,
on-site
healthcare services to residents of its extended care facilities.
|
|
|
|
idX Corporation is a global provider of merchandise
display solutions.
|
|
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc. is a provider of medical
markers used in procedures in Radiology, Radiation Therapy,
Orthopedics, Ear, Nose, and Throat, and Image Guided Surgeries.
|
|
|
|
JTC Education, Inc. is a platform of postsecondary
for-profit schools focused on nursing and allied health.
|
|
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC is a retailer that sells
brand-name luxury lighting products through a website and a
traditional
brick-and-mortar
showroom.
|
|
|
|
MK Network, LLC is a medical communications and
continuing medical education company. MK Networks medical
communication services assist pharmaceutical and biotechnology
brand teams with educating healthcare professionals on the
features, benefits and appropriate prescribing of drugs.
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc. combines leading technology and
marketing insight to drive customer communication programs
including: email communications, SMS mobile marketing, broadcast
voice messaging and database management.
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC designs and manufactures branded handbags
and accessories.
|
|
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. is a manufacturer of flat-panel
Liquid Crystal Display screens for medical applications.
|
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. provides
post-industrial plastic size reduction and reclamation services.
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc. provides telemarketing, telesales,
and call center operations for clients in a wide range of
industries. It deploys a unique mix of home-based and brick and
mortar center-based sales representatives to handle inbound
consumer calls from marketing promotions.
|
|
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. is a leading
manufacturer of a wide range of highly engineered, specialized
plastic and metal forming equipment, as well as complementary
tooling, parts, refurbishment and repair and maintenance
services.
|
|
|
|
Premier Trailer and Leasing, Inc. provides long-term and
short-term leases on truck trailers for periods ranging from a
single month to several years.
|
|
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP is a private fund that makes
venture capital investments in the healthcare sector.
|
|
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp. is a designer, manufacturer, and
distributor of linear slides and precision mechanical and
electro-mechanical products for original equipment manufacturers
in the computer hardware, telecommunications, and industrial
equipment markets.
|
|
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited is an investment company
that holds investments in the restaurant, transportation,
service and real estate sectors.
|
|
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP is a private fund that
invests in growing middle market healthcare and technology
oriented companies.
|
|
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP is a private fund that invests
in growing middle market healthcare and technology oriented
companies.
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. is a vinyl
fence installer and distributor in the Western United States.
|
|
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC is the primary producer of
ladyfingers in the United States as well as a leading provider
of other high-quality branded, in-store bakery, and private
label baked products.
|
|
|
|
Storytellers Theaters Corporation is an operator of
theaters in New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, and Wyoming.
|
|
|
|
TBA Global, LLC engages in designing, producing, and
executing corporate events and consumer marketing programs.
|
|
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC is a full service medical device
contract manufacturer, providing a one-stop shop with expertise
in metal grinding, precision laser welding and cutting, and wire
EDM capabilities.
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control and Safety Corporation sells, rents, and
services traffic control equipment and personal safety supplies.
It also provides safety training seminars and designs and
implements traffic control plans.
|
|
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc. is a non-asset based logistics company
that provides custom house brokerage, international freight
forwarding, domestic transportation, warehousing &
distribution, reverse logistics and other supply chain services
to a variety of customers.
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc. is a provider of technology-based
services.
|
|
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc. is a supplier of specialty
patented and standard asphalt emulsions and raw asphalt used for
roadway pavement preservation, repair, and restoration projects
with operations in Tucson, AZ and Irwindale, CA.
|
73
MANAGEMENT
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors appoints our
officers, who serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
The responsibilities of the Board of Directors include, among
other things, the oversight of our investment activities, the
quarterly valuation of our assets, oversight of our financing
arrangements and corporate governance activities. The Board of
Directors has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, a Valuation Committee and a Compensation
Committee, and may establish additional committees from time to
time as necessary.
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers
Our Board of Directors consists of seven members, five of whom
are classified under applicable New York Stock Exchange listing
standards by our Board of Directors as independent
directors and under Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act as
non-interested persons. Pursuant to our restated certificate of
incorporation, our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes. Each class of directors will hold office for a
three-year term. However, the initial members of the three
classes had initial terms of one, two and three years,
respectively. At each annual meeting of our stockholders, the
successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at such
meeting will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year
following the year of their election. Each director will hold
office for the term to which he or she is elected and until his
or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. Our restated
certificate of incorporation also gives our Board of Directors
sole authority to appoint directors to fill vacancies that are
created either through an increase in the number of directors or
due to the resignation, removal or death of any director.
Directors
Information regarding our Board of Directors is set forth below.
We have divided the directors into two groups
independent directors and interested directors. Interested
directors are interested persons of Fifth Street
Finance Corp. as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940
Act.
The address for each director is
c/o Fifth
Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White
Plains, NY 10606.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Expiration of
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Since
|
|
Term
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian S. Dunn
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Richard P. Dutkiewicz
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Byron J. Haney
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Frank C. Meyer
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Douglas F. Ray
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Bernard D. Berman
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Executive
Officers
The following persons serve as our executive officers in the
following capacities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Bernard D. Berman
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
President, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
|
William H. Craig
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Co-Chief Investment Officer
|
Chad S. Blakeman
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Co-Chief Investment Officer
|
74
The address for each executive officer is
c/o Fifth
Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White
Plains, NY 10606.
Biographical
Information
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Brian S. Dunn. Mr. Dunn has been a member
of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Mr. Dunn has
over 16 years of marketing, logistical and entrepreneurial
experience. He founded and turned around direct marketing
divisions for several consumer-oriented companies. Since June
2006, Mr. Dunn has been the marketing director for
Lipenwald, Inc., a direct marketing company that markets
collectibles and mass merchandise. Prior to that, from February
2001 to June 2006, he was sole proprietor of BSD
Trading/Consulting. Mr. Dunn graduated from the Wharton
School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1993 with a B.S. in
Economics.
|
Mr. Dunns executive experience brings extensive
business, entrepreneurial and marketing expertise to his Board
service with the company. His experience as a marketing
executive for several consumer-oriented companies provides
guidance to our investor relations efforts. Mr. Dunns
many experiences also make him skilled in leading committees
requiring substantive expertise, including his role as chairman
of the Boards Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. Mr. Dunns previous service on the Board
also provides him with a specific understanding of our company,
its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing
business development companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard P. Dutkiewicz. Mr. Dutkiewicz has
been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2010.
Since April 2010, Mr. Dutkiewicz has been the executive
vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex
Restaurants, Inc. Mr. Dutkiewicz previously served as chief
financial officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group from October
2003 to March 2010. From May 2003 to October 2003,
Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president -information technology
of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. In May 2003, Sirenza Microdevices,
Inc. acquired Vari-L Company, Inc. From January 2001 to May
2003, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance, and chief
financial officer of Vari-L Company, Inc. From April 1995 to
January 2001, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance,
chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer of Coleman
Natural Products, Inc., located in Denver, Colorado.
Mr. Dutkiewiczs previous experience includes senior
financial management positions at Tetrad Corporation,
MicroLithics Corporation and various divisions of United
Technologies Corporation. Mr. Dutkiewicz began his career
as an Audit Manager at KPMG LLP. Mr. Dutkiewicz received a
B.B.A. degree from Loyola University of Chicago.
Mr. Dutkiewicz currently serves on the Board of Directors
of Motor Sport Country Club, a Motorsports destination resort in
Denver, Colorado.
|
Through his prior experiences as a vice president and chief
financial officer at several public companies, including
executive vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex
Restaurants, Inc. and chief financial officer of Einstein Noah
Restaurant Group, Mr. Dutkiewicz brings business expertise,
finance and audit skills to his Board service with our company.
Mr. Dutkiewiczs expertise, experience and skills
closely align with our operations, and his prior investment
experience with managing public companies facilitates an
in-depth understanding of our investment business.
|
|
|
|
|
Byron J. Haney. Mr. Haney has been a
member of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Mr. Haney
is currently a principal of Duggan Asset Management, L.L.C.
where he serves as director of research. From 1994 until 2009,
Mr. Haney worked for Resurgence Asset Management LLC,
during which time he most recently served as managing director
and chief investment officer. Mr. Haney previously served
on the Board of Directors of Sterling Chemicals, Inc., and
Furniture.com. Mr. Haney has more than 25 years of
business experience, including having served as chief financial
officer of a private retail store chain and as an auditor with
Touche Ross & Co., a predecessor of
Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Haney earned his B.S.
in Business Administration from the University of California at
Berkeley and his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania.
|
Through his extensive experiences as a senior executive,
Mr. Haney brings business expertise, finance and risk
assessment skills to his Board service with our company. In
addition, Mr. Haneys past experience as an
75
auditor greatly benefits our oversight of our quarterly and
annual financial reporting obligations. Moreover,
Mr. Haneys knowledge of financial and accounting
matters qualify him as the Boards Audit Committee
Financial Expert. Mr. Haneys previous service on the
Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our
company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues
facing business development companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Frank C. Meyer. Mr. Meyer has been a
member of our Board of Directors since December 2007.
Mr. Meyer is a private investor who was chairman of
Glenwood Capital Investments, LLC, an investment adviser
specializing in hedge funds, which he founded in January of 1988
and from which he resigned in January of 2004. As of October of
2000, Glenwood has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Man
Group, PLC, an investment adviser based in England specializing
in alternative investment strategies. Since leaving Glenwood in
2004, Mr. Meyer has focused on serving as a director for
various companies. During his career, Mr. Meyer has served
as an outside director on a several companies, including Quality
Systems, Inc. (a public company specializing in software for
medical and dental professionals), Bernard Technologies, Inc. (a
firm specializing in development of industrial processes using
chlorine dioxide), and Centurion Trust Company of Arizona
(where he served as a non-executive chairman until its purchase
by GE Financial). Currently, he is on the Board of Directors of
Einstein-Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., a firm operating in the
quick casual segment of the restaurant industry, and United
Capital Financial Partners, Inc., a firm that converts
transaction-oriented brokers into fee-based financial planners.
He is also on the Board of Directors of three investment funds
run by Ferox Capital Management, Limited, an investment manager
based in the United Kingdom that specializes in convertible
bonds. Mr. Meyer received his B.A. and M.B.A. from the
University of Chicago.
|
Mr. Meyers extensive investment experiences within
the financial advisory industry provides our company with broad
and diverse knowledge concerning general business trends and the
capital markets. Mr. Meyers experience and skills
closely align with our business, and his lending and credit
experience facilitates an in-depth understanding of risk
associated with the structuring of investments.
Mr. Meyers board related experiences makes him
skilled in leading committees requiring substantive expertise.
In addition, Mr. Meyers risk management expertise and
credit related experience also qualify him to serve as chairman
of our Valuation Committee. Mr. Meyers previous
service on the Board also provides him with a specific
understanding of our company, its operations, and the business
and regulatory issues facing business development companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas F. Ray. Mr. Ray has been a member
of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Since August
1995, Mr. Ray has worked for Seavest Inc., a private
investment and wealth management firm based in White Plains, New
York. He currently serves as the president of Seavest Inc.
Mr. Ray has more than 15 years experience acquiring,
developing, financing and managing a diverse portfolio of real
estate investments, including three healthcare properties funds.
Mr. Ray previously served on the Board of Directors of Nat
Nast, Inc., a luxury mens apparel company. Prior to
joining Seavest, Mr. Ray worked in Washington, D.C. on
the staff of U.S. Senator Arlen Specter and as a research
analyst with the Republican National Committee. Mr. Ray
holds a B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh.
|
Through his broad experience as an officer and director of
several companies, in addition to skills acquired with firms
engaged in investment banking, banking and financial services,
Mr. Ray brings to our company extensive financial and risk
assessment abilities. Mr. Rays previous service on
the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our
company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues
facing business development companies. Mr. Rays
expertise and experience also qualify him to serve as chairman
of the Compensation Committee.
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum,
CFA. Mr. Tannenbaum has been our chief
executive officer since October 2007 and the chairman of our
Board of Directors since December 2007, and was our president
from October 2007 through February 2010. He is also the managing
partner of our investment adviser and serves on its investment
committee. Since founding his first private investment firm in
1998, Mr. Tannenbaum has
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
founded a number of private investment firms, including Fifth
Street Capital LLC, and he has served as managing member of each
firm. Prior to launching his first firm, Mr. Tannenbaum
gained extensive small-company experience as an equity analyst
for Merrill Lynch. In addition to serving on our Board of
Directors, Mr. Tannenbaum currently serves on the Board of
Directors of several private Greenlight Capital affiliated
entities and has previously served on the Boards of Directors of
several other public companies, including Einstein Noah
Restaurant Group, Inc., Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. and
WesTower Communications, Inc. Mr. Tannenbaum has also
served on four audit committees and five compensation
committees, of which he has acted as chairperson for one of such
audit committees and four of such compensation committees.
Mr. Tannenbaum graduated from the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania, where he received a B.S. in
Economics. Subsequent to his undergraduate degree from the
University of Pennsylvania, Mr. Tannenbaum received an
M.B.A. in Finance from the Wharton School as part of the
Submatriculation Program. He is a holder of the Chartered
Financial Analyst designation and he is also a member of the
Young Presidents Organization.
|
Through his broad experience as an officer and director of
several private and public companies, in addition to skills
acquired with firms engaged in investment banking and financial
services, Mr. Tannenbaum brings to our company a unique
business expertise and knowledge of private equity financing as
well as extensive financial and risk assessment abilities.
Mr. Tannenbaums previous service on the Board also
provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its
operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing
business development companies. Mr. Tannenbaums
positions as chief executive officer of our company, managing
partner of our investment adviser and member of its investment
committee provides the Board with a direct line of communication
to, and direct knowledge of the operations of, our company and
its investment advisor, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard D. Berman. Mr. Berman has been a
member of our Board of Directors since February 2009. He has
also been our president since February 2010, our chief
compliance officer since April 2009 and our secretary since
October 2007. Mr. Berman is also a partner of our
investment adviser and serves on its investment committee.
Mr. Berman is responsible for the operations of our
company. Prior to joining Fifth Street in 2004, Mr. Berman
was a corporate attorney from 1995 to 2004, during which time he
negotiated and structured a variety of investment transactions.
Mr. Berman graduated from Boston College Law School. He
received a B.S. in Finance from Lehigh University.
|
Mr. Bermans prior position as a corporate attorney
allows him to bring to the Board and our company the benefit of
his experience negotiating and structuring various investment
transactions as well as an understanding of the legal, business,
compliance and regulatory issues facing business development
companies. Mr. Bermans previous service on the Board
also provides him with a specific understanding of our company
and its operations.
Non-Director
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Craig. Mr. Craig has been our
chief financial officer since October 2007 and was our chief
compliance officer from December 2007 through April 2009. Prior
to joining Fifth Street, from March 2005 to October 2007,
Mr. Craig was an executive vice president and chief
financial officer of Vital-Signs, Inc., a medical device
manufacturer that was later acquired by General Electric
Companys GE Healthcare unit in October 2008. Prior to
that, from January 2004 to March 2005, he worked as an interim
chief financial officer and Sarbanes-Oxley consultant. From 1999
to 2004, Mr. Craig served as an executive vice president
for finance and administration and chief financial officer for
Matheson Trigas, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of industrial
gases and related equipment. Mr. Craigs prior
experience includes stints at GE Capital, Deloitte &
Touche LLP, and GMAC, as well as merchant banking.
Mr. Craig has an M.B.A. from Texas A&M University and
a B.A. from Wake Forest University. Mr. Craig is a
Certified Public Accountant and is accredited in Business
Valuation and certified in Financial Forensics.
|
|
|
|
Ivelin M. Dimitrov, CFA. Mr. Dimitrov
has been our co-chief investment officer since November 2010 and
the co-chief investment officer of our investment adviser since
June 2010. He is also a partner of our investment adviser and
serves on its investment committee. Mr. Dimitrov has over six
years of experience
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
structuring small and mid-cap transactions. Mr. Dimitrov joined
our investment adviser in May 2005 and is responsible for the
evaluation of new investment opportunities, deal structuring and
portfolio monitoring, in addition to managing the investment
advisers associate and analyst team. In addition, Mr.
Dimitrov is the chairman of the investment advisers
internal valuation committee. He has substantial experience in
financial analysis, valuation and investment research. Mr.
Dimitrov graduated from the Carroll Graduate School of
Management at Boston College with an M.S. in Finance and has a
B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Maine. He
is also a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chad S. Blakeman. Mr. Blakeman has been
our co-chief investment officer since November 2010, a managing
director of our investment adviser since April 2010 and co-chief
investment officer of our investment adviser since June 2010. He
also serves on our investment advisers investment
committee. Mr. Blakeman has more than 24 years of
lending-related experience in underwriting and account
management in the cash flow and asset-based markets. Mr.
Blakeman is primarily responsible for overseeing all
underwriting and risk management processes at our investment
adviser. Prior to joining, Mr. Blakeman was a managing partner
at CastleGuard Partners LLC, a middle market finance company,
from March 2009 to March 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Blakeman was
managing director and senior risk officer for Freeport Financial
LLC from October 2004 to March 2009, where he co-managed a
portfolio of approximately $1.5 billion. Prior to Freeport
Financial, Mr. Blakeman worked at GE Capital Corporations
global sponsor finance group, First Chicago Bank, Bank of
America and Heller Financial Inc. Mr. Blakeman received his B.S.
in Finance from the University of Illinois and his M.B.A. from
DePaul University.
|
Board
Leadership Structure
Our Board of Directors monitors and performs an oversight role
with respect to our business and affairs, including with respect
to investment practices and performance, compliance with
regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and
performance of service providers to us. Among other things, our
Board of Directors approves the appointment of our investment
adviser and our officers, reviews and monitors the services and
activities performed by our investment adviser and our executive
officers and approves the engagement, and reviews the
performance of, our independent registered public accounting
firm.
Under our Amended and Restated By-laws, our Board of Directors
may designate a chairman to preside over the meetings of the
Board of Directors and meetings of the stockholders and to
perform such other duties as may be assigned to him by the Board
of Directors. We do not have a fixed policy as to whether the
chairman of the Board of Directors should be an independent
director and believe that we should maintain the flexibility to
select the chairman and reorganize the leadership structure,
from time to time, based on the criteria that is in our best
interests and the best interests of our stockholders at such
times. Our Board of Directors has established corporate
governance procedures to guard against, among other things, an
improperly constituted Board. Pursuant to our Corporate
Governance Policy, whenever the chairman of the Board is not an
independent director, the chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will act as the presiding
independent director at meetings of the Non-Management
Directors (which will include the independent directors
and other directors who are not officers of the company even
though they may have another relationship to the company or its
management that prevents them from being independent directors).
Presently, Mr. Tannenbaum serves as the chairman of our Board of
Directors and he is also our chief executive officer. We believe
that Mr. Tannenbaums history with our company, familiarity
with its investment platform, and extensive knowledge of the
financial services industry qualify him to serve as the chairman
of our Board of Directors. We believe that we are best served
through this existing leadership structure, as
Mr. Tannenbaums relationship with our investment
adviser provides an effective bridge and encourages an open
dialogue between management and our Board of Directors, ensuring
that these groups act with a common purpose.
Our Board of Directors does not currently have a designated lead
independent director. We are aware of the potential conflicts
that may arise when a non-independent director is chairman of
the Board of Directors, but believe these potential conflicts
are offset by our strong corporate governance practices. Our
corporate governance practices includes regular meetings of the
independent directors in executive session without the presence
of interested directors and management, the establishment of
Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance
78
Committees comprised solely of independent directors and the
appointment of a chief compliance officer, with whom the
independent directors meet without the presence of interested
directors and other members of management, for administering our
compliance policies and procedures. While certain non-management
members of our Board of Directors currently participate on the
boards of directors of other public companies, we do not view
their participation as excessive or as interfering with their
duties on our Board of Directors.
Boards
Role In Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors performs its risk oversight function
primarily through (i) its four standing committees, which
report to the entire Board of Directors and are comprised solely
of independent directors, and (ii) active monitoring of our
chief compliance officer and our compliance policies and
procedures.
As described below in more detail, the Audit Committee, the
Valuation Committee, the Compensation Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assist the Board
of Directors in fulfilling its risk oversight responsibilities.
The Audit Committees risk oversight responsibilities
include overseeing the companys accounting and financial
reporting processes, the companys systems of internal
controls regarding finance and accounting, and audits of the
companys financial statements. The Valuation
Committees risk oversight responsibilities include
establishing guidelines and making recommendations to our Board
of Directors regarding the valuation of our loans and
investments. The Compensation Committees risk oversight
responsibilities include reviewing and approving the
reimbursement by the company of the compensation of the
companys chief financial officer and his staff, and the
staff of the companys chief compliance officer. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees risk
oversight responsibilities include selecting, researching and
nominating directors for election by our stockholders,
developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of
corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of
the Board of Directors and our management.
Our Board of Directors also performs its risk oversight
responsibilities with the assistance of the companys chief
compliance officer. The Board of Directors annually reviews a
written report from the chief compliance officer discussing the
adequacy and effectiveness of the compliance policies and
procedures of the company and its service providers. The chief
compliance officers annual report addresses at a minimum
(i) the operation of the compliance policies and procedures
of the company since the last report; (ii) any material
changes to such policies and procedures since the last report;
(iii) any recommendations for material changes to such
policies and procedures as a result of the chief compliance
officers annual review; and (iv) any compliance
matter that has occurred since the date of the last report about
which the Board of Directors would reasonably need to know to
oversee our compliance activities and risks. In addition, the
chief compliance officer meets separately in executive session
with the independent directors.
We believe that the role of our Board of Directors in risk
oversight is effective and appropriate given the extensive
regulation to which we are already subject as a BDC. As a BDC,
we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements
that control the levels of risk in our business and operations.
For example, we are limited in our ability to enter into
transactions with our affiliates, including investing in any
portfolio company in which one of our affiliates currently has
an investment.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors met eight times during our 2010 fiscal
year. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of
meetings of the Board and committees on which the director
served that were held while the director was a member. Our Board
of Directors has established the committees described below. Our
Corporate Governance Policy, Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics, our and our investment advisers Code of Ethics as
required by the 1940 Act and our Board Committee charters
are available at our corporate governance webpage at
http://ir.fifthstreetfinance.com/governance.cfm
and are also available to any stockholder who requests them by
writing to our secretary, Bernard Berman, at Fifth Street
Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY
10606, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
79
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and
discharging our independent accountants, reviewing the plans,
scope and results of the audit engagement with our independent
accountants, approving professional services provided by our
independent accountants (including compensation therefore),
reviewing the independence of our independent accountants and
reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial
reporting. The members of the Audit Committee are
Messrs. Dunn, Dutkiewicz and Haney, each of whom is not an
interested person of us for purposes of the 1940 Act and is
independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance
listing standards. Mr. Haney serves as the chairman of the
Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors has determined that
Mr. Haney is an audit committee financial
expert as defined under SEC rules. The Audit Committee met
five times during the 2010 fiscal year.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible
for determining criteria for service on the Board, identifying,
researching and nominating directors for election by our
stockholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on our Board
or a committee of the Board of Directors, developing and
recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance
principles and overseeing the self-evaluation of the Board and
its committees and evaluation of our management. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee considers nominees properly
recommended by our stockholders. The members of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Dunn, Haney
and Ray, each of whom is not an interested person of us for
purposes of the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the
New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards.
Mr. Dunn serves as the chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee met one time during the 2010 fiscal year.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
qualified director nominees recommended by stockholders when
such recommendations are submitted in accordance with our
Amended and Restated By-laws and any other applicable law, rule
or regulation regarding director nominations. Stockholders may
submit candidates for nomination for our Board of Directors by
writing to: Board of Directors, Fifth Street Finance Corp.,
10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606. When
submitting a nomination to us for consideration, a stockholder
must provide certain information about each person whom the
stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director,
including: (i) the name, age, business address and
residence address of the person; (ii) the principal
occupation or employment of the person; (iii) the class or
series and number of shares of our capital stock owned
beneficially or of record by the persons; and (iv) any
other information relating to the person that would be required
to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required
to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for
election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the
Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. Such notice must be accompanied by the proposed
nominees written consent to be named as a nominee and to
serve as a director if elected.
In evaluating director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee considers the following facts:
|
|
|
|
|
the appropriate size and composition of our Board;
|
|
|
|
our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience
of our directors;
|
|
|
|
the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees in light of
prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and
experience already possessed by other members of our Board;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and desire to serve as a member of our Board of
Directors and to represent the balanced, best interests of our
stockholders as a whole;
|
|
|
|
experience with accounting rules and practices; and
|
|
|
|
the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity
with the periodic addition of the fresh perspective provided by
new members.
|
80
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees goal is
to assemble a board of directors that brings us a variety of
perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and
professional experience.
Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria
for director nominees, although the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it
may deem are in our best interests and those of our
stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
also believes it appropriate for certain key members of our
management to participate as members of the Board. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign
specific weights to particular criteria and no particular
criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees.
We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of the
directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant
composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will
allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. Our Board does
not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of
race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation,
disability, cultural background and professional experiences in
evaluating candidates for Board membership.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies
nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board
willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board
with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and
who are willing to continue in service are considered for
re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by
existing members of the Board with that of obtaining a new
perspective. If any member of the Board does not wish to
continue in service or if the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee or the Board decides not to re-nominate a
member for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee identifies the desired skills and experience of a new
nominee in light of the criteria above. Current members of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board are
polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Research may
also be performed to identify qualified individuals. We have not
engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in
identifying potential nominees to the Board.
Valuation
Committee
The Valuation Committee establishes guidelines and makes
recommendations to our Board regarding the valuation of our
loans and investments. The Valuation Committee is presently
composed of Messrs. Dutkiewicz, Haney, Meyer and Ray, each
of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of the
1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate
governance listing standards. Mr. Meyer serves as the
chairman of the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee met
on five occasions during the 2010 fiscal year.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving the reimbursement by us of the compensation of our
chief financial officer and his staff, and the staff of our
chief compliance officer. The current members of the
Compensation Committee are Messrs. Dunn, Meyer and Ray,
each of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of
the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NYSE
corporate governance listing standards. Mr. Ray serves as
the chairman of the Compensation Committee. As discussed below,
currently, none of our executive officers are compensated by us.
The Compensation Committee met one time during our 2010 fiscal
year.
81
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
of Directors
The following table sets forth compensation of our directors for
the year ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in
Cash(1)(2)
|
|
Total
|
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard D. Berman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam C.
Berkman(3)
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
Brian S. Dunn
|
|
$
|
54,500
|
|
|
$
|
54,500
|
|
Richard P.
Dutkiewicz(4)
|
|
$
|
25,418
|
|
|
$
|
25,418
|
|
Byron J. Haney
|
|
$
|
69,500
|
|
|
$
|
69,500
|
|
Frank C. Meyer
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
Douglas F. Ray
|
|
$
|
52,500
|
|
|
$
|
52,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For a discussion of the independent directors
compensation, see below. |
|
(2) |
|
We do not maintain a stock or option plan, non-equity incentive
plan or pension plan for our directors. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Berkman resigned from the Board of Directors on
February 24, 2010 due to personal time constraints. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Dutkiewicz was appointed to the Board of Directors on
February 24, 2010. |
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the
independent directors received an annual retainer fee of
$30,000, payable once per year if the director attended at least
75% of the meetings held during the previous year, plus $2,000
for each board meeting in which the director attended in person
and $1,000 for each board meeting in which the director
participated other than in person, and reimbursement of
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with
attending each board meeting. The independent directors also
received $1,000 for each committee meeting in which they
attended in person and $500 for each committee meeting in which
they participated other than in person, in connection with each
committee meeting of the Board that they attended, plus
reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attending each committee meeting not held
concurrently with a board meeting.
In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee received an
annual retainer of $20,000, while the chairman of the Valuation
Committee and the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee each received an annual retainer of $20,000
and $5,000, respectively. No compensation was paid to directors
who are interested persons of us as defined in the 1940 Act.
Effective as of October 1, 2010, the annual retainer fee
received by the independent directors was amended to
(i) $20,000, payable once per year if a non-management
director not on any committee attends at least 75% of the
meetings held during the previous year, (ii) $40,000,
payable once per year if a non-management director on one
committee attends at least 75% of the meetings held the previous
year, (iii) $50,000, payable once per year if a
non-management director on two committees attends at least 75%
of the meetings held the previous year, and (iv) $60,000,
payable once per year if a non-management director on three
committees attends at least 75% of the meetings held the
previous year. In addition, the fees for Board meeting
attendance were increased from $2,000 for each meeting a
non-management director attended in person, to $2,500 for each
Board meeting in which a non-management director attended in
person and the chairman of the Compensation Committee will
receive an annual retainer of $5,000.
82
Compensation
of Executive Officers
None of our executive officers receive direct compensation from
us. The compensation of the principals and other investment
professionals of our investment adviser are paid by our
investment adviser. Compensation paid to William H. Craig, our
chief financial officer, is set by our administrator, FSC, Inc.,
and is subject to reimbursement by us of an allocable portion of
such compensation for services rendered to us. FSC, Inc. has
voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the
services performed for us by our chief compliance officer,
Bernard D. Berman. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends
to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no
obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the
future. During fiscal year 2010, we reimbursed FSC, Inc.
approximately $1.3 million for the allocable portion of
compensation expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. on behalf of
Mr. Craig and other support personnel, pursuant to the
administration agreement with FSC, Inc.
83
PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT
The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility
of our investment adviser, and its Investment Committee, which
currently consists of Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our chief executive
officer and managing partner of our investment adviser, Bernard
D. Berman, our president, chief compliance officer and secretary
and a partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our
co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment
adviser and Chad S. Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer.
For more information regarding the business experience of
Messrs. Tannenbaum, Berman, Dimitrov, Blakeman and Craig,
see Business The Investment Adviser,
Management Biographical
Information Interested Directors and
Non-Director
Executive Officers.
Investment
Personnel
Our investment advisers investment personnel consists of
its portfolio managers and principals, Messrs. Tannenbaum,
Berman, Dimitrov, Blakeman, Alva, Zmijeski and Craig, who, in
addition to our investment advisers Investment Committee,
are primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
management of our portfolio.
The portfolio managers of our investment adviser will not be
employed by us, and will receive no compensation from us in
connection with their activities. The portfolio managers receive
compensation that includes an annual base salary, an annual
individual performance bonus, contributions to 401(k) plans, and
a portion of the incentive fee or carried interest earned in
connection with their services.
As of December 31, 2010, the portfolio managers of our
investment adviser were also responsible for the
day-to-day
portfolio management of Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II,
L.P., a private investment fund that as of that date had total
commitments of $157.1 million and assets of approximately
$54.2 million. Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. and
Fifth Street have similar investment objectives, however, Fifth
Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. generally is fully committed
and, other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio
companies, is no longer making investments. However, the
portfolio managers of our investment adviser could face
conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment
opportunities to Fifth Street and Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners II, L.P. in certain circumstances.
Below are the biographies for the portfolio managers whose
biographies are not included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
Juan E. Alva. Mr. Alva is a partner of
our investment adviser. Mr. Alva joined our investment
adviser in January 2007 and is responsible for deal origination
in the Western United States. From March 1993 to January 2000,
he worked at Goldman, Sachs & Co., in its investment
banking division, focusing on mergers & acquisitions
and corporate finance transactions. Mr. Alva was also chief
financial officer of ClickServices.com, Inc., a software
company, from 2000 to 2002, and most recently, from 2003 to 2006
he was a senior investment banker at Trinity Capital LLC, a
boutique investment bank focused on small-cap transactions.
Mr. Alva graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with
a B.S. from the Wharton School and a B.S.E. from the School of
Engineering and Applied Science.
|
|
|
|
Casey J. Zmijeski. Mr. Zmijeski has been
a partner of our investment adviser since June 2010.
Mr. Zmijeski is responsible for developing private equity
sponsor relationships and originating loans in the Eastern
Region of the United States. Mr. Zmijeski joined us after
spending nearly four years at Churchill Financial in New York
where he was responsible for originating and structuring debt
financing opportunities for middle market private equity firms
from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Zmijeski held similar
responsibilities with CapitalSource in New York from 2003 to
2006. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Zmijeski worked at Heller
Financial and GE Capital in their middle market leveraged
finance groups. Prior to this time, Mr. Zmijeski spent over
seven years with ING as a member of their Merchant Banking Group
and Corporate Finance Advisory Group. Mr. Zmijeski
graduated from Emory University with an M.B.A. in Finance and
has an A.B. in Anthropology from Duke University.
|
84
The table below shows the dollar range of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by each portfolio manager of our investment
adviser as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Name of Portfolio Manager
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fifth Street(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
|
|
Over $1,000,000
|
Bernard D. Berman
|
|
$100,001 $500,000
|
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
Chad S. Blakeman
|
|
none
|
Juan E. Alva
|
|
$100,001 $500,000
|
Casey J. Zmijeski
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
William H. Craig
|
|
$100,001 $500,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with
Rule 16a-1(a)(2)
of the Exchange Act. |
|
(2) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned is
based on a stock price of $12.14 per share as of
December 31, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are:
none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000,
$100,001-$500,000, $500,001-$1,000,000, or over $1,000,000. |
85
INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview
of Our Investment Adviser
Management
Services
Our investment adviser, Fifth Street Management, is registered
as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940, or the Advisers Act. Our investment adviser
serves pursuant to the investment advisory agreement in
accordance with the 1940 Act. Subject to the overall supervision
of our Board of Directors, our investment adviser manages our
day-to-day
operations and provides us with investment advisory services.
Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, our
investment adviser:
|
|
|
|
|
determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and
timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of
implementing such changes;
|
|
|
|
determines what securities we purchase, retain or sell;
|
|
|
|
identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the
investments we make; and
|
|
|
|
executes, monitors and services the investments we make.
|
Our investment advisers services under the investment
advisory agreement may not be exclusive and it is free to
furnish similar services to other entities so long as its
services to us are not impaired.
Management
Fee
We pay our investment adviser a fee for its services under the
investment advisory agreement consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The cost of both the base management fee payable to our
investment adviser and any incentive fees earned by our
investment adviser will ultimately be borne by our common
stockholders.
Base
Management Fee
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of
our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment
purposes. The base management fee is payable quarterly in
arrears, and is calculated based on the value of our gross
assets at the end of each fiscal quarter, and appropriately
adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raises or
repurchases during such quarter. The base management fee for any
partial month or quarter will be appropriately pro rated. Our
investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base
management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements)
as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As
a result, our base management fee will be calculated at an
annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, including any investments
made with borrowings, but excluding any cash and cash
equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements) as of the end of each quarter.
Incentive
Fee
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated
and payable quarterly in arrears based on our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose,
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means
interest income, dividend income and any other income (including
any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from
portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus
our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base
management fee, expenses payable under the administration
agreement with FSC, Inc., and any interest expense and dividends
paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but
excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred
interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt
instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities),
accrued income that we have not yet received in cash.
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any
realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized
capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of
86
our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal
quarter, will be compared to a hurdle rate of 2% per
quarter (8% annualized), subject to a
catch-up
provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Our net
investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive
fee is also included in the amount of our gross assets used to
calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the
incentive fee with respect to our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee is payable to the investment adviser in any
fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle);
|
|
|
|
100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect
to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income,
if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal
to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the
investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the
hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any
fiscal quarter; and
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the investment adviser once the hurdle
is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved.
|
The following is a graphical representation of the calculation
of the income-related portion of the incentive fee:
Quarterly
Incentive Fee Based on Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income
Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income
(expressed as a percentage of the value of net assets)
Percentage
of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income allocated to income-related portion of incentive
fee
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable
in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon
termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the
termination date) and equals 20% of our realized capital gains,
if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of
each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses
and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less
the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain
incentive fees, provided that, the incentive fee determined as
of September 30, 2008 was calculated for a period of
shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any
realized capital gains computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation from inception.
Example
1: Income Related Portion of Incentive Fee for Each Fiscal
Quarter
Alternative
1
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
1.25%
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%
87
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(investment income − (management fee + other
expenses) = 0.55%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed hurdle
rate, therefore there is no income-related incentive fee.
Alternative
2
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
2.9%
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(investment income − (management fee + other expenses) =
2.2%
Incentive fee = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income (subject to
catch-up)(4)
= 100% × (2.2% 2%)
= 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the hurdle rate,
but does not fully satisfy the
catch-up
provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive
fee is 0.2%.
Alternative
3
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
3.5%
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(investment income − (management fee + other expenses) =
2.8%
Incentive fee = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income (subject to
catch-up)(4)
Incentive fee = 100% ×
catch-up
+ (20% × (Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income 2.5%))
Catch up = 2.5% 2%
= 0.5%
Incentive fee = (100% × 0.5%) + (20% ×
(2.8% 2.5%))
= 0.5% + (20% × 0.3%)
= 0.5% + 0.06%
= 0.56%
88
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the hurdle rate,
and fully satisfies the
catch-up
provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive
fee is 0.56%.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 8% annualized hurdle rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2% annualized base management fee. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our net investment
income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter. |
Example
2: Capital Gains Portion of Incentive Fee(*):
Alternative
1:
Assumptions
Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A
(Investment A), and $30 million investment made
in Company B (Investment B)
Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million and fair
market value (FMV) of Investment B determined to be
$32 million
Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be
$25 million
Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million
The capital gains portion of the incentive fee would be:
Year 1: None
Year 2: Capital gains incentive fee of
$6 million ($30 million realized capital
gains on sale of Investment A multiplied by 20%)
Year 3: None $5 million (20% multiplied by
($30 million cumulative capital gains less $5 million
cumulative capital depreciation)) less $6 million (previous
capital gains fee paid in Year 2)
Year 4: Capital gains incentive fee of $200,000
$6.2 million ($31 million cumulative realized capital
gains multiplied by 20%) less $6 million (capital gains
incentive fee taken in Year 2)
Alternative
2
Assumptions
Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A
(Investment A), $30 million investment made in
Company B (Investment B) and $25 million
investment made in Company C (Investment C)
Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of
Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of
Investment C determined to be $25 million
Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be
$27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million
Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be
$35 million
Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million
The capital gains incentive fee, if any, would be:
Year 1: None
Year 2: $5 million capital gains incentive
fee 20% multiplied by $25 million
($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
89
Year 3: $1.4 million capital gains incentive
fee(1) $6.4 million (20% multiplied by
$32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital
gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation))
less $5 million capital gains incentive fee received in
Year 2
Year 4: None
Year 5: None $5 million (20% multiplied by
$25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of
$35 million less realized capital losses of
$10 million)) less $6.4 million cumulative capital
gains incentive fee paid in Year 2 and Year 3(2)
|
|
|
* |
|
The hypothetical amounts of returns shown are based on a
percentage of our total net assets and assume no leverage. There
is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized and
actual returns may vary from those shown in this example. |
|
(1) |
|
As illustrated in Year 3 of Alternative 1 above, if Fifth Street
were to be wound up on a date other than its fiscal year end of
any year, Fifth Street may have paid aggregate capital gains
incentive fees that are more than the amount of such fees that
would be payable if Fifth Street had been wound up on its fiscal
year end of such year. |
|
(2) |
|
As noted above, it is possible that the cumulative aggregate
capital gains fee received by our investment adviser
($6.4 million) is effectively greater than $5 million
(20% of cumulative aggregate realized capital gains less net
realized capital losses or net unrealized depreciation
($25 million)). |
Payment
of Our Expenses
Our primary operating expenses are the payment of a base
management fee and any incentive fees under the investment
advisory agreement and the allocable portion of overhead and
other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement. Our investment
management fee compensates our investment adviser for its work
in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, executing and servicing
our investments. We bear all other expenses of our operations
and transactions, including (without limitation) fees and
expenses relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
offering expenses;
|
|
|
|
the investigation and monitoring of our investments;
|
|
|
|
the cost of calculating our net asset value;
|
|
|
|
the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our
common stock and other securities;
|
|
|
|
management and incentive fees payable pursuant to the investment
advisory agreement;
|
|
|
|
fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with,
making investments and valuing investments (including
third-party valuation firms);
|
|
|
|
transfer agent and custodial fees;
|
|
|
|
fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts (including
attendance at investment conferences and similar events);
|
|
|
|
federal and state registration fees;
|
|
|
|
any exchange listing fees;
|
|
|
|
federal, state and local taxes;
|
|
|
|
independent directors fees and expenses;
|
|
|
|
brokerage commissions;
|
|
|
|
costs of proxy statements, stockholders reports and
notices;
|
|
|
|
costs of preparing government filings, including periodic and
current reports with the SEC;
|
|
|
|
fidelity bond, liability insurance and other insurance
premiums; and
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
printing, mailing, independent accountants and outside legal
costs and all other direct expenses incurred by either our
investment adviser or us in connection with administering our
business, including payments under the administration agreement
that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead and
other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement and the
compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance
officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined
to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for
us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his
compensation arrangement with our investment adviser. However,
although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to
receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so
and may cease to do so at any time in the future.
|
Duration
and Termination
The investment advisory agreement was first approved by our
Board of Directors on December 13, 2007 and by a majority
of the limited partners of Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III,
L.P. through a written consent first solicited on
December 14, 2007. On March 14, 2008, our Board of
Directors, including all of the directors who are not
interested persons as defined in the 1940 Act,
approved an amendment to the investment advisory agreement that
revised the investment advisory agreement to clarify the
calculation of the base management fee. Such amendment was also
approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities
through a written consent first solicited on April 7, 2008.
Unless earlier terminated as described below, the investment
advisory agreement, as amended, will remain in effect for a
period of two years from the date it was approved by the Board
of Directors and will remain in effect from
year-to-year
thereafter if approved annually by the Board of Directors or by
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our
outstanding voting securities, including, in either case,
approval by a majority of our directors who are not interested
persons. The investment advisory agreement will automatically
terminate in the event of its assignment. The investment
advisory agreement may be terminated by either party without
penalty upon not more than 60 days written notice to
the other. The investment advisory agreement may also be
terminated, without penalty, upon the vote of a majority of our
outstanding voting securities.
Indemnification
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard
of their respective duties and obligations, our investment
adviser and its officers, managers, agents, employees,
controlling persons, members (or their owners) and any other
person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of our
investment advisers services under the investment advisory
agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.
Organization
of our Investment Adviser
Our investment adviser is a Delaware limited liability company
that registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act.
The principal address of our investment adviser is 10 Bank
Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
Board
Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
At a meeting of our Board of Directors held on March 1,
2011, our Board of Directors unanimously voted to approve the
investment advisory agreement. In reaching a decision to approve
the investment advisory agreement, the Board of Directors
reviewed a significant amount of information and considered,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other
services to be provided to us by Fifth Street Management;
|
|
|
|
the fee structures of comparable externally managed business
development companies that engage in similar investing
activities;
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
our projected operating expenses and expense ratio compared to
business development companies with similar investment
objectives;
|
|
|
|
any existing and potential sources of indirect income to Fifth
Street Management from its relationship with us and the
profitability of that relationship, including through the
investment advisory agreement;
|
|
|
|
information about the services to be performed and the personnel
performing such services under the investment advisory agreement;
|
|
|
|
the organizational capability and financial condition of Fifth
Street Management and its affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
various other matters.
|
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions detailed
above, the Board of Directors, including all of the directors
who are not interested persons as defined in the
1940 Act, concluded that the investment advisory fee rates and
terms are reasonable in relation to the services provided and
approved the investment advisory agreement and the
administration agreement as being in the best interests of our
stockholders.
92
ADMINISTRATION
AGREEMENT
We have also entered into an administration agreement with FSC,
Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative services for
us, including office facilities and equipment and clerical,
bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under
the administration agreement, FSC, Inc. also performs, or
oversees the performance of, our required administrative
services, which includes being responsible for the financial
records which we are required to maintain and preparing reports
to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition,
FSC, Inc. assists us in determining and publishing our net asset
value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns
and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of our
expenses and the performance of administrative and professional
services rendered to us by others. For providing these services,
facilities and personnel, we reimburse FSC, Inc. the allocable
portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in
performing its obligations under the administration agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of
compensation and related expenses of our chief financial officer
and chief compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has
voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the
services performed for us by our chief compliance officer,
Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation arrangement with our
investment adviser. However, although FSC, Inc. currently
intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is
under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time
in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide on our behalf
managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. The
administration agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the
other party.
The administration agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard
of their respective duties and obligations, FSC, Inc. and its
officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are
entitled to indemnification from us for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of services under the administration
agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
LICENSE
AGREEMENT
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street
Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has
agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use
the name Fifth Street. Under this agreement, we will
have a right to use the Fifth Street name, for so
long as Fifth Street Management or one of its affiliates remains
our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited
license, we will have no legal right to the Fifth
Street name.
93
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth
Street Management, our investment adviser. Fifth Street
Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing
member and the chairman of our Board and our chief executive
officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, fees
payable to our investment adviser will be equal to (a) a
base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our gross assets,
which includes any borrowings for investment purposes, and
(b) an incentive fee based on our performance. Our
investment adviser has agreed to permanently waive that portion
of its base management fee attributable to our assets held in
the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each
quarter beginning on March 31, 2010. The incentive fee
consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable
quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding
quarter, subject to a preferred return, or hurdle,
and a catch up feature. The second part is
determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal
year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement)
and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee Capital Gains,
which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis
from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net
of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital
depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of
any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. Since we entered into the
investment advisory agreement in December 2007, we have paid our
investment adviser $8,375,888, $13,729,321 and $20,031,299 for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010
respectively, under the investment advisory agreement.
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which
is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will furnish us
with the facilities and administrative services necessary to
conduct our day-to-day operations, including equipment,
clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such
facilities. In addition, FSC, Inc. will assist us in connection
with the determination and publishing of our net asset value,
the preparation and filing of tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to our stockholders. We will pay FSC,
Inc. our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses
incurred by it in performing its obligations under the
administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and
the compensation of our chief financial officer and our chief
compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily
determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services
performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D.
Berman. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo
its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no
obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the
future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either
party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days
written notice to the other. Since we entered into the
administration agreement in December 2007, we have paid FSC,
Inc. $1,569,912, $1,295,512 and $2,375,015 for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively, under
the administration agreement.
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street
Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has
agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use
the name Fifth Street. Under this agreement, we will
have a right to use the Fifth Street name, for so
long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates
remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this
limited license, we will have no legal right to the Fifth
Street name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by
Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.
94
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010,
the beneficial ownership of each director, each executive
officer, each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more
of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and the executive
officers and directors as a group. Percentage of beneficial
ownership is based on 55,059,057 shares of common stock
outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect
to the securities. Ownership information for those persons who
beneficially own 5% or more of our shares of common stock is
based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other
information obtained from such persons, if available.
Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes that each
beneficial owner set forth in the table has sole voting and
investment power and has the same address as the company. The
companys directors are divided into two groups
interested directors and independent directors. Interested
directors are interested persons of Fifth Street
Finance Corp. as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act).
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all executive
officers and directors is
c/o Fifth
Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White
Plains, NY 10606.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Interested Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum(1)
|
|
|
1,461,690
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
Bernard D. Berman(2)
|
|
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Independent Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian S. Dunn(3)
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard P. Dutkiewicz(3)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Byron J. Haney(4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frank C. Meyer
|
|
|
101,628
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Douglas F. Ray
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Craig(5)
|
|
|
10,052
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chad S. Blakeman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All officers and directors as a group (ten persons)
|
|
|
1,617,122
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares reported includes:
1,461,690 shares of which Mr. Tannenbaum is the direct
beneficial owner; 725,000 shares which Mr. Tannenbaum
holds in a margin account; and 20,000 shares owned by the
Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation, a 501(c)(3) corporation for
which Mr. Tannenbaum serves as the president. With respect
to the 20,000 shares held by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum
Foundation, Mr. Tannenbaum has sole voting and investment
power over all 20,000 shares, but has no pecuniary interest
in, and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of, the shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 13,100 shares held in margin accounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Shares are held in a brokerage account and may be used as
security on a margin basis. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 5,000 shares held in a margin account. |
|
(5) |
|
Pursuant to
Rule 16a-1,
Mr. Craig disclaims beneficial ownership of
6,552 shares of common stock owned by his spouse. |
95
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010,
the dollar range of our equity securities that is beneficially
owned by each of our directors and nominees for director. We are
not part of a family of investment companies, as
that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity
|
|
|
Securities Beneficially Owned(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Interested Directors:
|
|
|
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
|
|
Over $1,000,000
|
Bernard D. Berman
|
|
$100,001 $500,000
|
Independent Directors:
|
|
|
Brian S. Dunn
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
Richard P. Dutkiewicz
|
|
$10,001 $50,000
|
Byron J. Haney
|
|
$100,001 $500,000
|
Frank C. Meyer
|
|
Over $1,000,000
|
Douglas F. Ray
|
|
$10,001 $50,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with
Rule 16a-1(a)(2)
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
(2)
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned in us
is based on the closing price for our common stock of $12.14 on
December 31, 2010 on the New York Stock Exchange.
|
|
(3)
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are:
none, $1 $10,000, $10,001 $50,000,
$50,001 $100,000, $100,001 $500,000,
$500,001 $1,000,000, or over $1,000,000.
|
96
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for
reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders,
unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below.
As a result, if our Board of Directors authorizes, and we
declare, a cash distribution, then our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will
have their cash distributions automatically reinvested in
additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the
cash distributions.
No action will be required on the part of a registered
stockholder to have their cash distributions reinvested in
shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect
to receive an entire distribution in cash by notifying American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, the plan
administrator and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing
so that such notice is received by the plan administrator no
later than 3 days prior to the dividend payment date for
distributions to stockholders. The plan administrator will set
up an account for shares acquired through the plan for each
stockholder who has not elected to receive distributions in cash
and hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in the plan, received in writing not
less than 3 days prior to the dividend payment date, the
plan administrator will, instead of crediting shares to the
participants account, issue a certificate registered in
the participants name for the number of whole shares of
our common stock and a check for any fractional share. Those
stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other
financial intermediary may receive distributions in cash by
notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their
election. If the shareholder request is received less than
3 days prior to the dividend payment date then that
dividend will be reinvested. However, all subsequent dividends
will be paid out in cash on all balances.
We intend to use newly issued shares to implement the plan when
our shares are trading at a premium to net asset value. Under
such circumstances, the number of shares to be issued to a
stockholder is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of
the distribution payable to such stockholder by the greater of
(a) the current net asset value per share of our common
stock, and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our
common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed
by our Board of Directors. Market price per share on that date
will be the closing price for such shares on the New York Stock
Exchange or, if no sale is reported for such day, at the average
of their reported bid and asked prices. We reserve the right to
purchase shares in the open market in connection with our
implementation of the plan if either (1) the price at which
newly-issued shares are to be credited does not exceed 110% of
the last determined net asset value of the shares; or
(2) we have advised the plan administrator that since such
net asset value was last determined, we have become aware of
events that indicate the possibility of a material change in the
per share net asset value as a result of which the net asset
value of the shares on the payment date might be higher than the
price at which the plan administrator would credit newly-issued
shares to stockholders. Shares purchased in open market
transactions by the plan administrator will be allocated to a
stockholder based on the average purchase price, excluding any
brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common
stock purchased in the open market.
There will be no brokerage charges or other charges for dividend
reinvestment to stockholders who participate in the plan. We
will pay the plan administrators fees under the plan. If a
participant elects by written notice to the plan administrator
to have the plan administrator sell part or all of the shares
held by the plan administrator in the participants account
and remit the proceeds to the participant, the plan
administrator is authorized to deduct a $15.00 transaction fee
plus a $0.10 per share brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock
generally are subject to the same federal, state and local tax
consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
distributions in cash; however, since their cash dividends will
be reinvested, such stockholders will not receive cash with
which to pay any applicable taxes on reinvested dividends. A
stockholders basis for determining gain or loss upon the
sale of stock received in a distribution from us will be equal
to the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to the
stockholder. Any stock received in a distribution will have a
holding period for tax purposes commencing on the day following
the day on which the shares are credited to the
stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by
notifying the plan administrator via its website at
www.amstock.com, by filling out the transaction request
form located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to
the plan administrator at P.O. Box 922, Wall Street
Station, New York, New York,
10269-0560,
or by calling the plan administrators at 1-866-665-2281.
We may terminate the plan upon notice in writing mailed to each
participant at least 30 days prior to any record date for
the payment of any distribution by us. All correspondence
concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator
by mail at 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11219, or
by telephone at 1-866-665-2280.
97
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following description summarizes material provisions of
the Delaware General Corporation Law and our restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws.
This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer you to
the Delaware General Corporation Law and our restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws for
a more detailed description of the provisions summarized
below.
Capital
Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 150,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which
55,059,057 shares were outstanding as of December 31,
2010.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the ticker symbol FSC. No stock has been authorized
for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Delaware
law, our stockholders generally will not be personally liable
for our debts or obligations.
Set forth below is chart describing the classes of our
securities outstanding as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Held
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
by us or for
|
|
Exclusive of Amount
|
Title of Class
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Our Account
|
|
Under Column 3
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,059,057
|
|
Under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation,
all shares of our common stock will have equal rights as to
earnings, assets, dividends and voting and, when they are
issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our
common stock if, as and when authorized by our Board of
Directors and declared by us out of funds legally available
therefore. Shares of our common stock will have no preemptive,
exchange, conversion or redemption rights and will be freely
transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by
federal and state securities laws or by contract. In the event
of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of our
common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of our
assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay
all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential
rights of holders of our preferred stock, if any preferred stock
is outstanding at such time. Each share of our common stock will
be entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders, including the election of directors. The holders
of our common stock will possess exclusive voting power. There
will be no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which
means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
common stock will be able to elect all of our directors, and
holders of less than a majority of such shares will be unable to
elect any director.
Limitation
on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and
Advance of Expenses
Under our restated certificate of incorporation, we will fully
indemnify any person who was or is involved in any actual or
threatened action, suit or proceeding (whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative) by reason of the fact that such
person is or was one of our directors or officers or is or was
serving at our request as a director or officer of another
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with
respect to an employee benefit plan, against expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid or to
be paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such
person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. Our
restated certificate of incorporation also provides that our
directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to
us for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, except for
a breach of their duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. So
long as we are regulated under the 1940 Act, the above
indemnification and limitation of liability will be limited by
the 1940 Act or by any valid rule, regulation or order of the
SEC thereunder. The 1940 Act provides, among other things, that
a company may not indemnify any director or officer against
liability to it or its stockholders to which he or she might
otherwise be subject by reason of his or her willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office
unless a determination is made by final decision of a court, by
vote of a majority of a quorum of directors who
98
are disinterested, non-party directors or by independent legal
counsel that the liability for which indemnification is sought
did not arise out of the foregoing conduct.
Delaware law also provides that indemnification permitted under
the law shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to
which the directors and officers may be entitled under the
corporations bylaws, any agreement, a vote of stockholders
or otherwise.
Our restated certificate of incorporation permits us to secure
insurance on behalf of any person who is or was or has agreed to
become a director or officer of Fifth Street or is or was
serving at our request as a director or officer of another
enterprise for any liability arising out of his or her actions,
regardless of whether the Delaware General Corporation Law would
permit indemnification. We have obtained liability insurance for
our officers and directors.
Delaware
Law and Certain Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw
Provisions; Anti-Takeover Measures
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
General Corporation Law of Delaware. In general, the statute
prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
a business combination with interested
stockholders for a period of three years after the date of
the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner. A business combination includes
certain mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in
a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to
exceptions, an interested stockholder is a person
who, together with his, her or its affiliates and associates,
owns, or within three years did own, 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
the Board of Directors be divided into three classes, as nearly
equal in size as possible, with staggered three-year terms;
|
|
|
|
directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote
of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of our capital stock
entitled to vote; and
|
|
|
|
any vacancy on the Board of Directors, however the vacancy
occurs, including a vacancy due to an enlargement of the Board
of Directors, may only be filled by vote of the directors then
in office.
|
The classification of our Board of Directors and the limitations
on removal of directors and filling of vacancies could have the
effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring us.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws also provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders
at an annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may only
be taken if it is properly brought before such meeting and may
not be taken by written action in lieu of a meeting; and
|
|
|
|
special meetings of the stockholders may only be called by our
Board of Directors, chairman or chief executive officer.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, in order for any
matter to be considered properly brought before a
meeting, a stockholder must comply with requirements regarding
advance notice to us. These provisions could delay until the
next stockholders meeting stockholder actions which are
favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting
securities. These provisions may also discourage another person
or entity from making a tender offer for our common stock,
because such person or entity, even if it acquired a majority of
our outstanding voting securities, would be able to take action
as a stockholder (such as electing new directors or approving a
merger) only at a duly called stockholders meeting, and not by
written consent.
Delawares corporation law provides generally that the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on
any matter is required to amend a corporations certificate
of incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporations
certificate of incorporation or bylaws requires a greater
percentage. Under our amended and restated bylaws and our
restated certificate of incorporation, the affirmative vote of
the holders of at least
662/3%
of the shares of our capital stock entitled to vote will be
required to amend or repeal any of the provisions of our amended
and restated bylaws.
99
However, the vote of at least
662/3%
of the shares of our capital stock then outstanding and entitled
to vote in the election of directors, voting together as a
single class, will be required to amend or repeal any provision
of our restated certificate of incorporation pertaining to the
Board of Directors, limitation of liability, indemnification,
stockholder action or amendments to our certificate of
incorporation. In addition, our restated certificate of
incorporation permits our Board of Directors to amend or repeal
our amended and restated bylaws by a majority vote.
100
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and
to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to
be a complete description of the income tax considerations
applicable to such an investment. For example, we have not
described tax consequences that may be relevant to certain types
of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal
income tax laws, including stockholders subject to the
alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance
companies, dealers in securities, a trader in securities that
elects to use a market-to-market method of accounting for its
securities holdings, pension plans and trusts, and financial
institutions. This summary assumes that investors hold our
common stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the Code).
The discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations, and
administrative and judicial interpretations, each as of the date
of this prospectus and all of which are subject to change,
possibly retroactively, which could affect the continuing
validity of this discussion. We have not sought and will not
seek any ruling from the IRS regarding this offering. This
summary does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift
tax or foreign, state or local tax. It does not discuss the
special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws that
could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain
other investment assets.
A U.S. stockholder generally is a beneficial
owner of shares of our common stock who is for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
A citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
A corporation or other entity treated as a corporation, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any political
subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
A trust if a court within the United States is asked to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one
or more United States persons have the authority to control all
substantive decisions of the trust; or
|
|
|
|
An estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source.
|
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
generally is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock
who is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
A nonresident alien individual;
|
|
|
|
A foreign corporation; or
|
|
|
|
An estate or trust that in either case is not subject to U.S.
federal income tax on a net income basis on income or gain from
a note.
|
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is
a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock
should consult his, her or its tax advisers with respect to the
purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common
stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an
investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts
of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors
to consult their own tax advisers regarding the specific
consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and
foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable
tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax
laws.
Election
to be Taxed as a RIC
As a business development company, we have elected to be
treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC under
Subchapter M of the Code, beginning with our 2008 taxable year.
As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S.
federal income taxes on any income that we distribute to our
stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we
must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and
asset diversification
101
requirements (as described below). In addition, to qualify for
RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for
each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company
taxable income, which is generally our ordinary income
plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains
over our realized net long-term capital losses (the Annual
Distribution Requirement).
Taxation
as a Regulated Investment Company
For any taxable year in which we:
|
|
|
|
|
qualify as a RIC; and
|
|
|
|
satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement,
|
we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on
the portion of our income we distribute (or are deemed to
distribute) to stockholders. We will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on
any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed
distributed) to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax
on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely
manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of
our net ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2%
of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending
October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income
recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years (the
Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement). We generally will
endeavor in each taxable year to make sufficient distributions
to our stockholders to avoid any U.S. federal excise tax on
our earnings.
In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, we must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to qualify as a business development company under the
1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;
|
|
|
|
derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income
from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of
certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other
securities, net income from certain qualified publicly
traded partnerships, or other income derived with respect
to our business of investing in such stock or securities (the
90% Income Test); and
|
|
|
|
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the
taxable year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any
one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our
assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
the issuer; and
|
|
|
|
no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the
securities, other than U.S. government securities or
securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or more issuers
that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules,
by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related
trades or businesses or of certain qualified publicly
traded partnerships (the Diversification
Tests).
|
Qualified earnings may exclude such income as management fees
received in connection with our SBIC or other potential outside
managed funds and certain other fees.
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure issued by the IRS, the
IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions from certain
publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid part in cash
and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy the RICs
annual distribution requirements and qualify for the dividends
paid deduction for income tax purposes. In order to qualify for
such treatment, the revenue procedure requires that at least 10%
of the total distribution be paid in cash and that each
shareholder have a right to elect to receive its entire
distribution in cash. If the number of shareholders electing to
receive cash would cause cash distributions in excess of 10%,
then each shareholder electing to receive cash would receive a
proportionate share of the cash to be distributed (although no
shareholder electing to receive cash may receive less than 10%
of such shareholders distribution in cash). This revenue
procedure applies to distributions made with respect to taxable
years ending prior to January 1, 2012. Taxable stockholders
receiving such dividends will be required to include the full
amount of the dividend as
102
ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such
distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to
the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits
for United States federal income tax purposes. In situations
where this revenue procedure is not applicable, the Internal
Revenue Service has also issued private letter rulings on
cash/stock dividends paid by RICs and real estate investment
trusts using a 20% cash standard (instead of the 10% cash
standard of the revenue procedure) if certain requirements are
satisfied. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required
to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash
received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives
as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may
be less than the amount included in income with respect to the
dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time
of the sale.
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances
in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt
obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as
having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with
PIK interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a
portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the
life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing
such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may
also have to include in income other amounts that we have not
yet received in cash, such as PIK interest, deferred loan
origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or
are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock, or
certain income with respect to equity investments in foreign
corporations. Because any original issue discount or other
amounts accrued will be included in our investment company
taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to
make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the
Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have
received any corresponding cash amount.
Gain or loss realized by us from the sale or exchange of
warrants acquired by us as well as any loss attributable to the
lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital gain
or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term or
short-term, depending on how long we held a particular warrant.
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized
to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy
distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are
not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding
unless certain asset coverage tests are met.
Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our
distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the
illiquid nature of our portfolio
and/or
(2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC,
including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in
order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise
Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at
times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If we are prohibited from making distributions or are unable to
obtain cash from other sources to make the distributions, we may
fail to qualify as a RIC, which would result in us becoming
subject to corporate-level federal income tax.
In addition, we will be partially dependent on our SBIC
subsidiaries for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC
distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiaries may be limited
by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA
regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions
to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We
may have to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for
our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain
our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant
such waiver. If our SBIC subsidiaries are unable to obtain a
waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may cause us to fail
to qualify as a RIC, which would result in us becoming subject
to corporate-level federal income tax.
The remainder of this discussion assumes that we qualify as a
RIC and have satisfied the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Any transactions in options, futures contracts, constructive
sales, hedging, straddle, conversion or similar transactions,
and forward contracts will be subject to special tax rules, the
effect of which may be to accelerate income to us, defer losses,
cause adjustments to the holding periods of our investments,
convert long-term capital gains into short-term capital gains,
convert short-term capital losses into long-term capital losses
or have other tax consequences. These rules could affect the
amount, timing and character of distributions to stockholders.
We do not currently intend to engage in these types of
transactions.
103
A RIC is limited in its ability to deduct expenses in excess of
its investment company taxable income (which is,
generally, ordinary income plus net realized short-term capital
gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses). If
our expenses in a given year exceed gross taxable income (e.g.,
as the result of large amounts of equity-based compensation), we
would experience a net operating loss for that year. However, a
RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to
subsequent years. In addition, expenses can be used only to
offset investment company taxable income, not net capital gain.
Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, we may for
tax purposes have aggregate taxable income for several years
that we are required to distribute and that is taxable to our
stockholders even if such income is greater than the aggregate
net income we actually earned during those years. Such required
distributions may be made from our cash assets or by liquidation
of investments, if necessary. We may realize gains or losses
from such liquidations. In the event we realize net capital
gains from such transactions, you may receive a larger capital
gain distribution than you would have received in the absence of
such transactions.
Investment income received from sources within foreign
countries, or capital gains earned by investing in securities of
foreign issuers, may be subject to foreign income taxes withheld
at the source. In this regard, withholding tax rates in
countries with which the United States does not have a tax
treaty are often as high as 35% or more. The United States has
entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that may
entitle us to a reduced rate of tax or exemption from tax on
this related income and gains. The effective rate of foreign tax
cannot be determined at this time since the amount of our assets
to be invested within various countries is not now known. We do
not anticipate being eligible for the special election that
allows a RIC to treat foreign income taxes paid by such RIC as
paid by its shareholders.
If we acquire stock in certain foreign corporations that receive
at least 75% of their annual gross income from passive sources
(such as interest, dividends, rents, royalties or capital gain)
or hold at least 50% of their total assets in investments
producing such passive income (passive foreign investment
companies), We could be subject to federal income tax and
additional interest charges on excess distributions
received from such companies or gain from the sale of stock in
such companies, even if all income or gain actually received by
us is timely distributed to our shareholders. We would not be
able to pass through to our shareholders any credit or deduction
for such a tax. Certain elections may, if available, ameliorate
these adverse tax consequences, but any such election requires
us to recognize taxable income or gain without the concurrent
receipt of cash. We intend to limit
and/or
manage our holdings in passive foreign investment companies to
minimize our tax liability.
Foreign exchange gains and losses realized by us in connection
with certain transactions involving non-dollar debt securities,
certain foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency
option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign
currencies, or payables or receivables denominated in a foreign
currency are subject to Code provisions that generally treat
such gains and losses as ordinary income and losses and may
affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to our
stockholders. Any such transactions that are not directly
related to our investment in securities (possibly including
speculative currency positions or currency derivatives not used
for hedging purposes) could, under future Treasury regulations,
produce income not among the types of qualifying
income from which a RIC must derive at least 90% of its
annual gross income.
Taxation
of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income (which is, generally, our net ordinary income plus
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to
U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. To the extent such
distributions paid by us in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2013 to non-corporate stockholders (including
individuals) are attributable to dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations, such distributions (Qualifying
Dividends) may be eligible for a maximum tax rate of 15%,
provided holding period and other requirements are met at both
the stockholder and company levels. In this regard, it is
anticipated that distributions paid by us will generally not be
attributable to dividends and, therefore, generally will not
qualify for the 15% maximum rate applicable to Qualifying
Dividends. Distributions of our net capital gains (which are
generally our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of
realized net short-term capital losses) made in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2013 and properly reported by
us as capital gain dividends in written statements
furnished to our stockholders will be taxable to a
U.S. stockholder as long-
104
term capital gains that are currently taxable at a maximum rate
of 15% in the case of individuals, trusts or estates, regardless
of the U.S. stockholders holding period for his, her
or its common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions in excess
of our earnings and profits first will reduce a
U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in such
stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is
reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
U.S. stockholder.
We may retain some or all of our realized net long-term capital
gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses, but
designate the retained net capital gain as a deemed
distribution. In that case, among other consequences, we
will pay tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder
will be required to include his, her or its share of the deemed
distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to
the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be
entitled to claim a credit equal to his, her or its allocable
share of the tax paid thereon by us. Because we expect to pay
tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax
rate, and because that rate is in excess of the maximum rate
currently payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the
amount of tax that individual U.S. stockholders will be
treated as having paid will exceed the tax they owe on the
capital gain distribution and such excess generally may be
refunded or claimed as a credit against the
U.S. stockholders other U.S. federal income tax
obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a
stockholders liability for federal income tax. A
stockholder that is not subject to federal income tax or
otherwise required to file a federal income tax return would be
required to file a federal income tax return on the appropriate
form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. The
amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added
to the U.S. stockholders cost basis for his, her or
its common stock. In order to utilize the deemed distribution
approach, we must provide written notice to our stockholders
prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the
relevant taxable year. We cannot treat any of our investment
company taxable income as a deemed distribution.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual
Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and
(2) the amount of the deduction for ordinary income and
capital gain dividends paid for that year, we may, under certain
circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that is paid during the
following taxable year as if it had been paid during the taxable
year in question. If we make such an election, the
U.S. stockholder will still be treated as receiving the
dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made.
However, any dividend declared by us in October, November or
December of any calendar year, payable to stockholders of record
on a specified date in such a month and actually paid during
January of the following year, will be treated as if it had been
received by our U.S. stockholders on December 31 of the
year in which the dividend was declared.
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly
before the record date of a distribution, the price of the
shares will include the value of the distribution and the
investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though
economically it may represent a return of his, her or its
investment.
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss
if the U.S. stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her
or its shares of our common stock. The amount of gain or loss
will be measured by the difference between such U.S.
stockholders adjusted tax basis in the common stock sold
and the amount of the proceeds received in exchange. Any gain
arising from such sale or disposition generally will be treated
as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. stockholder has
held his, her or its shares for more than one year. Otherwise,
it will be classified as short-term capital gain or loss.
However, any capital loss arising from the sale or disposition
of shares of our common stock held for six months or less will
be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount
of capital gain dividends received, or undistributed capital
gain deemed received, with respect to such shares. In addition,
all or a portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of
shares of our common stock may be disallowed if other shares of
our common stock are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after
the disposition. In such a case, the basis of the newly
purchased shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
In general, U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates
currently are subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate
of 15% on their net capital gain (i.e., the excess of realized
net long-term capital gains over realized net short-term capital
losses) recognized in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2013, including any long-term capital gain
derived from an investment in our shares. Such rate is lower
than the maximum rate on ordinary income currently payable by
such U.S. stockholders. The maximum rate on long-term capital
gains for U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates is
scheduled to return to 20% for tax years beginning after
December 31, 2012. In addition,
105
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012,
individuals with income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 in the
case of married individuals filing jointly) and certain estates
and trusts are subject to an additional 3.8% tax on their
net investment income, which generally includes net
income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and
rents, and net capital gains (other than certain amounts earned
from trades or businesses). Corporate U.S. stockholders
currently are subject to U.S. federal income tax on net capital
gain at the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income.
Non-corporate U.S. stockholders with net capital losses for a
year (i.e., capital losses in excess of capital gains) generally
may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary
income each year any net capital losses of a non-corporate U.S.
stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be carried forward
and used in subsequent years as provided in the Code. Corporate
U.S. stockholders generally may not deduct any net capital
losses for a year, but may carry back such losses for three
years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly
as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice
reporting, on a per share and per distribution basis, the
amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital
gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years
distributions generally will be reported to the IRS (including
the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for the 15% maximum
rate). Dividends paid by us generally will not be eligible for
the dividends-received deduction or the preferential tax rate
applicable to Qualifying Dividends because our income generally
will not consist of dividends. Distributions may also be subject
to additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a
U.S. stockholders particular situation.
In some taxable years, we may be subject to the alternative
minimum tax (AMT). If we have tax items that are
treated differently for AMT purposes than for regular tax
purposes, we may apportion those items between us and our
stockholders, and this may affect our stockholders AMT
liabilities. Although regulations explaining the precise method
of apportionment have not yet been issued by the Internal
Revenue Service, we may apportion these items in the same
proportion that dividends paid to each stockholder bear to our
taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid
deduction), unless we determine that a different method for a
particular item is warranted under the circumstances. You should
consult your own tax advisor to determine how an investment in
our stock could affect your AMT liability.
We may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax
(backup withholding) from all distributions to any
U.S. stockholder (other than a stockholder that otherwise
qualifies for an exemption) (1) who fails to furnish us
with a correct taxpayer identification number or a certificate
that such stockholder is exempt from backup withholding or
(2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies us that such
stockholder has failed to properly report certain interest and
dividend income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that
effect. An individuals taxpayer identification number is
his or her social security number. Any amount withheld under
backup withholding is allowed as a credit against the
U.S. stockholders federal income tax liability,
provided that proper information is provided to the IRS.
U.S. stockholders that hold their common stock through foreign
accounts or intermediaries will be subject to U.S. withholding
tax at a rate of 30% on dividends and proceeds of sale of our
common stock paid after December 31, 2012 if certain
disclosure requirements related to U.S. accounts are not
satisfied.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan We have
adopted a dividend reinvestment plan through which all dividend
distributions are paid to our stockholders in the form of
additional shares of our common stock, unless a stockholder
elects to receive cash in accordance with the terms of the plan.
See Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Any distributions
made to a U.S. stockholder that are reinvested under the
plan will nevertheless remain taxable to the
U.S. stockholder. The U.S. stockholder will have an
adjusted tax basis in the additional shares of our common stock
purchased through the plan equal to the amount of the reinvested
distribution. The additional shares will have a new holding
period commencing on the day following the day on which the
shares are credited to the U.S. stockholders account.
Taxation
of Non-U.S.
Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An
investment in the shares by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
may have adverse tax consequences.
Non-U.S. stockholders
should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
106
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income to
Non-U.S. stockholders
(including interest income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized long-term capital losses, which
generally would be free of withholding if paid to
Non-U.S. stockholders
directly) will be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30%
rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the
extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits
unless an applicable exception applies. If the distributions are
effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
we will not be required to withhold federal tax if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements, although the distributions will be subject to U.S.
federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons.
(Special certification requirements apply to a
Non-U.S. stockholder
that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, and such
entities are urged to consult their own tax advisers.)
However, for taxable years beginning before January 1,
2012, no withholding will be required with respect to certain
distributions if (i) the distributions are properly
reported to our stockholders as interest-related
dividends or short-term capital gain dividends
in written statements to our stockholders, (ii) the
distributions are derived from sources specified in the Code for
such dividends and (iii) certain other requirements are
satisfied. Currently, we do not anticipate that any significant
amount of our distributions will be reported as eligible for
this proposed exemption from withholding. No assurance can be
provided that this exemption will be extended for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2011. Actual or deemed
distributions of our net capital gains to a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and gains realized by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
upon the sale of our common stock, will not be subject to
federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to
federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the
case may be, are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the
Non-U.S. stockholder.
The tax consequences to
Non-U.S. stockholders
entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty or
that are individuals that are present in the United States for
183 days or more during a taxable year may be different from
those described herein.
Non-U.S. stockholders
are urged to consult their tax advisers with respect to the
procedure for claiming the benefit of a lower treaty rate and
the applicability of foreign taxes.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed
rather than actual distributions, a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax
refund equal to the stockholders allocable share of the
tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed.
In order to obtain the refund, the
Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file
a U.S. federal income tax return even if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer
identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return.
For a corporate
Non-U.S. stockholder,
distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon
the sale of our common stock that are effectively connected to a
U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30%
rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable
treaty). Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be
appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise
subject to withholding of federal tax, may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. federal
income tax on dividends unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets
documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a
Non-U.S. stockholder
or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Recently enacted legislation that becomes effective after
December 31, 2012, generally imposes a 30% withholding tax
on payments of certain types of income to foreign financial
institutions that fail to enter into an agreement with the U.S.
Treasury to report certain required information with respect to
accounts held by U.S. persons (or held by foreign entities that
have U.S. persons as substantial owners). The types of income
subject to the tax include U.S. source interest and dividends
and the gross proceeds from the sale of any property that could
produce U.S.-source interest or dividends. The information
required to be reported includes the identity and taxpayer
identification number of each account holder that is a U.S.
person and transaction activity within the holders
account. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, this
legislation also imposes a 30% withholding on payments to
foreign entities that are not financial institutions unless the
foreign entity certifies that it does not have a greater than
10% U.S. owner or provides the withholding agent with
identifying information on each greater than 10% U.S. owner.
When these provisions become effective, depending on the status
of a Non-U.S. Holder and the status of the intermediaries
through which they hold their shares, Non-U.S. Holders could be
subject to this 30%
107
withholding tax with respect to distributions on their shares
and proceeds from the sale of their shares. Under certain
circumstances, a Non-U.S. Holder might be eligible for refunds
or credits of such taxes.
Non-U.S. persons
should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state,
local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the
shares.
Failure
to Qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
If we fail to satisfy the 90% Income Test or the Diversification
Tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless continue to
qualify as a RIC for such year if certain relief provisions are
applicable (which may, among other things, require us to pay
certain corporate-level federal taxes or to dispose of certain
assets).
If we were unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC and the
foregoing relief provisions are not applicable, we would be
subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate
rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our
stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any
distributions made in taxable years beginning on or before
December 31, 2012 would be taxable to our stockholders as
ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations,
may be eligible for the 15% maximum rate to the extent of our
current and accumulated earnings and profits provided certain
holding period and other requirements were met. Subject to
certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would
be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions
in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits
would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of
the stockholders tax basis, and any remaining
distributions would be treated as a capital gain. To requalify
as a RIC in a subsequent taxable year, we would be required to
satisfy the RIC qualification requirements for that year and
dispose of any earnings and profits from any year in which we
failed to qualify as a RIC. Subject to a limited exception
applicable to RICs that qualified as such under
Subchapter M of the Code for at least one year prior to
disqualification and that requalify as a RIC no later than the
second year following the nonqualifying year, we could be
subject to tax on any unrealized net built-in gains in the
assets held by us during the period in which we failed to
qualify as a RIC that are recognized within the subsequent
10 years, unless we made a special election to pay
corporate-level tax on such built-in gain at the time of our
requalification as a RIC.
108
REGULATION
Business
Development Company Regulations
We have elected to be regulated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions
and restrictions relating to transactions between business
development companies and their affiliates, principal
underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters.
The 1940 Act requires that a majority of the directors be
persons other than interested persons, as that term
is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides
that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease
to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development
company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting
securities.
The 1940 Act defines a majority of the outstanding voting
securities as the lesser of (i) 67% or more of the
voting securities present at a meeting if the holders of more
than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are present or
represented by proxy or (ii) 50% of our voting securities.
As a business development company, we will not generally be
permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which our
investment adviser or any of its affiliates currently have an
investment or to make any co-investments with our investment
adviser or its affiliates without an exemptive order from the
SEC. We currently do not intend to apply for an exemptive order
that would permit us to co-invest with vehicles managed by our
investment adviser or its affiliates.
Qualifying
Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not
acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in
Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as
qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made,
qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys
total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets
relevant to our business are any of the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any
public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer
(subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio
company, or from any person who is, or has been during the
preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible
portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such
rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio
company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal
place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small
business investment company wholly owned by the business
development company) or a company that would be an investment
company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
(i) does not have any class of securities that is traded on
a national securities exchange;
(ii) has a class of securities listed on a national
securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of
outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than
$250 million;
(iii) is controlled by a business development company or a
group of companies including a business development company and
the business development company has an affiliated person who is
a director of the eligible portfolio company; or
(iv) is a small and solvent company having total assets of
not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not
less than $2 million.
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we
control.
(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a
U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an
affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident
thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the
purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as
they came due without material assistance other than
conventional lending or financing arrangements.
109
(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased
from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready
market for such securities and we already own 60% of the
outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on
or with respect to securities described in (1) through
(4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or
rights relating to such securities.
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less
from the time of investment.
In addition, a business development company must be operated for
the purpose of making investments in the types of securities
described in (1), (2) or (3) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for
the purpose of the 70% test, we must either control the issuer
of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer
of the securities (other than small and solvent companies
described above) significant managerial assistance; except that,
where we purchase such securities in conjunction with one or
more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in
the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making
available managerial assistance means, among other things, any
arrangement whereby the business development company, through
its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if
accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel
concerning the management, operations or business objectives and
policies of a portfolio company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying
assets, as described above, our investments may consist of
cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or
high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from
the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as
temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying
assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. Treasury bills or
in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are
fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the
U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement
(which is substantially similar to a secured loan) involves the
purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and
the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an
agreed-upon
future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase
price by an amount that reflects an
agreed-upon
interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase
agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets
constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we
would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as
a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not
intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single
counterparty in excess of this limit. Our investment adviser
will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with
which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
Senior
Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple
classes of debt and one class of stock senior to our common
stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at
least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In
addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we may
be prohibited from making distribution to our stockholders or
repurchasing such securities or shares unless we meet the
applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution
or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value
of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without
regard to asset coverage. For a discussion of the risks
associated with leverage, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure
Regulations governing our operation as a business development
company and RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in
which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment
purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth
and Because we borrow money, the potential for
loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may
increase the risk of investing in us.
110
Common
Stock
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at
a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell
our common stock, warrants, options or rights to acquire our
common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of
the common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such
sale is in our best interests and that of our stockholders, and
our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price
at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be
less than a price which, in the determination of our Board of
Directors, closely approximates the market value of such
securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We
may also make rights offerings to our stockholders at prices per
share less than the net asset value per share, subject to
applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. See Risk
Factors Risks Relating to Our Business and
Structure Regulations governing our operation as a
business development company affect our ability to raise, and
the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for
investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our
growth.
Code
of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act and we have also approved the investment
advisers code of ethics that was adopted by it under
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act and
Rule 204A-1
of the Advisers Act. These codes establish procedures for
personal investments and restrict certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to the code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements. You may also read and copy the codes of ethics at
the SECs Public Reference Room located at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the codes of ethics are available on the EDGAR
Database on the SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Compliance
Policies and Procedures
We and our investment adviser have adopted and implemented
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violation of the federal securities laws and are required to
review these compliance policies and procedures annually for
their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation.
Our chief compliance officer is responsible for administering
these policies and procedures.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our
investment adviser. The proxy voting policies and procedures of
our investment adviser are set forth below. (The guidelines are
reviewed periodically by our investment adviser and our
non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to
change).
Introduction
As an investment adviser registered under the Investment
Advisers Act, our investment adviser has a fiduciary duty to act
solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this
duty, it recognizes that it must vote client securities in a
timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best
interests of its clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for the
investment advisory clients of our investment adviser are
intended to comply with Section 206 of, and
Rule 206(4)-6
under, the Advisers Act.
Proxy
policies
Our investment adviser will vote proxies relating to our
securities in the best interest of our stockholders. It will
review on a
case-by-case
basis each proposal submitted for a stockholder vote to
determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us.
Although our investment adviser will generally vote against
proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio
securities, it may vote for such a proposal if there exists
compelling long-term reasons to do so.
The proxy voting decisions of our investment adviser are made by
the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of
our investments. To ensure that its vote is not the product of a
conflict of interest, it will require that: (a) anyone
involved in the decision making process disclose to its chief
compliance officer any potential conflict that he or she is
aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any
interested party regarding a proxy
111
vote; and (b) employees involved in the decision making
process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how
our investment adviser intends to vote on a proposal in order to
reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy
voting records
You may obtain information, without charge, regarding how we
voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making
a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief
Compliance Officer, 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY
10606.
Other
We will be subject to periodic examination by the SEC for
compliance with the 1940 Act.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a
reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against
larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a business development
company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or
officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising
from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or
reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such
persons office.
Securities
Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Compliance
We are subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of
the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly, annual and
current reports, proxy statements and other required items. In
addition, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which
imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on
publicly-held companies and their insiders. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Exchange Act, our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer are required to certify the accuracy of the
financial statements contained in our periodic reports;
|
|
|
|
pursuant to Item 307 of
Regulation S-K,
our periodic reports are required to disclose our conclusions
about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures; and
|
|
|
|
pursuant to
Rule 13a-15
of the Exchange Act, our management will be required to prepare
a report regarding its assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting. Our independent registered public
accounting firm will be required to audit our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current
policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
We intend to monitor our compliance with all regulations that
are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions
necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
Small
Business Investment Company Regulations
In August 2009, we formed Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners IV, L.P. In February 2010, Fifth Street Mezzanine
Partners IV, L.P. received final approval to be licensed by
the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, as a
small business investment company, or SBIC.
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage
by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of
a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures.
SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only
debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten
year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures
is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid
at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed
debentures is fixed at the time of issuance at a market-driven
spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with
10-year
maturities.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity
capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations,
SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in
the equity securities of small businesses. Under present SBA
regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that
have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18 million and
have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding
$6 million for the
112
two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote
25% of its investment activity to smaller concerns
as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a
tangible net worth not exceeding $6 million and has average
annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2 million for
the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide
alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility,
which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged
and are based on such factors as the number of employees and
gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make
long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity
securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting
and advisory services.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC
subsidiary may borrow up to a maximum of $150 million when
it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives
a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an
examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of
December 31, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million
in regulatory capital and the SBA had issued a capital
commitment to our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of
$150 million.
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their
capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a
change of control or transfer of an SBIC and require
that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations.
In addition, our SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its
ability to make distributions to us if it does not have
sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
Our SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by
the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining
certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of
an SBIC license does not assure that our SBIC subsidiary will
receive SBA guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent
upon our SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA
regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a
superior claim to our SBIC subsidiarys assets over our
stockholders in the event we liquidate our SBIC subsidiary or
the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed
debentures issued by our SBIC subsidiary upon an event of
default.
The New
York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Regulations
The New York Stock Exchange has adopted corporate governance
regulations that listed companies must comply with. We are in
compliance with such corporate governance listing standards
applicable to business development companies.
113
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell our common stock through underwriters or dealers,
at the market to or through a market maker or into
an existing trading market or otherwise, directly to one or more
purchasers or through agents or through a combination of any
such methods of sale. Any underwriter or agent involved in the
offer and sale of our common stock will also be named in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
The distribution of our common stock may be effected from time
to time in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices,
which may be changed, at prevailing market prices at the time of
sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or at
negotiated prices, provided, however, that the offering price
per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions
and discounts or agency fees, must equal or exceed the net asset
value per share of our common stock.
In connection with the sale of our common stock, underwriters or
agents may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of
our common stock, for whom they may act as agents, in the form
of discounts, concessions or commissions.
Underwriters may sell our common stock to or through dealers and
such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts,
concessions or commissions from the underwriters
and/or
commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agents.
Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the
distribution of our common stock may be deemed to be
underwriters under the Securities Act, and any discounts and
commissions they receive from us and any profit realized by them
on the resale of our common stock may be deemed to be
underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such
compensation received from us will be described in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or
sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties
in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable
prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those
derivatives, the third parties may sell common stock covered by
this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement,
including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may
use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to
settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings
of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement
of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of
stock. The third parties in such sale transactions will be
underwriters and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be
identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a
post-effective amendment).
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement
will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or another
exchange on which our common stock is traded.
Under agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers
and agents who participate in the distribution of our common
stock may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in transactions
with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of
business.
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will
authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to
solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase our common
stock from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment and
delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such
contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies,
educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all
cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations
of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the
condition that the purchase of our common stock shall not at the
time of delivery be prohibited under the laws of the
jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject. The
underwriters and such other agents will not have any
responsibility in respect of the validity or performance of such
contracts. Such contracts will be subject only to those
conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement, and the
prospectus supplement will set forth the commission payable for
solicitation of such contracts.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states,
if applicable, our common stock offered hereby will be sold in
such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in certain states, our common stock may
not be sold unless it has been registered or qualified for sale
in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or
qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member
of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. will not be
greater than 10% for the sale of any securities being registered.
114
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DISTRIBUTION PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our portfolio securities are held under a custody agreement by
U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the
custodian is: U.S. Bank National Association, 214 N
Tryon Street,
27th Floor,
Charlotte, NC 28202. American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company acts as our transfer agent, distribution
paying agent and registrar for our common stock. The principal
business address of our transfer agent is 59 Maiden Lane, New
York, NY 10038, telephone
number: (212) 936-5100.
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we intend to generally acquire and dispose of our
investments in privately negotiated transactions, we expect to
infrequently use brokers in the normal course of our business.
Subject to policies established by our Board of Directors, our
investment adviser is primarily responsible for the execution of
the publicly-traded securities portion of our portfolio
transactions and the allocation of brokerage commissions. Our
investment adviser does not execute transactions through any
particular broker or dealer, but seeks to obtain the best net
results for us, taking into account such factors as price
(including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer
spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational
facilities of the firm and the firms risk and skill in
positioning blocks of securities. While our investment adviser
will generally seek reasonably competitive trade execution
costs, we will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or
commission available. Subject to applicable legal requirements,
our investment adviser may select a broker based partly upon
brokerage or research services provided to our investment
adviser and us and any other clients. In return for such
services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers
would charge if our investment adviser determines in good faith
that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services
provided.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus and certain other legal matters will be passed upon
for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington,
D.C. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the
underwriters, if any, by the counsel named in the prospectus
supplement, if any.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of September 30, 2010 and for the year ended
September 30, 2010, included in this prospectus, have been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing
herein.
The consolidated financial statements as of September 30,
2009 and for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and
the financial statement schedule for the year ended
September 30, 2009, included in this registration statement
and prospectus, have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, our
former independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their report appearing herein.
CHANGE IN
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On February 11, 2010, we dismissed Grant Thornton LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm. During the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and through
February 11, 2010, there were no disagreements between us
and Grant Thornton LLP with respect to any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton LLP, would have
caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such
disagreements in its reports on the financial statements for
such years.
On February 11, 2010, we engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as our new independent registered public accounting firm to
audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2010.
115
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our shares of common stock
offered by this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. The
registration statement contains additional information about us
and our shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus
or any prospectus supplement.
We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may inspect
and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information,
as well as the registration statement and related exhibits and
schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
e-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
20549.
PRIVACY
NOTICE
We are committed to protecting your privacy. This privacy notice
explains the privacy policies of Fifth Street and its affiliated
companies. This notice supersedes any other privacy notice you
may have received from Fifth Street.
We will safeguard, according to strict standards of security and
confidentiality, all information we receive about you. The only
information we collect from you is your name, address, number of
shares you hold and your social security number. This
information is used only so that we can send you annual reports
and other information about us, and send you proxy statements or
other information required by law.
We do not share this information with any non-affiliated third
party except as described below.
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Employees of Our Investment
Adviser. It is our policy that only authorized
employees of our investment adviser who need to know your
personal information will have access to it.
|
|
|
|
Service Providers. We may disclose your
personal information to companies that provide services on our
behalf, such as recordkeeping, processing your trades, and
mailing you information. These companies are required to protect
your information and use it solely for the purpose for which
they received it.
|
|
|
|
Courts and Government Officials. If required
by law, we may disclose your personal information in accordance
with a court order or at the request of government regulators.
Only that information required by law, subpoena, or court order
will be disclosed.
|
116
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
|
|
F-1
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost 12/31/10: $9,681,508; cost 9/30/10:
$12,195,029)
|
|
$
|
9,088,988
|
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost 12/31/10: $50,136,804; cost 9/30/10:
$50,133,521)
|
|
|
45,645,034
|
|
|
|
47,222,059
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost 12/31/10:
$695,146,171; cost 9/30/10: $530,168,045)
|
|
|
687,661,313
|
|
|
|
512,899,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value (cost 12/31/10:
$754,964,483; cost 9/30/10: $592,496,595)
|
|
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
563,821,316
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,020,557
|
|
|
|
76,765,254
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
4,663,901
|
|
|
|
3,813,757
|
|
Due from portfolio company
|
|
|
151,962
|
|
|
|
103,426
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
7,026,645
|
|
|
|
5,465,964
|
|
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
1,517,868
|
|
|
|
1,956,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
798,776,268
|
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
708,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,322,282
|
|
Base management fee payable
|
|
|
3,778,779
|
|
|
|
2,875,802
|
|
Incentive fee payable
|
|
|
3,513,901
|
|
|
|
2,859,139
|
|
Due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
1,261,541
|
|
|
|
1,083,038
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,147,642
|
|
|
|
282,640
|
|
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
|
|
|
1,146,210
|
|
|
|
1,330,724
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
89,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
123,300,000
|
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
223,856,455
|
|
|
|
82,753,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares
authorized, 55,059,057 and 54,550,290 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010
|
|
|
550,591
|
|
|
|
545,503
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
625,519,180
|
|
|
|
619,759,984
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(12,606,190
|
)
|
|
|
(29,448,713
|
)
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(46,541,180
|
)
|
|
|
(33,090,961
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
7,997,412
|
|
|
|
11,406,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets (equivalent to $10.44 and $10.43 per
common share at December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2010) (Note 12)
|
|
|
574,919,813
|
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
|
|
$
|
798,776,268
|
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
224,746
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
1,162,516
|
|
|
|
2,259,501
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
16,489,184
|
|
|
|
7,673,326
|
|
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,136
|
|
|
|
195,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
17,661,805
|
|
|
|
10,353,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
281,800
|
|
|
|
331,616
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
2,828,555
|
|
|
|
1,630,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total PIK interest income
|
|
|
3,143,688
|
|
|
|
1,961,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
126,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
133,554
|
|
|
|
253,777
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
4,267,216
|
|
|
|
661,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee income
|
|
|
4,527,256
|
|
|
|
915,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend and other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend and other income
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
25,335,183
|
|
|
|
13,241,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
3,778,779
|
|
|
|
2,267,003
|
|
Incentive fee
|
|
|
3,513,901
|
|
|
|
2,087,264
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
690,489
|
|
|
|
301,605
|
|
Board of Directors fees
|
|
|
49,500
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,938,710
|
|
|
|
91,179
|
|
Administrator expense
|
|
|
354,169
|
|
|
|
251,818
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
954,033
|
|
|
|
582,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
11,279,581
|
|
|
|
5,619,492
|
|
Base management fee waived
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
|
11,279,581
|
|
|
|
4,892,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
14,055,602
|
|
|
|
8,349,058
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap
|
|
|
736,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
8,070,596
|
|
|
|
1,993,222
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
(1,580,308
|
)
|
|
|
399,934
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
9,615,845
|
|
|
|
(1,393,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
16,106,133
|
|
|
|
999,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
(7,765,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
(5,685,100
|
)
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(13,450,219
|
)
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
17,447,906
|
|
|
$
|
9,454,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per common share basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic and diluted
|
|
|
54,641,164
|
|
|
|
37,880,435
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
14,055,602
|
|
|
$
|
8,349,058
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
16,842,523
|
|
|
|
999,294
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(13,450,219
|
)
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
|
17,447,906
|
|
|
|
9,454,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders from net investment income
|
|
|
(17,464,482
|
)
|
|
|
(10,227,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
|
|
|
(17,464,482
|
)
|
|
|
(10,227,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
4,814,310
|
|
|
|
(12,138
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
949,974
|
|
|
|
486,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
|
5,764,284
|
|
|
|
474,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
|
5,747,708
|
|
|
|
(298,720
|
)
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
574,919,813
|
|
|
$
|
410,257,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
55,059,057
|
|
|
|
37,923,407
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
17,447,906
|
|
|
$
|
9,454,352
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash used by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(16,842,523
|
)
|
|
|
(999,294
|
)
|
Net realized (gains) losses on investments
|
|
|
13,450,219
|
|
|
|
(106,000
|
)
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
(3,143,688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,961,774
|
)
|
Recognition of fee income
|
|
|
(4,527,256
|
)
|
|
|
(915,141
|
)
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(388,637
|
)
|
|
|
(220,943
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
409,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK interest income received in cash
|
|
|
5,109,022
|
|
|
|
525,194
|
|
Fee income received
|
|
|
8,005,581
|
|
|
|
4,834,926
|
|
Increase in interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
(850,144
|
)
|
|
|
(575,625
|
)
|
Increase in due from portfolio company
|
|
|
(48,536
|
)
|
|
|
(27,269
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
438,145
|
|
|
|
(984,419
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
|
|
122,488
|
|
|
|
(448,360
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in base management fee payable
|
|
|
902,977
|
|
|
|
(12,224
|
)
|
Increase in incentive fee payable
|
|
|
654,762
|
|
|
|
143,001
|
|
Increase in due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
178,503
|
|
|
|
24,115
|
|
Increase in interest payable
|
|
|
865,002
|
|
|
|
49,513
|
|
Increase (decrease) in payments received in advance from
portfolio companies
|
|
|
(184,514
|
)
|
|
|
58,640
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(238,577,119
|
)
|
|
|
(144,203,972
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled repayments
and revolver paydowns)
|
|
|
7,883,358
|
|
|
|
1,973,601
|
|
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
|
|
|
49,720,635
|
|
|
|
3,885,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(159,374,724
|
)
|
|
|
(129,400,679
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash
|
|
|
(16,514,508
|
)
|
|
|
(9,740,934
|
)
|
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
50,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
126,000,000
|
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
|
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
(37,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs paid
|
|
|
(1,969,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,992,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs paid
|
|
|
(178,492
|
)
|
|
|
(281,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
125,630,027
|
|
|
|
27,977,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(33,744,697
|
)
|
|
|
(101,422,971
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
76,765,254
|
|
|
|
113,205,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
43,020,557
|
|
|
$
|
11,782,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
664,613
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
949,974
|
|
|
$
|
486,392
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting By Gregory, LLC (13)(14)
|
|
Housewares & Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,055,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,996,187
|
|
|
$
|
4,055,655
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
155,404
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,556,187
|
|
|
|
4,055,655
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. (15)
|
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
|
|
4,957,235
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% Membership Interest in CD Holdco, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,125,321
|
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,681,508
|
|
|
$
|
9,088,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing & Outsourced Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
11,073,880
|
|
|
$
|
10,997,715
|
|
|
$
|
10,879,458
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,872,993
|
|
|
|
1,851,757
|
|
|
|
1,913,528
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,229,885
|
|
|
|
12,796,573
|
|
MK Network, LLC (13)(14)
|
|
Education services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,789,304
|
|
|
|
9,539,188
|
|
|
|
6,928,697
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,950,941
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
3,448,666
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058,767
|
|
|
|
10,377,363
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,783,839
|
|
|
|
6,492,617
|
|
|
|
6,768,521
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,808,616
|
|
|
|
14,275,137
|
|
|
|
14,353,376
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,349,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,848,152
|
|
|
|
22,471,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,136,804
|
|
|
$
|
45,645,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
Household Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,584,394
|
|
|
|
3,388,830
|
|
|
|
3,417,458
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
438,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,138,830
|
|
|
|
3,856,360
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
Construction and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
2,361,779
|
|
|
|
2,243,690
|
|
|
|
2,243,690
|
|
Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
2,846,473
|
|
|
|
2,704,149
|
|
|
|
2,704,149
|
|
Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,027,956
|
|
|
|
3,826,558
|
|
|
|
3,826,558
|
|
Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,987,501
|
|
|
|
4,987,501
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015(9)
|
|
|
|
|
20,174,355
|
|
|
|
19,942,451
|
|
|
|
19,742,401
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,755,534
|
|
|
|
4,755,534
|
|
|
|
4,221,399
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,144,820
|
|
|
|
37,725,698
|
|
F-6
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,952
|
|
|
|
395,215
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
1,121,180
|
|
|
|
1,125,818
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,667,603
|
|
|
|
5,619,154
|
|
|
|
5,726,159
|
|
1,000 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
121,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,783,242
|
|
|
|
6,973,522
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,327,820
|
|
|
|
9,108,209
|
|
|
|
9,023,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,108,209
|
|
|
|
9,023,399
|
|
Boot Barn(9)
|
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,191
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
18,606,639
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
|
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,123,432
|
|
|
|
9,877,279
|
|
|
|
9,917,997
|
|
33,463 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
739,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,221,792
|
|
|
|
10,657,539
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
|
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
16,821,351
|
|
|
|
14,042,454
|
|
|
|
11,680,404
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
4,959,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,001,589
|
|
|
|
16,639,539
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
|
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
6,615,232
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,562,970
|
|
|
|
6,255,358
|
|
|
|
6,485,832
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,204,760
|
|
|
|
10,104,760
|
|
|
|
10,082,408
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
|
|
|
546,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,850,118
|
|
|
|
17,114,326
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,658,366
|
|
|
|
13,436,082
|
|
|
|
13,415,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,436,082
|
|
|
|
13,415,216
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
20,051,045
|
|
|
|
19,186,297
|
|
|
|
19,569,475
|
|
414,419 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,319,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,784,679
|
|
|
|
20,888,624
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,249,775
|
|
|
|
4,196,179
|
|
|
|
4,232,773
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,259,468
|
|
|
|
16,743,527
|
|
|
|
17,113,683
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
647,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,360,961
|
|
|
|
21,993,525
|
|
F-7
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight & logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
16,006,996
|
|
|
|
15,710,301
|
|
|
|
15,878,390
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,890,667
|
|
|
|
1,956,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,600,968
|
|
|
|
17,835,145
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.89% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
|
|
122,105
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
|
|
321,417
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
|
|
|
8,311,428
|
|
|
|
8,365,910
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
14,298,448
|
|
|
|
13,985,575
|
|
|
|
14,002,842
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,026,520
|
|
|
|
4,170,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,323,523
|
|
|
|
26,539,336
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,250,000
|
|
|
|
9,048,648
|
|
|
|
8,951,281
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,567,297
|
|
|
|
22,101,997
|
|
|
|
21,922,954
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,436,550
|
|
|
|
1,444,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,587,195
|
|
|
|
32,318,609
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
Education services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
30,859,375
|
|
|
|
30,093,388
|
|
|
|
30,457,010
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,716,166
|
|
|
|
30,457,010
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
25,480,000
|
|
|
|
25,075,398
|
|
|
|
25,525,452
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,212,109
|
|
|
|
21,864,318
|
|
|
|
22,164,301
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,877,049
|
|
|
|
47,689,753
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
7,050,000
|
|
|
|
6,888,024
|
|
|
|
6,927,166
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,863,830
|
|
|
|
12,560,321
|
|
|
|
12,686,564
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,412,498
|
|
|
|
19,613,730
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,937,500
|
|
|
|
9,755,254
|
|
|
|
9,753,678
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,046,018
|
|
|
|
7,898,194
|
|
|
|
7,995,656
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,618,781
|
|
|
|
17,749,334
|
|
F-8
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (12.75% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
30,132,293
|
|
|
|
29,603,069
|
|
|
|
29,284,795
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,415,385
|
|
|
|
3,397,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,018,454
|
|
|
|
32,682,427
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,801,966
|
|
|
|
7,808,773
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741,890
|
|
|
|
7,803,773
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
15,250,000
|
|
|
|
14,950,346
|
|
|
|
14,892,359
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,043,150
|
|
|
|
10,827,388
|
|
|
|
10,928,166
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,699,275
|
|
|
|
25,820,525
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,685,000
|
|
|
|
9,459,263
|
|
|
|
9,423,141
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
17,031,895
|
|
|
|
16,624,539
|
|
|
|
16,680,678
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
728,544
|
|
|
|
779,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,812,346
|
|
|
|
26,882,924
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,769,920
|
|
|
|
8,799,561
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,723,533
|
|
|
|
10,706,353
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,392,920
|
|
|
|
19,505,914
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
|
|
28,460,094
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
|
21,582,000
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,804,594
|
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
16,400,000
|
|
|
|
16,079,508
|
|
|
|
16,400,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.25% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
21,030,634
|
|
|
|
20,624,634
|
|
|
|
21,030,634
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,134,000
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
2,086,163 Common Units in RPWL Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,163
|
|
|
|
2,086,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,924,305
|
|
|
|
40,766,797
|
|
F-9
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
|
15,118,187
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015
|
|
|
|
|
17,034,000
|
|
|
|
14,152,177
|
|
|
|
14,534,000
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
10,371 Preferred Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
146,289 Series D Common Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462,888
|
|
|
|
1,462,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,645,809
|
|
|
|
32,534,000
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P.
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
30,750,000
|
|
|
|
30,140,651
|
|
|
|
30,750,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
20,008,333
|
|
|
|
19,615,000
|
|
|
|
20,008,333
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,657,568
|
|
|
|
50,758,333
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
|
|
8,056,673
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,050,773
|
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
Human resources &
employment services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,727,732
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,300,346
|
|
|
|
8,128,965
|
|
|
|
8,300,346
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,774,104
|
|
|
|
21,300,346
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.(9)(16)
|
|
Building products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
|
|
757,516
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC.(9)(16)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
2,020,043
|
|
|
|
1,916,192
|
|
|
|
2,020,043
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
|
|
3,787,580
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock in Vanguard
Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,960,182
|
|
|
|
5,807,623
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
695,146,171
|
|
|
$
|
687,661,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted
in (13) or (14). Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise
noted. |
F-10
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
portfolio composition by geographic region. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective date
|
|
Cash interest
|
|
PIK interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
|
|
May 28, 2010
|
|
−4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
October 1, 2010
|
|
+1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
+4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Default interest per credit agreement
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
+2.0% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership
interest. |
|
(13) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of
December 31, 2010. |
|
(14) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of December 31,
2010. |
|
(15) |
|
On October 13, 2010, Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc., an
existing portfolio company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
as part of a restructuring of that investment. On December 2,
2010, the Company and the major shareholder of Nicos Polymers
& Grinding, Inc. closed on a restructuring agreement via an
out of court foreclosure process, resulting in a restructured
facility and these terms. |
|
(16) |
|
On November 4, 2010, the Company held a foreclosure auction of
the assets of Vanguard Vinyl, Inc., an existing portfolio
company, as part of a loan restructuring. The restructuring
broke up Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. into two operating companies.
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc., which is located in
California, and Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC, which will
manage operations in Utah and Hawaii, and resulted in a
restructured facility and these terms. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-11
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Housewares &
Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,419,495
|
|
|
$
|
4,728,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,503,716
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,575,783
|
|
|
|
6,906,440
|
|
|
|
2,196,284
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
152,312
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,961,448
|
|
|
$
|
10,869,262
|
|
|
$
|
10,805,775
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,853,976
|
|
|
|
1,828,494
|
|
|
|
1,896,645
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
38,592
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,740,358
|
|
|
|
9,539,188
|
|
|
|
7,913,140
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,926,187
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
3,938,660
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058,767
|
|
|
|
11,851,800
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,141,190
|
|
|
|
6,813,431
|
|
|
|
7,113,622
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,692,015
|
|
|
|
14,102,756
|
|
|
|
14,179,626
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,335,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,996,585
|
|
|
|
22,629,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,133,521
|
|
|
$
|
47,222,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
Household
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Building
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,827,373
|
|
|
|
5,812,199
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,207,895
|
|
|
|
1,029,268
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,708,971
|
|
|
|
3,475,906
|
|
|
|
3,486,342
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
354,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,225,906
|
|
|
|
3,840,456
|
|
F-12
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
|
|
Construction and
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
19,969,524
|
|
|
|
19,724,493
|
|
|
|
19,440,090
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Environmental
& facilities
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
3,154,876
|
|
|
|
3,040,465
|
|
|
|
1,782,181
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
6,180,185
|
|
|
|
5,713,125
|
|
|
|
3,347,672
|
|
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
TBA Global, LLC(9)
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,840,081
|
|
|
|
10,594,939
|
|
|
|
10,625,867
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,002,891
|
|
|
|
11,021,082
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,245,136
|
|
|
|
1,247,418
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,631,547
|
|
|
|
5,575,477
|
|
|
|
5,674,493
|
|
1,000 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
118,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,316,518
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
Boot Barn(9)
|
|
Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
|
|
|
|
|
23,545,479
|
|
|
|
23,288,566
|
|
|
|
23,477,539
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
18,452,952
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
|
|
Industrial
machinery
|
|
|
10,071,866
|
|
|
|
9,798,901
|
|
|
|
9,829,869
|
|
33,786 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
402,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
Goldco, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
8,355,688
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
|
|
Electronic
manufacturing
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
16,315,866
|
|
|
|
13,536,969
|
|
|
|
12,854,425
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
F-13
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
|
|
Construction
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,864,713
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies
& entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,662,970
|
|
|
|
6,324,339
|
|
|
|
6,488,990
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,178,726
|
|
|
|
10,068,726
|
|
|
|
9,962,414
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
489,000
|
|
|
|
508,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,882,065
|
|
|
|
16,960,371
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,588,794
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
20,172,004
|
|
|
|
19,257,215
|
|
|
|
19,544,864
|
|
414,419 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,417,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,855,597
|
|
|
|
20,962,750
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,449,775
|
|
|
|
4,387,947
|
|
|
|
4,406,684
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,258,033
|
|
|
|
16,702,405
|
|
|
|
17,092,868
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
676,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight
& logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,751,463
|
|
|
|
12,536,099
|
|
|
|
12,549,159
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,468,667
|
|
|
|
1,491,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.87% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Fertilizers
& agricultural
chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,789,498
|
|
|
|
8,806,763
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
14,225,615
|
|
|
|
13,892,772
|
|
|
|
13,897,677
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,012,255
|
|
|
|
4,107,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
F-14
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Home
improvement
retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,277,900
|
|
|
|
9,127,886
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,423,729
|
|
|
|
21,920,479
|
|
|
|
21,913,276
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,432,500
|
|
|
|
1,442,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
31,054,688
|
|
|
|
30,243,946
|
|
|
|
30,660,049
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,842,835
|
|
|
|
30,258,938
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
26,320,000
|
|
|
|
25,877,206
|
|
|
|
26,250,475
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,098,966
|
|
|
|
21,729,057
|
|
|
|
22,114,113
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
|
|
|
7,120,671
|
|
|
|
7,144,136
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,862,760
|
|
|
|
12,539,879
|
|
|
|
12,644,316
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,909,720
|
|
|
|
4,915,885
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,025,733
|
|
|
|
3,952,399
|
|
|
|
3,946,765
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,825,452
|
|
|
|
8,825,983
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Electronic
equipment
& instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
30,245,558
|
|
|
|
29,684,880
|
|
|
|
29,409,043
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,409,615
|
|
|
|
3,478,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
Diversified
support
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,014,977
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
376,852
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
F-15
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
7,750,000
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
13,555,178
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
Food
distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
530,168,045
|
|
|
$
|
512,899,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted
in (13) or (14). Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise
noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
portfolio composition by geographic region. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
F-16
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective date
|
|
Cash interest
|
|
PIK interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0
|
% on Term Loan A & B
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
|
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0
|
% on Term Loan B
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
April 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 0.5
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per loan amendment
|
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
+ 1.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
|
Boot Barn
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
+ 1.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
+ 2.5
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0
|
% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
+ 4.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default interest per credit agreement
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
May 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
− 4.5
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
− 0.5
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
|
|
|
May 28, 2010
|
|
|
|
− 4.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
+ 1.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
July 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
− 2.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
− 0.75
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 3.0
|
% on Term Loan
|
|
|
Per loan agreement
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership
interest. |
|
(13) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
|
(14) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
F-17
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the
Partnership), a Delaware limited partnership, was
organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt
securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC
was the Partnerships general partner (the General
Partner). The Partnerships investments were managed
by Fifth Street Management LLC (the Investment
Adviser). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were
under common ownership.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the Company), an
externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the 1940 Act). Fifth Street Finance Corp. is
managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to January 2,
2008, references to the Company are to the Partnership. Since
January 2, 2008, references to the Company, FSC,
we or our are to Fifth Street Finance
Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries,
including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax
purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the
Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company, and
the portfolio investments held by the subsidiaries are included
in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The Companys shares are currently listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol FSC. The following
table reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since
inception:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Offering price
|
|
|
Gross proceeds
|
|
|
June 17, 2008
|
|
Initial public offering
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.12
|
|
|
$
|
141.2 million
|
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,487,500
|
|
|
$
|
9.25
|
|
|
$
|
87.8 million
|
|
September 25, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
5,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
$
|
58.0 million
|
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$
|
78.4 million
|
|
February 25, 2010
|
|
Underwriters exercise of over-allotment option
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$
|
3.4 million
|
|
June 21, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.50
|
|
|
$
|
105.8 million
|
|
December 2010
|
|
At-the-Market offering
|
|
|
429,110
|
|
|
$
|
11.87(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.1 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average offering price. |
On February 3, 2010, the Companys consolidated
wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV,
L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from
the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to
operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under
Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of
1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private
equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA
regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses
and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
The SBIC license allows the Companys SBIC subsidiary to
obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to
the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other
customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are
non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable
semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount
of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to
maturity
F-18
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest
rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual
basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes
with 10-year
maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the
Companys SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of
$150 million when it has at least $75 million in
regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA
and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to
licensing. As of December 31, 2010, the Companys SBIC
subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA
has issued a capital commitment to the Companys SBIC
subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and
$123.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of
December 31, 2010. $73.0 million of these debentures
bore an interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge
of 0.285%, while the remainder do not have a locked interest
rate.
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their
capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a
change of control or transfer of an SBIC and require
that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations.
In addition, the Companys SBIC subsidiary may also be
limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if
it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA
regulations.
The Companys SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and
oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to
maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other
covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the
SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding
and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in
compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC
subsidiarys assets over the Companys stockholders in
the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA
exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures
issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
The Company has received exemptive relief from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit it to
exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA
from the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This
allows the Company increased flexibility under the 200% asset
coverage test.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification:
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification) on July 1, 2009 (effective
for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009), changes the way that
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the
Codification officially became the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants
must also consider rules, regulations and interpretive guidance
issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way
companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their
accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely
of the number used in the Codifications structural
organization.
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification,
financial statements for periods ending after September 15,
2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification
historical GAAP.
Basis
of Presentation and Liquidity:
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with GAAP and
Regulation S-X.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal
recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation
of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The
financial results of the Companys portfolio investments
are not consolidated in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its
investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent
and future equity offerings, the Companys dividend
reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future
borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company
cannot assure that its plans to raise capital
F-19
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
will be successful. In addition, the Company intends to
distribute to its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its
taxable income each year in order to satisfy the requirements
applicable to Regulated Investment Companies (RICs)
under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). Consequently, the Company may not have the
funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional
investments in its portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded
commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In
addition, the illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make
it difficult for the Company to sell these investments when
desired and, if the Company is required to sell these
investments, it may realize significantly less than their
recorded value.
Use of
Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information
that is currently available to the Company and on various other
assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most
significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are the
valuation of investments and revenue recognition.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio
investments at fair value of $742.4 million and
$563.8 million at December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2010, respectively. The portfolio investments
represent 129.1% and 99.1% of net assets at December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively, and their fair
values have been determined by the Companys Board of
Directors in good faith in the absence of readily available
market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation,
the determined values may differ significantly from the values
that would have been used had a ready market existed for the
investments, and the differences could be material.
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the
requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control
Investments are defined as investments in companies in
which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board
representation; Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5%
and 25% of the voting securities; and
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate
Investments.
Fair
Value Measurements:
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820), defines fair value as the amount that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. A liabilitys fair value is
defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the
liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to
settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair
value is based on observable market prices or parameters or
derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices
or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques
are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of
management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is
dependent on the price transparency for the investments or
market and the investments complexity.
Assets recorded at fair value in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements are categorized based upon the level of
judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair
value.
Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly
related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs
to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted, quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement
date.
|
F-20
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data at the measurement date for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement
date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the
valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the
model.
|
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of
its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using
market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In
general, the Company utilizes a bond yield method for the
majority of its investments, as long as it is appropriate. If,
in the Companys judgment, the bond yield approach is not
appropriate, it may use the enterprise value approach, or, in
certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including
an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise
value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is
no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact,
for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best
expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company
derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the
enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes
various factors, including the portfolio companys
historical and projected financial results. Typically, private
companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows,
net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The
Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual
audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial
statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming
fiscal year.
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and
analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the
future free cash flows of the business.
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield
models to determine the present value of the future cash flow
streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various
sources of transactional data, including private mergers and
acquisitions involving debt investments with similar
characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation
process.
The Companys Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step
valuation process each quarter in connection with determining
the fair value of the Companys investments:
|
|
|
|
|
The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of the Investment Adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit the reports to the Company;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
F-21
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in the Companys portfolio in
good faith.
|
The fair value of all of the Companys investments at
December 31, 2010 was determined by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation
of the portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good
faith pursuant to the Companys valuation policy and a
consistently applied valuation process.
The Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms
to provide valuation assistance. Upon completion of their
processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide
the Company with written reports regarding the preliminary
valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of
such quarter. The Company will continue to engage independent
valuation firms to provide assistance regarding the
determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities
each quarter; however, the Board of Directors is ultimately and
solely responsible for determining the fair value of the
Companys investments in good faith.
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the
difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of
portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses
may also be recorded in connection with the Companys
determination that certain investments are considered worthless
securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
Investment
Income:
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments
when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In
connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives
nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation
process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company
receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost
basis in its investment between its debt securities and its
nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting
discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest
income over the life of the loan.
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded
as dividend income when the distribution is received.
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a
payment-in-kind
or PIK interest provision. PIK interest is computed
at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement
and added to the principal balance of the investment and
recorded as income.
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees
that the Company receives in connection with its debt
investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination
fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees
received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income
from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the
straight line method or effective interest method as applicable,
over the life of the investment.
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its
portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of
those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon
the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the
maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full
prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are
earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar
to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included
in net investment income until received. The receipt of such
fees as well the timing of the Companys receipt of such
fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the
investments.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when
acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with
financial institutions and, at
F-22
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
times, cash held in bank accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation insured limit. Included in cash and cash
equivalents is $0.8 million that is held at Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo) in
connection with the Companys three-year credit facility.
The Company is restricted in terms of access to this cash until
such time as the Company submits its required monthly reporting
schedules and Wells Fargo verifies the Companys compliance
per the terms of the credit agreement.
Deferred
Financing Costs:
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in
connection with the closing of credit facilities and are
capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are
amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the
respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is
included in interest expense in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Collateral
posted to bank:
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral
with respect to the Companys interest rate swap. The
Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral
until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires.
Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
Interest
Rate Swap:
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its
interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through
operations.
Offering
Costs:
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the public offer and sale of the Companys
common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees.
$0.3 million of offering costs have been charged to capital
during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
Income
Taxes:
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on
the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed
currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company intends
to distribute between 90% and 100% of its taxable income and
gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the Company
anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state income
tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a
federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its
taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year
2011). The Company anticipates timely distribution of its
taxable income within the tax rules; however, the Company
incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for calendar years 2008
and 2009, and expects to incur a de minimis federal excise tax
for the calendar year 2010. In addition, the Company may incur a
federal excise tax in future years.
The purpose of the Companys taxable subsidiaries is to
permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio
companies which are pass through entities for
federal tax purposes in order to comply with the source
income requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements.
The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company
for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a
result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This
income tax expense, if any, would be reflected in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its
taxable subsidiaries income taxes. Using this method, the
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary
differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets
and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred
tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that
it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company
measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which it expects to recover or settle those temporary
differences.
F-23
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(ASC 740) provides guidance for how uncertain
tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether
the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year.
Managements determinations regarding ASC 740 may be
subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon
factors including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of
tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company
recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only
where the position is more likely than not to be
sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management
has analyzed the Companys tax positions, and has concluded
that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be
recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns
filed for open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in
the Companys 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its
major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State,
and the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it
is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized
tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair
Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving
disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant
transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. The new disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for
the interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for
certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and
interim periods within those years, the new guidance became
effective for the Companys fiscal 2010 second quarter. The
adoption of this disclosure-only guidance is included in
Note 3 Portfolio Investments and did not have
an impact on the Companys consolidated financial results.
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2009-12,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate
Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) which provides
guidance on estimating the fair value of an alternative
investment, amending
ASC 820-10.
The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on either the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At December 31, 2010, 129.1% of net assets or
$742.4 million was invested in 45 long-term portfolio
investments and 7.5% of net assets or $43.0 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at
September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or
$563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio
investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31,
2010, primarily all of the Companys debt investments were
secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the
portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity
investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of
common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company
interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity
for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do
not produce a current return, but are held for potential
investment appreciation and capital gain.
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the
Company recorded net realized losses on investments of
$13.5 million. During the three months ended
December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a $0.1 million
F-24
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reduction to a previously recorded realized gain. During the
three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company
recorded net unrealized appreciation of $16.8 million and
$1.0 million, respectively.
The composition of the Companys debt investments as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 at fixed
rates and floating rates was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt securities
|
|
$
|
366,003,445
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
375,584,242
|
|
|
|
67.24
|
%
|
Floating rate debt securities
|
|
|
366,014,988
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
|
182,995,709
|
|
|
|
32.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
732,018,433
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of the Companys investments as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 at cost and
fair value was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities
|
|
$
|
743,136,969
|
|
|
$
|
732,018,433
|
|
|
$
|
585,529,301
|
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
Investments in equity securities
|
|
|
11,827,514
|
|
|
|
10,376,902
|
|
|
|
6,967,294
|
|
|
|
5,241,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value as of December 31, 2010, by caption on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,402,398
|
|
|
|
642,402,398
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,394,636
|
|
|
|
85,394,636
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,221,399
|
|
|
|
4,221,399
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,963,240
|
|
|
|
3,963,240
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,413,662
|
|
|
|
6,413,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value as of September 30, 2010, by caption on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
|
416,323,957
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument
within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable
factors are the most significant to the overall fair value
measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or
Level 3 components, observable components (that is,
components that are actively quoted and can be validated by
external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation)
in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part
to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
F-26
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2010 to December 31,
2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair
value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
$
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
$
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
$
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
Purchases and other increases
|
|
|
231,619,326
|
|
|
|
1,973,839
|
|
|
|
177,734
|
|
|
|
1,037,112
|
|
|
|
3,823,108
|
|
|
|
238,631,119
|
|
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
|
|
|
(7,910,103
|
)
|
|
|
(54,802,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,713,014
|
)
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
(13,450,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,450,219
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
15,819,437
|
|
|
|
372,460
|
|
|
|
(361,081
|
)
|
|
|
33,993
|
|
|
|
241,324
|
|
|
|
16,106,133
|
|
Transfers into (out of) level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
642,402,398
|
|
|
$
|
85,394,636
|
|
|
$
|
4,221,399
|
|
|
$
|
3,963,240
|
|
|
$
|
6,413,662
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at December 31, 2010 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
three months ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,559,340
|
|
|
$
|
592,361
|
|
|
$
|
(361,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,993
|
|
|
$
|
241,324
|
|
|
$
|
6,065,937
|
|
F-27
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2009 to December 31,
2009, for all investments for which the Company determines fair
value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
$
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,471
|
|
|
$
|
800,266
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
Purchases and other increases
|
|
|
138,819,323
|
|
|
|
3,387,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,972
|
|
|
|
142,360,904
|
|
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
|
|
|
(1,711,417
|
)
|
|
|
(4,672,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,383,795
|
)
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
1,643,654
|
|
|
|
(470,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227,648
|
)
|
|
|
54,208
|
|
|
|
999,294
|
|
Transfers into (out of) level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
280,768,502
|
|
|
$
|
152,254,769
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,661,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,008,446
|
|
|
$
|
436,693,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at December 31, 2009 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
three months ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,643,654
|
|
|
$
|
(712,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(227,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
54,208
|
|
|
$
|
757,651
|
|
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective
October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation
techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt
investments where there is not a readily available market value
(Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company
estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by
first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company
which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise
value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various
factors, including the portfolio companies historical and
projected financial results. Typically, private companies are
valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income,
revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the
Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics,
discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In
some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a
discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a
portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may
have provided the best indication of enterprise value.
F-28
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment
of the Companys debt, the fair value of the Level 3
loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the
amortized original issue discount unless the borrowers
condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value
at a different amount.
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a
bond yield model to value these investments based on the present
value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the
model are market interest rates for debt with similar
characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio
companys credit risk. The credit risk component of the
valuation considers several factors including financial
performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral
position.
The table below summarizes the changes in the Companys
investment portfolio from September 30, 2010 to
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
|
$
|
5,241,365
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
New investments
|
|
|
233,716,898
|
|
|
|
4,860,221
|
|
|
|
238,577,119
|
|
Redemptions/ repayments
|
|
|
(60,794,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,794,114
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
(1,965,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,965,334
|
)
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
388,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,637
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(3,478,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,478,325
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
15,830,817
|
|
|
|
275,316
|
|
|
|
16,106,133
|
|
Net changes from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
(10,260,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,260,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
732,018,433
|
|
|
$
|
10,376,902
|
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of
$95.3 million and $49.5 million of unfunded
commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies
or to fund limited partnership interests as of December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Such commitments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess
of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities and are not reflected on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
F-29
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments
(consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership
interests) as of December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2010 is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
877,895
|
|
|
|
966,360
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
678,583
|
|
|
|
864,175
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
9,062,453
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,623,148
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
Specialty Bakers, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
5,040,865
|
|
|
|
4,798,897
|
|
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership
interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welocalize, Inc.
|
|
|
4,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miche Bag, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Pain Management
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISA, Inc.
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
95,347,343
|
|
|
$
|
49,515,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summaries of the composition of the Companys investment
portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total
investments are shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
640,609,701
|
|
|
|
84.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
430,200,694
|
|
|
|
72.61
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
96,672,806
|
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
|
|
150,600,807
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
5,854,462
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
4,727,800
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
4,416,468
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
2,330,305
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
6,967,524
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
4,467,524
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
443,522
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
642,402,398
|
|
|
|
86.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
84,295,708
|
|
|
|
11.35
|
%
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
24.45
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
5,320,327
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
2,955,827
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
625,371
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
6,977,553
|
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
4,446,529
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
443,522
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United
States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by
geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of
total investments. The geographic composition is determined by
the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio
company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of
the portfolio companys business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
210,633,806
|
|
|
|
27.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
175,370,861
|
|
|
|
29.60
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
180,442,847
|
|
|
|
23.91
|
%
|
|
|
121,104,464
|
|
|
|
20.44
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
158,144,424
|
|
|
|
20.95
|
%
|
|
|
108,804,931
|
|
|
|
18.36
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
144,318,593
|
|
|
|
19.12
|
%
|
|
|
133,879,457
|
|
|
|
22.60
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
61,424,813
|
|
|
|
8.12
|
%
|
|
|
53,336,882
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
208,392,159
|
|
|
|
28.07
|
%
|
|
$
|
161,264,153
|
|
|
|
28.60
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
167,079,771
|
|
|
|
22.51
|
%
|
|
|
107,468,588
|
|
|
|
19.07
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
160,412,465
|
|
|
|
21.61
|
%
|
|
|
109,457,070
|
|
|
|
19.41
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
143,781,175
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
%
|
|
|
131,881,487
|
|
|
|
23.39
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
62,729,765
|
|
|
|
8.44
|
%
|
|
|
53,750,018
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The composition of the Companys portfolio by industry at
cost and fair value as of December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
150,745,526
|
|
|
|
19.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,443,639
|
|
|
|
14.76
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
49,804,594
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
46,877,049
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
44,774,933
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
44,901,602
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
39,924,305
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
39,144,820
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
33,018,454
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
32,587,195
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
31,893,000
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
28,501,129
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
30,415,200
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
26,323,523
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
25,699,275
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
21,360,961
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
20,774,104
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,412,498
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
19,001,589
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
18,026,733
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
19,828,343
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
17,600,968
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,436,082
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
13,229,885
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,221,792
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
6,783,242
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
6,717,698
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
5,125,321
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
4,556,187
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
4,138,830
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
12,485,385
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
443,522
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
754,964,483
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
154,124,078
|
|
|
|
20.76
|
%
|
|
$
|
89,261,760
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
%
|
IT consulting & other services
|
|
|
51,000,000
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
47,689,753
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
%
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
40,834,373
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
42,110,738
|
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
Internet software & services
|
|
|
40,766,797
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
F-32
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
37,725,698
|
|
|
|
5.08
|
%
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
32,682,427
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
|
|
|
32,605,394
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
32,318,609
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
28,529,313
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
30,316,811
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
26,539,336
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
25,820,525
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
21,993,525
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Human resources & employment services
|
|
|
21,300,346
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,613,730
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
18,144,549
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
19,847,065
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
17,835,145
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
16,639,539
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,415,216
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
12,796,573
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,657,539
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
6,973,522
|
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
6,565,139
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
6,477,386
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
5,033,333
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Housewares & specialties
|
|
|
4,055,655
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
3,856,360
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
12,099,935
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
1,098,928
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
443,522
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,395,335
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investments are generally in small and
mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company
had no single investment that represented greater than 10% of
the total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting
of interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and
realization of gains or losses, can fluctuate upon repayment or
sale of an investment and in any given year can be highly
concentrated among several investments. For the three months
ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no
individual investment produced income that exceeded 10% of
investment income.
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of
business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are
capitalized and amortized in accordance with
ASC 310-20
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs . In accordance with
ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted
against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such
as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as
fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
F-33
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the three months
ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
11,900,871
|
|
|
$
|
5,589,630
|
|
Net fees received
|
|
|
4,706,689
|
|
|
|
4,861,907
|
|
Unearned fee income recognized
|
|
|
(1,228,366
|
)
|
|
|
(915,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
15,379,194
|
|
|
$
|
9,536,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had structured
$7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio
investments upon the future exit of those investments. These
fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of
(i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the
assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan,
or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs.
Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of
a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not
accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until
received. The receipt of such fees as well the timing of the
Companys receipt of such fees is contingent upon a
successful exit event for each of the investments.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding
partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for
12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An
additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders
in cash.
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public
offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the
offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled
$129.5 million after deducting investment banking
commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of
$1.8 million.
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of
$0.7 million.
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock,
which included the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per
share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million
and offering costs of $0.3 million.
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at
the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional
shares being sold as part of the underwriters partial
exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25,
2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million
and offering costs of $0.5 million.
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, amendments to the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 49,800,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares and to remove the Companys
authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of
$0.5 million.
F-34
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 7, 2010, the Company entered into an
at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of its common
stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, the Company sold
429,110 shares of its common stock at an average offering
price of $11.87 per share. The net proceeds totaled
$5.0 million after deducting fees and commissions of
$0.1 million. The Company terminated the at-the-market
equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011
and did not sell any shares of the Companys common stock
pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets
and Liabilities at December 31, 2010. The following table
sets forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for
computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the
three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
54,641,164
|
|
|
|
37,880,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per
share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared
and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the
dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP), on its common
stock from inception to December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.9 million
|
|
|
|
133,317
|
|
|
$
|
1.9 million
|
|
8/6/2008
|
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
5.1 million
|
|
|
|
196,786
|
(1)
|
|
|
1.9 million
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
6.4 million
|
|
|
|
105,326
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
6.6 million
|
|
|
|
139,995
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
12/18/2008
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
1.0 million
|
|
|
|
21,211
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
4/14/2009
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
5.6 million
|
|
|
|
11,776
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
8/3/2009
|
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
7.5 million
|
|
|
|
56,890
|
|
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
11/12/2009
|
|
|
12/10/2009
|
|
|
|
12/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
9.7 million
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
1/12/2010
|
|
|
3/3/2010
|
|
|
|
3/30/2010
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12.9 million
|
|
|
|
58,689
|
|
|
|
0.7 million
|
|
5/3/2010
|
|
|
5/20/2010
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
14.0 million
|
|
|
|
42,269
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
10/6/2010
|
|
|
|
10/27/2010
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.5 million
|
|
|
|
24,850
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
11/3/2010
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
6.0 million
|
|
|
|
26,569
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
12/1/2010
|
|
|
|
12/29/2010
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
6.0 million
|
|
|
|
28,238
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed. |
In October 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$8 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open
market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed
appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009.
In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of
common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase
program.
In October 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$20 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the
open market at times and in such amounts as the Companys
management deems appropriate, provided
F-35
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
it is below the most recently published net asset value per
share. The stock repurchase program expires December 31,
2011 and may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors
at any time without prior notice.
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a
consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose
subsidiary (Funding), and the Company entered into a
Loan and Servicing Agreement (Agreement), with
respect to a three-year credit facility (Wells Fargo
facility) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank,
National Association (Wachovia), Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional
institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to
time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to
time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion
feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the
facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at
LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of
November 16, 2012.
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility.
Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional
$50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the
facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an
accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of
that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of
$150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells
Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date
of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two
additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each
of the lender parties thereto.
On November 5, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from
time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of the
Companys portfolio companies. The letters of credit are
subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base
limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company
concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement
with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding
certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will
originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells
Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity
interests in Funding as security for the payment of
Fundings obligations under the Agreement and other
documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo
facility.
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo
facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other
things (i) make representations and warranties regarding
the collateral as well as each of their businesses,
(ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and
(iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures,
limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting
requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit
facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include
usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to
make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of
Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially
perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the
facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate
repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely
affecting the Companys liquidity, financial condition and
results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance
with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of
Funding, and all of the Companys equity interest in
Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the
Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination
activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan
origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding
will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at
any particular time or at all. As of December 31, 2010, the
Company had $38.0 million of borrowings outstanding under
the Wells Fargo facility.
F-36
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year
secured syndicated revolving credit facility (ING
facility) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Agreement (ING Credit Agreement) with certain
lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as
administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to
borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate
based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus
0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity
date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the
Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as
the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility
is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion
feature that allows for potential future expansion of the
facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is
secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, as
well as the assets of two of the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.,
subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity
interests in the Companys SBIC subsidiary and equity
interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge
and Security Agreement (ING Security Agreement)
entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among
FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as
collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Companys
SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and
their respective assets have not been pledged in connection
therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use
the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for
general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding
leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities,
convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other
investments.
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING
Security Agreement, including the Companys obligations to
the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit
Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity
interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to
the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security
Agreement.
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the
ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.
and the Company to, among other things (i) make
representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well
as each of the Companys businesses, (ii) agree to
certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to
comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other
customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING
facility documents also include usual and customary default
provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the
facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure
by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit
Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which,
if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the
facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the
Companys liquidity, financial condition and results of
operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all
financial covenants under the ING facility.
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The
Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds
under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $51.0 million
of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
As of December 31, 2010, except for assets that were funded
through the Companys SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of
the Companys assets were pledged as collateral under the
Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
Interest expense for the three months ended December 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1.9 million and
$0.1 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 7.
|
Interest
and Dividend Income
|
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent
that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance
with the Companys policy, accrued interest is evaluated
periodically for collectability. The Company
F-37
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined
that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from
portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the
distribution is received.
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a
payment-in-kind
(PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, which
represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan
balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is
generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such
amounts are expected to be collected. The Company generally
ceases accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to
support the accrual or if the Company does not expect the
portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest
due. The Companys decision to cease accruing PIK interest
involves subjective judgments and determinations based on
available information about a particular portfolio company,
including whether the portfolio company is current with respect
to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt
securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company; the
Companys assessment of the portfolio companys
business development success, including product development,
profitability and the portfolio companys overall adherence
to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in
connection with periodic formal update interviews with the
portfolio companys management and, if appropriate, the
private equity sponsor; and information about the general
economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company
operates. Based on this and other information, the Company
determines whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or
debt security. The Companys determination to cease
accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally
made well before the Companys full write-down of such loan
or debt security.
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
PIK balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19,300,954
|
|
|
$
|
12,059,478
|
|
Gross PIK interest accrued
|
|
|
3,384,078
|
|
|
|
2,430,656
|
|
PIK income reserves
|
|
|
(240,390
|
)
|
|
|
(468,882
|
)
|
PIK interest received in cash
|
|
|
(5,109,022
|
)
|
|
|
(525,194
|
)
|
Adjustments due to loan exits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(530,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
17,335,620
|
|
|
$
|
12,965,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had stopped accruing
cash interest, PIK interest and original issue discount
(OID) on three investments that did not pay all of
their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the period
ended December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five
investments, including two investments that had not paid all of
their scheduled monthly cash interest payments.
The non-accrual status of the Companys portfolio
investments as of December 31, 2010, September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income non-accrual amounts for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
$
|
2,106,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,134,564
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
240,390
|
|
|
|
468,882
|
|
OID income
|
|
|
30,138
|
|
|
|
103,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,376,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,707,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8.
|
Taxable/Distributable
Income and Dividend Distributions
|
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net
assets resulting from operations primarily due to:
(1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments,
as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable
income until they are realized; (2) origination fees
received in connection with investments in portfolio companies,
which are amortized into interest income over the life of the
investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon
receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs;
(4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and
(5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss
carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains,
to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss
carryforward will expire in the Companys tax year ending
September 30, 2017. During the year ended
September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses
from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year
end (post-October capital losses) of
$12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as
arising on the first day of the following year.
Listed below is a reconciliation of net increase in net
assets resulting from operations to taxable income for the
three months ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
17,448,000
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
(16,843,000
|
)
|
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
|
|
|
3,478,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to organizational and deferred offering
costs
|
|
|
(22,000
|
)
|
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
|
|
|
1,051,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
|
|
|
13,450,000
|
|
Other book-tax differences
|
|
|
131,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable/Distributable Income(1)
|
|
$
|
18,693,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys taxable income for 2011 is an estimate and
will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax
return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the
estimate. |
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date.
The Company is required to distribute annually to its
stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net
realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized
long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be
eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter
M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend
all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid
out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is
based on
F-39
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
managements estimate of the Companys annual taxable
income. The Company maintains an opt out dividend
reinvestment plan for its stockholders.
To date, the Companys Board of Directors declared the
following distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
Dividend Type
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/6/2008
|
|
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
12/18/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
4/14/2009
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/3/2009
|
|
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
11/12/2009
|
|
|
|
12/10/2009
|
|
|
|
12/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
1/12/2010
|
|
|
|
3/3/2010
|
|
|
|
3/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
5/3/2010
|
|
|
|
5/20/2010
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
10/6/2010
|
|
|
|
10/27/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
11/3/2010
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
12/1/2010
|
|
|
|
12/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
1/4/2011
|
|
|
|
1/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
2/1/2011
|
|
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
11/30/2010
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
0.1066
|
|
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that its
distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and
will be reflected as such on the
Form 1099-DIV
for the calendar years 2010 and 2011. The Company anticipates
declaring further distributions to its stockholders to meet the
RIC distribution requirements.
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax
based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a
calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these
distribution requirements for calendar years 2008 and 2009, the
Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those
calendar years, and the Company expects to incur a de minimis
federal excise tax for the calendar year 2010.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Realized
Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
|
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between
the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis
of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or
depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments
written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized
losses may also be recorded in connection with the
Companys determination that certain investments are
considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax
rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the
portfolio pursuant to the Companys valuation guidelines
and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized
appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.
F-40
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the
Company recorded the following investment realization events:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$8.7 million from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all
obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was
exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of
all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment
was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on
this transaction;
|
|
|
|
In November 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material
modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the
Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$1.7 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring
resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan
agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the
amount of $3.9 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all
obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was
exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction;
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial
satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No
realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction; and
|
|
|
|
In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Lighting by Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a
material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As
such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$7.8 million in accordance with
ASC 470-50.
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the
Company recorded the following investment realization events:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the
amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of
all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan
agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company
recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously
recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in
American Hardwoods; and
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment of
$3.9 million from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in
partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan
agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this
transaction.
|
|
|
Note 10.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risks
|
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at
times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit.
The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its
cash with high credit quality financial institutions and
monitoring their financial stability.
|
|
Note 11.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement
with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory
agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its
services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of
two components a base management fee and an
incentive fee.
F-41
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Base
management Fee
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of
the Companys gross assets, which includes any borrowings
for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable
quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value
of the Companys gross assets at the end of each fiscal
quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any
equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The
base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be
appropriately prorated.
On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the
Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following
actions:
|
|
|
|
|
To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio
investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of
the management fee waived was $727,000; and
|
|
|
|
To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee
attributable to the Companys assets held in the form of
cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter
beginning March 31, 2010.
|
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as
defined in the notes to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, base management fees were
$3.8 million, and $1.5 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2010, the Company had a liability on its
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount
of $3.8 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the base
management fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
Incentive
Fee
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement
has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable
quarterly in arrears based on the Companys
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose,
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means
interest income, dividend income and any other income (including
any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company
receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal
quarter, minus the Companys operating expenses for the
quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable
under the Companys administration agreement with FSC,
Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding
the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest
feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with
PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that
the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains,
realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of the Companys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter,
will be compared to a hurdle rate of 2% per quarter
(8% annualized), subject to a
catch-up
provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The
Companys net investment income used to calculate this part
of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross
assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. The
operation of the incentive fee with respect to the
Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each
quarter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any
fiscal quarter in which the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle);
|
|
|
|
100% of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee
Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but
is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company
refers to this portion
|
F-42
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds
the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of the Companys Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when
the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal
quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser
once the hurdle is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
|
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable
in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon
termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the
termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and
equals 20% of the Companys realized capital gains, if any,
on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each
fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and
unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the
aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive
fees.
For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, incentive fees were $3.5 million
and $2.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010,
the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of
Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $3.5 million
reflecting the unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser.
Indemnification
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard
of their respective duties and obligations, the Companys
Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and
any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to
indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities,
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees
and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the
rendering of the Investment Advisers services under the
investment advisory agreement or otherwise as the Companys
Investment Adviser.
Administration
Agreement
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement
with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative
services for the Company, including office facilities and
equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services
at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC,
Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the
Companys required administrative services, which includes
being responsible for the financial records which the Company is
required to maintain and preparing reports to the Companys
stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC,
Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the
Companys net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of the Companys tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to the Companys stockholders, and
generally overseeing the payment of the Companys expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services,
facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the
allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by
FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration
agreement, including rent and the Companys allocable
portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the
Companys chief financial officer and chief compliance
officer and their staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined
to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for
the Company by its chief compliance officer. However, although
FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such
reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease
to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide,
on the Companys behalf, managerial assistance to the
Companys portfolio companies. The administration agreement
may be terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party.
F-43
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company
accrued administrative expenses of $0.8 million, including
$0.4 million of general and administrative expenses, that
are due to FSC, Inc. At December 31, 2010,
$1.3 million was included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
|
|
Note 12.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
Per share market value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
12.14
|
|
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
Total return(1)
|
|
|
11.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
54,550,290
|
|
|
|
37,878,987
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
55,059,057
|
|
|
|
37,923,407
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
$
|
410,556,071
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
574,921,159
|
|
|
$
|
410,257,351
|
|
Average net assets(2)
|
|
$
|
572,151,947
|
|
|
$
|
409,840,589
|
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(3)
|
|
|
9.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.08
|
%
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets(3)
|
|
|
7.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Weighted average outstanding debt(4)
|
|
$
|
102,678,261
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Average debt per share
|
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market
value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided
by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment
prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return is not annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated based upon the daily weighted average net assets for
the period. |
|
(3) |
|
Interim periods are annualized. |
|
(4) |
|
Calculated based upon the daily weighted average of loans
payable for the period. |
The Companys restated certificate of incorporation had not
authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on
April 4, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate
of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common
stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred
stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of
$500 per share (Series A Preferred Stock) and
authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock. A certificate of amendment was
also approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of the
Companys outstanding common stock through a written
consent first solicited on April 7, 2008.
F-44
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, amendments to the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 49,800,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares and to remove the Companys
authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
|
|
Note 14.
|
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest
rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse
fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of
$100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the
Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a
floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as
of December 31, 2010 was 0.26%. For the three months ended
December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $0.7 million
of unrealized appreciation related to this swap agreement. As of
December 31, 2010, this swap agreement had a fair value of
($37,000), which is included in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company posted
$1.5 million of cash as collateral with respect to the
interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access
to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap
agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account
at Wells Fargo.
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which
could result from changes in the market values of underlying
assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a
result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the
total amount of potential losses that the Company could
ultimately incur.
F-45
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Fifth Street Finance Corp.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of
assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedule of
investments, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in net assets and cash flows, present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the Company) at
September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations, the
changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year ended
September 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule
listed in the index appearing under Item 15(2) presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing on page 119 of the annual report to
stockholders. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
New York, New York
December 1, 2010
F-46
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of
assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedule of
investments, of Fifth Street Finance Corp. (a Delaware
corporation) (the Company) as of September 30,
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in net assets, and cash flows and the financial
highlights (included in Note 12) for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. Our audits of the basic
financial statements included the Schedule of Investments In and
Advances to Affiliates. These financial statements, financial
highlights and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures
included physical inspection or confirmation of securities owned
as of September 30, 2009. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Fifth Street Finance Corp.
as of September 30, 2009, and the results of its
operations, changes in net assets and its cash flows and
financial highlights for the years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
New York, New York
December 9, 2009
F-47
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost September 30, 2010: $12,195,029;
cost September 30, 2009: $12,045,029)
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,691,107
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost September 30, 2010:
$50,133,521; cost September 30, 2009: $71,212,035)
|
|
|
47,222,059
|
|
|
|
64,748,560
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost September 30,
2010: $530,168,045; cost September 30, 2009: $243,975,221)
|
|
|
512,899,257
|
|
|
|
229,171,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments at Fair Value (cost September 30,
2010: $592,496,595; cost September 30, 2009:
$327,232,285)
|
|
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
299,611,137
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
76,765,254
|
|
|
|
113,205,287
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
3,813,757
|
|
|
|
2,866,991
|
|
Due from portfolio company
|
|
|
103,426
|
|
|
|
154,324
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
5,465,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
1,956,013
|
|
|
|
49,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
|
$
|
415,887,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,322,282
|
|
|
$
|
723,856
|
|
Base management fee payable
|
|
|
2,875,802
|
|
|
|
1,552,160
|
|
Incentive fee payable
|
|
|
2,859,139
|
|
|
|
1,944,263
|
|
Due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
1,083,038
|
|
|
|
703,900
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
282,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
|
|
|
1,330,724
|
|
|
|
190,378
|
|
Offering costs payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,720
|
|
SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
82,753,625
|
|
|
|
5,331,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares
authorized, 54,550,290 and 37,878,987 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009
|
|
|
545,503
|
|
|
|
378,790
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
619,759,984
|
|
|
|
439,989,597
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(29,448,713
|
)
|
|
|
(27,621,147
|
)
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(33,090,961
|
)
|
|
|
(14,310,713
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
11,406,292
|
|
|
|
12,119,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
|
|
$
|
651,925,730
|
|
|
$
|
415,887,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-48
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
$
|
182,827
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
7,619,018
|
|
|
|
10,632,844
|
|
|
|
8,804,543
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
46,089,945
|
|
|
|
27,931,097
|
|
|
|
16,800,945
|
|
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
237,557
|
|
|
|
208,824
|
|
|
|
750,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
54,129,347
|
|
|
|
38,772,765
|
|
|
|
26,356,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
1,227,133
|
|
|
|
1,634,116
|
|
|
|
1,539,934
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
8,776,935
|
|
|
|
5,821,173
|
|
|
|
3,357,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total PIK interest income
|
|
|
10,004,068
|
|
|
|
7,455,289
|
|
|
|
4,897,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
1,433,206
|
|
|
|
1,101,656
|
|
|
|
702,463
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
4,537,837
|
|
|
|
2,440,538
|
|
|
|
1,105,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee income
|
|
|
5,971,043
|
|
|
|
3,542,194
|
|
|
|
1,808,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend and other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,740
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
433,317
|
|
|
|
22,791
|
|
|
|
130,971
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend and other income
|
|
|
433,317
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
157,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
70,537,775
|
|
|
|
49,828,435
|
|
|
|
33,219,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
10,002,326
|
|
|
|
6,060,690
|
|
|
|
4,258,334
|
|
Incentive fee
|
|
|
10,756,040
|
|
|
|
7,840,579
|
|
|
|
4,117,554
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,348,908
|
|
|
|
1,492,554
|
|
|
|
1,389,541
|
|
Board of Directors fees
|
|
|
278,418
|
|
|
|
310,250
|
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,747
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,929,389
|
|
|
|
636,901
|
|
|
|
917,043
|
|
Administrator expense
|
|
|
1,321,546
|
|
|
|
796,898
|
|
|
|
978,387
|
|
Line of credit guarantee expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,333
|
|
Transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,726
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,604,051
|
|
|
|
1,500,197
|
|
|
|
674,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
28,240,678
|
|
|
|
18,638,069
|
|
|
|
13,075,025
|
|
Base management fee waived
|
|
|
(727,067
|
)
|
|
|
(171,948
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
|
27,513,611
|
|
|
|
18,466,121
|
|
|
|
13,075,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
43,024,164
|
|
|
|
31,362,314
|
|
|
|
20,144,216
|
|
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap
|
|
|
(773,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
(2,141,107
|
)
|
|
|
(1,792,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
3,294,482
|
|
|
|
286,190
|
|
|
|
(10,570,012
|
)
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
(2,207,506
|
)
|
|
|
(9,289,492
|
)
|
|
|
(6,378,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(1,054,131
|
)
|
|
|
(10,795,317
|
)
|
|
|
(16,948,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
(6,937,100
|
)
|
|
|
(4,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
(11,843,148
|
)
|
|
|
(10,373,200
|
)
|
|
|
62,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(18,780,248
|
)
|
|
|
(14,373,200
|
)
|
|
|
62,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
22,416,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,193,797
|
|
|
$
|
3,257,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income per common share basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share basic and diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic and diluted
|
|
|
45,440,584
|
|
|
|
24,654,325
|
|
|
|
15,557,469
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The earnings and net investment income per share calculations
for the year ended September 30, 2008 are based on the
assumption that if the number of shares issued at the time of
the merger on January 2, 2008 (12,480,972 shares of
common stock) had been issued at the beginning of the fiscal
year on October 1, 2007, the Companys earnings and
net investment income per share would have been $0.21 and $1.29
per share, respectively. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-49
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
43,024,164
|
|
|
$
|
31,362,314
|
|
|
$
|
20,144,216
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(1,827,566
|
)
|
|
|
(10,795,317
|
)
|
|
|
(16,948,767
|
)
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(18,780,248
|
)
|
|
|
(14,373,200
|
)
|
|
|
62,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
22,416,350
|
|
|
|
6,193,797
|
|
|
|
3,257,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders from net investment income
|
|
|
(43,737,416
|
)
|
|
|
(29,591,657
|
)
|
|
|
(10,754,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
|
|
|
(43,737,416
|
)
|
|
|
(29,591,657
|
)
|
|
|
(10,754,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
178,017,945
|
|
|
|
137,625,075
|
|
|
|
129,448,456
|
|
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
1,919,155
|
|
|
|
2,455,499
|
|
|
|
1,882,200
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(462,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of partnership interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,420,000
|
|
Redemption of partnership interest for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,420,000
|
)
|
Fractional shares paid to partners from conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
Capital contributions from partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,497,000
|
|
Capital withdrawals by partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,810,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
|
179,937,100
|
|
|
|
139,618,092
|
|
|
|
195,016,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in net assets
|
|
|
158,616,034
|
|
|
|
116,220,232
|
|
|
|
187,520,144
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
|
294,335,839
|
|
|
|
106,815,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
$
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
$
|
294,335,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
13.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
54,550,290
|
|
|
|
37,878,987
|
|
|
|
22,614,289
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-50
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
22,416,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,193,797
|
|
|
$
|
3,257,936
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
1,827,566
|
|
|
|
10,795,317
|
|
|
|
16,948,767
|
|
Net realized (gains) losses on investments
|
|
|
18,780,248
|
|
|
|
14,373,200
|
|
|
|
(62,487
|
)
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
(10,004,068
|
)
|
|
|
(7,455,289
|
)
|
|
|
(4,897,398
|
)
|
Recognition of fee income
|
|
|
(5,971,043
|
)
|
|
|
(3,542,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808,039
|
)
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(893,077
|
)
|
|
|
(842,623
|
)
|
|
|
(954,436
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
798,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK interest income received in cash
|
|
|
1,618,762
|
|
|
|
428,140
|
|
|
|
114,412
|
|
Fee income received
|
|
|
11,882,094
|
|
|
|
3,895,559
|
|
|
|
5,478,011
|
|
Increase in interest receivable
|
|
|
(946,766
|
)
|
|
|
(499,185
|
)
|
|
|
(1,613,183
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in due from portfolio company
|
|
|
50,898
|
|
|
|
(73,561
|
)
|
|
|
46,952
|
|
Decrease in prepaid management fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,586
|
|
Increase in collateral posted to bank and other assets
|
|
|
(1,906,404
|
)
|
|
|
(14,903
|
)
|
|
|
(34,706
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
|
|
(176,705
|
)
|
|
|
156,170
|
|
|
|
150,584
|
|
Increase in base management fee payable
|
|
|
1,323,642
|
|
|
|
170,948
|
|
|
|
1,381,212
|
|
Increase in incentive fee payable
|
|
|
914,876
|
|
|
|
130,250
|
|
|
|
1,814,013
|
|
Increase in due to FSC, Inc.
|
|
|
379,138
|
|
|
|
129,798
|
|
|
|
574,102
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest payable
|
|
|
282,640
|
|
|
|
(38,750
|
)
|
|
|
28,816
|
|
Increase in payments received in advance from portfolio companies
|
|
|
1,140,346
|
|
|
|
56,641
|
|
|
|
133,737
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(325,527,419
|
)
|
|
|
(61,950,000
|
)
|
|
|
(202,402,611
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments
|
|
|
306,178
|
|
|
|
144,000
|
|
|
|
62,487
|
|
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled repayments
and revolver paydowns)
|
|
|
21,776,331
|
|
|
|
6,951,902
|
|
|
|
2,152,992
|
|
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
|
|
|
22,767,681
|
|
|
|
11,350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(239,160,240
|
)
|
|
|
(19,676,179
|
)
|
|
|
(179,376,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash
|
|
|
(41,818,261
|
)
|
|
|
(27,136,158
|
)
|
|
|
(8,872,521
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(462,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,497,000
|
|
Capital withdrawals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,810,369
|
)
|
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
|
|
|
73,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
43,000,000
|
|
|
|
29,500,000
|
|
|
|
79,250,000
|
|
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
(43,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(29,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
(79,250,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
|
179,125,148
|
|
|
|
138,578,307
|
|
|
|
131,316,000
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of mandatorily redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
Deferred financing costs paid
|
|
|
(6,264,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs paid
|
|
|
(1,322,223
|
)
|
|
|
(1,004,577
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501,179
|
)
|
Redemption of partnership interests for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
202,720,207
|
|
|
|
109,975,090
|
|
|
|
184,628,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(36,440,033
|
)
|
|
|
90,298,911
|
|
|
|
5,252,320
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
113,205,287
|
|
|
|
22,906,376
|
|
|
|
17,654,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
76,765,254
|
|
|
$
|
113,205,287
|
|
|
$
|
22,906,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
848,257
|
|
|
$
|
425,651
|
|
|
$
|
888,227
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
1,919,155
|
|
|
$
|
2,455,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,882,200
|
|
Reinvested shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,882,200
|
)
|
Redemption of partnership interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(173,699,632
|
)
|
Issuance of shares of common stock in exchange for partnership
interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173,699,632
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-51
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Housewares &
Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,419,495
|
|
|
$
|
4,728,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,503,716
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,575,783
|
|
|
|
6,906,440
|
|
|
|
2,196,284
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
152,312
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,961,448
|
|
|
$
|
10,869,262
|
|
|
$
|
10,805,775
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,853,976
|
|
|
|
1,828,494
|
|
|
|
1,896,645
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
38,592
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,740,358
|
|
|
|
9,539,188
|
|
|
|
7,913,140
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,926,187
|
|
|
|
4,748,004
|
|
|
|
3,938,660
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058,767
|
|
|
|
11,851,800
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,141,190
|
|
|
|
6,813,431
|
|
|
|
7,113,622
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,692,015
|
|
|
|
14,102,756
|
|
|
|
14,179,626
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,335,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,996,585
|
|
|
|
22,629,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,133,521
|
|
|
$
|
47,222,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
Household
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Building
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,827,373
|
|
|
|
5,812,199
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,207,895
|
|
|
|
1,029,268
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
Repechage Investments Limited
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,708,971
|
|
|
|
3,475,906
|
|
|
|
3,486,342
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
354,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,225,906
|
|
|
|
3,840,456
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
|
|
Construction and
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
19,969,524
|
|
|
|
19,724,493
|
|
|
|
19,440,090
|
|
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,577,800
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
F-52
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Environmental
& facilities
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
3,154,876
|
|
|
|
3,040,465
|
|
|
|
1,782,181
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
6,180,185
|
|
|
|
5,713,125
|
|
|
|
3,347,672
|
|
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
TBA Global, LLC(9)
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,840,081
|
|
|
|
10,594,939
|
|
|
|
10,625,867
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
179,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,002,891
|
|
|
|
11,021,082
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,245,136
|
|
|
|
1,247,418
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,631,547
|
|
|
|
5,575,477
|
|
|
|
5,674,493
|
|
1,000 Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
118,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,316,518
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,063,155
|
|
|
|
8,964,766
|
|
Boot Barn(9)
|
|
Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods and
Footwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
|
|
|
|
|
23,545,479
|
|
|
|
23,288,566
|
|
|
|
23,477,539
|
|
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
71,394
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
18,452,952
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
|
|
Industrial
machinery
|
|
|
10,071,866
|
|
|
|
9,798,901
|
|
|
|
9,829,869
|
|
33,786 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
402,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
Goldco, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
8,355,688
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
|
|
8,259,479
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
|
|
Electronic
manufacturing
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
16,315,866
|
|
|
|
13,536,969
|
|
|
|
12,854,425
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
5,201,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
|
|
Construction
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,864,713
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies
& entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
61,613
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
F-53
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
6,662,970
|
|
|
|
6,324,339
|
|
|
|
6,488,990
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,178,726
|
|
|
|
10,068,726
|
|
|
|
9,962,414
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
489,000
|
|
|
|
508,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,882,065
|
|
|
|
16,960,371
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,588,794
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
|
|
|
|
|
20,172,004
|
|
|
|
19,257,215
|
|
|
|
19,544,864
|
|
414,419 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,382
|
|
|
|
1,417,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,855,597
|
|
|
|
20,962,750
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,449,775
|
|
|
|
4,387,947
|
|
|
|
4,406,684
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,258,033
|
|
|
|
16,702,405
|
|
|
|
17,092,868
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
676,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight
& logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,751,463
|
|
|
|
12,536,099
|
|
|
|
12,549,159
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,468,667
|
|
|
|
1,491,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.87% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
|
|
33,640
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
|
|
135,825
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Fertilizers
& agricultural
chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,789,498
|
|
|
|
8,806,763
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
14,225,615
|
|
|
|
13,892,772
|
|
|
|
13,897,677
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,000
|
|
|
|
4,012,255
|
|
|
|
4,107,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Home
improvement
retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,277,900
|
|
|
|
9,127,886
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,423,729
|
|
|
|
21,920,479
|
|
|
|
21,913,276
|
|
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,432,500
|
|
|
|
1,442,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
Education
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
31,054,688
|
|
|
|
30,243,946
|
|
|
|
30,660,049
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
(401,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,842,835
|
|
|
|
30,258,938
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
Healthcare
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
26,320,000
|
|
|
|
25,877,206
|
|
|
|
26,250,475
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
22,098,966
|
|
|
|
21,729,057
|
|
|
|
22,114,113
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
(66,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
F-54
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
Food retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
|
|
|
7,120,671
|
|
|
|
7,144,136
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,862,760
|
|
|
|
12,539,879
|
|
|
|
12,644,316
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
(38,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
|
|
Multi-sector
holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,909,720
|
|
|
|
4,915,885
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
4,025,733
|
|
|
|
3,952,399
|
|
|
|
3,946,765
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
(36,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,825,452
|
|
|
|
8,825,983
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Electronic
equipment
& instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
30,245,558
|
|
|
|
29,684,880
|
|
|
|
29,409,043
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,409,615
|
|
|
|
3,478,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
|
|
7,783,892
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
(64,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
|
|
7,719,498
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
Diversified
support
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
|
|
15,171,867
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,014,977
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
|
|
10,782,174
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
376,852
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
292,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
7,750,000
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
|
|
7,554,728
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
13,555,178
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
|
|
13,211,532
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
223,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
|
|
20,989,894
|
|
Specialty Bakers LLC
|
|
Food
distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
|
|
8,755,670
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
|
|
10,704,008
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
1,892,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
21,352,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
530,168,045
|
|
|
$
|
512,899,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity is non-income
producing unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
portfolio composition by geographic region. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
F-55
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective date
|
|
Cash interest
|
|
PIK interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A & B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
April 1, 2008
|
|
+ 0.5% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Per loan amendment
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Boot Barn
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 2.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
+ 4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Default interest per credit agreement
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
May 1, 2010
|
|
− 4.5% on Term Loan
|
|
− 0.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
|
|
May 28, 2010
|
|
− 4.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per restructuring agreement
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
July 1, 2010
|
|
− 2.0% on Term Loan
|
|
− 0.75% on Term Loan
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
+ 3.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per loan agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents an unfunded commitment to fund limited partnership
interest. |
|
(13) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
|
(14) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2010. |
F-56
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Control Investments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC (15)(16)
|
|
Housewares & Specialties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,800,003
|
|
|
$
|
4,728,589
|
|
|
$
|
2,419,627
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,115,649
|
|
|
|
6,906,440
|
|
|
|
3,271,480
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,045,029
|
|
|
|
5,691,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,045,029
|
|
|
$
|
5,691,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
Data Processing & Outsourced Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,526,514
|
|
|
$
|
10,370,246
|
|
|
$
|
10,186,501
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,422
|
|
|
|
2,722,952
|
|
|
|
2,919,071
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
53,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,473,611
|
|
|
|
13,289,816
|
|
CPAC, Inc.(9)(16)
|
|
Household Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
|
|
|
|
|
11,398,948
|
|
|
|
9,506,805
|
|
|
|
4,448,661
|
|
Charge-off of cost basis of impaired loan(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2,297 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,803,805
|
|
|
|
4,448,661
|
|
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
|
|
|
|
|
8,030,061
|
|
|
|
7,553,247
|
|
|
|
7,311,604
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
492,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,303,247
|
|
|
|
7,804,073
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,220,111
|
|
|
|
9,033,826
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,212,692
|
|
|
|
4,967,578
|
|
|
|
5,163,544
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,959,264
|
|
|
|
14,197,370
|
|
Martini Park, LLC(9)(16)
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,390,798
|
|
|
|
3,408,351
|
|
|
|
2,068,303
|
|
5% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,058,351
|
|
|
|
2,068,303
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,570,595
|
|
|
|
8,092,364
|
|
|
|
8,225,400
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,242,034
|
|
|
|
13,440,995
|
|
|
|
13,508,338
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,398
|
|
|
|
1,206,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,613,757
|
|
|
|
22,940,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,212,035
|
|
|
$
|
64,748,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Vinyl Acquisition Corporation(9)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,779,947
|
|
|
$
|
6,138,582
|
|
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
20,326
|
|
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,036,357
|
|
|
|
6,158,908
|
|
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
|
|
Construction and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/29/2014
|
|
|
|
|
19,310,587
|
|
|
|
19,025,031
|
|
|
|
17,693,780
|
|
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,500
|
|
|
|
158,512
|
|
25,000 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,275,031
|
|
|
|
17,852,292
|
|
F-57
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(16)
|
|
Environmental & facilities services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
3,091,972
|
|
|
|
3,040,465
|
|
|
|
2,162,593
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,980,128
|
|
|
|
5,716,250
|
|
|
|
3,959,643
|
|
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,924,801
|
|
|
|
6,122,236
|
|
TBA Global, LLC(9)
|
|
Media: Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 8/3/2010
|
|
|
|
|
2,583,805
|
|
|
|
2,576,304
|
|
|
|
2,565,305
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,797,936
|
|
|
|
10,419,185
|
|
|
|
10,371,277
|
|
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,975
|
|
|
|
162,621
|
|
191,977 Shares A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,403,441
|
|
|
|
13,099,203
|
|
Fitness Edge, LLC
|
|
Leisure Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
1,740,069
|
|
|
|
1,753,262
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
|
|
|
|
|
5,490,743
|
|
|
|
5,404,192
|
|
|
|
5,321,281
|
|
1,000 Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,908
|
|
|
|
70,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,187,169
|
|
|
|
7,144,897
|
|
Filet of Chicken(9)
|
|
Food Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
9,307,547
|
|
|
|
8,922,946
|
|
|
|
8,979,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,922,946
|
|
|
|
8,979,657
|
|
Boot Barn(9)
|
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
|
|
|
|
|
22,518,091
|
|
|
|
22,175,818
|
|
|
|
22,050,462
|
|
24,706 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,060
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
1,308 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,423,009
|
|
|
|
22,082,721
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. (15)(16)
|
|
Trucking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
17,855,617
|
|
|
|
17,063,645
|
|
|
|
9,860,940
|
|
285 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
9,860,940
|
|
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
|
|
|
|
|
9,813,993
|
|
|
|
9,621,279
|
|
|
|
9,606,186
|
|
33,463 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,513
|
|
|
|
160,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,965,792
|
|
|
|
9,766,485
|
|
Rose Tarlow, Inc.(9)
|
|
Home Furnishing Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 1/25/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,191,188
|
|
|
|
10,016,956
|
|
|
|
8,827,182
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+4% (9% floor) due 1/25/2014(10)
|
|
|
|
|
1,550,000
|
|
|
|
1,538,806
|
|
|
|
1,509,219
|
|
0.00% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,855,762
|
|
|
|
10,336,401
|
|
Goldco, LLC
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,024,147
|
|
|
|
7,926,647
|
|
|
|
7,938,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,926,647
|
|
|
|
7,938,639
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 4/1/2013
|
|
|
|
|
15,668,956
|
|
|
|
15,416,411
|
|
|
|
15,081,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,416,411
|
|
|
|
15,081,138
|
|
Western Emulsions, Inc.
|
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
11,928,600
|
|
|
|
11,743,630
|
|
|
|
12,130,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,743,630
|
|
|
|
12,130,945
|
|
F-58
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment(1)(2)(5)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Principal(8)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15% due 7/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
7,275,313
|
|
|
|
7,166,749
|
|
|
|
7,162,190
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+3.5% (10% floor), due 7/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
234,167
|
|
|
|
223,136
|
|
1,692 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
156,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,601,085
|
|
|
|
7,541,582
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
|
|
Healthcare facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
7,800,000
|
|
|
|
7,574,591
|
|
|
|
7,731,153
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,076,089
|
|
|
|
9,926,089
|
|
|
|
9,587,523
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
485,000
|
|
|
|
534,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,985,680
|
|
|
|
17,853,369
|
|
idX Corporation
|
|
Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
13,316,247
|
|
|
|
13,014,576
|
|
|
|
13,074,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,014,576
|
|
|
|
13,074,682
|
|
Cenegenics, LLC
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2013
|
|
|
|
|
10,372,069
|
|
|
|
10,076,277
|
|
|
|
10,266,770
|
|
116,237 Common Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,108
|
|
|
|
515,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,227,385
|
|
|
|
10,782,552
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
|
5,504,943
|
|
|
|
5,547,944
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
17,042,500
|
|
|
|
16,328,120
|
|
|
|
16,532,244
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,755
|
|
|
|
530,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,241,818
|
|
|
|
22,565,204
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
Air freight & logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
11,016,042
|
|
|
|
10,798,229
|
|
|
|
10,838,952
|
|
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,333
|
)
|
|
|
(39,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,758,896
|
|
|
|
10,799,619
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP(13)
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP(13)
|
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92% limited partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243,975,221
|
|
|
$
|
229,171,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
327,232,285
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity is non-income
producing unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements for summary
geographic location. |
|
(3) |
|
Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (1940 Act) as investments in companies in which
the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments
in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the
voting securities. |
|
(5) |
|
Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies
related to the portfolio companies. |
|
(6) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940
Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliate Investments. |
F-59
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of
repayments. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and
revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to
financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit
agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver
documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by
portfolio company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Effective date
|
|
Cash interest
|
|
PIK interest
|
|
Reason
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A & B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
TBA Global, LLC
|
|
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A & B
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Best Vinyl Acquisition Corporation
|
|
April 1, 2008
|
|
+ 0.5% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Per loan amendment
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
October 1, 2008
|
|
− 6.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 6.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
November 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
Rose Tarlow, Inc.
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 0.5% on Term Loan, + 3.0% on Revolver
|
|
+ 2.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Filet of Chicken
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
Boot Barn
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
+ 1.0% on Term Loan
|
|
+ 2.5% on Term Loan
|
|
Tier pricing per waiver agreement
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
April 30, 2009
|
|
+ 2.0% on Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
Per waiver agreement
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely
to be renewed in the future. |
|
(11) |
|
Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments. |
|
(12) |
|
All or a portion of the loan is considered permanently impaired
and, accordingly, the charge-off of the cost basis has been
recorded as a realized loss for financial reporting purposes. |
|
(13) |
|
Represents unfunded limited partnership interests that were
closed prior to September 30, 2009. |
|
(14) |
|
Represents a de minimis membership interest percentage. |
|
(15) |
|
Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2009. |
|
(16) |
|
Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of
September 30, 2009. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-60
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the
Partnership), a Delaware limited partnership, was
organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt
securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC
was the Partnerships general partner (the General
Partner). The Partnerships investments were managed
by Fifth Street Management LLC (the Investment
Adviser). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were
under common ownership.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the Company), an
externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the 1940 Act). The merger involved the exchange of
shares between companies under common control. In accordance
with the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under
common control, the Companys results of operations and
cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2008 are
presented as if the merger had occurred as of October 1,
2007. Accordingly, no adjustments were made to the carrying
value of assets and liabilities (or the cost basis of
investments) as a result of the merger. Fifth Street Finance
Corp. is managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to
January 2, 2008, references to the Company are to the
Partnership. Since January 2, 2008, references to the
Company, FSC, we or our are to Fifth
Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries,
including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax
purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the
Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company, and
the portfolio investments held by the subsidiaries are included
in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The Companys shares are currently listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol FSC. The following
table reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since
inception:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Offering price
|
|
|
Gross proceeds
|
|
|
June 17, 2008
|
|
Initial public offering
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.12
|
|
|
$
|
141.2 million
|
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,487,500
|
|
|
$
|
9.25
|
|
|
$
|
87.8 million
|
|
September 25, 2009
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
5,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
$
|
58.0 million
|
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$
|
78.4 million
|
|
February 25, 2010
|
|
Underwriters exercise of over-allotment option
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
$
|
3.4 million
|
|
June 21, 2010
|
|
Follow-on public offering (including underwriters exercise
of over-allotment option)
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.50
|
|
|
$
|
105.8 million
|
|
On February 3, 2010, the Companys consolidated
wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV,
L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from
the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to
operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under
Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of
1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private
equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA
regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses
and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
The SBIC license allows the Companys SBIC subsidiary to
obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to
the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other
customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are
non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable
semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount
of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to
maturity
F-61
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest
rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual
basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes
with 10-year
maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the
Companys SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of
$150 million when it has at least $75 million in
regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA
and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to
licensing. As of September 30, 2010, the Companys
SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The
SBA has issued a capital commitment to the Companys SBIC
subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and
$73 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of
September 30, 2010.
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their
capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a
change of control or transfer of an SBIC and require
that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations.
In addition, the Companys SBIC subsidiary may also be
limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if
it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA
regulations.
The Companys SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and
oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to
maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other
covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the
SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding
and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in
compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC
subsidiarys assets over the Companys stockholders in
the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA
exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures
issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
The Company has applied for exemptive relief from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit it to
exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA
from the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. If the
Company receives an exemption for this SBA debt, the Company
would have increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage
test.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification) on July 1, 2009 (effective
for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009), changes the way that
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the
Codification officially became the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants
must also consider rules, regulations and interpretive guidance
issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way
companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their
accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely
of the number used in the Codifications structural
organization.
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification,
financial statements for periods ending after September 15,
2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification
historical GAAP.
Basis
of Presentation and Liquidity:
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with GAAP and
Regulation S-X.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal
recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation
of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The
financial results of the Companys portfolio investments
are not consolidated in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its
investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent
and future equity offerings, the Companys dividend
reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future
borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company
cannot assure that its plans to raise capital
F-62
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
will be successful. In addition, the Company intends to
distribute to its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its
taxable income each year in order to satisfy the requirements
applicable to Regulated Investment Companies (RICs)
under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). Consequently, the Company may not have the
funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional
investments in its portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded
commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In
addition, the illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make
it difficult for the Company to sell these investments when
desired and, if the Company is required to sell these
investments, it may realize significantly less than their
recorded value.
Use of
Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information
that is currently available to the Company and on various other
assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most
significant estimate inherent in the preparation of the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements is the
valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized
appreciation and depreciation.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio
investments at fair value of $563.8 million and
$299.6 million at September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. The portfolio investments
represent 99.1% and 73.0% of net assets at September 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and their fair
values have been determined by the Companys Board of
Directors in good faith in the absence of readily available
market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation,
the determined values may differ significantly from the values
that would have been used had a ready market existed for the
investments, and the differences could be material.
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the
requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control
Investments are defined as investments in companies in
which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or
has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board
representation; Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5%
and 25% of the voting securities; and
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined as
investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate
Investments.
Fair
Value Measurements:
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820), defines fair value as that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A liabilitys fair value is defined as
the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new
obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the
liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is
based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from
such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are
not available or reliable, valuation techniques are applied.
These valuation techniques involve some level of management
estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the
price transparency for the investments or market and the
investments complexity.
Assets recorded at fair value in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities are categorized based upon
the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure
their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820
and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated
with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and
liabilities, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted, quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement
date.
|
F-63
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data at the measurement date for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement
date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the
valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the
model.
|
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of
its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using
market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In
general, the Company utilizes a bond yield method for the
majority of its investments, as long as it is appropriate. If,
in the Companys judgment, the bond yield approach is not
appropriate, it may use the enterprise value approach, or, in
certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including
an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise
value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is
no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact,
for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best
expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company
derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the
enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes
various factors, including the portfolio companys
historical and projected financial results. Typically, private
companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows,
net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The
Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual
audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial
statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming
fiscal year.
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and
analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the
future free cash flows of the business.
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield
models to determine the present value of the future cash flow
streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various
sources of transactional data, including private mergers and
acquisitions involving debt investments with similar
characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation
process.
The Companys Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step
valuation process each quarter in connection with determining
the fair value of the Companys investments:
|
|
|
|
|
The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio
investment;
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the
principals of the Investment Adviser;
|
|
|
|
Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of
Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and
submit the reports to the Company;
|
|
|
|
The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations
to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation
Committee of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of
the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and
supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments
provided by the Valuation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
|
F-64
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the
fair value of each investment in the Companys portfolio in
good faith.
|
The fair value of all of the Companys investments at
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was
determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is
solely responsible for the valuation of the portfolio
investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant
to the Companys valuation policy and a consistently
applied valuation process.
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the
difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of
portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses
may also be recorded in connection with the Companys
determination that certain investments are considered worthless
securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
Investment
Income:
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments
when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In
connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives
nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation
process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company
receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost
basis in its investment between its debt securities and its
nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting
discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest
income over the life of the loan.
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded
as dividend income when the distribution is received.
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a
payment-in-kind
or PIK interest provision. PIK interest is computed
at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement
and added to the principal balance of the investment and
recorded as income.
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees
that the Company receives in connection with its debt
investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination and
exit fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees
received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income
from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the
straight line method or effective interest method as applicable,
over the life of the investment.
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its
portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of
those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon
the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the
maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full
prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are
earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar
to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included
in net investment income until received. The receipt of such
fees as well the timing of the Companys receipt of such
fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the
investments.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when
acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with
financial institutions and, at times, cash held in bank accounts
may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured
limit. Included in cash and cash equivalents is
$0.9 million that is held at Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (Wells Fargo) in connection with the
Companys three-year credit facility. The Company is
restricted in terms of access to this cash until such time as
the Company submits its required monthly reporting schedules and
Wells Fargo verifies the Companys compliance per the terms
of the credit agreement.
F-65
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred
Financing Costs:
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in
connection with the closing of credit facilities and are
capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are
amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the
respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is
included in interest expense in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Collateral
posted to bank:
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral
with respect to the Companys interest rate swap. The
Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral
until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires.
Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
Interest
Rate Swap:
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its
interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through
operations.
Offering
Costs:
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the public offer and sale of the Companys
common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees.
$1.1 million of offering costs have been charged to capital
during the year ended September 30, 2010.
Income
Taxes:
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on
the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed
currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company
anticipates distributing between 90% and 100% of its taxable
income and gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the
Company anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state
income tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also
subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive
requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis
(e.g., calendar year 2010). The Company anticipates timely
distribution of its taxable income within the tax rules;
however, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax
for calendar years 2008 and 2009. In addition, the Company may
incur a federal excise tax in future years.
The purpose of the Companys taxable subsidiaries is to
permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio
companies which are pass through entities for
federal tax purposes in order to comply with the source
income requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements.
The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company
for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a
result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This
income tax expense, if any, is reflected in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses the
asset and liability method to account for its taxable
subsidiaries income taxes. Using this method, the Company
recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated
future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In
addition, the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits
associated with net operating carry forwards that it may use to
offset future tax obligations. The Company measures deferred tax
assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which it expects to
recover or settle those temporary differences.
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(ASC 740) provides guidance for how uncertain
tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether
the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year.
Managements determinations regarding ASC 740 may be
subject to
F-66
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors
including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of tax laws,
regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company recognizes
the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the
position is more likely than not to be sustained
assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed
the Companys tax positions, and has concluded that no
liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded
related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for
open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in the
Companys 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its major
tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State, and
the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is
reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair
Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving
disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant
transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. The new disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for
the interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for
certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and
interim periods within those years, the new guidance became
effective for the Companys fiscal 2010 second quarter. The
adoption of this disclosure-only guidance is included in
Note 3 Portfolio Investments and did not have
an impact on the Companys consolidated financial results.
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2009-12,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate
Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) which provides
guidance on estimating the fair value of an alternative
investment, amending
ASC 820-10.
The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on either the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(SFAS 166) (to be included in ASC 860
Transfers and Servicing). SFAS 166 will require
more information about transfers of financial assets, eliminates
the qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) concept, changes
the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires
additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for the first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15,
2009. The Company does not anticipate that SFAS 166 will have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements. This statement has not yet been codified.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) which
provides guidance with respect to consolidation of variable
interest entities. This statement retains the scope of
Interpretation 46(R) with the addition of entities previously
considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as the concept
of these entities was eliminated in SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This statement
replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation
for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity. The approach focuses on identifying which enterprise has
the power to direct activities that most significantly impact
the entitys economic performance and the obligation to
absorb the losses or receive the benefits from the entity. It is
possible that application of this revised guidance will change
an enterprises assessment of involvement with variable
interest entities. This statement, which has been codified
within ASC 810, Consolidations, was effective for
the Company as of September 1, 2010. The initial adoption
did not have an effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-67
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or
$563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio
investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at
September 30, 2009, 73.0% of net assets or
$299.6 million was invested in 28 long-term portfolio
investments and 27.6% of net assets or $113.2 million was
invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30,
2010, primarily all of the Companys debt investments were
secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the
portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity
investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of
common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company
interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity
for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do
not produce a current return, but are held for potential
investment appreciation and capital gain.
At September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
$375.6 million and $281.0 million, respectively, of
the Companys portfolio debt investments at fair value were
at fixed rates, which represented 67.2% and 95.0%, respectively,
of the Companys total portfolio of debt investments at
fair value. During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008, the Company recorded realized losses of
$18.8 million, $14.4 million and 0, respectively.
During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
the Company recorded unrealized depreciation of
$1.8 million, $10.8 million and 16.9 million,
respectively.
The composition of the Companys investments as of
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 at cost and
fair value was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities
|
|
$
|
585,529,301
|
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
|
$
|
317,069,667
|
|
|
$
|
295,921,400
|
|
Investments in equity securities
|
|
|
6,967,294
|
|
|
|
5,241,365
|
|
|
|
10,162,618
|
|
|
|
3,689,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
$
|
327,232,285
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value as of September 30, 2010 on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
|
416,323,957
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
|
2,892,135
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
773,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the financial instruments carried
at fair value on September 30, 2009 on the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the
three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
|
142,016,942
|
|
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
|
153,904,458
|
|
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,889,471
|
|
|
|
2,889,471
|
|
Investments in equity securities (common)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,266
|
|
|
|
800,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument
within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable
factors are the most significant to the overall fair value
measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or
Level 3 components, observable components (that is,
components that are actively quoted and can be validated by
external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation)
in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part
to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
F-69
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2009 to September 30,
2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair
value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
$
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,471
|
|
|
$
|
800,266
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
Purchases and other increases
|
|
|
319,865,964
|
|
|
|
1,138,340
|
|
|
|
5,609,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201,676
|
|
|
|
327,815,724
|
|
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
|
|
|
(32,138,885
|
)
|
|
|
(12,966,681
|
)
|
|
|
(1,031,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
|
|
(46,287,510
|
)
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
(11,405,820
|
)
|
|
|
(611,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,247,000
|
)
|
|
|
(16,263,904
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(2,014,244
|
)
|
|
|
(3,613,785
|
)
|
|
|
(173,054
|
)
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
4,744,288
|
|
|
|
(1,054,131
|
)
|
Transfers into (out of) level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
$
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
$
|
2,892,135
|
|
|
$
|
2,349,230
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at September 30, 2010 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
year ended September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
(14,247,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,586,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(173,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,664
|
|
|
$
|
497,288
|
|
|
$
|
(18,507,499
|
)
|
F-70
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in
fair value from September 30, 2008 to September 30,
2009, for all investments for which the Company determines fair
value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Lien Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
108,247,033
|
|
|
$
|
160,907,915
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,430,852
|
|
|
$
|
2,173,354
|
|
|
$
|
273,759,154
|
|
Purchases and other increases
|
|
|
54,218,598
|
|
|
|
14,156,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,091,644
|
|
|
|
69,466,403
|
|
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
|
|
|
(9,727,499
|
)
|
|
|
(8,718,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,445,903
|
)
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,123,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,373,200
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(10,721,190
|
)
|
|
|
1,681,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,619
|
|
|
|
(2,464,732
|
)
|
|
|
(10,795,317
|
)
|
Transfers into (out of) level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
$
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,471
|
|
|
$
|
800,266
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to
Level 3 assets still held at September 30, 2009 and
reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
year ended September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(3,365,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,845,148
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
458,619
|
|
|
$
|
(2,464,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,217,199
|
)
|
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective
October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation
techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt
investments where there is not a readily available market value
(Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company
estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by
first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company
which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise
value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various
factors, including the portfolio companies historical and
projected financial results. Typically, private companies are
valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income,
revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the
Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics,
discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In
some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a
discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a
portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may
have provided the best indication of enterprise value.
F-71
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment
of the Companys debt, the fair value of the Level 3
loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the
amortized original issue discount unless the borrowers
condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value
at a different amount.
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a
bond yield model to value these investments based on the present
value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the
model are market interest rates for debt with similar
characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio
companys credit risk. The credit risk component of the
valuation considers several factors including financial
performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral
position.
The table below summarizes the changes in the Companys
investment portfolio from September 30, 2009 to
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
295,921,400
|
|
|
$
|
3,689,737
|
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
New investments
|
|
|
324,475,743
|
|
|
|
1,051,676
|
|
|
|
325,527,419
|
|
Redemptions/repayments
|
|
|
(46,439,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,439,537
|
)
|
Net accrual of PIK interest income
|
|
|
8,385,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,385,306
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
893,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,077
|
|
Net change in unearned income
|
|
|
(5,911,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,911,051
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(5,801,083
|
)
|
|
|
4,746,952
|
|
|
|
(1,054,131
|
)
|
Net changes from unrealized to realized
|
|
|
(12,943,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4,247,000
|
)
|
|
|
(17,190,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
558,579,951
|
|
|
$
|
5,241,365
|
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of
$49.5 million and $9.8 million of unfunded commitments
to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund
limited partnership interests as of September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. Such commitments involve,
to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the
amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and
are not reflected on the Companys Consolidated Statement
of Assets and Liabilities.
F-72
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments
(consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership
interests) as of September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009 is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,750,000
|
|
HealthDrive Corporation
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Trans-Trade, Inc.
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
966,360
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
864,175
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTC Education, Inc.
|
|
|
9,062,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tegra Medical, LLC
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flatout, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Group, Inc.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
|
|
|
3,623,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Bakers, LLC
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
4,798,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,515,033
|
|
|
$
|
9,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-73
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summaries of the composition of the Companys investment
portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total
investments are shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
430,200,694
|
|
|
|
72.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
153,207,248
|
|
|
|
46.82
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
150,600,807
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
%
|
|
|
163,862,419
|
|
|
|
50.08
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
4,727,800
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
2,330,305
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
4,170,368
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
4,467,524
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
5,992,250
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
327,232,285
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
$
|
416,323,957
|
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
142,016,942
|
|
|
|
47.40
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
137,851,248
|
|
|
|
24.45
|
%
|
|
|
153,904,458
|
|
|
|
51.37
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
4,404,746
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Purchased equity
|
|
|
625,371
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
517,181
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
Equity grants
|
|
|
4,446,529
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
3,172,556
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Limited partnership interests
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United
States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by
geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of
total investments. The geographic composition is determined by
the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio
company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of
the portfolio companys business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
175,370,861
|
|
|
|
29.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
103,509,164
|
|
|
|
31.63
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
133,879,457
|
|
|
|
22.60
|
%
|
|
|
98,694,596
|
|
|
|
30.16
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
108,804,931
|
|
|
|
18.36
|
%
|
|
|
39,463,350
|
|
|
|
12.06
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
53,336,882
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
22,980,368
|
|
|
|
7.02
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
121,104,464
|
|
|
|
20.44
|
%
|
|
|
62,584,807
|
|
|
|
19.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
327,232,285
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
|
$
|
161,264,153
|
|
|
|
28.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,895,220
|
|
|
|
29.34
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
131,881,487
|
|
|
|
23.39
|
%
|
|
|
93,601,893
|
|
|
|
31.24
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
109,457,070
|
|
|
|
19.41
|
%
|
|
|
39,858,633
|
|
|
|
13.30
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
53,750,018
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
%
|
|
|
22,841,167
|
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
Southwest
|
|
|
107,468,588
|
|
|
|
19.07
|
%
|
|
|
55,414,224
|
|
|
|
18.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The composition of the Companys portfolio by industry at
cost and fair value as of September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
87,443,639
|
|
|
|
14.76
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,826,822
|
|
|
|
15.53
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
47,539,596
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
44,901,602
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
33,094,495
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
32,630,879
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
30,415,200
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
|
8,922,946
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
26,694,525
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
24,987,230
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
19,275,031
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear
|
|
|
23,535,757
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
22,423,009
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
21,509,107
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
37,201,082
|
|
|
|
11.37
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
19,828,343
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
|
|
13,403,441
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,622,414
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
18,738,072
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
15,416,411
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
17,475,899
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
11,743,630
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
|
|
17,064,785
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
14,004,766
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
|
|
10,758,896
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,350,633
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
13,014,576
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
13,078,169
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
|
|
13,473,611
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
12,485,385
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
20,288,245
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
%
|
Housewares and specialties
|
|
|
12,195,029
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
12,045,029
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,143,414
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
|
|
9,965,792
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
Environmental and facility services
|
|
|
8,921,676
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
8,924,801
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
8,291,678
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
|
|
7,036,357
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
6,863,521
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
7,187,169
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
7,803,805
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
200,169
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
7,601,085
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Home furnishing retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
12,855,762
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,496,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
327,232,285
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare services
|
|
$
|
89,261,760
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,576,258
|
|
|
|
17.21
|
%
|
Healthcare equipment
|
|
|
48,297,921
|
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Education services
|
|
|
42,110,738
|
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic equipment & instruments
|
|
|
32,887,767
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Home improvement retail
|
|
|
32,483,858
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Food distributors
|
|
|
30,316,811
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
|
|
8,979,657
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
F-75
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
|
|
|
26,811,860
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Diversified support services
|
|
|
26,246,237
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Construction and engineering
|
|
|
23,844,836
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
17,852,292
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear
|
|
|
23,548,933
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
|
22,082,721
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
%
|
Healthcare technology
|
|
|
22,140,613
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
36,762,574
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
%
|
Media Advertising
|
|
|
19,847,065
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
|
|
13,099,203
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
Food retail
|
|
|
19,750,316
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Electronic manufacturing services
|
|
|
18,055,528
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
15,081,138
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
Construction materials
|
|
|
17,039,751
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
|
|
12,130,945
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
Air freight and logistics
|
|
|
14,040,532
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
10,799,619
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
Distributors
|
|
|
13,258,317
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
13,074,682
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
Data processing and outsourced services
|
|
|
12,741,012
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
13,289,816
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
Restaurants
|
|
|
12,099,935
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
|
17,811,015
|
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
Industrial machinery
|
|
|
10,232,763
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
9,766,485
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
%
|
Leisure facilities
|
|
|
7,040,043
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
7,144,897
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
Building products
|
|
|
6,841,467
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
|
|
6,158,908
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Environmental and facility services
|
|
|
5,129,853
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
6,122,236
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
Trucking
|
|
|
4,597,412
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
|
|
9,860,940
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
Housewares and specialties
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
|
|
5,691,107
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
Household products
|
|
|
1,064,910
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
4,448,661
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
Movies & entertainment
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
7,541,582
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Multi-sector holdings
|
|
|
169,465
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Home furnishing retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
10,336,401
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
563,821,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
299,611,137
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investments are generally in small and
mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company
had no single investment that represented greater than 10% of
the total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting
of interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and
realization of gains or losses on equity interests, can
fluctuate upon repayment of an investment or sale of an equity
interest and in any given year can be highly concentrated among
several investments. For the years ended September 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, no individual investment produced
income that exceeded 10% of investment income.
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of
business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are
capitalized and amortized in accordance with
ASC 310-20
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with
ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted
against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such
as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as
fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
F-76
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the years ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Beginning accumulated unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
5,589,630
|
|
|
$
|
5,236,265
|
|
Net fees received
|
|
|
11,806,209
|
|
|
|
3,895,559
|
|
Unearned fee income recognized
|
|
|
(5,494,968
|
)
|
|
|
(3,542,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending unearned fee income balance
|
|
$
|
11,900,871
|
|
|
$
|
5,589,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had structured
$7.1 million in aggregate exit fees across
10 portfolio investments upon the future exit of those
investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the
sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the
maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full
prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are
earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar
to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included
in net investment income until received. The receipt of such
fees as well the timing of the Companys receipt of such
fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the
investments.
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and
into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding
partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for
12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An
additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders
in cash.
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public
offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the
offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled
$129.5 million after deducting investment banking
commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of
$1.8 million.
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of
$0.7 million.
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock,
which included the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per
share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million
and offering costs of $0.3 million.
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on
public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at
the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional
shares being sold as part of the underwriters partial
exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25,
2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after
deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million
and offering costs of $0.5 million.
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, amendments to the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 49,800,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares and to remove the Companys
authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public
offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which
included the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net
proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment
banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of
$0.5 million.
F-77
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Assets
and Liabilities at September 30, 2010. The following table
sets forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for
computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the
years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
45,440,584
|
|
|
|
24,654,325
|
|
|
|
15,557,469
|
|
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per
share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared
and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the
dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP), on its common
stock from inception to September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record
|
|
Payment
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cash
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
|
DRIP Shares
|
Date Declared
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Issued
|
|
Value
|
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.9 million
|
|
|
|
133,317
|
|
|
$
|
1.9 million
|
|
|
8/6/2008
|
|
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
5.1 million
|
|
|
|
196,786
|
(1)
|
|
|
1.9 million
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
6.4 million
|
|
|
|
105,326
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
6.6 million
|
|
|
|
139,995
|
|
|
|
0.8 million
|
|
|
12/18/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
1.0 million
|
|
|
|
21,211
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
|
4/14/2009
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
5.6 million
|
|
|
|
11,776
|
|
|
|
0.1 million
|
|
|
8/3/2009
|
|
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
7.5 million
|
|
|
|
56,890
|
|
|
|
0.6 million
|
|
|
11/12/2009
|
|
|
|
12/10/2009
|
|
|
|
12/29/2009
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
9.7 million
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
|
1/12/2010
|
|
|
|
3/3/2010
|
|
|
|
3/30/2010
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12.9 million
|
|
|
|
58,689
|
|
|
|
0.7 million
|
|
|
5/3/2010
|
|
|
|
5/20/2010
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
14.0 million
|
|
|
|
42,269
|
|
|
|
0.5 million
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.2 million
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
0.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed. |
In October 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$8 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open
market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed
appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009.
In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of
common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase
program.
In October 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to
$20 million of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the
open market at times and in such amounts as the Companys
management deems appropriate, provided it is below the most
recently published net asset value per share. The stock
repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be
limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time
without prior notice.
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a
consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose
subsidiary (Funding), and the Company entered into a
Loan and Servicing Agreement (Agreement), with
respect to a three-year credit facility (Wells Fargo
facility) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank,
National Association (Wachovia), Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional
institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to
time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to
time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion
feature which allowed for potential future expansion of
F-78
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest
at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of
November 16, 2012.
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo
facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility.
Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional
$50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the
facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an
accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of
that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of
$150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells
Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date
of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to
May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two
additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each
of the lender parties thereto.
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company
concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement
with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding
certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will
originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells
Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity
interests in Funding as security for the payment of
Fundings obligations under the Agreement and other
documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo
facility.
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo
facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other
things (i) make representations and warranties regarding
the collateral as well as each of their businesses,
(ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and
(iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures,
limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting
requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit
facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include
usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to
make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of
Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially
perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the
facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate
repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely
affecting the Companys liquidity, financial condition and
results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance
with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of
Funding, and all of the Companys equity interest in
Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the
Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination
activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan
origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding
will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at
any particular time or at all. The Company had no borrowings
outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility as of
September 30, 2010.
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year
secured syndicated revolving credit facility (ING
facility) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Agreement (ING Credit Agreement) with certain
lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as
administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to
borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per
annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate
based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus
0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity
date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the
Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as
the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility
is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion
feature that allows for potential future expansion of the
facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is
secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, as
well as the assets of two of the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.,
subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity
interests in the Companys SBIC subsidiary and equity
interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge
and Security Agreement (ING Security Agreement)
entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among
FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as
collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Companys
SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and
their respective assets have not been pledged in connection
therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use
the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for
general corporate
F-79
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans,
mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities,
preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and
FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING
Security Agreement, including the Companys obligations to
the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit
Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity
interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to
the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security
Agreement.
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the
ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc.
and the Company to, among other things (i) make
representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well
as each of the Companys businesses, (ii) agree to
certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to
comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other
customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING
facility documents also include usual and customary default
provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the
facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure
by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit
Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which,
if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the
facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the
Companys liquidity, financial condition and results of
operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all
financial covenants under the ING facility.
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The
Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds
under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
Through September 30, 2010, there had been no borrowings or
repayments on the ING facility.
As of September 30, 2010, except for assets that were
funded through the Companys SBIC subsidiary, substantially
all of the Companys assets were pledged as collateral
under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
Interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2010,
2009 and 2008 was $1.9 million, $0.6 million, and
$0.9 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 7.
|
Interest
and Dividend Income
|
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent
that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance
with the Companys policy, accrued interest is evaluated
periodically for collectability. The Company stops accruing
interest on investments when it is determined that interest is
no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies
are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is
received.
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a
payment-in-kind
(PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, which
represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan
balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is
generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such
amounts are expected to be collected. The Company generally
ceases accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to
support the accrual or if the Company does not expect the
portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest
due. The Companys decision to cease accruing PIK interest
involves subjective judgments and determinations based on
available information about a particular portfolio company,
including whether the portfolio company is current with respect
to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt
securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company; the
Companys assessment of the portfolio companys
business development success, including product development,
profitability and the portfolio companys overall adherence
to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in
connection with periodic formal update interviews with the
portfolio companys management and, if appropriate, the
private equity sponsor; and information about the general
economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company
operates. Based on this and other
F-80
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
information, the Company determines whether to cease accruing
PIK interest on a loan or debt security. The Companys
determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt
security is generally made well before the Companys full
write-down of such loan or debt security.
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the years ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
PIK balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,059,478
|
|
|
$
|
5,367,032
|
|
Gross PIK interest accrued
|
|
|
11,907,073
|
|
|
|
8,853,636
|
|
PIK income reserves
|
|
|
(1,903,005
|
)
|
|
|
(1,398,347
|
)
|
PIK interest received in cash
|
|
|
(1,618,762
|
)
|
|
|
(428,140
|
)
|
Loan exits
|
|
|
(1,143,830
|
)
|
|
|
(334,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
19,300,954
|
|
|
$
|
12,059,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five investments did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash
interest payments for the period ended September 30, 2010.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had also stopped
accruing PIK interest and original issue discount
(OID) on these five investments. At
September 30, 2009, the Company had stopped accruing PIK
interest and OID on five investments, including two investments
that had not paid all of their scheduled monthly cash interest
payments. At September 30, 2008, no investments were on
non-accrual status.
The non-accrual status of the Companys portfolio
investments as of September 30, 2010, September 30,
2009, and September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc.
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
PIK non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Cash non-accrual
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments
for the years ended September 30, 2010, September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
$
|
5,804,101
|
|
|
$
|
2,938,190
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
PIK interest income
|
|
|
1,903,005
|
|
|
|
1,398,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
OID income
|
|
|
328,792
|
|
|
|
402,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,035,898
|
|
|
$
|
4,739,059
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8.
|
Taxable
Distributable Income and Dividend Distributions
|
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net
assets resulting from operations primarily due to:
(1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments,
as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable
income until they are realized; (2) origination fees
received in connection with investments in portfolio companies,
F-81
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which are amortized into interest income over the life of the
investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon
receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs;
(4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and
(5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss
carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains,
to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss
carryforward will expire in the Companys tax year ending
September 30, 2017. During the year ended
September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses
from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year
end (post-October capital losses) of
$12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as
arising on the first day of the following year.
Listed below is a reconciliation of net increase in net
assets resulting from operations to taxable income for the
year ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
22,416,000
|
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
1,828,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
|
|
|
6,311,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to organizational and offering costs
|
|
|
(87,000
|
)
|
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
|
|
|
2,748,000
|
|
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
|
|
|
14,922,000
|
|
Other book-tax differences
|
|
|
(363,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable Distributable Income(1)
|
|
$
|
47,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys taxable income for 2010 is an estimate and
will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax
return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the
estimate. |
As of September 30, 2010, the components of accumulated
undistributed income on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income, net (RIC status)
|
|
$
|
4,037,000
|
|
Realized capital losses
|
|
|
(1,539,000
|
)
|
Unrealized losses, net
|
|
|
(34,606,000
|
)
|
Accumulated partnership taxable income not subject to
distribution
|
|
|
6,236,000
|
|
Other book-tax differences
|
|
|
(26,800,000
|
)
|
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for
its taxable subsidiaries income taxes. Using this method,
the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary
differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets
and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred
tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that
it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company
measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which it expects to recover or settle those temporary
differences. The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset for
the difference in the book and tax basis of certain equity
investments and tax net operating losses held by its taxable
subsidiaries of $1.4 million. However, this amount has been
fully offset by a valuation allowance of $1.4 million,
since it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date.
The Company is required to distribute annually to its
stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net
realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized
long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be
eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter
M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend
all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid
out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is
based on
F-82
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
managements estimate of the Companys annual taxable
income. The Company maintains an opt out dividend
reimbursement plan for its stockholders.
To date, the Companys Board of Directors declared the
following distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Type
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
5/1/2008
|
|
|
|
5/19/2008
|
|
|
|
6/3/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/6/2008
|
|
|
|
9/10/2008
|
|
|
|
9/26/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
|
12/29/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
12/9/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
12/18/2008
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
4/14/2009
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/3/2009
|
|
|
|
9/8/2009
|
|
|
|
9/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
11/12/2009
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
1/12/2010
|
|
|
|
12/30/2008
|
|
|
|
1/29/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
5/3/2010
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
6/25/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
9/1/2010
|
|
|
|
9/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
10/6/2010
|
|
|
|
10/27/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
11/3/2010
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010
|
|
|
|
12/1/2010
|
|
|
|
12/29/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that these
distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and
will be reflected as such on the Form
1099-DIV for
the calendar year 2010. The Company anticipates declaring
further distributions to its stockholders to meet the RIC
distribution requirements.
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax
based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a
calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these
distribution requirements for calendar years 2008 and 2009, the
Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those
calendar years.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Realized
Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
|
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between
the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis
of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or
depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments
written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized
losses may also be recorded in connection with the
Companys determination that certain investments are
considered worthless securities
and/or meet
the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax
rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the
portfolio pursuant to the Companys valuation guidelines
and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized
appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company
recorded the following investment realization events:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the
amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of
all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan
agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company
recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously
recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in
American Hardwoods;
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, the Company recorded a realized loss in the
amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a
portion of its interest in CPAC, Inc.;
|
F-83
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2010, the Company received a cash payment of
$7.6 million from Storyteller Theaters Corporation in full
satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The
debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss
was recorded on this transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, the Company restructured its investment in
Rail Acquisition Corp. Although the full amount owed under the
loan agreement remained intact, the restructuring resulted in a
material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As
such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of
$2.6 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, the Company sold its investment in Martini
Park, LLC and received a cash payment in the amount of
$0.1 million. The Company recorded a realized loss on this
investment in the amount of $4.0 million; and
|
|
|
|
In September 2010, the Company exited its investment in Rose
Tarlow, Inc. and received a cash payment in the amount of
$3.6 million in full settlement of the debt investment. The
Company recorded a realized loss on this investment in the
amount of $9.3 million.
|
During the year ended September 30, 2009 the Company exited
its investment in American Hardwoods Industries, LLC and
recorded a realized loss of $10.4 million, and recorded a
$4.0 million realized loss on one of its portfolio company
investments in connection with the determination that the
investment was permanently impaired based on, among other
things, analysis of changes in the portfolio companys
business operations and prospects. During the year ended
September 30, 2008 the Company sold its equity investment
in Filet of Chicken and realized a gain of $62,000.
During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
the Company recorded net unrealized depreciation of
$1.8 million, $10.8 million, and $16.9 million,
respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the
Companys net unrealized depreciation consisted of
$18.7 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt
investments and $0.8 million of net unrealized depreciation
on interest rate swaps, offset by $17.2 million of
reclassifications to realized losses and $0.5 million of
net unrealized appreciation on equity investments.
|
|
Note 10.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risks
|
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at
times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit.
The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its
cash with high credit quality financial institutions and
monitoring their financial stability.
|
|
Note 11.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement
with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory
agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its
services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of
two components - a base management fee and an incentive fee.
Base
management Fee
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of
the Companys gross assets, which includes any borrowings
for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable
quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value
of the Companys gross assets at the end of each fiscal
quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any
equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The
base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be
appropriately prorated.
In addition to the proration described above, for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the Investment Advisor waived
$172,000 of the base management fee on a portion of the proceeds
raised in connection with the equity offerings the Company
completed in 2009 and which were held in cash or cash
equivalents at September 30, 2009.
F-84
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Also, On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the
Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following
actions:
|
|
|
|
|
To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio
investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of
the management fee waived was $727,000; and
|
|
|
|
To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee
attributable to the Companys assets held in the form of
cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter
beginning March 31, 2010.
|
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as
defined in the notes to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, base
management fees were $9.3 million, $5.9 million,
$4.3 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010, the
Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets
and Liabilities in the amount of $2.9 million reflecting
the unpaid portion of the base management fee payable to the
Investment Adviser.
Incentive
Fee
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement
has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable
quarterly in arrears based on the Companys
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose,
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means
interest income, dividend income and any other income (including
any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company
receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal
quarter, minus the Companys operating expenses for the
quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable
under the Companys administration agreement with FSC,
Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding
the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest
feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with
PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that
the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains,
realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of the Companys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter,
will be compared to a hurdle rate of 2% per quarter
(8% annualized), subject to a
catch-up
provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The
Companys net investment income used to calculate this part
of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross
assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. The
operation of the incentive fee with respect to the
Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each
quarter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any
fiscal quarter in which the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the
preferred return or hurdle);
|
|
|
|
100% of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee
Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but
is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10%
annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company
refers to this portion of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal
to 2.5%) as the
catch-up.
The
catch-up
provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an
incentive fee of 20% on all of the Companys Pre-Incentive
Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when
the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
|
F-85
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net
Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal
quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser
once the hurdle is reached and the
catch-up is
achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
|
The second part of the incentive fee will be determined and
payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon
termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the
termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and
will equal 20% of the Companys realized capital gains, if
any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of
each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses
and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less
the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain
incentive fees.
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
incentive fees were $10.8 million, $7.8 million and
$4.1 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010, the
Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets
and Liabilities in the amount of $2.9 million reflecting
the unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to the
Investment Adviser.
Transaction
fees
Prior to the merger of the Partnership with and into the
Company, which occurred on January 2, 2008, the Investment
Adviser received 20% of transaction origination fees. For the
year ended September 30, 2008, payments for the transaction
fees paid to the Investment Adviser amounted to approximately
$0.2 million and were expensed as incurred.
Indemnification
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard
of their respective duties and obligations, the Companys
Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and
any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to
indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities,
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees
and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the
rendering of the Investment Advisers services under the
investment advisory agreement or otherwise as the Companys
Investment Adviser.
Administration
Agreement
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement
with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative
services for the Company, including office facilities and
equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services
at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC,
Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the
Companys required administrative services, which includes
being responsible for the financial records which the Company is
required to maintain and preparing reports to the Companys
stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC,
Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the
Companys net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of the Companys tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to the Companys stockholders, and
generally overseeing the payment of the Companys expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services,
facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the
allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by
FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration
agreement, including rent and the Companys allocable
portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the
Companys chief financial officer and chief compliance
officer and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to
forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for the
Company by its chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman,
given his compensation arrangement with the Investment Adviser.
However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right
to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do
so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc.
may also provide, on the Companys behalf, managerial
F-86
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assistance to the Companys portfolio companies. The
administration agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the
other party.
For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company accrued
administrative expenses of $2.4 million, including
$1.1 million of general and administrative expenses, that
are due to FSC, Inc. At September 30, 2010,
$1.1 million was included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
|
|
Note 12.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)(2)
|
|
|
Per Share Data(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
13.02
|
|
|
$
|
8.56
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.75
|
)
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
|
(1.20
|
)
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(1.21
|
)
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Capital withdrawals by partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
10.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
13.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
|
$
|
10.05
|
|
|
$
|
12.12
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
|
$
|
10.05
|
|
Total return(4)
|
|
|
11.22
|
%
|
|
|
26.86
|
%
|
|
|
(13.90
|
)%
|
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
37,878,987
|
|
|
|
22,614,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
54,550,290
|
|
|
|
37,878,987
|
|
|
|
22,614,289
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
|
294,335,839
|
|
|
|
106,815,695
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
|
569,172,105
|
|
|
|
410,556,071
|
|
|
|
294,335,839
|
|
Average net assets(5)
|
|
|
479,003,947
|
|
|
|
291,401,218
|
|
|
|
205,932,850
|
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
8.98
|
%
|
|
|
10.76
|
%
|
|
|
9.78
|
%
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Weighted average outstanding debt(6)
|
|
|
22,591,839
|
|
|
|
5,019,178
|
|
|
|
11,887,427
|
|
Average debt per share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflected in the financial highlights above
represent net assets, income and expense ratios for all
stockholders. |
|
(2) |
|
Per share data for the year ended September 30, 2008
presumes the issuance of the 12,480,972 common shares at
October 1, 2007 which were actually issued on
January 2, 2008 in connection with the merger described
above. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on actual shares outstanding at the end of the
corresponding period or weighted average shares outstanding for
the period, as appropriate. |
|
(4) |
|
Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market
value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided
by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment
prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return is not annualized during interim periods. |
|
(5) |
|
Calculated based upon the weighted average net assets for the
period. |
|
(6) |
|
Calculated based upon the weighted average of loans payable for
the period. |
F-87
FIFTH
STREET FINANCE CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys restated certificate of incorporation had not
authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on
April 4, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate
of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common
stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred
stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of
$500 per share (Series A Preferred Stock) and
authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock. The Companys certificate of
amendment was also approved by the holders of a majority of the
shares of its outstanding common stock through a written consent
first solicited on April 7, 2008. On April 24, 2008,
the Company filed its certificate of amendment and on
April 25, 2008, it sold 30,000 shares of Series A
Preferred Stock to a company controlled by Bruce E. Toll, one of
the Companys directors at that time. During the year ended
September 30, 2008, the Company paid dividends of $234,000
on the 30,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The
dividend payment is considered and included in interest expense
for accounting purposes since the preferred stock has a
mandatory redemption feature. On June 30, 2008, the Company
redeemed 30,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at
the mandatory redemption price of 101% of the liquidation
preference or $15,150,000. The $150,000 is considered and
included in interest expense for accounting purposes due to the
stocks mandatory redemption feature.
On April 20, 2010, at the Companys 2010 Annual
Meeting, the Companys stockholders approved, among other
things, amendments to the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 49,800,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares and to remove the Companys
authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
|
|
Note 14.
|
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest
rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse
fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of
$100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the
Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a
floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as
of September 30, 2010 was 0.26%. For the year ended
September 30, 2010, the Company recorded $0.8 million
of unrealized depreciation related to this swap agreement. As of
September 30, 2010, this swap agreement had a fair value of
$(0.8 million), which is included in accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has posted
$1.9 million of cash as collateral with respect to the
interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access
to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap
agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account
at Wells Fargo.
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which
could result from changes in the market values of underlying
assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a
result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the
total amount of potential losses that the Company could
ultimately incur.
F-88
Schedule 12-14
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Schedule
of Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
Credited in
|
|
|
at October 1,
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)
|
|
Income(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Additions(3)
|
|
|
Reductions(4)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
$
|
82,486
|
|
|
$
|
2,419,627
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(915,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,503,716
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
100,341
|
|
|
|
3,271,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,075,196
|
)
|
|
|
2,196,284
|
|
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
$
|
182,827
|
|
|
$
|
5,691,107
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,141,107
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
1,928,958
|
|
|
|
10,186,501
|
|
|
|
899,299
|
|
|
|
(280,025
|
)
|
|
|
10,805,775
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
420,577
|
|
|
|
2,919,071
|
|
|
|
152,040
|
|
|
|
(1,174,466
|
)
|
|
|
1,896,645
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,821
|
)
|
|
|
38,592
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
|
|
|
1,234,701
|
|
|
|
4,448,661
|
|
|
|
3,625,144
|
|
|
|
(8,073,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2,297 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
|
|
|
68,289
|
|
|
|
7,311,604
|
|
|
|
309,935
|
|
|
|
(7,621,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
1,460,576
|
|
|
|
9,033,826
|
|
|
|
510,044
|
|
|
|
(1,630,730
|
)
|
|
|
7,913,140
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
957,980
|
|
|
|
5,163,544
|
|
|
|
334,625
|
|
|
|
(1,559,509
|
)
|
|
|
3,938,660
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
|
|
|
228,975
|
|
|
|
2,068,303
|
|
|
|
3,631,618
|
|
|
|
(5,699,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
(650,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
1,084,474
|
|
|
|
8,225,400
|
|
|
|
372,270
|
|
|
|
(1,484,048
|
)
|
|
|
7,113,622
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
2,894,827
|
|
|
|
13,508,338
|
|
|
|
1,355,767
|
|
|
|
(684,479
|
)
|
|
|
14,179,626
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206,599
|
|
|
|
129,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
$
|
10,279,357
|
|
|
$
|
64,748,560
|
|
|
$
|
11,970,142
|
|
|
$
|
(29,496,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,222,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control & Affiliate Investments
|
|
$
|
10,462,184
|
|
|
$
|
70,439,667
|
|
|
$
|
12,120,142
|
|
|
$
|
(31,637,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,922,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This schedule should be read in connection with the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, including the
Schedules of Investments and Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-89
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The principal amount and ownership detail as shown in the
Consolidated Schedules of Investments. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the total amount of interest, fees and dividends
credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was
included in the Control or Non-Control/Non-Affiliate categories,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Gross additions include increases in the cost basis of
investments resulting from new portfolio investments, follow-on
Investments and accrued PIK interest, and the exchange of one or
more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross
additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation
or net decreases in unrealized depreciation as well as the
movement of an existing portfolio company into this category or
out of a different category. |
|
(4) |
|
Gross reductions include decreases in the cost basis of
investment resulting from principal payments or sales and
exchanges of one or more existing securities for one or more new
securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in
unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized
appreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio
company out of this category and into a different category. |
F-90
Schedule 12-14
Fifth
Street Finance Corp.
Schedule
of Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
Credited in
|
|
|
at October 1,
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)
|
|
Income(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Additions(3)
|
|
|
Reductions(4)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,044,732
|
|
|
$
|
(625,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,419,627
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,138,390
|
|
|
|
(866,910
|
)
|
|
|
3,271,480
|
|
97.38% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,483,122
|
|
|
$
|
(1,792,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,691,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCurrance, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
1,856,153
|
|
|
|
9,888,488
|
|
|
|
511,758
|
|
|
|
(213,745
|
)
|
|
|
10,186,501
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
|
|
|
573,147
|
|
|
|
3,581,245
|
|
|
|
367,826
|
|
|
|
(1,030,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,919,071
|
|
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding
Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,413
|
|
3.3% Membership Interest in OCurrance Holding Co., LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,325
|
)
|
|
|
53,831
|
|
CPAC, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
|
|
|
1,318,008
|
|
|
|
3,626,497
|
|
|
|
4,932,164
|
|
|
|
(4,110,000
|
)
|
|
|
4,448,661
|
|
2,297 shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
|
|
|
1,472,389
|
|
|
|
7,145,198
|
|
|
|
449,845
|
|
|
|
(283,439
|
)
|
|
|
7,311,604
|
|
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,386
|
|
|
|
296,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,469
|
|
MK Network, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
1,462,272
|
|
|
|
9,115,152
|
|
|
|
161,959
|
|
|
|
(243,285
|
)
|
|
|
9,033,826
|
|
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
|
|
|
872,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,581,544
|
|
|
|
(418,000
|
)
|
|
|
5,163,544
|
|
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
|
|
(11,113
|
)
|
|
|
17,113
|
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
11,030 Membership Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760,441
|
|
|
|
186,780
|
|
|
|
(947,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Rose Tarlow, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 1/25/2014
|
|
|
1,128,302
|
|
|
|
9,796,648
|
|
|
|
177,084
|
|
|
|
(9,973,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+4% (9% floor) due 1/25/2014
|
|
|
123,460
|
|
|
|
323,333
|
|
|
|
1,214,827
|
|
|
|
(1,538,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
6.9% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(591,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
0.1% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Martini Park, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
|
|
|
475,732
|
|
|
|
2,719,236
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
(870,933
|
)
|
|
|
2,068,303
|
|
5% membership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caregiver Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
1,263,662
|
|
|
|
9,381,973
|
|
|
|
288,785
|
|
|
|
(1,445,358
|
)
|
|
|
8,225,400
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
|
|
|
2,806,310
|
|
|
|
12,811,951
|
|
|
|
1,101,389
|
|
|
|
(405,002
|
)
|
|
|
13,508,338
|
|
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183,867
|
|
|
|
22,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
$
|
13,368,616
|
|
|
$
|
71,350,417
|
|
|
$
|
15,529,889
|
|
|
$
|
(22,131,746
|
)
|
|
$
|
64,748,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control & Affiliate Investments
|
|
$
|
13,368,616
|
|
|
$
|
71,350,417
|
|
|
$
|
23,013,011
|
|
|
$
|
(23,923,761
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,439,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
This schedule should be read in connection with the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, including the
Schedules of Investments and Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The principal amount and ownership detail as shown in the
Consolidated Schedules of Investments. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the total amount of interest, fees and dividends
credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was
included in the Control or Non-Control/Non-Affiliate categories,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Gross additions include increases in the cost basis of
investments resulting from new portfolio investments, follow-on
Investments and accrued PIK interest, and the exchange of one or
more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross
additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation
or net decreases in unrealized depreciation as well as the
movement of an existing portfolio company into this category or
out of a different category. |
|
(4) |
|
Gross reductions include decreases in the cost basis of
investment resulting from principal payments or sales and
exchanges of one or more existing securities for one or more new
securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in
unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized
appreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio
company out of this category and into a different category. |
F-92
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
5,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
UBS Investment Bank
RBC Capital Markets
Deutsche Bank
Securities
,
2011